That's a bit of a stretch, me thinks.

from that one line? Nah.

I thought Romney was the Change candidate now.

A lot of the diaries you post are not deserving of a front page post.

Nothing of substance.

He said he is not endorsing , you would think that would be the end of the story , but in your infinite wisdom you want us to start psycho analyzing his words.

Thats not really worthy of the front page . Enough of this yellow journalism you like to push.

I don't think I see that.  Todd, as you have already pointed out part of the whole Clinton thing now is redefining the change vs. experience debate and turning it into a 'who can accomplish change' debate.

Todd, I'm sorry but your analysis this bullshit. I have never said this about any front pager before, not even Bowers of Stoller, whom I did not care for. But something's got to give with your posts and I hope Jerome corrects it. Yes, you are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to your own bullshit!

Come again? How did you come to this conclusion?

I thought the same thing too when I watched the video. Then again, the polls show this election is about change so that's a factual statement.

It seems to me that he is saying that the campaign as a whole is about change and that the candidates should be focusing on how they are going to bring about positive change rather than focusing on a petty feud.

Sounds like an argument for Edwards to me, as everyone knows his approach would be most effective in accomplishing change.  Or maybe it's an argument for Clinton, who we all know has been making change for 35 years.  Or perhaps he backs Kucinich...

Or Clinton.  Or Edwards.

All are promising to bring change.

Last I checked Obama doesn't own that theme.  It is trotted out in every campaign.

There is enough in Clyburns statement for everyone to find something they like, or to take from it what they will.

When did Obama assume full ownership over the word "change"?

Todd you need to put your love for Obama aside and try to look at things from the planet earth not the moon.

Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying

"remourseful"

That comment did bother me too gladiatorstail.  I thought to myself, what did they have to be "remourseful" about. Maybe you are right! May I am wrong!

Parseth much Todd?

who watched the interview agree completely. J/K.

I think that from some of his statements that he is leaning towards Obama, but that he doesn't want to burn any bridges.

I think he basically ruined any kind of endorsement for Obama when he announced possibly endorsing him to spite Clinton for the NYTimes' faulty reporting of her comments. What kind of endorsement of someone's leadership is it when you gave it not because of your opinion of the man you're endorsing but because you want to punish somebody else?