Why I support John Edwards

Listening to John Edwards speak outside his Des Moines campaign headquarters yesterday, I was as proud as ever to support his candidacy. My reasons for supporting Edwards are too numerous to discuss in one diary, but I want to introduce myself and tell part of that story.

I am a 38-year-old mother of two young boys, living in an older suburb of Des Moines. I grew up here, left Iowa for college, grad school and work, and returned in 2002 when my husband and I were ready to start a family. I've been a Democrat my whole life and been interested in politics since I was a kid. I was proud to fly back to Iowa my freshman year of college to caucus for Paul Simon.

Deciding which candidate to support in a Democratic primary is rarely simple for me. I am not looking for one overriding quality (best policy plans, most reliably progressive, most experienced, best temperament for the job, best ability to communicate, most electable), but for the candidate who has the best combination of these qualities.

I saw most of the Democratic field speak in Iowa more than once in 2002 and 2003. My initial leanings were toward Florida Senator Bob Graham. What he lacked in the charisma/communication department I thought he made up for in other areas. I still think he would have been a good general-election candidate and president. When he failed to catch fire and dropped out of the race early, it took a while for me to decide.

I had ruled out Dean earlier in the year. John Edwards was the best speaker in the field and connected well with audiences. However, I ended up in the John Kerry camp in large part because of his lengthy background (outstanding record on environmental and other progressive issues, Senate Foreign Affairs Committee service). The Edwards campaign of 2003 was touching on a lot of important themes, but I didn't see enough specific proposals about how to address the big problems facing the country.

As I witnessed the tidal wave of momentum toward Edwards in the final weeks before the Iowa caucuses, I noticed a few things. First, when people saw Edwards in person, he was often able to seal the deal, even if people had been leaning toward a different candidate earlier. Second, he seemed to do especially well with suburbanites in their 30s and 40s (a critical swing group). Third, my friends in the sustainable agriculture community told me that he was making the best connection by far with people in the smaller towns and rural areas.

Kerry held on to win Iowa and the nomination. I don't think he ran as bad a campaign as people say he did (and I still think he won Ohio), but no one can deny that his communication problems, and his identity as a northeast liberal, hurt us badly, especially in down-ticket races in much of the country.

Going into this election cycle, I had no idea who I would support for president. I went to hear a lot of the candidates when they came to central Iowa in 2006. When I saw Edwards a couple of times, the way he talked about economic and labor issues caught my attention. I wrote diaries about those speeches here and here.

This diary by RDemocrat lays out a strong case for why Edwards is the best candidate to strengthen organized labor in this country. Academics who study voting behavior have repeatedly shown that belonging to a labor union both makes people more likely to vote and more likely to vote for Democrats.

But those weren't the only things that impressed me when Edwards talked about the disparity between how we tax work and wealth, and the need to strengthen labor unions in this country. He used simple but powerful language. In a different context, I thought jsamuel did a great job articulating Edwards' ability to talk about issues in accessible language:

John Edwards is capable of not only turning progressive ideals into wonderful realistic plans, but he is also capable of advocating for them so that they become mainstream.

Since I decided to support Edwards late last year, he has shown repeatedly that he has outstanding ideas to offer voters, such as:

A detailed, universal health care plan, which has been praised by many who follow this issue closely (including Ezra Klein and Paul Krugman).

An ambitious energy plan, analyzed well here by BruceMcF. He has not just committed to decrease CO2 emissions, he has committed to concrete proposals and is not afraid to say no more subsidies for coal, and no new coal-fired power plants (even when speaking in Marshalltown, Iowa, the site of a proposed new coal-fired power plant).

A detailed proposal to reform the tax system, which would have particular benefits for working people, as RDemocrat has shown.

A commitment to take on abusive lenders, a growing problem.

And of course, a 30-year plan for ending poverty.

Several of Edwards' proposals address issues that particularly important for Democrats as we try to win over swing demographics:

His rural recovery plan addresses the biggest problems affecting those who live in rural or small-town America. In this context, I recommend ManfromMiddletown's excellent diary on electability, complete with lots of maps that show how a candidate who connects well in rural areas puts many more states into play for Democrats.

Edwards' balanced approach to trade is good policy and good politics, which will help in the midwestern swing states.

He has taken a strong stand on food safety and country-of-origin labeling, one of those no-brainers that Congress can't manage to get done because of the undue influence of certain industries. I believe this issue will become more salient, especially with parents of young children.

