On Taking Questions

When I saw John Edwards up in Lebanon, NH yesterday, I was struck by the enthusiasm with which he invited questions, even though he had apparently not intended to take any, or was running so late that he was advised not to. At the end of a rousing speech, he said "I can't hold a New Hampshire meeting without taking questions" and proceeded to take 4 or so despite the protests of his staff. Two of the questions were single-payer advocates wondering why they should support him when his plan isn't single payer. Edwards responded passionately, ultimately asking his critics to understand that we need to cover everyone as quickly as possible and that there is not consensus on single payer, there is consensus to cover everyone. He went on to say that he his plan could very well became single payer if that's what people want it to be and hit back hard when a questioner called his plan a "patchwork."

Edwards was also confronted by a woman who insisted that she loves everything he says about taking on the entrenched corporate interests but... "how are you going to do it!?" Edwards seemed taken aback a bit but clearly relished the opportunity to make the case. He said he'd bring the congress to the right place by galvanizing the American people, institute lobbying reform and seek publicly funded elections to name just a few things and ultimately appealed to the idealism of the crowd:

Together there is nothing we can't do and we will win this fight.

The point here is that part of my hope in going to New Hampshire was to get a sense of that retail politicking that New Hampshire is so famous for and I really only got a sense of it from John Edwards, and had to drive to way northern New Hampshire to see it.

Part of the problem, of course, is that I went the final weekend before the primary, when people's interest is at its peak, so it made sense for Barack Obama to hold larger rallies -- he does have "meet the candidate" forums scheduled for the next few days. And Hillary Clinton, to her credit, is back to taking questions, albeit (in the case of the event I went to Friday) at a distance from questioners that comes with standing on a stage above the crowd. But her questions were not terribly challenging, or if they were, as one appeared to be from the answer Clinton gave, she didn't repeat it for all to hear. Where John Edwards relished in being challenged by audiences, Clinton seemed to fear it, although I'm not sure why as she shines in that setting. As a sidenote, I was amused to run into a guy at the Obama rally yesterday who'd asked her a question at the Friday Clinton event and was accosted by media afterwards demanding to know if he was a plant; this guy couldn't have been further from a plant if he tried.

So I leave New Hampshire and head back west with the distinct regret that I didn't get more up close and personal time with the candidates, although certainly glad for the time I did get to see the candidates in action. I also can't help but think that if New Hampshire really wants to prove the value of the retail politicking that they boast of as a justification for their inordinate influence on the nomination and if they want to reward the candidate who embraces it the most, they should vote for John Edwards on Tuesday.

Tags: 2008 Presidential election, Barack Obama, Democratic Primary, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, New Hampshire (all tags)

Comments

21 Comments

Re: On Taking Questions

Clinton took 22 questions at an event yesterday. What more do you want from her?

by world dictator 2008-01-06 07:06AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Striving to highlight her command of policy issues and perhaps cultivate an image of greater accessibility, Hillary Clinton is reconstructing her campaign style to open herself to lengthy questioning from New Hampshire voters.

At a rally this morning, she jettisoned most of her stump speech and instead opened the floor to questions, devoting more than an hour and a half to answering 22 questions posed by members of the audience.

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politi cs/blog/2008/01/question_time_for_hillar y_clin.html

by world dictator 2008-01-06 07:08AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

So are you supporting Edwards, Todd?  Or are you just saying his style of Campaigning is the closest to what New Hampshire is known for and professes to love.  

by yitbos96bb 2008-01-06 07:11AM | 0 recs
Both, I think

by clarkent 2008-01-06 07:20AM | 0 recs
Re: Both, I think

I thought he was an Obama supporter, but we'll see.

by KainIIIC 2008-01-06 07:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Both, I think

He said just before Iowa that he liked Edwards' approach better.

by clarkent 2008-01-06 07:35AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Please Hillary has never engaged anyone personally until she thought she could lose. In NY she wont appear on any local media forum and discuss issues, she rarely responds to constituents. This woman has only cared about ne thing her entire life.....herself and her political goals.......its my more and more voters including women like my wife are now turned off by her now (my wife is independent and has no interest in partisan politics). She basically now says Hillary is a very bright, intelligent individual, but not someone she could vote for. For one thing being the wife of a Governor and President doesnt make her qualified to have been elected to the Senate in the first place....

by adbct 2008-01-06 07:44AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

You should've stayed long enough to catch one of Barack's "Meet the Candidate" forums. Why leave early, and then complain that you didn't get to see him take questions?

