Presidential Candidates Respond UPDATED

From CNN's Political Ticker (h/t BlueDiamond in the comments)

Sen. Barack Obama
"This decision to commute the sentence of a man who compromised our national security cements the legacy of an Administration characterized by a politics of cynicism and division, one that has consistently placed itself and its ideology above the law. This is exactly the kind of politics we must change so we can begin restoring the American people's faith in a government that puts the country's progress ahead of the bitter partisanship of recent years."

Sen. Joe Biden
"Last week Vice President Cheney asserted that he was beyond the reach of the law. Today, President Bush demonstrated the lengths he would go to, ensuring that even aides to Dick Cheney are beyond the judgment of the law. It is time for the American people to be heard -- I call for all Americans to flood the White House with phone calls tomorrow expressing their outrage over this blatant disregard for the rule of law."

Former Sen. John Edwards
"Only a president clinically incapable of understanding that mistakes have consequences could take the action he did today. President Bush has just sent exactly the wrong signal to the country and the world. In George Bush's America, it is apparently okay to misuse intelligence for political gain, mislead prosecutors and lie to the FBI. George Bush and his cronies think they are above the law and the rest of us live with the consequences. The cause of equal justice in America took a serious blow today."

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson
"It's a sad day when the President commutes the sentence of a public official who deliberately and blatantly betrayed the public trust and obstructed an important federal investigation," said Governor Richardson. "This administration clearly believes its officials are above the law, from ignoring FISA laws when eavesdropping on US citizens, to the abuse of classified material, to ignoring the Geneva Conventions and international law with secret prisons and torturing prisoners.

There is a reason we have laws and why we expect our Presidents to obey them. Institutions have a collective wisdom greater than that of any one individual. The arrogance of this administration's disdain for the law and its belief it operates with impunity are breathtaking.

Will the President also commute the sentences of others who obstructed justice and lied to grand juries, or only those who act to protect President Bush and Vice President Cheney?"

mcjoan has Sen. Chris Dodd's response:

"By commuting Scooter Libby's sentence, the President continues to abdicate responsibility for the actions of his Administration. The only ones paying the price for this Administration's actions are the American people."

TPM's Election Central is updating with statements as they're released. So far, it looks as though the only Republican to respond is Fred Thompson with a typically glib:
I'm very happy for Scooter Libby.
Update [2007-7-2 20:14:47 by Todd Beeton]:: Still no statement from the Clinton campaign but TPM has this update (h/t Doug Dilg in comments):
It's been about two hours since the Scooter Libby pardon, and Hillary Clinton's campaign has still not released a comment regarding the Scooter Libby commutation. Election Central has called them three times in the last hour, and we still have not received any statement from them. We have been told that one is forthcoming, but they do not know when it will be ready.
And as for McCain:
Election Central just sent an e-mail to John McCain campaign spokesman Danny Diaz, asking if the Senator has any comment on the Libby commutation. His reply: "Nope."
Update [2007-7-2 21:11:36 by Todd Beeton]:: Sen. Hillary Clinton's response c/o TPM (h/t bebe in the comments.)
"Today's decision is yet another example that this Administration simply considers itself above the law. This case arose from the Administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies. Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice."

Tags: Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, joe biden, John Edwards, Scooter Libby (all tags)

Comments

76 Comments

Any statement from Hillary? n/t

by rashomon 2007-07-02 03:33PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

I checked her website. I can't find it. Take a look and see if you see it. It's a little too "busy" for me.

LOL

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 03:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

Hillary is currently getting ready to speak in Iowa at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. I expect that she will issue her statement from that venue.

by DoIT 2007-07-02 03:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

It will be interesting , as others have pointed out, she dodged this question when it was asked of her by Chris Matthews.

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 03:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

other presidential candidates were also in the midst of their campaigns

by bruh21 2007-07-02 03:49PM | 0 recs
That's OK

She had to carry the water unassisted on the Fred Thompson anti-Cuban slurs last week. Let some of the other Democrats do a little lifting in the campaign.

by hwc 2007-07-02 03:52PM | 0 recs
Re: That's OK

No thanks- if she wants to President- that means leadership. If she can't handle the small stuff, I don't trust her on the big. It's really that simple. But please feel free to spin (unless of course you are joking- and then you can do that too).

by bruh21 2007-07-02 03:54PM | 0 recs
Re: That's OK

Better to have "no comment" by Hillary Clinton, than to be like Bush and feed the public lies and inaccuracies and garbage and stupidity.