I have confidence in Edwards' ability to make the case for these policies with the general public as well as with Democrats.

I will write more about Edwards' campaign in Iowa in future posts. For now, I'll just say that as a volunteer precinct captain, I am happy with the resources Edwards has invested in building up an organization here. His focus on substantive, progressive policies is well-suited to the Iowa caucus-goer. His campaign events have been balanced geographically, hitting counties where he did very well in 2004 as well as counties where he will need to improve his showing considerably.

The events have been managed well; yesterday, as I waited with many others in the 90-degree heat to kick off Edwards' bus tour of Iowa, campaign staff repeatedly wandered through the crowd offering cool, bottled water. Those details matter. For more on the first day of the bus tour, see diaries by cosbo and by NCDemAmy (both with video)

Thanks to all who are reading, to Jerome for the invitation to advocate on Edwards' behalf. I look forward to everyone's diaries in this series.

Tags: 2008 elections, Democratic Party, Iowa, John Edwards, president, Primaries (all tags)

Comments

56 Comments

there's so much substance

to your diary like the candidate.

the only thing I'd suggest is the campaign simultaneously work on simple narratives the corporate media can repeat....

by TarHeel 2007-08-14 10:17AM | 0 recs
Re: there's so much substance

agree

by bruh21 2007-08-14 11:06AM | 0 recs
Bingo

None of that high falutin' Senator speak.

by dpANDREWS 2007-08-14 11:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Great work desmoinedem , good work . I will gladly work my butt off for him if he wins even though he is not my choice in the primary.

by lori 2007-08-14 10:19AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Very gracious comment, Lori.  Clinton supporrters should be proud of you, for you exemplify the best with that comment.  I also will work for Senator Clinton is she is nominated.  

by TomP 2007-08-14 11:09AM | 0 recs
I'll also do GOTV work for our nominee

whoever it is. I've volunteered for plenty of candidates I didn't support in the primaries.

Hell, Kerry was the first candidate I ever supported who actually won the presidential nomination, and my favorite candidates for Iowa governor haven't won any primaries here.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:11AM | 0 recs
Yes, those

people who worry about the flame wars and such don't understand politics. When this is said and done, we'll all get behind whoever's the nominee. After the intitial disappointment of seeing our candidate lose, we'll set about the business of kicking GOP ass.

Great diary, Desmoines Dem, I like diaries that have a personal angle, and you've solidified your standing as an especially astute, level-headed blogger.

I also like that you mention his rural strategy--it can't be mentioned too much. I think his appeal to rural voters could help enormously in a general election.

by david mizner 2007-08-14 02:40PM | 0 recs
Why I don't support John Edwards

Hillary Clinton will win the nomination. Take it to the bank.

by joliepoint 2007-08-14 10:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I don't support John Edwards

joliepoint - what I AM taking to the bank, is that you won't be writing the Hillary diary here :)

by catchawave 2007-08-14 10:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I don't support John Edwards
You are right. I can't even write a simple declarative sentence.
But I can read polls.
by joliepoint 2007-08-14 11:10AM | 0 recs
I guess you were reading polls in Nov. 2003

that showed Kerry and Edwards had no chance to catch Dean nationally or in the early-voting states.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:18AM | 0 recs
Re: I guess you were reading polls in Nov. 2003

At the time I did notice that Dean's numbers were broad but very thin. Hillary has a more experienced crew running her campaign that Dean had.

by joliepoint 2007-08-14 11:26AM | 0 recs
Re: I guess you were reading polls in Nov. 2003

But...if I am wrong, I will be the first to bring freshly baked cupcakes to your celebration party.

by joliepoint 2007-08-14 11:31AM | 0 recs
Re: I guess you were reading polls in Nov. 2003

Yeah, experienced at Union-busting...

Experienced at 'blurring the lines'..

Experienced at 'bi-partisanship'....

But best of all experienced at really, really communicating with The Hill's real base.

I can do without that.

Oh....Oh.....Oh! Don't forget her experience with health-care reform and....

NAFTA.

by Pericles 2007-08-14 03:18PM | 0 recs
Uhh?

