PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

North Carolina-based Democratic pollster Public Policy Polling (.pdf) has new numbers out of the Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary. Below, the results along with last weeks PPP numbers (in parens) and the latest Pollster.com average out of the state (which does not appear to include this latest survey).

PPP (2/11)Pollster.com
Obama53 (50)46.5
Clinton40 (39)43.7

Is Obama breaking away in Wisconsin? Or is he up big on Clinton? It could be -- though as I've noted before PPP doesn't have the best track record thus far in the primaries (in fact it seems to have one of the worst). I still get the sense that this is a tight race (check out the composite of all recent polling by Pollster.com that has Obama's lead within 3 points with a whole lot of voters still undecided), though perhaps I'm wrong. A lot of folks -- even some in the campaigns -- may be looking past Tuesday's contests to Ohio and Texas, but it seems to me that Wisconsin could be a tighter race than many expect.

Update [2008-2-18 13:30:2 by Jonathan Singer]: It looks like SurveyUSA might have some new numbers from the Wisconsin Democratic priamry coming out soon, but first they have released general election numbers from Wisconsin:

McCain 42
Obama 52

McCain 49
Clinton 42

Update [2008-2-18 14:3:35 by Jerome Armstrong]: Who knows, PPI may be right, but they also have a second set of numbers, showing under "standard turnout" that "Obama would lead Clinton just 47-44". I agree with their assumption, in the upper numbers, that turnout among youth and blacks will be higher than normal, but I wonder too if turnout is going to be higher than they have projected, a 54-46 breakdown would be pretty low of a gender-gap in voting, compared with previous primaries. This is something I've noticed across all the polling done in WI over the past week, that the turnout models are widening, from a 2% to a 4% to a now 8% gap, that seems to be a trend.

Tags: Democratic primaries, Wisconsin, Wisconsin Primary (all tags)

Comments

58 Comments

Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

That last Pollster average includes the ARG poll, which has the greatest likelihood of being and outlier (cuz they've relatively sucked).

This poll is also probably an outlier though PPP has been better than ARG so my current assumption is that Obama is still probably 4-5 points up. In otherwords, time to get back to work.

by MNPundit 2008-02-18 08:26AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

ARG has been BETTER than PPP:

http://www.surveyusa.com/wp-content/uplo ads/2008/02/4-pm-021308-median-hi-level- all.JPG

by DaTruth 2008-02-18 08:27AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

actually arg has been better than ppp this cycle ,

Check survey usa scorecard for ratings ,

http://www.surveyusa.com/

However they are both crappy.

By the way did you see the caveat in there , if they used 04 turnout model , Obama would lead

47 - 44 .

but they seem to believe turnout would be higher in obama's constituency younger voters and african americans.

So thier turnout model based on their expectations is entirely responsible for his lead.

Turnout predictions is purely subjective thats why I would just wait for the votes.

by lori 2008-02-18 08:31AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

But that's consistent with so many of the other primary states, isn't it?

by bigdcdem 2008-02-18 08:34AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

I don't know , I haven't checked the turnout differences in every state that has held a primary to know that.

Even if that is the case ,doesn't mean it would be the same in Wisconsin.

Its all subjective , what if the weather is so bad and the younger voters or voters just decide to stay home.

I am not saying he is not leading , its just worth pointing out.

by lori 2008-02-18 08:38AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

The Minnesota numbers would argue for an Obama lead.

The weather could go either way.

by MNPundit 2008-02-18 08:43AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

* I am not saying he is not leading , its just worth pointing out. *

- This seems like a circular argument to me.

by lori 2008-02-18 08:45AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Actually, I think bad weather would reduce turnout in rural areas, where road-cleaning would take much longer, moreso than in urban areas with better public works.  Having never closely studied the candidates' demographics, I would speculate that that would benefit Obama.

by rfahey22 2008-02-18 08:46AM | 0 recs
The Story Of The Primaries Overall

has been dramatically increased turnout in Democratic primaries over '04, so any model based on predicted increased turnout is likely to be right. Depends on how much.