It sure was a stupid, but typical move by Bush.  Wonder if he's going to pardon Abramoff too???

by Cher 2007-07-02 04:51PM | 0 recs
Re: That's OK

Actually no - sorry spin isn't going to work here. When people show you who they are- believe it. And she's showing us her character.

by bruh21 2007-07-02 05:01PM | 0 recs
Re: That's OK

Wow, she denounced racial slurs? All by herself?? That's so brave. She's really going out on a limb with that one...

by Max Fletcher 2007-07-02 04:21PM | 0 recs
Re: That's OK

It was a pretty major gaffe on Thompson's part. Florida will probably decide the 2008 election. It would have been nice to have some of the other Democratic candidates assisting in building the story.

by hwc 2007-07-02 04:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

When does she go on stage, do you know? I.E. if she is planning to make her statement from the Iowa State Fairgrounds event, when should we expect that statement to be available by?

by Silent sound 2007-07-02 04:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Any statement from Hillary? n/t

Just wow.

by Rt hon McAdder esq KBE 2007-07-02 03:58PM | 0 recs
HILLARY"S STATEMENT

 "Today's decision is yet another example that this Administration simply considers itself above the law. This case arose from the Administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies. Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice."

by bebe 2007-07-02 04:53PM | 0 recs
Re: HILLARY"S STATEMENT

Who cares anymore, Bush has demonstrated once again that he has no regard for the law, the constitution, or our civil liberties.

Until any candidate from the legislative branch accepts there own constitutional duty to impeach this President and VP, I have far less than zero interest in any of the hot air.

by BeekerDynasty 2007-07-02 05:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Where's Hillary's statement?...I remember her refusing to answer Matthews question about this issue...What is she afraid of?

I think Mike penn did some polling and found out that the right position is to not take a position on this issue.

by JaeHood 2007-07-02 03:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

I think Mike penn did some polling and found out that the right position is to not take a position on this issue.

Considering that every single other real* candidate DID take a position immediately, that's actually a very STRONG position to be taking if that's the path they actually take...

* Not Kucinich or Gravel

by Silent sound 2007-07-02 03:59PM | 0 recs
Perjury and Obstruction of Justice

will remind people in Iowa of monica lewinsky.

Plus Carville AND Fred Thompson are both part of the Libby defense fund.

Very awkward for team Hillary.

Not exactly the rollout you want particularly if the media is as mean to her as they are to Edwards.

If they were EVERY story about perjury and obstruction of justice would have some Republican talking about Bubba

by TarHeel 2007-07-02 04:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Perjury and Obstruction of Justice

will remind people in Iowa of monica lewinsky.

I'm not sure she can prevent this by just avoiding talking about it. By not saying anything she just calls attention to herself on this issue...

Let's see what she says when she gets on stage in Iowa.

Plus Carville AND Fred Thompson are both part of the Libby defense fund.

I'm sorry, maybe I just misunderstand you-- is there some connection between Hillary Clinton and Fred Thompson?

by Silent sound 2007-07-02 04:34PM | 0 recs
they're potential opponents

for the presidency..

by TarHeel 2007-07-02 04:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Wrnog again:

""Today's decision is yet another example that this Administration simply considers itself above the law. This case arose from the Administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies. Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice."

by georgep 2007-07-02 05:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

"I remember her refusing to answer Matthews question about this issue."

Actually I think you might remember the crowd loudly criticizing the question before Hillary had an opportunity to answer.

If you want your opinion to mean something more than just hot air contributing to global warming then please state facts.

by DoIT 2007-07-02 06:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Actually she stalled. The crowd reaction got stronger as she gave some bullshit answer about how this is not the kind of question appropriate for this venue and crowd. Forget her exact words. But it was something along those lines.

