What's the NRSC's 2010 Pitch to Potential Senate Candidates and Donors?

A recent Roll Call piece highlights the top challenges for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) as both Parties begin preparing for the 2010 Senate elections.

At the dawn of the 2010 election cycle, opportunities abound for Senate Democrats to add to their 58-seat majority.

In Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania -- even in Kansas, where they have not won a Senate election since the 1930s -- a combination of open seats, shaky Republican incumbents, top-flight potential Democratic candidates, or changing political dynamics guarantees that Democrats will be on offense in several states for the third straight cycle.

Republicans, on the other hand, could face a depressing rerun of 2008, when they only went on offense in one state -- Louisiana -- and lost a minimum of seven seats (with the outcome of the Minnesota race still up in the air).

"You can't have a cycle like 2008, when you were only playing defense," fretted one GOP strategist.

Even the most optimistic Republicans concede that they have only one obvious pickup opportunity in 2010: in Nevada, where Sen. Harry Reid (D) will face the voters in his swing state for the first time since becoming Majority Leader and being closely associated with the national Democratic agenda.

But even there, the GOP is facing some difficulty. Republicans' preferred candidate, Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki, was indicted last week for allegedly mishandling state funds -- a prosecution that Krolicki and his allies insist is politically motivated.

The "most optimistic Republicans" (and, after the last two cycles, "optimistic" Republicans may be at a premium) only see one obvious pickup opportunity, and a very flawed opportunity at that.  Sure, a tough map is a big obstacle for Republicans looking to rebound from horrendous 2006 and 2008 Senate race results, but the tough map might just be a contributory factor to a larger problem.  Roll Call continues (emphasis added by me):

But where are the NRSC's top recruiting opportunities -- and what's the pitch to possible candidates when the GOP is so deeply in the minority?

What is the pitch to potential candidates?  Commit 12 to 18 months of your life to an effort that may very well be in vain, where you beg your friends and colleagues for campaign cash, see your family less, sleep less, put yourself under intense media scrutiny, and basically surrender the routine of your life.  And, if you actually win, you get to spend six years in a deep minority where you will accomplish little and where "success" is synonymous with "legislative obstruction."

Beyond the pitch to potential candidates, something that Roll Call doesn't touch on is: what's the pitch to potential Republican contributors? After giving thousands upon thousands of dollars to the NRSC and to Republican Senate candidates in 2006 and 2008, only to see Republicans lose the majority in '06 and approach an un-filibuster-able minority in '08 (and fail to shift a single Democratic seat into the Republican column), we want you to pour thousands more of your hard-earned dollars during a worse economy into our political activities for 2010, which features a Senate battleground that is arguably tougher for Republicans than both 2006 and 2008.  Please, flush your money down the NRSC toilet.

Success begets success and failure begets failure.  And the NRSC is in a downward spiral.  The DSCC absolutely crushed the NRSC in fundraising during the 2008 cycle and was able to substantially support Democratic candidates, contributing significantly to the success of candidates like Oregon's Jeff Merkley and North Carolina's Kay Hagan.  The NRSC simply can't offer Republican candidates that degree of support.

For instance, it's not unreasonable to suggest that Republicans' only prayer for competitive races against North Dakota's Senator Byron Dorgan and Hawaii's Senator Daniel Inouye are both states' Republican Governors, John Hoeven and Linda Lingle, respectively.  But how will the NRSC pursuade them to spend half their lives on airplanes between their home states and Washington D.C., accomplishing little along the way, missing their families and spending much less time in the states they serve?

Further, does new NRSC Chair John Cornyn have the salesmanship, creativity, tenacity, and all-around Schumerosity to turn around the Senate GOP's steep slide?  I strongly doubt it.

For daily news and updates on the U.S. Senate races around the country, regularly read Senate Guru.

Tags: candidate recruiting, donors, NRSC. 2010 elections, Republicans, Senate (all tags)

Comments

7 Comments

What?

Further, does new NRSC Chair John Cornyn have the salesmanship, creativity, tenacity, and all-around Schumerosity to turn around the Senate GOP's steep slide?  I strongly doubt it.

How can you say that about Big Bad John?

by Dracomicron 2008-12-15 10:10AM | 0 recs
they have only one play, in my opinion

Arguing that no matter what the playing field looks like now, 2010 will be a bad year for Democrats across the board because of the housing slump and deep recession. Unemployment is likely to continue to rise over the next couple of years. Democrats may raise taxes, either at the federal or state level. Almost certainly spending will have to be cut at the state level.

Democrats control the presidency and both houses of Congress, so (the argument will go), voters will punish Democrats at the polls in November 2010.

The benefits of whatever Obama manages to get through Congress may not be visible yet by November 2010, just as the benefits of Clinton's 1993 budget weren't apparent to many in 1994.

The Iowa Republican Party is in terrible disarray now, but the conservative bloggers are clinging to hope because they're sure 2010 is bound to be a bad year for Democrats.

Anyway, if I were Cornyn this would be my big selling point to candidates I was recruiting.

by desmoinesdem 2008-12-15 10:27AM | 0 recs
Re: they have only one play, in my opinion

If that's the case, 2010 will be more like 192 was for the GOP. A trip to the woodshed, but not as bad as it might have been (the two parties tied in the Senate in '82, mainly beacause most of the seats up were held by Democrats).

by spirowasright 2008-12-15 10:49AM | 0 recs
but you are absolutely right

Repeated failures depress fundraising. Even rich Republicans don't like to keep putting money behind losing candidates. That's hurting fundraising for the Republican Party of Iowa already, and it's bound to hurt the NRSC's fundraising.

by desmoinesdem 2008-12-15 10:28AM | 0 recs
Cornyn is an idiot

at least he appears to be mentally challenged from his public statements and media buys.

I don't see him being the best face of the GOP for recruiting candidates.

GOP Senators who would do better (who aren't up in 2010):

* Susan Collins

  • Norm Coleman (?)
  • Mike Johanns
  • Lindsey Graham
  • Lamar Alexander

I suppose the GOP has fewer good options than I thought, but still, Cornyn seems a particularly bad person to schmooze waffling candidates about running.

by Carl Nyberg 2008-12-15 11:23AM | 0 recs
and Donors?

What do we know about Bob Menendez?  Schumer did a terrific job at DSCC but I'm not familiar enough with Menendez to know if he's any better for us than Cornyn is for the R's.

by Vox Populi 2008-12-15 12:04PM | 0 recs
Thanks AL

Even if Franken loses this recount, He will have at least stopped Norm from getting the job Big bad John has now.

by Judeling 2008-12-15 02:11PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------