But LOOK at those numbers: Obama 52, McCain 42, versus McCain 49 Clinton 42. I don't care what methodology you use, if you poll the same people that indicates a 10 point advantage for Obama versus McCain in Wisconsin versus Hillary.

Now, it's a long way to November, but if that kind of number held throughout the campaign it would mean that Obama would be able to spend a lot more time campaigning in marginal states trying to take Ohio, Colorado, Iowa, Florida, Nevada, Virginia and West Virginia from McCain and less time playing defense.

In short, if Obama really had that big of an advantage in the blue states of the upper-midwest, it would equal the McCain advantage in the red states like Alabama, South Carolina, etc. Bush had an advantage because he could play offense and concentrate on a few states without having to worry about securing his base. That wouldn't necessarily be true for McCain versus Obama.

by Cugel 2008-02-18 09:11AM | 0 recs
Re: The Story Of The Primaries Overall

I don't disagree, I'm just trying to handicap what effect, if any, the recent snowfall may have on Tuesday.

by rfahey22 2008-02-18 09:19AM | 0 recs
Weather impact

Wet bad weather hurts rural turnout, as it's hard to drive. Tomorrow will be very cold but basically dry. some flurries, but the air'll be too cold to hold enough moisture for the kind of snow that makes driving hazardous, like we chad yesterday.

Rural folks have Carhearts or other serious coldweather gear, so it won't be an impediment. Straight cold deters urban elderly.

by benmasel 2008-02-18 10:33AM | 0 recs
I was looking at AVERAGE error

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archive s/individual/2008_02/013102.php

Again, it's consistent with a closer race with a slight Obama lead.

by MNPundit 2008-02-18 08:39AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

SurveyUSA Report Card confirms PPP is near the bottom as far as accuracy:

http://www.surveyusa.com/wp-content/uplo ads/2008/02/4-pm-021308-median-hi-level- all.JPG

by DaTruth 2008-02-18 08:26AM | 0 recs
Crappy pollsters

Jonathan, if you don't see the point in posting an ARG poll, then there's no need to post a PPP poll.

They are both very crappy pollsters.

by richochet 2008-02-18 08:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Crappy pollsters

One has Obama up big, the other Clinton. Naturally I'd take the ARG poll, but someone must be wrong.

Also, I don't think GE polls of either candidate v. McCain really hold water because there's a lot of excitement surrounding Obama at the moment which is going to wear off as the entire electorate--Democrat and Republican--gives Obama a second look.

by Zeitgeist9000 2008-02-18 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Crappy pollsters

I guess this comment might be seen as overly negative, but I think the bigger deal is the Clinton-McCain matchup.  She has 99% name recognition.  Her negatives have gone up as she's gone on the attack (to 53% in the latest Rasmussen Reports.)  Why in the world should I feel good about her as a general election candidate when head to head polls in the last 2 days show her losing light blue states like WI, OR (45-42) and PA (44-42)?

by Nissl 2008-02-18 08:55AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama 52 McCain 42, McCain 49 Hillary 42

Right now the numbers for a McCain Obama matchup don't matter much because they will change over time. But, it's very instructive to see the same poll give Obama a ten point advantage over Hillary versus McCain.

Now that will change over time, but it's a very good place to start for Obama in a general campaign.

And it is logical to think that a Democrat SHOULD have a national advantage after the Republicans have screwed things up so badly and Bush is so wildly unpopular. It's frightening to think that our nominee WOULDN'T start out with a significant advantage in the general campaign given the last 8 years of Bush!

If the American people aren't ready for a change NOW when will they ever be?

by Cugel 2008-02-18 09:20AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

I wouldn't doubt those GE numbers.  I haven't been home all that much in the last few years, but I do get the sense that people REALLY like McCain in Wisconsin.  He would be very formidable there.

by rfahey22 2008-02-18 08:33AM | 0 recs
SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Not good for Hillary

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollRepo rtEmail.aspx?g=a661ced6-61db-4aea-a60c-e be256c4676c

I think it is unlikely that she is leading the Dem primary when Obama does so much better against McCain than she does in the General Election. We absolutely cannot lost WI.  Did Kerry ever trail Bush there by this much (as the Hillary v. McCain numbers)?

by bigdcdem 2008-02-18 08:33AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

This GE result mirrors Rasmussen's findings in NV, PA, OR, and CO.  So, now it's multiple pollsters in multiple states that show Obama winning key swing states vs. McCain and Hillary losing within the MOE.

