Elections Have Consequences part deux

Sweet, sweet consequences (h/t SusanG):

Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse the president on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues, according to congressional Democrats, campaign aides and experts working with the transition team.

A team of four dozen advisers, working for months in virtual solitude, set out to identify regulatory and policy changes Obama could implement soon after his inauguration. The team is now consulting with liberal advocacy groups, Capitol Hill staffers and potential agency chiefs to prioritize those they regard as the most onerous or ideologically offensive, said a top transition official who was not permitted to speak on the record about the inner workings of the transition.

In so many ways, the last eight years have been, at best, wasted time so it's nice that on several issues we won't have to wait for progress.

Obama himself has signaled, for example, that he intends to reverse Bush's controversial limit on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, a decision that scientists say has restrained research into some of the most promising avenues for defeating a wide array of diseases such as Parkinson's. Bush's August 2001 decision pleased religious conservatives who have moral objections to the use of cells from days-old human embryos, which are destroyed in the process.

And...

The new president is also expected to lift a so-called global gag rule barring international family planning groups that receive U.S. aid from counseling women about the availability of abortion, even in countries where the procedure is legal, said Cecile Richards, spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Federation of America. When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he rescinded the Reagan-era regulation, known as the Mexico City Policy, but Bush reimposed it.

Oh yeah, and...

The president-elect has said, for example, that he intends to quickly reverse the Bush administration's decision last December to deny California the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles. "Effectively tackling global warming demands bold and innovative solutions, and given the failure of this administration to act, California should be allowed to pioneer," Obama said last January.

Hell, yes!

Tags: 2008 Presidential election, Barack Obama (all tags)

Comments

23 Comments

Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

 by "swiftly undone" does that mean Obama just has to sign a bill or does it still have to go through congress?

by viggy716 2008-11-08 04:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

The executive orders can be rescinded just based on the Presidents signature.

by parahammer 2008-11-08 04:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

More than that -- ALL executive branch decisions (by EPA, DOD, Commerce, Labor, etc) can be essentially undone immediately by the new heads of these agencies.  "Executive Orders" are not necessary.

There are actually very few bad things Bush did that required Congress' participation.  That's what he meant by Unitary Executive.  The downside of that (for Bush) is that they can be undone just as easily.

by julatten 2008-11-08 05:14PM | 0 recs
Comment periods for some of this

There are regulatory procedures to be followed that are mandated by law.

Some of the egregious stuff might still take months, others might be implemented by Executive Order (stem cell research?).

Still, this is the easiest stuff for the Obama administration to take care of, but be prepared for some of it to be messier than one might expect.

by Reptile 2008-11-09 06:53AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

That emissions decision is great stuff... we've needed that to be reversed here for awhile, and California emissions standards drive the industry due to the size of the state...

by auronrenouille 2008-11-08 04:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

How about our Constitution?  Can we get that back with a pen stroke?

by julica 2008-11-08 04:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

We will get some of it back immediately, other parts will have to await legislation.

by parahammer 2008-11-08 04:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Undoing Bush's mess?  I hope his pen doesn't run out of ink.

by Homebrewer 2008-11-08 04:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Yes.....we should save the environment....save the trees but allow for the continued murder of the unborn by abortion.......nice to see some are more concerned about saving the trees than the unborn....

by adb67 2008-11-08 05:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Free Republic still down?

by abulic 2008-11-08 06:58PM | 0 recs
Free Republic was down?

I didn't know my schadenfreude could crash servers.

Awesome.  I should become a superhero or something.

by mistersite 2008-11-08 08:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

It's called CHOICE.  And right now you can legally make one.

by cameoanne 2008-11-09 03:32AM | 0 recs
but not practically

in many states.  The anti-choice strategy is not focused on Roe v. Wade.  That's just rhetoric for fundraising and rousing the single-issue voters.  The anti-choice strategy is about putting up as many roadblocks as possible so that abortion is as difficult and expensive to obtain as possible.

by JJE 2008-11-09 06:46AM | 0 recs
I love trees

And the unborn suck!  Take that quote back to Freeperland, dildo!  It will 'prove' we here are all barbarians!  And oh yeah -- I LOVE THE TASTE OF CRUSHING VICTORY!!!

by Tangie3 2008-11-09 06:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

This morning I looked up from the paper and realized that I still, after 4 whole days, get a euphoric feeling when it enters my mind that Obama has been elected President.

And this story reinforces it. When Obama isn't busy taking his orders from Mussulman terrorists, he's taking them from me! I've been saying for some time that between Election and Inauguration he needed to have his staff set up a stack of executive orders to reverse some of the rot immediately, and he heard. In fact, given the work his staff has already done, he seems to have heard before I said it, which is the way I like people to take my orders.