So you're biggest concern in the primary is making sure you vote for the winning candidate?  Why?  If you think it's a foregone conclusion shouldn't you just support the candidate who you like the best/whose policies agree with you the most?  

by telephasic 2007-08-14 11:41AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Great diary, desmoinesdem.  You articulated a lot of reasons that I support John Edwards.  

by TomP 2007-08-14 10:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Thanks, desmoinedem.  I am often asked why I support Edwards and I give a short highlights explanation.  From now on, when asked, I'll make sure I have the person's email and I'll link them to your post.  Great job.

How does his field operation in Iowa compare -- so far -- to Obama's and Clinton's?

by Arthurkc 2007-08-14 10:26AM | 0 recs
he's building a strong ground game

Edwards and Clinton have about the same number of field offices (14 or 15), and Obama has more (28) in Iowa.

Months ago Edwards announced volunteer co-chairs in each of Iowa's 99 counties--most counties have two of those, the bigger counties more.

I went to a meeting for precinct captains at campaign HQ not long ago. Someone who worked on the Edwards campaign in Iowa four years ago was joking about how the field organizer for Council Bluffs had all of his identified supporters entered into his cell phone. That's how far back they were organizationally.

The field organizers have been hard at work lining up volunteer precinct captains and identifying supporters and leaners. I know the other campaigns are doing the same kind of work (I've been called by field organizers for everyone except Gravel and Kucinich), but I don't know who has the biggest volunteer army so far.

I can tell you that the people I know personally who were precinct captains in the Des Moines area for Kerry, Edwards, Dean or Kucinich in 2003/2004 are either supporting Edwards, Obama or are undecided. The people I know who support Clinton write checks but do not a lot of phone banking and door-knocking for their candidates.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:24AM | 0 recs
Re: he's building a strong ground game

expect Obama to have more than expected.

by wiretapp 2007-08-14 12:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Smart and heartfelt diary, thank you so much for sharing what inspires me too...Edwards' intelligence, vision and communication skills :)

by catchawave 2007-08-14 10:29AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Good diary.

I like Edwards' populist message but I have some reservations about him as well.

Anyway, good job.

by Bush Bites 2007-08-14 10:30AM | 0 recs
Nice diary.

I like John Edwards, and whomever wins he has ben excellent at shaping the election. I will happily work my butt off for him should he get the nod.

by bookgrl 2007-08-14 10:35AM | 0 recs
yes, tough primaries are good

Last year my preferred candidate, Ed Fallon, did not win the nomination for Iowa governor, but his presence in the race was a good influence on Chet Culver, who ended up winning.

I will support any Democratic nominee against any Republican for sure.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:25AM | 0 recs
good job,

desmoinesdem

by iamready 2007-08-14 10:39AM | 0 recs
Great diary dmdem...

you pretty much summed up my support for John.  

by cosbo 2007-08-14 10:39AM | 0 recs
Re: Great diary dmdem...

Very nicely done.  An example of how supporting a candidate does not require deconstructing another.  Still he needs more money, media, and less of his Wife taking to the airwaves.  She is just smothering his message, and is not all that affable.  Sorry, just the word I am getting in MO, where he currently sits second behind Hillary.

by Todd Bennett 2007-08-14 10:54AM | 0 recs
Must disagree

with your critcism fo Elizabeth Edwards and your choice of the term "smothering."

As for Elziabeth Edwards' "affability," I find her extremely likeable.  But more importantly, she is smart and right on the key issues facing America.  John is a fortunate man to have a spouse as smart and strong as she is.  She has faced difficulties in her life, rejected bitterness, and embraced compassion.  She is a fundamentally good person.  I believe your criticism is misplaced.

by TomP 2007-08-14 11:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Must disagree

We do indeed disagree.  She comes off as a know-it-all to some I have talked to, including my own Mom who loves John as a candidate.  She probably is a good person, and maybe she should take over as his communications director because she can grab media.  However it is getting to the point where I am wondering who is running.  Her or him.

by Todd Bennett 2007-08-14 11:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Gee, can we get one more pro-John Edwards diary posted on the front page? Please?!?!?

by AC4508 2007-08-14 10:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Don't you read what Jerome wrote?  Stop whining and pay attention.