Personally, I believe that Hillary is losing right now because the divisiveness of their campaign has alienated a significant portion of Dems against the other Dem candidate, but I also think that the party will come together after a final ticket is selected, and Hillary would not lose all of those states in the GE, but it's clear that, right now anyway (things can certainly change over time), Obama is a much stronger GE candidate.

by NJIndependent 2008-02-18 08:42AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Always the unknown is better in the polls. Wait a few months. You will see the real number Obama can generate.

by praxis1 2008-02-18 08:46AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Then why was Hillary leading the nomination polls for over a year?

by PantherDem 2008-02-18 09:05AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Severe lack of name recognition and most voters not paying attention.  Giuliani was kicking the Rep fields butt for months as "America's Mayor" until reality set in.  A great deal of reality has set in for the 3 candidates remaining with most people having seen debates, speeches, websites and other information.  The race just isn't as fluid as it once was.

by GobBluth 2008-02-18 11:24AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Wow.  A great, reasoned posting!  One of the best all day!  Really.

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 09:03AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Obama is better against McCain because people do not pay attention to who he is. We do not know who Obama is. All we know is he is inspirational (mostly because he has great speeches). Always the unknown person gets better poll numbers. I am surprised that Obama can not beat McCain or Hillary in bigger margins considering this crazy love-fest going on in the media about his magical personality.

by praxis1 2008-02-18 08:45AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Always the unknown person gets better poll numbers.

Do you have support for this claim? My understanding (wrong though it may be) had always been that better known candidates had an advantage. Better known candidates may have higher unfavorable numbers, but in preference ratings do better.

I am just basing my hunch off of Clinton's big leads back when she was the better known, Lieberman's early leads in the 2004 Dem nomination polling, etc.

by demondeac 2008-02-18 08:59AM | 0 recs
Re: SUSA also has WI GE numbers

Better known candidates do better unless they have Hillary's negatives.

by NJIndependent 2008-02-18 09:23AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

That poll says that Obama leads among women by 7%. It also says that 12% of the respondents were African American. I have trouble believing this. But, we'll find out tomorrow.

by Tove 2008-02-18 08:36AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Re: women, that happened in Iowa. The black percentage is a bit high - more like 9%.

by elrod 2008-02-18 09:39AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

I don't buy a lead that big, even though I want to.  At this point, with most polls showing a VERY tight race, I think the expectation has to be for a 3-4 point margin either way.  

by HSTruman 2008-02-18 08:36AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Hillary doesn't EVEN WIN WI? SUSA and Rasmussen have her losing a bunch of other insignificant states - IA, WA, OR, NV, CO, PA and OH. She's on track to being the worst Democratic nominee since Dukkakis.

by crazymoloch 2008-02-18 08:37AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Obama couldn't even win California????? I know, I know...you'l rationalize that away, too.  

by DaTruth 2008-02-18 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Is there a general election poll showing Obama losing California? Even an outlier? No? Interesting.

p.s: Obama lost Nevada in the primary, but does much better in GE polls against McCain in the state. I'm sure what kind of retarded logic you use to infer that losing a state in a primary is evidence of a candidate losing said state in the general. Does that mean Clinton won't win WA, CT, DE, ME, MN, IA, VA, MD (which actually she doesn't in GE polls) or DC?

by crazymoloch 2008-02-18 08:52AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Apples and oranges.

by PantherDem 2008-02-18 08:53AM | 0 recs
Analysis of SurveyUSA poll:

From the crosstabs:
Obama's margins remain the same among Clinton's among the 55+ age group, but he wins big among younger voters.

He wins considerably more Hispanic voters than Clinton, but note that they only make up 2% of the survey sample, and could easily be an outlier.

