Out of SC and into...

The Clinton's seem to have seen this blowout coming, they yesterday released PR's announcing Bill Clinton would be Kansas City, and Hillary Clinton in Nashville, tonight.

This now sets up a PR/expectations battle over Florida on Tuesday. After Obama went up on the air in a national buy in Florida, the Clinton's seemed to have said off-the-record that the agreement was off, but on the record, they remained committed to it. On Friday, they released this PR about Florida, saying a few things in it:

1. Clinton will ask that the FL & MI delegates be seated (though not exactly clarifying as to when- if their delegates are to be counted toward the nomination).

2. That Clinton will continue abiding to the pledge to not campaign in Florida.

3. That Clinton expects others will as well.

Obama got the huge victory and momentum that he wanted out of South Carolina. With a double-digit lead in the polls heading in, it was expected, but still-- it comes with momentum. What does he do with it, especially in regards to Florida?

He could either continue to ignore Florida, ask the press too as well, and hope that it doesn't matter. Or, Obama could go long, and head into Florida, breaking the pledge that doesn't matter any longer (which #3 above is trying to head off).

Neither is that great of a choice for Obama. Ignoring it sets up a process story over the next three days that ends in Clinton's favor; and his campaigning in Florida the next three days is risky because he's been behind in the polls and it would up the stakes.

Everyone would bet that the Obama campaign has already made up its mind, and will ignore Florida, like he did Michigan. I don't really see how that's a winning strategy for Obama. Florida is different, first, because Obama is on the ballot in Florida, and second, because its Florida. Obama has won SC by a 20 percent plus blowout, but Clinton will be able to reverse that claim in FL. And what matters more, FL or SC? In the first big state to have a primary, a week ahead of Feb 5th, Clinton will be seen as victor over Obama.

Tags: 2008 election, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (all tags)

Comments

58 Comments

Re: Out of SC and into...

dammit all, Florida doesn't matter!

by Jerome Armstrong 2008-01-26 03:32PM | 0 recs
You're right about MSNBC and Joe Scarborough

They're not even trying to be objective anymore. It's seriously a  "fuck the Clinton's" broadcast tonight

I get the feeling that with Clinton trying to push Florida into the narrative the media is going to give them the bird and say "the Clintons are trying to cheat again!"

Even the supposedly "substance based and objective" blogosphere has not held back their Clinton bashing about Florida, and everything else.

by world dictator 2008-01-26 03:37PM | 0 recs
Re: You're right about MSNBC and Joe Scarborough

Cuz it's cheating.

by MNPundit 2008-01-26 03:41PM | 0 recs
Re: You're right about MSNBC and Joe Scarborough

how? Please enlighten me with detailed facts.

by world dictator 2008-01-26 03:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

why advertize? She's going to win by large margins anyways.

by world dictator 2008-01-26 03:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

yes, I think he has no good choice but to make the best of the "playing by the rules" narrative and move on.

by along 2008-01-26 03:41PM | 0 recs
Media will give Obama a pass

MSNBC panels already ycuking it up (just short of high fiving the Obama win) and saing on air that Clinton has broke the pledge (how?  she of course hasn't).

Obam could break the pledge tomorrow (really he already has with his national ads airing in FL) and the media will twist it and blame Bill.

by dpANDREWS 2008-01-26 03:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Media will give Obama a pass

It's just MSNBC.

It is apparently their goal in life to demonstrate they can nominate a president.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 03:46PM | 0 recs
Of all the 350 viewers watching

Am I the only one who thinks they look like ass-oles?

by dpANDREWS 2008-01-26 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Of all the 350 viewers watching

To you the do :-)

I spoke to a friend of mine who is an executive at MSNBC and he was saying that the demographic of MSNBC News includes male, university educated, conservative trending people which seems to overlap Obama's demographic so they don't mind being the 'pro Obama' channel.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Florida will get a big chunk of coverage.  I think it'll be a pretty big blowout for Clinton, then we are heading into Feb. 5.   Only 10 more days of this, then things hopefully settle down a little (even if things are not 100% clear at that point yet.)  

by georgep 2008-01-26 03:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

We can only hope.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Yeah you're pretty credible with your Obama will win by 5-8%.

Lets see you were off by- uhhhhh 20 plus points!?

by crackityjones 2008-01-26 09:00PM | 0 recs
AFTER Florida polls close Clinton should fly in

She should land in Jacksonville and give a huge victory speech and thank Fl for their support.

by dpANDREWS 2008-01-26 03:44PM | 0 recs
Re: AFTER Florida polls close Clinton should fly i

I am sure something to that effect is planned.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Given the number of "uncommitted" votes in Michigan, I don't think Obama has to campaign there to get respectable results.  Let his Florida surrogates make the case and all he has to do is win some delegates to "beat expectations."