Front page stories by partisan diarists:  Mondays are for Clinton, Tuesdays - Edwards, Wednesdays - Obama, and Thursdays - Richardson and Dodd.

by pioneer111 2007-08-14 10:57AM | 0 recs
Thanks for the hon. mention

Glad you liked it!  Thanks for this great post!

by jsamuel 2007-08-14 10:45AM | 0 recs
Re: Thanks for the hon. mention

Good diary

by BDM 2007-08-14 10:59AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Fabulous post on your journey to supporting Edwards.  I concur that the diaries you linked to are excellent.  I went through a journey from Gore to Clark to Edwards.  I still like Gore and Clark but I don't think either has the fire in the belly to really campaign at this time.  I think Edwards is the people's populist.

Well done, demoinesdem.  I look forward to your next diaries.

by pioneer111 2007-08-14 11:00AM | 0 recs
I was waiting for Gore for a lot of 2006

but I think he is playing an important role where he is now.

I wonder how Clark would have done in IA if he'd gotten in the race earlier in 2003. By the time he declared it was too late to put together a strong organization here, and he didn't try.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:13AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Both you and David have provided great diaries. Thank you.

One question- do you think Edwards message will gain traction? If so- how?

by bruh21 2007-08-14 11:09AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

In campaign history candidates that are behind feel it is necessary to knock down some of the leaders' points. Translation: Edwards may have to consider going negative and that may cause problem now and in the future. It's a hard call. Hillary wouldn't hesitate if she was behind. Infact she doesn't hesitate even when she is way ahead.

by joliepoint 2007-08-14 11:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

I hav eno problem with him going negative. In fact, one of my issues is that neither he or Obama are making much efforts to define Clinton. They do the first half- define themselves, but then give a pass to let Clinton say "I am too" when its convenient to her efforts.

by bruh21 2007-08-14 11:28AM | 0 recs
Edwards can catch Obama. Thats for sure.

Edwards can put Obama away in the next 45 to 60 days.  It looks like he has refocused his campaign.  The question is will he stop shooting himself in the foot and will he take his wife out of the spotlight an put himself in it.  

There is no reason for Edwards to run as poorly as he has run, other than he has run an awful campaign to date.  People are not focused, as you are, on his issues, but instead in his wife, Ann Coulter, haircuts, houses, book deals, etc.

by dpANDREWS 2007-08-14 11:11AM | 0 recs
no one is putting Obama away

He'll have plenty of money to get a message out and put foot soldiers on the ground (in addition to the volunteers).

I disagree with you on the Edwards campaign--I think the media have continually put the focus on trivia rather than the substance Edwards has been talking about. He has never been a favorite with the beltway boys and girls.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:15AM | 0 recs
That is what the media does, like it or not.

We have to read that Bill is in Paris partying this week, or that Bill and Hillary only spend a few nights a month in the same house, or that Obama invested in some stocks, or made a complicated deal on his home, involving a sponsor of his, etc., etc.

A good campaign does their best to avoid or at least diffuse this type of coverage and get their message out.  The Edwards camp has been sidetracked from their message too often, and at time, such as with the Coulter thing, has seemed to welcome the distraction.

by dpANDREWS 2007-08-14 11:22AM | 0 recs
Re: no one is putting Obama away

Have to disagree. At the end of the day- Edwards job both now and in the general is to control the message. We can not simply blame the media. His campaign must be thinking of ahead of them.

by bruh21 2007-08-14 11:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Good diary. Well done.

by georgep 2007-08-14 11:13AM | 0 recs
Very gracious

comment, George.  Thank you for adding to the level of discourse here.  Good diary yesterday.  

by TomP 2007-08-14 11:15AM | 0 recs
I think people like him a lot

There are a huge number of Edwards leaners around here. Most Iowans like to take their time and make up their minds later in the campaign, but I think people recognize that he is talking about the important issues.

A lot of people are trying to decide between Edwards and some other candidate. The debates and campaign rallies down the stretch will determine who can seal the deal with these voters.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

I posted this comment a while back I think I posted it a little too late and didn't too much feedback. Posting it again to see if you all have comments.

I like Edwards but I am a little puzzled by the amount of enthusiasm he has generated here and on Daily Kos. The reason being, that I don't remember his senate record being stellar (in terms of accomplishments) or very liberal. I intend to do some more research on this but I thought I'd post this comment to see if anyone else has done it already. In fact, one of the first links that I came across is from media matters and I'm including an extract here.