Most interestingly, almost all of his improvement comes from SE Wisconsin; I think that this is the part of Wisconsin with Madison and Milwaukee, so he may be winning over the suburbs.

by MILiberal 2008-02-18 08:44AM | 0 recs
Madison's not Southeast

South Central. Different market.

Obama's also surging in western and northwest. (Kind and Obey's CDs.) Rural kids are going to the polls, as they did in '06.

by benmasel 2008-02-18 09:58AM | 0 recs
This is just for the general election

If you look at the crosstabs, Obama wins 57-38 in SE WI, compared to Clinton who loses 38-54. This accounts for the vast difference in their numbers.

In the rest of the state, Obama wins 47-46; Clinton wins 46-44, hardly a significant difference.

by MILiberal 2008-02-18 10:31AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

At this point, I'd figure the general election polls to be essentially meaningless. Having two potential nominees for the Democratic primary probably skews perceptions in a way that makes even an honest respondent have trouble figuring out his or her preference.

by mhojo 2008-02-18 08:45AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

The PPP Poll is pretty close to what I found out yesterday whn making calls for Obama.

I made about 300 calls, and spoke to almost 100 people.  Of them,

51 supported Obama strong (40)/leaning (11)
36 supported Hillary  strong (15)/leaning (21)
13 for GOP.

If these results hold up, for the good of the party, HRC should drop out before she damages the Clinton brand beyond repair.

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 09:01AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Those GE numbers are scary for Clinton, but they're really not that much of a surprise.  Clinton can beat McCain, but it won't be easy.

We saw a preview of what an Obama-McCain matchup would look like last Tuesday after the Potomac Primary.  Obama delivered an inspiring speech to an excited crowd of 16,000 people of diverse ages and backgrounds; McCain followed up in a hotel conference room on stage with a bunch of white men older even than he is, where he struggled to read a speech off of the teleprompters to a crowd of ~100.  Compared to Obama, McCain looked like a paraplegic.

If he gets the nomination, Obama will destroy McCain in the general.

by chinapaulo 2008-02-18 09:14AM | 0 recs
Full set:

"Coming on the heels yesterday's Rasmussen poll of Pennsylvania which showed Barack Obama beating John McCain by 10 points while Senator Clinton trailed McCain by 2 points, a new SurveyUSA poll of Wisconsin shows Obama again leading McCain by double-digists, while McCain beats Hillary Clinton 49% to 42%.

According the to results:

John McCain beats Hillary Clinton by 7 points, turning Wisconsin red for the first time since 1984, when Ronald Reagan beat Walter Mondale by 9 points in Wisconsin en route to a 49-state blowout.

In a recent Rasmussen poll providing an early look at potential general election Presidential match-ups in the important state of Pennsylvania, Barack Obama holds a commanding double-digit lead over John McCain, while McCain edges out Hillary Clinton in a close race. Obama leads McCain 49% to 39%, but McCain leads Clinton 44% to 42%.

The report also notes:

Obama currently outperforms Clinton in several other recent state polls including Oregon, New Hampshire, Colorado, and Nevada
Nationally, Barack Obama leads John McCain in eight of the nine most recent head-to-head polls, while Senator Clinton leads in only two.

In the latest CNN poll Barack leads by 8 points, and in the lone poll where McCain leads (taken in late January) Barack trails by only 1 pt.

The New Republic writes...

Not a single polls has Clinton doing as well as Obama. Normally this wouldn't be such a big deal--after all, most people don't obsessively read polling data. But this year's race might be different. "

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 09:14AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

The PPP Poll is pretty close to what I found out yesterday whn making calls for Obama.

I made about 300 calls, and spoke to almost 100 people.  Of them,

51 supported Obama strong (40)/leaning (11)
36 supported Hillary  strong (15)/leaning (21)
13 for GOP.

If these results hold up, for the good of the party, HRC should drop out before she damages the Clinton brand beyond repair.

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 09:22AM | 0 recs
Nobody knows how to poll this Primary.

Too many wildcards. At the Polls registration, crossover, weather.