Seriously, is it not a joyful experience to see somebody Smart headed for that office?

I'd be a little disappointed if I believed that bit about how he will probably reverse the Gag Rule; but surely this is just stupid journalism talking. Reversing the Gag Rule is a given, an established ritual for the first day of a new administration. We can expect more than that.

by Porlock Junior 2008-11-08 10:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

And we helped pay for it,
     our contribution, directly or indiectly have allows him to assemble a fantastic transition.

Over 40 people pouring over bush exec orders for frour month.

Awesome.

by holder 2008-11-09 06:48AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

I guess there is no place on this site for a pro lifer. I voted for Obama, supported his campagin, but I cant post a comment declaring my objection to abortion and the notion that we care more about the environment that killing the unborn.

Whats that about being the party of inclusion? Is it rhetoric or is my position on the subject just not welcome?

by adb67 2008-11-09 07:04AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Don't be dismayed. There are a wide range of views on abortion on this site. We all do agree however, that making abortions illegal is NOT the way to make them more rare.
I used to be part of http://www.democratsforlife.org/ but they are moving hard  to the right. They believe in criminalizing the doctors that perform aborions. Post election, I find thier views not tolerable anymore.
As a pro-life Democrat I believe the way to  drastically reduce the number of abortions is to provide viable alternatives so that women don't want to have an abortion or at least feel that they don't HAVE to have one if they don't want to. This requires money, which is why Republicans just rather take the easy way and make it illegal.

Welcome to the board

by xodus1914 2008-11-09 08:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

If you really are concerned, and not a troll, then phrasing your objections in a reasonable tone will get you a lot more help.  Inclusive does NOT mean putting up with a "my way or the hiway" attitude.  We all have to act respectfully to each other.  That means that those who consider themselves pro-life, like me, have to be able to engage in civil discourse with the pro-birth people and the pro-abortion people.

What?

Pro-birth are people who only focus on the rights of the fetus and the sanctity of unborn life to the detriment of any other life if need be.  Post birth, that is the parents problem/responsability.  This also includes those who view contraception the same as abortion.  They blame unwanted pregnancies on irresponsable people and look down on them for needing help.

Pro-abortion are people who are interested STRINCTLY in regards to a femals choice and women's empowerment.  No room for the father's views.  No room for the idea of adoption.  They view the uterus as a factory and the woman as the CEO.

Pro-life people are distressed by abortion, but understand its place in a imperfect world.  Pro-life people understand that the SITUATION a parent-to-be is in can effect a pregnancy.  They take the father and mothers views into account.  Pro-lifers are concerned about the QUALITY of life as well as the SANCTITY.  They want pregnancies to be a CHOICE and not a accident, so they promote responsable sexual activity INCLUDING contraception.  They also promote, but not EXCLUSIVELY, abstinance-until-marriage and single-sexual-partner lifestyles.  They believe that giving people real CHOICES, including a real adoption option (not the mail-order-baby-racket that we currently have), TRUE social help (financial, educational, and nutritional)for pregnant mothers, and allowing for the fact that some people are going to want to have an abortion, horrible as that may seem.

Pretty horrible stuff.  Essentially it comes down to one problematic fact... (most) people are born inherently fertile with a natural desire to procreate regardless of rational thought.  How we deal with that defines our society.

And I thank God that Obama is now in charge of dealing with this like an ADULT.  (I was one of those lucky people who shoudl have been an abortion...my mother got pregnant with me when she was 16, dad was 17, and they were both dirt poor.  ONLY the support of thier respective families, who gave from thier own meagre belongings with little admonition, allowed me to live, and, live well.  I know what my choice means and what responsability lies within it.)

by Hammer1001 2008-11-09 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Unfortunately, that is how the reversal of these oredes are going to be spun (Trees-yes, unborn babies-no).
There were all screeching about it on Fox News this morning. How this was going to cause problmes for Obamam, while energizing and unifying the Republicans.

Here's a joke:
After a press briefing and news conference in the Obamam White House, the Fox News Presidential correspndent walks up to Helen Thomas. What does he ask her?

A: "So just what did the President say in there?"

by spirowasright 2008-11-09 02:11PM | 0 recs
Don't forget that Rush and Hannity

get kicked off Armed Forces radio Jan 20 2009.

by parahammer 2008-11-09 10:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Don't forget that Rush and Hannity
Really?
I thought the troops just LOVED those guys...
snark
by xodus1914 2008-11-09 11:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Elections Have Consequences part deux

Good news. Bush left so many messes to clean up.

by Batocchio 2008-11-09 12:24PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------