As Media Matters for America previously noted, although National Journal's 2003 vote ratings of senators placed Edwards fourth, that rating was based on only 40 of Edwards's Senate votes during 2003 and is not representative of his more moderate lifetime Senate voting record. In fact, as National Journal congressional reporter Richard E. Cohen pointed out in a July 9 article, Edwards's average National Journal "liberal score" during his five years in the Senate (1999-2003) is 75.7 percent, "a number that puts him in the moderate wing of his party," and is almost 20 points lower than the 2003 rating that Republicans are touting with the help of the conservative media. National Journal's Cohen also noted that in 1999, Edwards's National Journal "liberal score" placed him as the 31st most liberal senator, in 2000, Edwards ranked 19th, in 2001, he ranked 35th, and in 2002, he ranked as the 40th most liberal among all senators -- 15 to 36 spots lower than "the fourth most liberal senator" label that Republicans and the conservative media are pushing. As Cohen wrote, "From 1999 to 2002, Edwards had ranked among the more conservative Democratic senators. In 2002, only 11 of the 50 Senate Democrats voted more conservatively."

Maybe it is because he was representing NC? I don't know. Any thoughts?

URL for the extract: http://mediamatters.org/items/2004071200 04

by scriberal 2007-08-14 11:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

I think it is the NC consideration.

by bruh21 2007-08-14 12:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

David had an excellent diary on just this topic: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/14/ 12235/5740

by clarkent 2007-08-14 05:40PM | 0 recs
Wonderful Diary

You hit on my many positive feelings about Edwards and if he does not become the nominee you can bet I will be supporting whoever is.  We will fly United in 2008!

Please consider an Edwards donation at my Actblue page:

http://www.actblue.com/page/markforedwar ds

Also visit my other House of Reps page for consideration as we reform congress and te Democratic Party!

by politics64 2007-08-14 11:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards
I am a new leaning-to-Edwards person. My biggest reason is I believe he will have the positive qualities of LBJ, mostly, his policies are concrete and have a realistic chance of becoming legislation. His health care plan paticularly- forcing private insurers to put up or shut up, would be hard for all but the most conservative repubs to vote against, and most of his plans have this same built in feature. He knows without the first step there is no second step, and is willing to go there without selling his soul.
by dhooters 2007-08-14 12:33PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

LBJ?

Wow. That's a comparison I never would imagine. I recommend strolling over to the C-SPAN site and listening to a few hours of LBJ presidential tapes from the Oval Office. LBJ was a real piece of work! They don't make politicians like that anymore. He could strongarm a recalcitrant Congressman like nobody's business. Love it.

by hwc 2007-08-14 02:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Excellent diary.  Though I support another candidate, I think you've really hit on a number of Edwards's strengths, included his outstanding and detailed policy proposals on a number of topics.  I'll look forward to reading your diary next week too.

by markjay 2007-08-14 02:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

Very nice. You are my kind of Democrat, and a perfect example of why I put my trust in the well informed voters of Iowa. When it comes to politics, Iowa leads the Nation.

by hanna 2007-08-14 04:16PM | 0 recs
"I had ruled out Dean"

A curious statement (with no explanation) considering you now support the candidate who sounds the most like Dean did in 2003. Edwards's message today is a combination of his economic populist message of 2004 and Dean's message of grassroots empowerment from that campaign. Edwards has even brought Joe Trippi into his campaign this time....

I still support a potential Gore entry into the race because I believe he has the knowledge of government and personal statesmanship that will be needed to actually accomplish the kind of change Edwards (and Gore) has been talking about. I do give Edwards credit for showing that he understands the magnitude of the problems we face and the need for grassroots action to help solve them.

by Jim in Chicago 2007-08-14 09:27PM | 0 recs
I knew someone would bring that up!

I don't have time to go into the full explanation now. I always liked Dean, ever since I saw him speak at the Jefferson Jackson dinner in fall 2002. He wasn't my first choice for president for several reasons. Maybe I will get to that in another diary about running a campaign in Iowa.

I do think he's doing a great job at the DNC, for what it's worth.

by desmoinesdem 2007-08-14 11:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards, Me too

Excellant compilation of Edwards position. Very well laid out, WE will do great in Iowa!!!!

by gasperc 2007-08-15 05:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Why I support John Edwards

I couldn't agree more with this diary. Poverty is the biggest reason why I'm supporting Edwards. There's also an interesting and balanced article I recently read on John that can be found here:

www.mensvogue.com/business/politics/feat ure/articles/2007/06/john_edwards

by suzenews 2007-08-27 08:24AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------