Fortunately, you've got me. Running a Statewide race without staff, you learn stuff. I 'interviewed' something like 15,000 eligible Wisconsinites in '06.

By Districts:
1st (Ryan) narrow Obama, 3-3 NO CHANGE

2nd (Baldwin) Obama 5-3. NO CHANGE I'm hearing a lot of 6-2 locally, but I don't buy it. Clinton's rescheduled visit for tonight is firewall on the 6th delegate. She loses Madison in a rout, but breaks even in the burbs.

3d (Kind) Obama UPGRADE from 3-3 to 60% chance of 4-2. based on reports from the ground in rural Counties especially Trempeleau and along the Kickapoo, plus the success of Obama's visit to Eau Claire. Congressman Kind's said he'll cast his SD vote with the district winner.

4th: (Moore) Obama likely 3-3, big turnout favors an Obama delegate split, as Clinton's support from public employee Unions is diluted. 20% chance Obama 4-2. Clinton's weather-forced retail appearances yesterday probably better for her than a typical staged event.

5th (Sensenbrenner) Clinton 3-2, on prochoice Republican womens' crossover NO CHANGE

6th (Petri) Obama, 3-2, I'm becoming confident on this one. UPGRADE OBAMA

7th (Obey) Obama, Dicey as to whether he makes the 4-2 split. He romped in Duluth, and the Eau Claire and Stevens Point campuses had monster turnout in `06. Eau Claire County straddles the District line. now 70% chance of the 4-2. UPGRADE OBAMA

8th (Kagen) 6 delegates. Tossup. Was lean Clinton UPGRADE OBAMA. Kagen's also said he'll cast his SD with the District's voters.

by benmasel 2008-02-18 09:55AM | 0 recs
Re: Nobody knows how to poll this Primary.

Interesting.  Any speculation as to the popular vote percentages?

by rfahey22 2008-02-18 10:02AM | 0 recs
Obama by 8

Edwards 2, Kucinich 1, Gravel .75, write-ins for Feingold .5

by benmasel 2008-02-18 10:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama by 8

That would be a huge win for Obama.  Wisconsin is very much like MO in terms of demographics and sensibility.  Clinton SHOULD do better than that, unless the cold and slippery roads keep some of her older voters away.

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 11:02AM | 0 recs
Re: Nobody knows how to poll this Primary.

All pre-election polls are crap, especially this year!  That's why we vote.  Now is the time to GOTV, cheeseheads.  Pump up your turnout!

We green chiles in NM did our job.  Now it's your turn.  Make us proud.

by NM Ward Chair 2008-02-18 10:48AM | 0 recs
PPP looks to me as Zogby-like pollster

they are not a very good predictor, based on other polls they did, their quality similar to Zogby or ARG.

by WeNeed3rdParty 2008-02-18 09:59AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

If there is any fairness in the world, Obama's presidential campaign will be finished over his stealing from Deval Patrick's speech. Joe Biden got trashed for borrowing only a few lines from John Kinnock (sp??) the British labor leader for which Kinnock did not have any objections. May be the lazy beltway reporters will now do their job and actually find out what else Obama has been borrowing/stealing in his rhetoric. BTW, Biden and Kinnock were also very close philosophically and may be they even spoke on occasions

by ScottinNJ 2008-02-18 10:14AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

crickets

by a gunslinger 2008-02-18 11:03AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

There's a huge difference in the Biden and Obama incidents, mostly that Patrick and Obama are close and they always use each other's lines.

It also matters that Obama said - right away - that he should have given the attribution.  Thus the story goes away, lasts just one news cycle.

Too bad Hillary can never say she made a mistake.  

