Jerome's Personal Election Thread
by Jerome Armstrong, Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 04:38:54 PM EST
I will bump this up as I update it, Jerome
First off: Networks project McCain victory:
Second: With 15% reporting, Clinton leads by 4 percent, now, who were the bloggers saying this was over? Banish them to delegate calculations. Even if Obama does pull ahead, we have a real battle for the nomination.
Update [2008-1-8 21:00:12 by Jerome Armstrong]: Obama is said to already have made travel plans to get an expected endorsement from the powerful Culinary Workers union in Nevada on Friday... With 23 percent reporting, Clinton opens her lead over Obama by a 40-34 margin. Edwards at 18 percent. Hope you are having fun.Update [2008-1-8 21:16:12 by Jerome Armstrong]: The culinary vote/endorsement, or not, comes at 11 pm est tonight. With 34 percent reporting, Clinton is still ahead by 4 percent. At this rate, the only question is going to be who calls it first for Clinton-- that's the win, she's already beaten the expectations game. I emailed georgep and told him to get back in the action here. Marc Ambinder says that the "Obama leadership cloistered to figure out why" Clinton seems poised to win. Any suggestions?
Update [2008-1-8 21:38:28 by Jerome Armstrong]:
Over? No. Pretty close. Clinton by 2% with 42% reporting. This bodes awful well for Clinton:
Clinton 6,827, Obama 4,654 in 9 of 12 Manchester wards
Clinton 3,464, Obama 2,089 in 4 of 9 Nashua wards
So does this, from Mike Connery:
18 - 24 year olds: 11% of the electorate - Obama winning with 61% 25 - 29 year olds: 7% of the electorate - Clinton winning narrowly 37% - 34%
In Iowa, Obama carried both the 17-24 and 25-29 demographics with 57% of the vote. Clinton cutting into his lead among the older Millennials could be bad news for Obama.











70 Comments