Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down

The Habeas Corpus Restoration Act cloture vote failed today 56-43 (roll call is HERE. )

The 56 Yeas included every single Democrat in the Senate, Bernie Sanders of VT of course, plus Republicans Chuck Hagel, Dick Lugar, Gordon Smith, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter and John Sununu.

Chris Dodd responds:

"America's moral standing, and with it the security of the United States, suffered another setback today, atop a pile of setbacks that has accumulated over the past six years. The outcome of this vote is both symbolic and tragic. Each of us in the Senate faced a decision either to cast a vote in favor of helping to restore America's reputation in the world, or to help dig deeper the hole of utter disrespect for the rule of law that the Bush Administration has created. Unfortunately, too many of my colleagues chose the latter, and my disappointment runs deep. But I will not rest my case with this vote. Instead, this defeat will only deepen my resolve to restore the rule of law and with it American security, for far too much is at stake - for every American - to simply give up the fight."

This vote demonstrated a remarkable display of unity on the part of Democrats, something not present during the Military Commissions Act vote last year, which passed 65-34. It's also notable that the endangered Smith and Sununu joined with the Democrats on this while Collins and Coleman did not. To no one's surprise, Joe Lieberman voted against cloture and against the constitution.

Tags: Chris Dodd, Habeas Corpus (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down

When are we going to start making the Repubs actually filibuster?

by patricks54 2007-09-19 10:46AM | 0 recs
Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down

Can the Democrats de-caucus Lieberman?  It would be great symbolism, and so far I am not aware of a single bill where it even made a difference that he has caucused with us.  For that he gets an enormously important committee seat?    

by georgep 2007-09-19 10:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down

post 2008, maybe

by sepulvedaj3 2007-09-19 10:51AM | 0 recs
well

Nice theater, but the time to fight was when 40 votes could block the law, not when you need 67 votes to override a veto.

by John DE 2007-09-19 11:32AM | 0 recs
Collins' "popularity" has gone to her

head.  That's all that can explain this vote...ego.

She let her ego get in the way of better judgment.  This is the mark of a politician who is already dead in the water but is too arrogant to see it.  

Susan Collins being a popular woman senator in Maine has made her think she is untouchable like Olympia Snowe (who, btw, is actually pretty far more progressive than Colllins is).  Well, she's not and she's gonna be beat by Allen.

by jgarcia 2007-09-19 11:49AM | 0 recs
Re: Collins' "popularity"

The question is how good of an election issue this is.  It's not as easily demagogued as the opposite side of the issue is ("Democrats want to give constitutional rights to terrorists!").  It's a shameful vote, but I don't really know what the political consequences are.

by Steve M 2007-09-19 12:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Habeas Corpus Goes Down

I am a bit surprised that Collins in Maine and Norm Coleman in Minnesota didn't do what Sununu in NH and Smith in OR did -- try to save their hides by voting "independently" of the Bush party line! Maybe they have a defeat wish.

In fact, I'm a bit surprised that Voinovich didn't vote with us to save his sorry behind, but maybe, seeing the way things are going in Ohio, he figured, Why bother? Do we have a retirement watch list up yet on Senators with terms expiring in 2010?

Anyway, I'm very pleased to see Mary Landrieu voting with the Democratic Party on this one. She takes a lot of heat for being a less than perfect Dem, but she voted opposite from Vitter (R-LA)on this one and I'm proud for her.

by Woody 2007-09-19 12:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down
From reading all these posts by the "loyal" Dem base, all I have is this question.
Why does Reid bother? Doesn't he know that he can't please the little old lefties in tennis shoes?
by spirowasright 2007-09-19 12:44PM | 0 recs
Wrong comparison...

The Specter Amendment to the MCA is closer to what we're talking about.  It had complete Democratic unity - including Lieberman.  We lost him in this vote, and gained just a few Senators (Snowe, Lugar, and Hagel).  The lesson here is, elect more Democrats and get a Democratic President.

An interesting fact is that the vulnerable Senators up this cycle voted in exactly the same manner this year and last.  Both times, Sununu and Smith voted for Specter/Leahy's legislation.

by Ramo 2007-09-19 01:27PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------