The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nomination

One interesting aspect of the resignation of Alberto Gonzales is the degree to which the potential battle in the senate over his replacement's confirmation will take place against the backdrop of the fight for the Democratic nomination for president. With four current US senators vying for the nomination and Bush's replacement nominee likely to come before the end of the year, the senators would no doubt savor the opportunity to use the battle to win favor with the Democratic base. The value of that opportunity will, of course, depend on who Bush's nominee is.

So it was interesting that, on the heels of CNN's Political Ticker blog's reporting that...

Senior administration officials were quick to tell CNN's Suzanne Malveaux that Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff would likely get the nod.

...Senator Clinton concluded her statement in response to Gonzales's resignation with a not so veiled reference to Chertoff, on whose watch FEMA so tragically failed to respond to Hurricane Katrina:

The second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is one more reminder that the President must appoint someone to lead the Department of Justice with the leadership and competence necessary to defend the Constitution.

CNN is backtracking on the Chertoff story a bit, now reporting that:

Some senior administration officials floated Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff as a possible replacement, but others waved CNN away from Chertoff, saying that his nomination could run into problems because of his role during Hurricane Katrina.

But certainly Clinton's pre-emptive dig at Chertoff signaled that she is ready to take his nomination on. Not only would this fit nicely into the narrative that she's the best candidate to take on the right-wing machine, but it would also serve as sweet revenge.

From The Politicker:

Recall that the former First Lady has a history with Chertoff, who served as the lead G.O.P. Counsel to the Senate committee that investigated Whitewater in the mid-1990s -- and perhaps nothing makes Hillary Clinton more irate than the memory of that probe. Indeed, she cast the lone Senate vote against Chertoff's nomination to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in 2003, citing his Whitewater conduct as her rationale.

If President Bush does nominate Chertoff for Attorney General, Hillary will have plenty of ammunition to go after him, as her Katrina comment today demonstrated. And in going after him, she would undoubtedly score points with the Democratic base (especially if she took a leading role in any nomination fight), thereby burnishing her primary season credentials. At the same time, of course, she'd also be getting even with her old nemesis, especially her effort resulted in the death of his nomination.

Clinton isn't the only one taking advantage of the rumored Chertoff nomination, of course. John Edwards, certainly not one to cede an issue to Senator Clinton, actually turned it into a fundraising ask:

Latching onto press speculation that President Bush will name Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff as Gonzales' replacement, [senior advisor Joe] Trippi warns that Edwards needs his supporters' help to fight such an unacceptable nomination.

"Gonzales is out--but another crony may be on their way in. Help John lead the fight against crony out, crony in at the Justice Department--make a contribution today.," Trippi wrote.

To be honest, I find it hard to believe the Democrats + Lieberman wouldn't be united against Chertoff right off the bat based on his failure during Katrina alone, but certainly the rivals for the Democratic nomination would relish the chance to lead the opposition against him for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that it would present a no-lose opportunity to rally the progressive blogosphere to their side, an opportunity that is actually far more valuable to Clinton at this point than to Edwards.

Update [2007-8-27 20:41:59 by Todd Beeton]: Some other less contentious names that CNN has cited as possible replacement Attorney General nominees include Larry Thompson, "the former deputy Attorney General until 2003, and now a general counsel at PepsiCo Corporation," Ted Olsen, former United States Solicitor General, and George Terwilliger, a former deputy Attorney General.

Tags: 2008 Presidential election, alberto gonzales, attorney general, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Michael Chertoff (all tags)

Comments

21 Comments

They won't open up the Katrina wounds, so

Chertoff ain't going nowhere.

by jgarcia 2007-08-27 04:20PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

Lieberman?  Todd, ya gotta remember that Lieberman was the one who decided NOT to investigate Katrina malfeasance once he became the chair of the Homeland Security Committee.  And keep in mind Lieberman was about the only Democrat that was defending Gonzales.

by BruinKid 2007-08-27 04:29PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

At this point though, think about the politics of defending Chertoff. Hard for me to see even Lieberman going to the mat for him.

by Todd Beeton 2007-08-27 04:48PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

Nah...it's a walkover. HRC will not oppose Mr. SkullFace as that would get her in deep trouble with the Broderites.

Far too 'partisan' you see. 'sides Mr. Decider will do a recess appointment leaving 'Fittin' Harry Reid to gape like beached fish.

Nope. HRC ain't gonna rock the boat for her buds the Republicans.
.

by Pericles 2007-08-27 04:39PM | 0 recs
Propaganda

you're full of shit.  Silly propaganda.

Hillary Clinton was among the first to filibuster BOTH Roberts and Alito...much more important posts than anyone else this joke of a president has appointed to anything.

or are you too frothing at the mouth with rage to even read this?

by jgarcia 2007-08-27 05:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Propaganda

They say one good picture is worth a thousand words....

Here is mine....