He should immediately head west and start wooing Hispanics, and maybe up to whereever Caroline Kennedy lives for a photo op.

by Drummond 2008-01-26 03:47PM | 0 recs
Umm, no

She is not going to get those Michigan delagates seated until there is a clear nominee.  If they are seated now, the uncomitted share should be translated into delagates for Obama.  

by Toddwell 2008-01-26 03:48PM | 0 recs
Come on

Jerome...

NO ONE had a 25-30 point win in mind for Obama.

I thought folks that we're saying he needed to win by 20 points to "win" were being ridiculous... turns out he's probably going to beat even that spread.

You can spin this.  It was a substantial Obama win and a big HRC defeat.

by zonk 2008-01-26 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Come on

Your absolutely correct.

You also cannot spin the fact that Obama's support among white voters actually fell from earlier contests.

You cannot win the democratic nomination, to say nothing of the presidency, with less the 1/4 of white voters.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:08PM | 0 recs
OK

Then you tell me...

What is it that Obama needs to do to appeal to white voters.   What special needs does the white electorate have that Obama isn't currently delivering to them.

by zonk 2008-01-26 04:10PM | 0 recs
Nope

Then you've misjudged America.

Seriously - get out of the blogosphere for a while.  I know I do - and I know you just don't get the same need for partisanship.

America gives low approval ratings, record low approval ratings, to Dubya... but they're not looking for someone to string him up.

They're ready for something new.

by zonk 2008-01-26 04:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Nope

Primaries and caucuses tend to be more partisan than a general election would be.  That is the problem Obama has with his particular message.  The more partisan primary voters are, well, more partisan.  Therefore Obama does not appeal to them as much as someone who is the more partisan candidate.  

Now, as for the white vote moving further away from Obama and the black vote moving more for Obama, I am thinking that that is a temporary phenomenon.  SC is the state where the AAs share of the vote is the highest of all, where those types of things are the most pronounced (even more so than Georgia,) so hopefully we can move on now from all of this and talk a bit more about Hispanics, youth voters, old voters, etc. again from here on out.  Once the dust settles Obama's obvious problem attracting the "white" vote and Hillary's problem attracting the "black" vote will be much less pronounced, with both making healthy gains in either category again.  

by georgep 2008-01-26 04:29PM | 0 recs
You all

keep missing the forest for the trees.

Hillary Clinton is the most well known Democrat in America.   She has enormous advantages in her corner.

Yes - Obama wins Iowa... Obama only finishes 3 points back in NH.... Obama loses the popular vote, but wins the delegate count in NV... Obama blows out SC.

But you're still talking about Obama as if it's some sort of strange thing that just cannot continue.

You really need to get used to the idea that America is looking not just to move past George W Bush -- but move past the 90s... and the 80s... and the 70s...  I lived through all 3 of those decades  - and I'm ready to move forward, too.

by zonk 2008-01-26 04:34PM | 0 recs
Re: You all

Well, I am talking about the numbers ...

The numbers say he is going to lose because of his weakness among white and hispanic voters.

Actually, if Edwards were to hold his percentage among whites Obama would come in 3rd in some states. I personally don't think that will happen. I think Edwards will get about 10% nationally and the remainder will split between Obama and Clinton.

That will give Clinton a 10-15% margin of victory overall.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:46PM | 0 recs
Re: You all

What numbers?

The numbers in SC?  The numbers in IA?  The numbers in NH?  The numbers in NV?  Or the numbers across all 4 states combined?

Or the numbers for states that haven't voted yet?

If you'd have told me that Obama would be looking at the delegate count and vote totals he's gotten so far the week before Iowa -- no rational Obama supporter or staffer in the world would have turned them down.

We'd have taken these numbers sight unseen and gladly just moved on to 2/5.

There's just no way you can spin the results positively for the most well known Democrat in America.

by zonk 2008-01-26 05:01PM | 0 recs
Re: You all

We KNOW a lot about where this race is from the results in the first four states (plus MI.)  We know who has what demographics.  That puts Obama at a major disadvantage moving forwards, as those demographics will take over after this point (overwhelmingly.)   Obama HAS to have a strong showing with Independents to compete.  Guess what:  9 of the Feb. 5 states have closed primaries, so true Democrats take over.  Obama has shown extremely weak in the Hispanic community.  Guess what:  They are going to be extremely important in some of the biggest and delegate-rich states moving forward.   And so on.  