This candidate cannot even give a simple answer immediately on a  slam dunk answer. Is she going to govern like this - do polling after  being confronted with every tough issue>? I can see her tackle a response to another 9-11 like this - "Hey people, should we send fighter jets to take down two hijacked planes? Do research and get back to me. THen we will decide what to do, even if it may end up beign too late"

by Pravin 2007-07-02 06:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

As I said- this was one of those freebies and she waited hours to respond. To me it says all I need to know about a Clinton presidency.

by bruh21 2007-07-02 07:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Interesting.  It is exactly the "slam-dunk" answers when others hem and haw that is winning the debates for her every single time.  People are looking at it and they see apprehension, even comical answers from others.  

Q: What would you do in the first 100 days of your presidency

Slam-dunk:  "End the war in Iraq"

Hem-haw:  Travel around the globe, restore good-will, etc.

by georgep 2007-07-03 05:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

John Edwards: "president clinically incapable"

HAHA!

by jsamuel 2007-07-02 03:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

I think he was trying to state , as kindly as possible, that George Bush is in fact, mentally challenged.

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 03:44PM | 0 recs
25th amendment

Time for the 25th Amendment!

by Alice Marshall 2007-07-02 03:47PM | 0 recs
Re: 25th amendment

LOL

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

It's interesting what they epmhasize, they are similar, but their are definitely subtle differences.  Notice that Edwards and Obama both stay with their central themes:

Edwards emphasizes "equal justice" harkening to the Two Americas

Obama: "politics of cynicism and division" harkening to New Politics

by MassEyesandEars 2007-07-02 03:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

I did notice that.

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 03:43PM | 0 recs
Howard Dean's statement for the DNC

also talked about equal justice

by TarHeel 2007-07-02 04:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

exactly. hrc's silence and not saying anything thus far is to me equally telling

by bruh21 2007-07-02 03:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Telling of what? That with an appearance until 3:30 in Phila and another at 7:30 in Iowa, the Clintons were probably in an airplane when Bush pardoned Libby at 5:40 pm?

by hwc 2007-07-02 04:21PM | 0 recs
Except that doesn't

explain why she refused to answer the question at the last debate when she WAS there..

to pretend that their campaign has not before now discussed this assumes we are low information voters (snark)

by TarHeel 2007-07-02 04:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Except that doesn't

Don't corner them. They'll bite.

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 04:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Except that doesn't

She did answer Matthews' question. She said that there would be plenty said on that topic without her adding to it.

by hwc 2007-07-02 04:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Except that doesn't

Thats an acceptible answer in your mind? Really??

What she meant by that was this:

"I don't want to answer this question because it may bring up some embarassing moments regarding my self and my husband."

by JDF 2007-07-02 04:40PM | 0 recs
matthews even said

that's a political answer.

and she waved her head showing she knew that too

by TarHeel 2007-07-02 04:46PM | 0 recs
Re: matthews even said

Considering the statement that was just released, it is very obvious that you have been chasing a strawman for a week now  .  

Here it is again:

""Today's decision is yet another example that this Administration simply considers itself above the law. This case arose from the Administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies. Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice."
 

by georgep 2007-07-02 05:06PM | 0 recs
Re: matthews even said

It took her campaign a few hours to come up with that?????  A freaking leader should be able to come up with something more from the heart in minutes. Are you seriously telling me this was not the major news of the day that it took her that long to draft a fucking statement of what is not exactly a shcoking turn of events when one knows what BUsh was going to do eventuall.

by Pravin 2007-07-02 06:51PM | 0 recs
Re: matthews even said

They were in transit when the issue hit, according to hwc even in mid-air.   I guess you rather bash than look at an issue reasonably.

Oh, and her statement was a lot better than what Obama came up with.  "Bitter partisanship?"   Way to ONCE AGAIN include BOTH parties when a strong condemnation of Bush alone was called for.  

by georgep 2007-07-03 05:06AM | 0 recs
Re: matthews even said

spin you spin right round baby spin right round

by bruh21 2007-07-02 07:10PM | 0 recs
Re: matthews even said

"Like a record baby round round round round."

Now THAT should be her Campaign song.

by FreedomOFSpeechFromTheDNC 2007-07-02 09:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Except that doesn't

Yes. Absolutely acceptable at an AFSCME rally where they were interested solely in questions that pertain to their interests.

by bowiegeek 2007-07-03 11:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Look at the update: Per Camp Clinton

A response is supposedly "forthcoming"

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 04:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

I liked the clinical incapacity line.

