AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In, Giving Dems Another Toss-Up

Josh Kraushaar appears to be the first up with this exciting news:

Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich is expected to announce this afternoon that he'll be running against Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), setting up a political battle between an iconic figure in Alaska politics against one of the rising Democratic stars statewide.

Begich has called a news conference for 2:30 p.m. EST to "announce his plans regarding the United States Senate seat held by Sen. Ted Stevens," according to a campaign statement.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has been recruiting Begich for the last several months, believing he has the best chance of unseating Stevens. Begich's father, who was a congressman, died in a 1972 plane crash while campaigning in Alaska.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee, anticipating Begich's campaign, has recently set up a website titled begichbaggage.com, designed to alert voters about Begich's political record. It is still under construction.

Alaska won't elect a Democrat, you say? After all, no Democrat has won a federal contest in the state since 1974 (thank you Mike Gravel) -- and that was about as good a year for the Democrats nationwide as we've ever seen. But take a look at Begich. Before you say that, though, take a look at some of the numbers on Begich, the son of the last Democrat to represent the state in the House and the current mayor of Anchorage.

According to a Hays Research in the field in Alaska back in June, 47 percent of Alaskans viewed Begich positively -- including 26 percent viewing him very positively -- compared with just 18 percent viewing him negatively. Newer non-partisan Research 2000 polling results from December showed largely the same results, with 48 percent rating Begich favorably and just 19 percent rating him unfavorably.

The head-to-heads for Begich, pitting him up against incumbent Republican Senator Ted Stevens, show the Democrat already leading 47 percent to 41 percent (according to that December R2K poll). Why, might you ask, would a key Alaskan figure like Stevens, who has represented the state for well over half of its existence, poll at 41 percent in a named head-to-head against a challenger -- albeit a very popular one? Perhaps this story from July explains it.

Federal law enforcement agents raided U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens' Alaska home in Girdwood on Monday, hauling off undisclosed items from inside and taking extensive pictures and video.

Being conservative, I'll put this one in the "Tossup/Narrowly Leans Republican" column, largely because although Begich comes in with high favorables and a lead we do not know for certain that Stevens will be the one on the ballot come November. But that lean is about as narrow as they come, and this is very much a winnable race for Begich -- and one of the Democrats' five best Senate pickup opportunities in 2008.

Tags: AK-Sen, Alaska, Senate 2008 (all tags)

Comments

14 Comments

Re: AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In, Giving Dems Ano

it's delicious to get something other then primary news.

and good news it is. I guess my question is, is the Democrat bench in Alaska fairly weak after Begich?

by alex100 2008-02-27 06:13AM | 0 recs
Re: AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In

Go Begich and Berkowitz!

by TheUnknown285 2008-02-27 06:14AM | 0 recs
Re: AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In

Fantastic news. Just diaried this at SSP. I would put it below the top 5 of VA, NM, NH, CO and MN but above OR and ME in likelihood of changing hands. The impossible 60 seat dream may actually be possible!

by conspiracy 2008-02-27 06:16AM | 0 recs
Begich?

So his father was the guy that Boggs (I think) was campaigning for?

by Socraticsilence 2008-02-27 06:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Begich?

Yes

by conspiracy 2008-02-27 06:35AM | 0 recs
How is Ted in AK

I worry that the odious pork which both Dems and the few remaining fiscal cons loathe him for might be viewed as awesome up there, does the corruption scandal cancel it out?

by Socraticsilence 2008-02-27 06:19AM | 0 recs
Re: How is Ted in AK

People are tired of the pork.  Witness Gov. Palin's cancellation of the Bridge to Nowhere.  (She's an honest Republican if there ever was one.)  Alaskans are also tired of all the VECO scandals and are looking to clean house even if that means losing some pork.

by lorax 2008-02-27 06:55AM | 0 recs
Re: How is Ted in AK

Ted is a lot less popular than he was.  His partner in crime, pretty much literally, Frank Murkowski, was killed in a primary for re-election by Sarah Palin a good government type Wally Hickel protege from Wasilla (part of Mat-Su borough).  In a multi-candidate field, the former Senator/ then current governor got around 19% IIRC.  Arrogance goes with pork and it doesn't seem to play well these days.

Mat-Su is a huge sprawling sort of exurb north of Anchorage with 80,000 people and a 35% growth rate between 2000 and 2006.  It went solidly for Young against Diane Benson (about 2.5:1, results in Alaska are by election district, not municipality so that's approximate).  Don Young is already feuding with the Anchorage Daily News, unwilling and unable to explain his legal bills.  A good government Republican will sweep the state like Palin but Young and Stevens are polling losing numbers right now.

by David Kowalski 2008-02-27 07:02AM | 0 recs
Re: AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In, Giving Dems Ano

  Alaskan politics is very much oriented around personalities.  Sure it's right-wing state, but Alaska voters are very fickle and can turn on politicians very quickly.

by cilerder86 2008-02-27 08:04AM | 0 recs
Re: AK-Sen: Reports Put Begich In, Giving Dems Ano

A Stevens/Palin primary would be brutal.

by nogo war 2008-02-27 08:48AM | 0 recs
Reports Put Begich In, Giving Dems Ano

She'd destroy him, but she's not interested in DC.

by Vox Populi 2008-02-27 09:00AM | 0 recs
Dynasties

We like this guy, right?

So this guy is the son of a former pol?

And we're busy running not one, but two Udalls for Senate?

And we just elected Pat Casey Jr. to the Senate in Pennsylvania?

And I forget how many Kennedys/Shrivers are currently big players in the Democratic Party.

We supported Jimmy Carter's son for senate in Nevada?

We're happy that Paul Sarbanes' son is a House member from Maryland.

Niki Tsongas and Doris Matsui represent us in the House as well.

But when Hillary Clinton runs for president, it's a mortal sin, because we can't possibly have a dynasty. Is there some logic here that I'm missing?

by OrangeFur 2008-02-27 10:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Dynasties

I've noticed a lack of the dynasty arguments against Clinton the past couple months.  Seems like most people got that out of their system and started focusing on other stuff.

by Skaje 2008-02-27 11:53AM | 0 recs
Re: Dynasties

It's certainly not a mortal sin.  She's a quite capable candidate and would have made a fine President.  She's just unfortunately (for her) the 2nd best horse in the race this time.  Being a dynasty candidate doesn't automatically entitle you to the candidacy, either.

by NJIndependent 2008-02-27 03:12PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------