I don't expect you to come to the correct realization, but you probably will in just 9 days.  That is UNLESS Obama can make huge strides in those groups, which is highly unlikely.

by georgep 2008-01-27 04:28PM | 0 recs
Re: OK

I don't buy the theory that white voters watch who the black voters are going for and then gravitate against them in some sort of backlash, but I do think repeated accusations of racism are a big turnoff for white voters.

by Steve M 2008-01-26 04:16PM | 0 recs
Re: OK

I am not sure about that.

I think if you keep hearing that a minority candidate is about to be elected on the strength of the minority vote you might be disinclined to vote for that candidate.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:49PM | 0 recs
Re: OK

It sorta matters where you're from.  Times have changed in some places.

by Steve M 2008-01-26 04:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Given that the next state pays zero attention to the previous state, I wouldn't say that Obama gets momentum. It seems NO ONE is getting momentum from this primary.

I don't see much changing for Feb 5th except maybe GA swinging into Obama's direction.

by Ga6thDem 2008-01-26 03:49PM | 0 recs
Georgia

was going for Obama anyway.  

by Toddwell 2008-01-26 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

I'll be honest.. Obama should break the pledge and go balls in for Florida. I dont think Democratic voters in Florida or Michigan should be penalized. Their delegates should be seated. Obama should not sit idly by and say Florida shouldn't matter. Obama has to opportunity to ride a prospective wave, he should campaign in Florida. Not campaigning there to listen to a pledge is foolish in my opinion.

It's about winning. The Clintons will get dirty. Obama should too.

by falcon4e 2008-01-26 03:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

I have a question..

Will the regular voter be watching this Obama speech? Or will they have turned off the TV since it was a rout and Obama is speaking two hours after a projection has been made?

And I'll be fair, I don't honestly care about this Caroline Kennedy Schloessberg endorsement. Am I wrong in not caring about it?

by falcon4e 2008-01-26 03:56PM | 0 recs
You called it

Florida is the 'first big state'.

Given the prominence the media has awarded Florida, I can't foresee a Clinton victory being ignored.

The momentum will be behind Hillary

by Coldblue 2008-01-26 03:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

If (it ain't gonna happen but if...) HRC loses the delegate count by a few, after winning Michigan and Florida, will the DNC be under any added pressure to seat those delegates? I think this boycotting by the DNC is TERRIBLE for the party come November. I knew about Michigan but had no idea of the Florida boycott. This is a disaster for our party come November if Giuliani (ahhahahah!) or McCain are the nominees. We could lose Florida and even Michigan based on a few good commercials about the boycott..

by ND1979 2008-01-26 03:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Falco: Probably (even though it is saturday) and no.

by ND1979 2008-01-26 03:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

I think the whole boycott is retarded and indeed terrible, so is this whole race issue.. But ya ND, you make a good point. The GOP could air ads saying how the Democrats didnt care for your vote in the primary season, why should you care for them now.

by falcon4e 2008-01-26 04:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

It isn't a question of "could" since they started campaigning on that LAST YEAR. The questions are how much and how effective will it be.

by Step Beyond 2008-01-26 04:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

It's because Obama actually did worse tonight among white voters then in prior contests so although his showing bodes well for the souther states, it bodes poorly everywhere else.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Alright alright, you're a big fan of Michigan and Florida counting, we get it. No way Obama is going to bite though, that would be crazy. Clinton is going to win there and if Obama breaks the pledge then it matters way more that he loses. As it is, we're all going to be talking about the Republican primary there already, if the Dems stick to keeping out, then it will get way less play.

by Mullibok 2008-01-26 04:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

He already broke the pledge. It's the worse thing he could have done. I swear I would kick the person advising him if they were in front of me. And kick them hard.

Those ads are a violation of that pledge (although he technically got permission) and while they air, people who see them here KNOW no other Dem aired any ads as per the pledge. And while the one candidate did, he also the one still walking around saying that Floridians don't count and there should be no campaigning here.

Clinton is spinning, which is annoying, but so is Obama. And the Obama spin doesn't even make sense. I don't understand how they think it should play.

by Step Beyond 2008-01-26 04:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

It might be a violation, but I would have to say it's a pretty weak violation. An ad that airs nationally is way different from an ad that airs only in Florida. Direct campaigning there would be way bigger news.

by Mullibok 2008-01-26 04:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into America's wang.

Ah but remember what you said


...if Obama breaks the pledge then it matters way more that he loses

Pledge broken, even weakly, makes it matter way more. He lost the ability to say he didn't campaign here as a reason for his loss. So now he has to hope the pundits don't play that up. A situation he could have avoided.