Edwards on Bush--"This guy is frigging nuts!"

by Rt hon McAdder esq KBE 2007-07-02 04:02PM | 0 recs
noticed it too

it's all about the message, they looked pretty slick...

by Max Fletcher 2007-07-02 04:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

She is staying with her theme of not taking positions on issues until the publics demands that she does -

Where was she on Iraq last year?
Where was she on ethics two years ago?
Where was she on the Patriot Act three years ago?
Where was she on ethenol three years ago?

One More, Where was she on land mines NOW?

I can't stand pandering, I hated brown nosers in school - and I don't like them in my politics - no guts, no glory my friends no guts, no glory.

by gb1437a 2007-07-02 08:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

She is staying with her theme of not taking positions on issues until the publics demands that she does -

Where was she on Iraq last year?
Where was she on ethics two years ago?
Where was she on the Patriot Act three years ago?
Where was she on ethenol three years ago?

One More, Where was she on land mines NOW?

I can't stand pandering, I hated brown nosers in school - and I don't like them in my politics - I guess it is no guts, no glory in every realm but politics... because Hillary has not taken a single risky progressive position since 1993.

by gb1437a 2007-07-02 08:20PM | 0 recs
Joltin' Joe

I like Biden's call to flood the White House with phone calls tomorrow.

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Joltin' Joe

YES, we should. I also just sent my senator, Russ Feingold, an email asking him to re visit and renew his motion to Censure to the President.

by BlueDiamond 2007-07-02 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

From TPM:


It's been about two hours since the Scooter Libby pardon, and Hillary Clinton's campaign has still not released a comment regarding the Scooter Libby commutation. Election Central has called them three times in the last hour, and we still have not received any statement from them. We have been told that one is forthcoming, but they do not know when it will be ready.

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 03:48PM | 0 recs
so what?

a bunch of useless statements.

by areyouready 2007-07-02 03:50PM | 0 recs
Classic Bill Richardson

Instead of one concise paragraph, his statement is three paragraphs...to ensure that nobody actually reads to the end of it.

BTW, what in the heck is Obama talking about? Partisan politics? Bipartisanship? Is he trying to suggest that the Democrats somehow had something to do with this?

by hwc 2007-07-02 03:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

Richardson just sucks.  How anyone could vote for him just beggars belief.

by Rt hon McAdder esq KBE 2007-07-02 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

Yeah, it truly is unbelievable. He's unequivocal about getting out of Iraq. He doesn't respond to treasonous activities of the POTUS with a glib two word sound bite or need to wait for his polling to come in before he knows what to say.

Plus his resume has more than a short senate stint or a marriage license on it! What a jerk, how dare he make the panderers look bad.

by BeekerDynasty 2007-07-02 10:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

He's always Mr Bipartisan.  It's a congenital thing for him.

by Rt hon McAdder esq KBE 2007-07-02 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

They were a good three paragraphs, though.

BTW, what in the heck is Obama talking about? Partisan politics?

I think he was trying to imply that Bush's commutation of Libby was a partisan act.

by Silent sound 2007-07-02 04:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

It is. People look at the word partisan and only see bi-partisanship.  There is such a concept of non-partisan, which is what the Justice Department is supposed to be.  

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 04:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

we rarely agree but on that I am giving you a 3- I rarely rate anyone on here, but you deserve it. rule of law isn't a partisan or bipartisan issue.

by bruh21 2007-07-02 05:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Classic Bill Richardson

Obama . i hate to say this. But the guy needs to speak from the heart on national issues instead of his careful statements. It was like a government press release when a foreign leader does something naughty. It was an OK statement but I want to see some fucking passion. I want to see some real outrage.

by Pravin 2007-07-02 06:53PM | 0 recs
Hillary

Maybe she's planning on putting it on Hill Cam, that whacky wonderful laughfest of the misadventures of the Clintons as they travel across Iowa.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/feature/hi llcam/?sc=8

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 04:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

