ID-01: Not a Pickup in 2006... But Perhaps in 2008?

Despite the fact that Democrat Larry Grant was outspent by more than a 2-to-1 margin when expenditures by candidates and party committees are included in a district, Idaho 1, that leans significantly towards the Republicans (PVI R+19), Grant only narrowly lost to Republican Bill Sali, 50 percent to 45 percent. In a rematch race this cycle between the freshman Sali and Grant, the political prognosticators seem to be uninterested, with neither The Rothenberg Political Report nor The Cook Political Report (.pdf) rating the contest as either competitive or potentially competitive. But new polling out of the Grant campaign may have the campaign watchers thinking twice. Aaron Blake has the details for The Hill.

Rep. Bill Sali's (R) approval rating is below 30 percent, and his disapproval mark is 46 percent, according to a poll released Monday by one of his opponents, 2006 Democratic nominee Larry Grant.

The poll showed just 29 percent of respondents approved of Sali. Grant was close behind at 28 percent but had a much lower unfavorable rating of 13 percent.

There's no doubt that this is a difficult district for the Democrats to win. The fact that Grant was not able to win this seat even in the Democratic landslide of 2006 is a testament to this fact.

But, amazingly, for as good as 2006 was for Democrats, 2008 could actually be better. Both Democratic polling and non-partisan polling indicate that the electorate is still significantly more disposed to vote Democratic than Republican in Congressional races this cycle. What's more, Democratic party committees have nearly twice the cash-on-hand as do GOP committees, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has close to 10 times the cash-on-hand that the National Republican Congressional Committee now holds, indicating that the Democrats could have significantly more room to help a Larry Grant than Republicans could to help a Bill Sali.

So given this potential environment, the fact that Sali is so remarkably unpopular -- which is unsurprising due to his extremely far right stances which even put him outside of the mainstream of this conservative district -- Grant really may have a shot at winning.

Tags: House 2008, ID-01, Idaho (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

Re: ID-01: Not a Pickup in 2006... But Perhaps in

Glad to see he's giving it another shot. It's races like these that have the potential to invigorate a dormant party structure in states like Idaho, and will ultimately lay the groundwork for the revitalization of such areas. Any word whether the DNC plans to send any field workers out there?

by Max Fletcher 2007-08-07 06:59PM | 0 recs
Re: ID-01: Not a Pickup in 2006... But Perhaps in

Thanks for the coverage, Jonathan.

The DNC added three staffers here in 2005 as part of the 50-state strategy, and I am pretty sure they funded extra field people last year as well. We had by far the best organized GOTV we've had in Idaho in the almost 20 years I've been here. Most notably, we identified 125,000 more Democrats in 2006.

Hopefully, the D-trip will come in far sooner with help. We got a smidge last year, but it was way too little, way too late.

I worked with Grant last year. I'm helping Larry LaRocco kick his U.S. Senate campaign this summer. Both were at YKC. Their ActBlue pages are here:

LaRocco
http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraiser s/17920

Grant
http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraiser s/17921

by Julie Fanselow 2007-08-08 06:16AM | 0 recs
Re: ID-01: Not a Pickup in 2006... But Perhaps in

Wow, very cool. Thanks for the info, and good luck with the campaign!

by Max Fletcher 2007-08-08 01:10PM | 0 recs
2008 is OUR Time

There are a lot of seats that are being overlooked.  Anyone want to guess how much money Kerry spent in states like Indiana?  Wyoming?  Oklahoma?  Not a lot.  That's the thing, people look at these seats in a Kerry VS. Bush 2004 fashion.  A lot of seats may not look winnable, but they are.  We just need to invest where it matters.  I'm starting to think we could make Indiana competitive on a presidential level if we take a strong step forward and attack two Congressional Districts there.  

I have a list of around 20-25 Democrat seats and 40-50 Republican seats we need to invest into deseating.  

Also, we need to make sure we come out of 2008 with 30+ Governors.  From what I have seen, we trade-off Kentucky and Louisiana (Unless we manage to pull off a LA victory, but nobody knows the odds of it).  So we go into 2008 with 28 governor seats.  We have 1-2 seats we need to defend and 2-3 we can attack.  We can then gerrymander (as cheap and political as it gets) to create more opportunities for growing a majority.  

by JeremiahTheMessiah 2007-08-07 08:23PM | 0 recs
Re: 2008 is OUR Time

one hole in your plan is before we get to play with redistricting, we have to go through 2010. Then we have the legislatures to compete with.

Of note; the 2000 redistricting, we had the governorship in MO (I thinkwe had the House as well), and we had the Governorship and House in Indiana but not the senate. North Carolina we had all 3 and still have all three.

While Montana and New Hampshire have had some swings in their state chambers and governors, redistricting has little effect in those states, especially since we now control almost all of New Hampshire. Same goes for Deleware and North Dakota.

I'll laugh if anyone says anything about Utah.

by Trowaman 2007-08-07 09:36PM | 0 recs
Re: 2008 is OUR Time

Going through 2010... I figured that would be a part of it... We could also pickup Minnesota and possibly Nevada governors.  Other than that, I'm not sure.  I haven't gone that far ahead.  I'll have to look into it some more.  

by JeremiahTheMessiah 2007-08-07 09:45PM | 0 recs
Re: 2008 is OUR Time

A look at 2010 Govs:
(I am assuming 2 term limit, someone correct me if this does not apply to any state)
Offense:
MN- term 2 is up for Pawlenty
CA- term 2 is up for Ahnold, word has been circulating about him challenging Boxer (also I just watched T2, AWSOME!)
NV- unpopularity
HI- Term 2 is up for Lingle
TX - Perry is weird. No one likes him but the base. No one knows if he is going for term 3 (no term limits in TX). He can quit and have Hutchison and Lt. Gov. Dewhurst fight it out. Houston Mayor Bill White will go for the dems.
CT - Term 2 is up for Rell
RI - Term 2 is up. Possible bid by Chaffee though (maybe as an independent)

Defense
A LOT! If the two term rule applies we are looking at work in OR, AZ, NM, WY, KS, OK, WI, MI, TN, PA.

At least we got some good heirs in place in some of those states (NM, OR, OK, KS)

All our first term govs look fine, the Spitzer mess should pass long before the election in NY. ME and IL should benefit from not having incumbents on the ballot, but we have some rich benches in those states, no worries mate.

In temrs of redistricting, MN and TX would be great pick ups, as would CA and NV. We need to make sure we hold TN, PA, MI, WI, and AZ.

by Trowaman 2007-08-07 10:49PM | 0 recs
Re: ID-01: Not a Pickup in 2006...

A lot of Idahoans fancy themselves as independent voters, but the reality is they will either hold their nose and vote Repub or stay home.  Grant had a good opportunity in 2006 with the increased likelihood of voters staying home out of disgust with the Republican party and disgust with the divisive Sali nomination.  In 2008, a presidential election year, they will not stay home.  I believe they will hold their nose and vote Sali.  As he represents my district, this makes me sad to say.  Hope I'm wrong.

by my2petpeeves 2007-08-08 10:51AM | 0 recs
Not so sure

More Idahoans consider themselves independent than either R or D. And historically, they come out for presidential years more often than for midterms.

For example, Larry LaRocco won every county in the 1st District in his 1992 House run and outpolled Bill Clinton by tens of thousands of votes. (Perot was a factor, of course.) So Grant may well benefit from that sort of action in 2008, too.

by Julie Fanselow 2007-08-08 01:55PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------