Of course an establishment Democrat like Debbie Stabenow will endorse the establishment queen.

You know this might actually work .i.e. Wes Clark for Vice President , never really thought of it that way , why not unite my former choice with the current one , that would really be 2 for 1. Obama's chances have become slimer as a choice for me after this week.

Jim webb has moved up in my book and maybe Clark.

Wrong.  Gore will NOT endorse Hillary.  They haven't even met this year and they had a falling out when Gore ran in 2000.  Apparently, he took credit for Clinton administration high points while criticizing Bill's personal conduct.  That leaves three other possibilities based on Gore's acquaintance with the others: Dodd, Edwards or Obama.  

I'm putting my money on Obama for the Gore endorsement.  Bet on it.

A-Clark opposes/criticizes the Illegal war of Iraq.

B-Hillary Votes for and to fund the ILLEGAL war of Iraq.

C-Clark endorses Hillary clinton.

Something just doesnt seem right about such logic. But hey, who cares that Hillary was a war cheerleader; such thing doesnt seem to matter to democratic voters.

If hillary's the candidate I'll vote for Nader.

I have heard for a long while that there was a problem between Clinton and Gore because when Gore was running in 2000 he would not allow Clinton to campaign for him.  I think it would be a great gesture for Gore to endorse Hillary.  I could see Gore in a Hillary Clinton administration as Head of the EPA. This will be the most important position in her administration and will signal that we are serious about Global Warming.

I watched Carl Bernstein on Bill Maher.  He said nobody expected Hillary to run such a good campaign and he now believes she can and will be President.  With Wes Clark on the ticket its a given.  

Good points.  I hadn't thought of it that way, it's good not to confuse some one's on-line supporters with the candidate.

but Clark was NOT a Bill Clinton appointee.

That's not how it works.

Shali appointed him.

Why is it a good way when it was a given?

Oh yeah, because people will spend it as such, acting like it's "NEWS," even though it's a given.

I guess he and Keith Olbermann can openly kiss Hillary Clinton's behind now with "Clinton Supporter" under their names the next time Clark is a guest on Countdown.

How many times do I have to talk about HILLARY CLINTON'S MEDIA SURROGATES before people accept the fact that THE PRESS has been pushing her from day one.

She doesn't even need to buy ads.  The media establishment is doing all they can to get her endorsed because most of them support her.  

Thanks Clark for just letting us all know, so that we can say it when you are on MSNBC unlike Keith Olbermann, Bill Press, Peter Fein, and even those idiots Paul Begala and James Carville who try and ACT LIKE they are unbiased when they are on CNN.

So, Clark and Hilary Rosen have made it clear that they are supporting Hillary Clinton.

Yet, they are always on MSNBC running their mouths.  Go figure.

GOOD PRESS, EQUALS GOOD POLL NUMBERS.

Good poll numbers beget better poll numbers.

The fix was in a long time ago.

Why is it a good DAY when it was a given?...

She doesn't even need to buy ads.  The media establishment is doing all they can to get her NOMINATED because most of them support her.

I love Wesley Clark.  My fingers a crossed that he becomes the VP candidate.  

Actually, for anyone WITH INTELLIGENCE, they already know why they don't TRUST HILLARY CLINTON on Iraq, and Clark isn't going to change their minds on the issue.

You really dont mean that shit. How's hillary to be trusted the most on Iraq? And please dont give me some agenda-driven poll numbers. Give me specifics.  What has hillary done to be trusted on Iraq? What has she done while in the senate that tells you she's qualified to be commander in chief? Give 10 things she's done that merits her the presidency of the United States.  Fuck it, just give me 5. The woman didnt read the NIE...then goes on the floor of the Senate to talk about the danger of saddam husseim.  Ha ha ha how foolish, the spako.

Remember when they caught saddam and Dean pointed out the obvious that it wouldnt mean shyt? it wasnt the right-wing that went after him....it was hillary, the woman you're saying needs to be trusted on Iraq.

Keep pushing hillary and you'll end up with another republican....and guess what: You will have only yourself to be blamed.

I doubt it.  It won't bring Clinton thousands of anything.

Many of Wes Clark's supporters, as many of us tried to tell them in 2004, were delusional liberals who thought that Clark that Wes Clark was a dream come true -- a progressive Military General.