And I must say, sir, that you might want to consider gobbling some Xanax for that emotional disorder you appear  to be suffering from.
.

by Pericles 2007-08-27 05:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Propaganda

Hmm, imagine a magazine wanting to do a cover story on a Democratic frontrunner. If Fortune does a story on Hillary, Hillary has to be corporate. If Men's Vogue does a cover story on Edwards, he has to be a fashionista. If Barack Obama appears on the cover of Vibe, he must be an MC. I got it. It's all about iconography for you...

by bowiegeek 2007-08-27 08:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Propaganda

She will vote for Chertoff while  she cast the only Senate vote against Chertoff's nomination to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in 2003? Just because she was on the cover of Fortune?

And what does Obama's cover on GQ tell you?

O dear, not to worry you, but it may be time to ask your doctor if your chlorpromazine shouldn't be changed to fluphenazine or haloperidol

by Ernst 2007-08-28 03:54AM | 0 recs
Re: Propaganda

I'm not worried. It's folks like you who will be suffering mentally if she gets elected.

The point of the cover story, which you missed, is that 'America's CEOs Luvs dem some Hill!'

I wonder why that would be?

NAFTA....

NAU....

More war...

Keep Big Pharma happy...

Keep Big Oil happy...

Nah...not Hillary 'I'm your girl' Clinton!
.
Wake up! Hillary is just about at 'progressive' as her new good friend....

Rupert Murdoch.
.

by Pericles 2007-08-28 05:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Propaganda

Maybe if you read the article instead of just frothing at the cover, you'd see it was about CEOs' relationships with all of the top candidates. Don't think for a second that Hillary is the only one earning the support of top moneymakers in America...

by bowiegeek 2007-08-29 07:00PM | 0 recs
And here it is:

for your edification.

by bowiegeek 2007-08-29 07:00PM | 0 recs
Re: And here it is:

Hah...hah...hah! For my edification...That's rich that is. I think you overlooked something about 'all the top candidate....' Try reading this part

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/f ortune_archive/2007/05/14/100008849/inde x.htm

then cruise over to my humble blog and clik thru on this post:

http://takeaction.wordpress.com/2007/09/ 05/now-this-is-more-like-it/

The simple fact is that Hillary and Obama are corporatist stealth candidates who have very little to offer in the way of radical change because....

The corporations own them and all the bloviating in the world will not change that.

by Pericles 2007-09-06 05:55PM | 0 recs
fight

George W. Bush's days are numbered.I'm not sure how much more damage the next AG can do. Democrats in the Congress need to figure out a way to get something done instead of all out 24/7 wars which in the end will have a collateral damage.

As a Hillary fan, I'm not so eager for her to pick up this symbolic fight...

Just my two cents.

by areyouready 2007-08-27 04:58PM | 0 recs
Re: fight

Disagree.  Chertoff is a political hack who botched up Katrina.  He should not be confirmed as AG.  I'm sure Bush will choose someone else. I doubt he'll want to drudge up Katrina memories.

by bookgrl 2007-08-27 06:02PM | 0 recs
Re: fight

I'm not so sure... If they have something illegal they're covering up, they'll want a loyal and unprincipled hack to keep quiet.

by bowiegeek 2007-08-27 08:16PM | 0 recs
Re: fight

If they have something illegal they're covering up, they'll want a loyal and unprincipled hack that will be confirmed to keep quiet.

I doubt he'll fit the bill.

by Ernst 2007-08-28 03:56AM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

I don't see Chertoff being nominated--Bush could seriously pick just about anyone else on the planet and expect a better reception than him. If he does, Clinton will definitely have her Ace of Spades, and that's at least a couple points in primary polls, plus her cementing her control of the media discourse.

Of course, if by an off chance Chertoff is nominated and competing interests among the Democrats end up getting him through, Clinton will have received a serious blow (as will our legal and judicial system). Again, though, seems unlikely.

by Zephyrus 2007-08-27 05:52PM | 0 recs
The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG

I don't think George Bush should be allowed to have another Attorney General to play with.

The Democrats shouldn't even consider confirming an AG until everyone currently defying subpoenas shows up to testify, in open session, under oath, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

by hwc 2007-08-27 06:03PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG

is part of Rove's strategy to get Hillary nominated.  Despite his leaving the Bush administration, the hand of Rove is still present--the Kennedy switch in Louisiana and this.

He sucked at policy, but he can still influence elections.  

by mikelow1885 2007-08-27 06:08PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

Is Hillary vindictive? The one thing that would persuade me to support her would be for her to hunt down all these fascist dogs and put them in jail.

But I'm afraid that she would sweep it all away as "ancient history" and just focus on increasing outsourcing and corporate profits.

How about it Hillary supporters? Would she do a "Michael Corleone settlement of family business" or not?

by antiHyde 2007-08-27 07:08PM | 0 recs
Re: The Presidential Politics of a Chertoff AG Nom

You are kidding, right?

Hillary was always the bad cop to Bill's good cop.

Hillary Clinton is a total bad ass.

by hwc 2007-08-27 07:19PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------