Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

Watch it HERE.

Update [2007-9-19 17:46:52 by Todd Beeton]: So far, Republican Senators Hagel, Coleman, Sununu, Smith, Snowe and Collins have voted Aye (Lugar, Voinovich and Specter all voted No, not sure if they were among the fence-sitters Democrats were hoping to turn.) Warner voted no as he said he would.

Update [2007-9-19 17:55:39 by Todd Beeton]: Cloture on amendment failed 56-44. "Amendment has been withdrawn." Now they're about to vote on the useless McCain "sense of the senate" amendment. I understand that there was an agreement that this amendment would require 60 votes to pass.

Update [2007-9-19 18:14:31 by Todd Beeton]: The McCain amendment goes down too, 55-45.

Tags: Webb Amendment (all tags)

Comments

20 Comments

Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

It went down 56-44.  Lieberman, of course, voted No.  Can someone give me a good reason he should still be a committee chair????

by minvis 2007-09-19 01:54PM | 0 recs
Until 2008 we need him

After that we need to kick that b*tch to the curb.  

by dpANDREWS 2007-09-19 02:01PM | 0 recs
We don't need him

The senate organizing agreement leaves Democrats in power until 2008, regardless of the actual count.  REPEAT - WE DON'T NEED THAT BACKSTABBING LITTLE PUNK

by DrFrankLives 2007-09-19 02:03PM | 0 recs
How did Dole vote?

??

by DrFrankLives 2007-09-19 02:03PM | 0 recs
Re: How did Dole vote?

Dole voted "no"

by hwc 2007-09-19 02:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

Why does everything take 60 votes?  Perhaps it's time for our own "nuclear option."

by mikelow1885 2007-09-19 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

At least make them filibuster Jimmy Stewart style. As it is, they only have to say,"Nyah! Nyah! Nyah! Takes 60 votes!" and then WALK OUT!!!

This is some sort of "Gentlemen's Agreement" to preserve the "Decorum and Prestige" of the Senate.

I say, "Let's give them a taste of Chicago back alley fighting".

by antiHyde 2007-09-19 02:08PM | 0 recs
Again with 56-44?

Geez that's the buffer i guess...

the other vote went down 56-43... just 4 more guys...

by MrMacMan 2007-09-19 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Again with 56-44?

yeah, this amendment got 56 in July WITH Warner. If Warner had remained supportive, I bet his advocacy could have brought 3 more over for the 60. So much for any boldness or independence that may have come with retirement.

by Todd Beeton 2007-09-19 02:13PM | 0 recs
This sucks. I'm confused.

Why did they need 60 votes?

by bookgrl 2007-09-19 02:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

Nuclear option is sounding more and more appealing. Rethugs don't believe in democracy, or most votes would be 50+1 to pass. And since our Democratic leaders come from the boneless chicken ranch (a la Larson), they don't know how to stand up to the rethugs either. So just why are we NOT forcing them to actually filibuster all these bills? Too much to ask of Reid and Pelosi? Boo hiss to both of them!

by owlskinner 2007-09-19 02:18PM | 0 recs
So, the amendment was filibustered?

by bookgrl 2007-09-19 02:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

Worst Congressional leaders, ever! Operating in tandem with Worst President and administration ever. How lucky can we get?

by owlskinner 2007-09-19 02:20PM | 0 recs
I am not an expert

But didn't leadership change hands in the wake of Jefford's switch?

Or did Jeffords switch before a new Congress was seated?

At any rate I am sure the leadership doesn't want Jomentum out there giving any Zell Miller type speeches at the Repub Convention in '08.  I don't.  It is not helpful.

by dpANDREWS 2007-09-19 02:20PM | 0 recs
Re: I am not an expert

If Joe Weaselman gave a speech at the Republican Convention, it would be a tremendous blessing to the Democrats. Joe is a turncoat! Americans don't like liars and Joe is right up there with his "kissin' cousin" Presidunce George W. Bush. They are BOTH jokes; punchlines; not to taken seriously and most certainly, NOT to be believed!

by randron 2007-09-19 02:28PM | 0 recs
Zell had his impact

It wasn't earth shattering but it had effect.  It gave them a former Dem Senator and Gov. (he was gov of GA I think) to trott out.  The media gave it coverage.  It wasn't helpful.

Not imagine of it was the former VP nominee.  There would be milage there.

by dpANDREWS 2007-09-19 02:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment

When Dems take the Congress in '08 and have a true majority, not dependent on Joe Weaselman or any so-called "moderates,"  I sincerely hope that they will stick it long, hard, and strong to all the closeted, cowardly, duplicitous, lying bastards that call themselves Republicans. How many times do you have to get screwed by these guys before you realize that, in reality, they don't give a damn about America, the troops, justice, fairness, truth, the environment or the Constitution. They are rapists - we are just their victims! The Dems need to STOP crying, "Don't taser me, Bro.," and realize that the only way that will happen is when they start to FIGHT BACK! GIVE NO QUARTER!

by randron 2007-09-19 02:20PM | 0 recs
So no one actually filibustered.

Ok, I officially hate my Party.  Although hates a strong word, but I'm pissed.

by bookgrl 2007-09-19 02:26PM | 0 recs
Thank you

by dpANDREWS 2007-09-19 02:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Webb Amendment Vote Happening Now

And people want to legislatively end the Iraq war? It CANNOT be done.

by RJEvans 2007-09-19 07:41PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------