Should the President Really Be Reading Two Books a Week?
by Jonathan Singer, Fri Dec 26, 2008 at 01:10:16 PM EST
Karl Rove, on his book reading competition against President Bush in 2006.
At year's end, I defeated the president, 110 books to 95. My trophy looks suspiciously like those given out at junior bowling finals. The president lamely insisted he'd lost because he'd been busy as Leader of the Free World.
I'm not certain that I want my President to be reading nearly two books a week. This isn't to say, of course, that I don't believe a President should be well read, or that the President shouldn't be allowed to have down time to do things that can, even for a short time, take his mind off the nearly unfathomably grave issues he must confront on a daily basis.
But just thinking about these numbers -- 1.83 books per week -- you get the sense that the President could more efficiently use his time. Just going by the amount of reading I do on a day-to-day basis between reading for blogging and reading for law school, it's difficult for me to get through more than a dozen books a year, give or take a few -- and only then generally during real breaks (which presumably a President doesn't get much of). I would assume that the job of the President of the United States requires as much or more reading than does the job of being a political blogging law student, or at least as much or more active attention, so it's difficult for me to visualize where the time to read a couple books (whether it's James L. Swanson's "Manhunt" or Albert Camus's "The Stranger") every single week would materialize for a President.
Update [2008-12-27 13:11:40 by Jonathan Singer]:Ezra Klein on point:
No one cares if Bush has read an Andrew Jackson biography. It's his unfamiliarity with his briefing books, not with Founding Fathers porn, that most concerned the nation.
Tags: George W. Bush (all tags)













38 Comments