They love Wes Clark, but they are still, many of them, IDEOLOGICALLY OPPOSED to Hillary Clinton.

They were fooling themselves into believing that Wes Clark actually believes many of the same things they do.  They already know that Hillary Clinton doesn't.

I think many of Clark's supporters will go into hiding for a while and try to figure out what to do next.  I don't think they are going to just follow Clark to Hillary Clinton.

I supported Clark in 04.  His endorsement of Hillary does nothing to make people like me (who actually supported him) sway unto hillary's camp. I dont take marching orders from no candidate....and I bet you most people feel the same way I do.

If I was the other candidates running, I would just be blunt.  

What did anyone suspect.

Anyone who didn't see this endorsement coming is an idiot.

Clinton/Clark sounds good to me.  I am channeling God to please make this happen.

Why doesn't Wes Clark just cut out the crap and say:

"I worked as a General for Bill Clinton.  I liked Bill Clinton.  What did you expect me to do?"

Absolutely expected.

sour grapes? lOL

that will be the default answer for a lot of people, i expected someone to go for a low blow because they  would covet a WC endorsement

Of course they do.

Joe Wilson voted for Dubya in 2000, Dole in 1996, and Bush Sr in 1992 and 1988.

Clark was a Republican who became a Democrat in 2003, just a little while after he was on video praising the Bush policy in Iraq.

Why wouldn't people expect them to endorse Hillary Clinton?  They are disaffected beltway Republicans.  Of course they are going to support the status quo.

I just don't understand why this would surprise ANYBODY.

considering Bush I is the only sitting VP to be elected President since the early 1800s, I think having an open race after 8 years is probably a good thing.

LMAO.   I thought the exact same thing, but you know, the low-info voter theme is reserved for the "unwashed masses."   People like Wes Clark are instead described as sell-outs, fishing for cabinet positions, and the like.    

Well, gee, I don't "know" her. I just know how she voted in '02...nothing courageous about that. And my opinion about her lack of humility is based partly on her refusal to apologize for that vote.

I never said she was a 'vile shrew', I don't think she is a vile shrew...but you have certainly mastered the Republican approach to framing for the opposition.

And, I am really tired of the insults directed to people who are not Clinton supporters. I am not 'deluded.' Can any of you ever try to disagree with a bit of class rather than the manner in which you do?

This was my response at http://securingamerica.com/ccn

I do want to say one thing...

PLEASE DO NOT go to Wes Clark's blog and start trying to "recruit people for Hillary or any other candidate. You WILL be Smacked Down!

Did you expect something different?  He fully expects to be her running mate if she wins the nomination.

This coronation can rot in hell as far as I care.

So, I'm guessing that you could be very happy with a lost House and Senate, and a stolen election in 2008 as well, because that's what you WILL GET with Clinton.

Too bad "YOU PEOPLE" can't see that.

One of the reasons that Clinton will choose Clark if HER CORONATION IS SUCCESSFUL, as I said back in 2005, is because of height.

She's not going to pick any candidate to run with her that towers over her...such is the detailed-oriented, vanity, of her privilege-based campaign.

I don't have any leaders.

WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, are the leaders.

I don't owe Hillary Clinton anything, especially not my support, and I do not support the coronation of a corporate whore.

dem dem sounds like a brainwashed Bush's supporter.

Maybe Bill Maher should ask them about animal farming and global warming.

But, I understand that only the TOUGH QUESTIONS go to John Edwards.

There has been no "Hsu-nami" and anyone who thinks that the mere MENTION of a story constitutes A LOT of negative coverage, must have had never received much punishment as a child.

The media has been pushing Clinton for 9 months, and they haven't piled any negative coverage on her, especially not like they have "GORED" Edwards with fake scandals like they did to Gore in 2000.

Patrick Murphy is a great admirer of Wesley Clark. If Clark had run this time, Murphy would most likely have endorsed him. There is no reason for you to disrespect General Clark. Patrick Murphy wouldn't appreciate it.

Wes Clark's endorsement doesn't change anything.

Anyone endorsing Hillary Clinton doesn't change anything.

During the 1990s, the Clintons took the Democratic Party down a road that led to the loss of Congress and a major change in political philosphy.

Somebody needs to lead the Democratic Party in a different direction, it's not going to be Hillary Clinton.

Wait till you see what she has on Al Gore.