Pundit "Obama sure didn't carry his South Carolina momentum anywhere. He was the only democrat to air any ads in Florida and he still lost by xx%. Is Obama done?" Of course followed by more pundit idiocy but you get the idea.

by Step Beyond 2008-01-26 04:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into America's wang.

No, I meant breaking it by specifically going to Florida, not by buying an ad that happens to reach Florida. I'm not a politician, don't twist my words. :)

by Mullibok 2008-01-27 05:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

The media has been very consistent in talking about this as the last primary before Super Tuesday.

I think those Clinton fans who are counting on the media to do them a favor and treat Florida like a big deal may be in for a disappointment.

by Steve M 2008-01-26 04:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

The media will treat Florida as a big deal because it matters in the GOP contest.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

That doesn't follow.  The media covered Michigan on the GOP side and almost totally ignored the Dem results.

by Steve M 2008-01-26 04:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Mullibok, I guess I can understand that point. Obama is down big there, and if he campaigns there, it'll show he cares about Florida.

However, there will be spin in my opinion anyway and Florida will matter a lot more than South Carolina will in my humble opinion because it's the last primary before Super Tuesday.

by falcon4e 2008-01-26 04:06PM | 0 recs
Delegates, Delegates, Delegates

Doesn't matter re:  Florida.  That's easy for Camp Obama to spin, as it doesn't count unless the credential committee or a floor vote of the non-FL, non-MI delegates decide to seat them.  Not to mention the "Calvinball" aspect of the Clinton strategy of changing the rules once it becomes amenable to them.

Not to mention that on the R side, FL decides everything and takes the oxygen out of the room.  The media spin on Wed. covers McCain/Romney results, Guiliani's spectacular collapse (and where he goes), etc., etc...

It just isn't a good idea for Clinton to chase pyrhhic non-delegate victories.  We seem to think that both campaigns' resources are unlimited -- they aren't if this thing goes to the convention.  

Everything on 2/5 is deciding spin (HRC is about state wins, Obama about purple/blue states and keeping the delegate count differential low).

by ChrisR 2008-01-26 04:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

It's Florida and the candidates name appear on the ballot. The Media didn't care about Michigan because Clinton v. Uncommitted isn't a story. Obama v. Clinton matters.

by ND1979 2008-01-26 04:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

It would be helpful, Jerome, if you quoted the HRC press memo you refer to.

In it, her campaign accuses Obama of "ignoring" the voters of Florida! The key graph:

Despite efforts by the Obama campaign to ignore Floridians, their voices will be heard loud and clear across the country, as the last state to vote before Super Tuesday on February 5th.

by demondeac 2008-01-26 04:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

I must say it's funny that all the networks covered Bill Clinton and now their all covering Hillary Clinton.

by kristoph 2008-01-26 04:51PM | 0 recs
You guys are hilarious

You wanted so bad for michigan to matter and -- wait -- nobody mentions it.  You've been wrong on this issue for so long, you just can't bear to talk about something else, can you?

Obama: it's too bad that we are not allowed to campaign in Florida, but we feel it's important to play by the rules.

The media: no delgates, no campaign: Hillary gets no victory speech, and minimal press because McCain or Romney will all the news.  If she campaigns there, she broke the rules and Obama is somewhere else campaigning in a state that matters.  Do you understand?  Yes, but emotion has frozen your mind.

When they are seated, they will seated according to the wishes of the actual pledged delegates in Denver.  They will.  Not. Matter.

by responsible 2008-01-26 05:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Are there Georgia media markets that overlap with northern Florida? Anyone know?

by js noble 2008-01-26 06:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Typical Armstrong. Obama wins big tonight and he wants to talk about Clinton and Florida. He and this website are a total joke.  Read Frank Rich in the Sunday NY Times to see what the Clintons are in for with the nomination. Obama is not done yet. OBAMA 08.

by Lawdawg 2008-01-26 07:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Wow, Jerome Armstrong, your inability to even partially disguise your naked Clinton partisanship when you try to "objectively" analyze the political situation is rendering you utterly absurd.  

by arguendo1 2008-01-26 08:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

If Hillary wanted to write an "analysis" we'd have what Jerome wrote.

hmmmm

by crackityjones 2008-01-26 09:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Out of SC and into...

Obama brilliantly distorted Hillary Clinton's MLK comment and used it to pursue a divisive strategy in South Carolina (with the eager help of the media).  He got the blowout he needed, but it's hard to see how he builds on it, notwithstanding Joe Scarborough's hyperventilating.

by Upstate Dem 2008-01-27 01:02AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------