I'd rather have a president who can admit error, however major or minor.

by mainelib 2008-02-18 11:09AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

The issue with this for Clinton isn't even the plagarism per se, it's the association of Obama with Duval Patrick.  The similarity of their speeches (similar enough for the Clinton camp to call it "plagarism" to create a media-ready story) is just a means to tie Obama to Patrick.  The important issue for Clinton is that Duval Patrick had the same advisors (Axelrod...) and ran the same sort of campaign based on hope and rhetoric and since the election has been seen as an ineffective leader.  This plays right into Clinton's narrative that Obama isn't experienced enough for the job, has little substance, and won't be an effective leader, either.  They could really care less about the "plagarism".  What is important to them is tying Obama to Patrick.

by NJIndependent 2008-02-18 11:25AM | 0 recs
PPP Wisconsin Poll; very indicative of reality.
The PPP poll reflects very well the noise coming out of Wisconsin.
For Obama to win big, the demographics of young people, African Americans, college educated whites, and independents would have be motivated to turn out in mass. They are.
For Clinton to win narrowly, the demographics of blue collar whites and old guard Democrats would have to be more motivated than the voting blocks that favor Obama. They aren't.
Several factors are working again Clinton in Wisconsin.
Her desperate looking negative ad campaign against a fellow Democrat. Her lack of public campaigning in the state. The desire on the part of Democrats to end the nomination process sooner rather than later by voting against Clinton. A sense that Clinton can't win over Obama's voting blocks, but that Obama can win her's. A greater appeal for Obama among moderates and conservatives than even McCain has, which is huge because Wisconsin is an open primary (and a possible swing state in the general election). And a general feeling of apathy for Hillary Clinton and the Clinton legacy. The cafe talk, the blog talk, and the small talk regarding Clinton in Wisconsin has been "have you heard what she did today?"
I am sticking to my previous prediction of a 7-8 point victory for Obama, but I am going conservative in that prediction.
Tomorrow it will all depend upon who actually shows up to vote, but the vibe favors Obama.
by fetboy 2008-02-18 10:16AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Pretty standard stuff here.  Obama gets into a state, things look close for a few days and then WHAM!  He crushes her.  

by crackerdog 2008-02-18 11:11AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

Speaking of tying Obama to Patrick - what about tying McCain to Clinton.

Mark Penn, Clinton's top campaign strategist, is CEO of the public relations firm Burson-Marsteller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Penn

Lance Tarrance, a Senior Republican Strategist for McCain is managing director to Burson-Marsteller Public Affairs Practice in Washington D.C.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Tarra nce

by CB Todd 2008-02-18 11:48AM | 0 recs
Re: PPP Wisconsin Poll: Obama 53, Clinton 40

That's a pretty dubious connection.  All it means is that the two guys surely know each other pretty well but (1) people with different political leanings work together peacefully all the time, even at the top of business firms, and (2) neither is working on the campaign in an official capacity as a member of the firm.

by NJIndependent 2008-02-18 12:06PM | 0 recs
According to ARG...

... Wisconsin is Clinton's to lose.

by Bob Johnson 2008-02-18 11:53AM | 0 recs
The Gallup National Trendline
This set of figures out Wisconsin are very very telling. On or about Valentines day, it appears America made up its mind. The numbers from Wisconsin match closely to the numbers in much of the rest of America. It wont be a blow out for Obama, but it will signal that the decision has been made. In the great way that momentum feels like 'we' have made up 'our' mind now.

This is the Gallup National Trendline. Three-day rolling average. N=approx. 1,200 Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.

You can find the raw data at the top of the page here, and elsewhere. http://pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm



There was a dance where they were even but Clinton's fall is obvious and continous, and Obama has been embraced, he has reached 49% support. Please note the dates for Obama's new momentum, its since this new growth started again just February 10th. This is well past the SuperTuesday bump. This is now confirmation on a national scale.

When you combine that with, for example, todays poll in Wisconsin. It is cited above, not the one showing Obama ahead of Clinton, but the numbers for McCain against our Candidates. America has said OK we're buying.
McCain 42 Obama 52

McCain 49 Clinton 42


This could not be any more stark.

Lastly, I have a youtube video from Lawrence Lessig explaining why he endorsed Obama. My faith in the will of the voters is reinforced, as I feel more strongly about their wisdom choosing Barack Obama. It is 20 minutes long, and needs professional help with its graphics, I warn you. Lessig is the American intellectual hero of rights and the internet and corruption.

Professor Lawrence Lessig on Obama
by inexile 2008-02-18 12:30PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------