From what I've witnessed, Barack thrives in Q&A more than in any other format. He consistently hits them "out of the park".

Here's a link to his response to my diary on his respone to a question in Iowa about illegal immigration:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1 /2/92418/51166/49/429119

by dmc2 2008-01-06 08:27AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

As a former resident of NH and thus a participant in a couple primaries there I now the weakness of Todd's argument for Edwards here.  Its even more embarrassing given that I lean towards Edwards myself.

The "retail" primary in NH helps its residents slowly get an understanding of the candidates.  But that happens over time as the word "slowly" implies.  By now, just a couple days before the election, its too late to get a real understanding of what NH residents go through.  That Edwards is enthusiastic about answering questions has very little connection with him possibly being a good president because its taking one aspect out of context of the whole person.

by Taran 2008-01-06 08:29AM | 0 recs
Edwards IS

the We The People candidate!

by kevin22262 2008-01-06 08:30AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions
When he'll answer a question about where my 2004 vote went, then I'll be impressed.(he said then "This time, every vote will be counted"
        Or, even when he'll tackle SPONSORING the IWR (as opposed to just "sorry I voted for it). Until then - same self-serving stuff as usual.
by Robbedvoter 2008-01-06 08:54AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Edwards has just added many more events to his schedule. He's going to do another marathon of campaigning, including in the early hours, before the big Tuesday vote.

http://www.johnedwards.com/events/

by Progressive America 2008-01-06 09:04AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

I'm sorry, who did your candidate lost to again?

by Progressive America 2008-01-06 09:59AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Ah that's too bad, the ship is sinking.

by Progressive America 2008-01-06 10:19AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Maybe Hillary should start campaigning on something other than her husband's eight years as President. What do you think?

by Progressive America 2008-01-06 10:42AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

Do you care about the Democratic Party at all? Do your care about this community at all?

I have a huge fear that people like you, and there are too many at this point are going to run into the arms of McCain, or Bloomberg, or even Huckabee if your candidate loses the nomination.

Furthermore, if you are going to argue so violently against the other candidates you can at least do it with class and dignity and perhaps make salient points instead of sounding like a parrot.

by JDF 2008-01-06 11:25AM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

his "master"?

What, exactly, are you implying?

by machka 2008-01-06 09:14AM | 0 recs
Allow me to put this kindly:

Fuck off.

by Rooktoven 2008-01-06 10:44AM | 0 recs
Edwards has become an embarassment..

You're definitely a hard core Edwards supporter .." ...I went the final weekend before the primary, when people's interest is at its peak, so it made sense for Barack Obama to hold larger rallies --".  Ridiculously implying that Obamas campaign has a spigot to control the crowd numbers attending his appearances.  
On C-span this morning the reporter said ther were actual traffic jams of people going to Baracks rallies.

Here's what it is Todd  
-Edwards only got 14% of the youth vote to Hillary's 18% and Obama's 57%.  When your guy is LESS inspirational than Hillary Clinton, Edwards is toast.  But he keeps showing his bizarre views:
-to say he wants all the troops removed right now including all the ones training the army and police -except the ones controlling the trillion dollar boondoggle embassy the Iraqis will turn into a  falafel factory as soon as Bush is out.
-to say there's now only two candidates in the race.
-but also just now, when a cafe customer on CNN asked him, after they were talking about Elizabeths illness, "Why don't you just stay home and enjoy your family".

This is the exact verbatim answer of the spotlight loving self-absorbed John Edwards I won't be voting for:
"You have to sacrifice (meaning his sacrifice, not Elizabeths) to make America capable of what it can be."
"Make us capable.."??  
As if we need someone to tell us what to do..???

Edwards is dead right to say there are big differences between himself and Obama.
One is focused on himself  -the other is focused on the world.

by hazmaq 2008-01-06 12:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards has become an embarassment..

jeez your an ahole.....the sacrifice John Edwards talks about is hone he and his wife agreed to. Who the hel are you to question what they have chosen to do as husband and wife and as a family you moron. The guy is a heall of a lot more real and honest than Obama's sanctimonius smug self and Hillary's corrupt power grabbing self. Your a freaking hypocrite like so many other left wing liberals talkign about wanting change, being more honest and opne, beng better neighbors to each other.....what a fraud you and your ilk are.

by adbct 2008-01-06 12:50PM | 0 recs
Re: On Taking Questions

"Way northern New Hampshire"?  No you weren't.  You were closer to Vermont than Canada.

by KimPossible 2008-01-06 04:13PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------