Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

Minnesota Campaign Report's Joe Bodell has an excellent recap of the House Financial Service Committee's Thursday hearing on Predatory Lending, held in Minneapolis.  

From Bodell's post:


Chairman Frank noted in his opening remarks that "foreclosures are not occurring in little houses on the prairie -- they're happening in neighborhoods." He went on to discuss the issue of the unregulated, non-FDIC mortgage market, saying that "if only regulated banks made mortgage loans, we might not have this problem -- this is largely a problem in the unregulated segment of the mortgage market."

Predatory lending has been all over the news this week, but the MSM seems mostly interested in how the rapidly rising number of foreclosures will affect the market overall.  Not much is being said about the families and individuals who stand to lose their homes.  The committee hearing however focused more on the human element of this probable financial crisis.

Many panelists focused pointed questions on Dick Todd of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve.  Ellison asked whether the Fed has a role in regulating so-called "exotic" mortgage produts, and Todd responded that while the local Fed branch can write rules governing such products, it cannot enforce those rules.

Sharon Glover of Golden Valley told her tale:  she made an accident getting into a refinancing deal in which she extracted no equity, never received loan documentation, and her payments increased drastically twice:  once when her loan was refinanced and again when her loan was sold to another lender, Ocwen.  She said she never missed a payment, but nevertheless was  served with a foreclosure notice.  "I was planning to sell the house anyway because it had become too much for one person, but I hadn't planned to lose everything." She detailed the predatory practices undertaken by the mortgage lender, who was forced to withdraw the sheriff's sale on her home when her lawyer presented the company with a class action lawsuit.

I'm not a financial analyst so I have no idea if a crash is imminent or what its affects will be on markets worldwide.  What worries me is that the needs of home owners who bought or refinanced into sub-prime loans will get lost in the shuffle.    We can't count on corporate interests concerning themselves with  individual losses, but government at the federal and state level can and should be advocates for those who stand to lose their homes.  

Hillary Clinton released her plan to fight the effects of predatory lending this week and Chris Dodd responded by releasing a time line of his own efforts.  I expect that in 2008 predatory lending will become a key issue for Democratic candidates from the Presidency down to State House seats across the country.  Sub-prime mortgages won't always be front page news but the increase in foreclosures will have long term effects for families and communities.  Voters will be pressing candidates to offer a solution.  
 

Tags: Congress, House Financial Service Committee, MN, subprime loans (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

Re: Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

Hopefully this will get the attention it actually deserves now that the hedge funds and stock market have been affected.

by Max Fletcher 2007-08-11 09:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

It's interesting.  I wonder what took HRC and Dodd so long.  Is it because CT and NY aren't as affected as other regions?  These are exactly the type of issues Edwards is talking about.  I know plenty of blogs have been on this issue for months.  Anyone with the slightest knowledge of economics could see the housing crash coming.  Especially hearing about all the exotic loans, with no money down and teaser rates.  What exactly is HRC gonna do?  After all, as  Fortune says, Wall Street loves HRC.  She can't let them down now, can she?

by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle 2007-08-11 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

Good.  I'm glad everyone is talking about this.  We're facing a foreclosure crisis mostly in high risk areas to begin with, but even among some middle class homeowners because of disruptions in employment, which have become increasingly common.

 

by bookgrl 2007-08-11 10:11AM | 0 recs
Here's the big issue in a nutshell:

The Chinese used to be the biggest purchaser of the loan contracts from Fannie and Freddie. However, starting about five years ago - after the Bush tax cuts went through, exploding the deficit - the Chinese started to sell because of the falling dollar. Now, they are speeding up dumping those loans and NOT buying any more new ones.

Our government's deficit and heavy borrowing (again, this problem could be made a lot better by getting rid of Bush's tax cuts, though not completely solved) has led to a cheaper dollar which is killing the profits for the Chinese investments and even making them lose money on their dollar-denominated holdings, including those mortgage contracts from Freddie and Fannie. Thus, we are in a Catch-22: we have to raise interest rates to combat the falling dollar, which fucks the ARM-holders, second and third mortgage holders, and new potential buyers, OR, if we don't and we cut interest rates, we ensure that China continues its exodus OUT of dollar-denominated holdings...not only these mortgage contracts, but even T-bills. Scary.

However, the government could strengthen the dollar without the Fed having to raise interest rates (and even may be able to lower them some) by ending Bush's tax cuts. This would lower the deficit and may even create a surplus in a few years. One other way we could lower the deficit is to STOP SPENDING ALL THIS FUCKING MONEY IN IRAQ AND END THE FUCKING WAR!!!

by jgarcia 2007-08-11 11:16AM | 0 recs
Re: Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

First, I have no sympathy at all for those who tried to get rich quick by "flipping" houses with no money down interest only variable rate mortgages. They were gambling and lost. It's as simple as that.

As for the other category of sub-prime loans, namely borrowers with shaky credit records buying homes to live in, I do have sympathy. But the current crisis does not affect them any more than if it did not occur. Either they can make the payments or they can't. If they can't make the payments due to job loss or health care, how is that different from homeowners who were prime borrowers and then lost their jobs or got sick?

The goal of a home for eveyone is worthy, but has no connection with the bursting of a speculative bubble.

by antiHyde 2007-08-11 04:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Goverment and Sub-Prime Mortgages

Because this administration has ignored domestic policy for the past 7 years we are in deep doo doo.  Everytime the dems want to talk about domestic issues.  Bush talks terror.  It reminds me of a mother-in-law who always feigns illness to keep her son from living his own life.

by changehorses08 2007-08-11 07:57PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------