My God, this action by Bush is about as close as a literal spit on the public's face as it gets, I mean, this aught to make any American that's being paying attention over the past 5+ years just boil with rage, and I'm afraid that all we'll get from our Democratic representatives is a lot of wasted air, with no bite nor consequence.  Of all the statements, Edwards' comes to closest to expressing some anger; and then there's Obama's, jesus, I get why some like him, but what is it with his overly cautious tone and constant appeal to some mushy middle.  Man, after reading his statement I immediately thought of Mareen Dowd's name for Obama, OBambi -- the man is too afraid to give voice to the betrayal and rancor that many American feel.

by bedobe 2007-07-02 04:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

You can't exactly appeal for a change in our politics away from the rancor and anger of the past while expressing rancor. Can you?  I don't need Obama to voice my anger for me, I'm more than capable of doing that myself.  

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 04:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Right -- well, I believe in representative Democracy, and I believe in supporting candidates that best voice my concerns, hopes, ambitions and values; since I'll not be raising the estimated billion dollars that it takes to be president any time soon. Accordingly, I must settle for second best, and work to support the vision of a man/or woman that best represent my political core.  Again, with his blind adherence to some mushy middle, I, at this point, am simply not inspired by all that "can't we all just get along" gibberish.

And, like you, I'm perfectly capable of expressing my own rancor, so don't try to suggest anything else.

by bedobe 2007-07-02 04:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

I thought the poster Tibbs expressed it very well in a comment on a different thread:

http://tibbs.mydd.com/comments/2007/7/1/ 193647/8396/72#72

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 04:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Great -- except that his rhetoric doesn't inspire me.

Look, I wasn't strong leadership, and someone that's not afraid to move the liberal/progressive yardstick forward.  Thus far, and this is only my read (an early thirties, immigrant male, that served in the Marines and is a great admirer of FDR's populist rhetoric), my impression is that Obama would not be strong enough to stand-up to the entrenched establishment interest -- the man is simply too cautious by nature (his demeanor and rhetoric is one of measured caution).  

But fine, you like his approach.  Good for you -- glad he satisfies you.

-------------------

And now to wash dishes and prep for my fly to Idaho.

by bedobe 2007-07-02 04:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

Have a good flight.  When you get back perhaps you will take a look beyond the rhetoric into some of his accomplishments in government and you'll find something different.  Nothing I'm going to say will sway you but perhaps you will find it on your own. Start with his initial speech opposing the War.  Read the speech he made in front of the Economic Club in Detroit.  Look at some the issues he tackled in Illinois. Move on from there.

by Doug Dilg 2007-07-02 05:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

"my impression is that Obama would not be strong enough to stand-up to the entrenched establishment interest -- the man is simply too cautious by nature (his demeanor and rhetoric is one of measured caution)."

My read is that he listened to bad advice and that he has now painted himself into a corner with this "Let's all hold hands and get along" stuff.   Sure, he will get some Independents, who always like "to get along," but partisan Democrats are naturally turned off.  The miscalculation comes in when you look at the primary calendar and how many primaries/caucuses don't allow Independents to vote.  Without them and a ho-hum Democratic constituency his chances diminish.  

by georgep 2007-07-03 04:58AM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond UPDATED

Wow!  I think we have just witnessed this eras equivilent of Gerald Ford pardoning Richard Nixon.  Bush seems to be doing everything possible to ensure his party will lose in 2008.  Any Repub candidate is going to have to carry this lead weight around their ankle in 2008.

by John Mills 2007-07-02 05:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond

How about responding by calling for impeachment?

I don't expect any of them will, but feigned outrage without consequences or even just threats of consequences is getting old. And no, Biden's call for angry phone calls doesn't count.

by End game 2007-07-02 06:06PM | 0 recs
Republican statements start trickling in

Giuliani comments on the commutation:

GOP presidential candidate and former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani said: "After evaluating the facts, the President came to a reasonable decision and I believe the decision was correct."

by mcc 2007-07-02 07:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond UPDATED

Three days after George W. Bush declared martial law and suspended the 2008 elections, this following Al Quada elements 'revealing' in their latest video that they had planted a 'dirty bomb' in Los Angeles, Senator Clinton told the nation....

'I do not agree with the President's action and will tell him so....When next I see him.'

She spoke from the Nevada detention camp military reservation where she has been since martial law was declared.

by Pericles 2007-07-02 08:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Presidential Candidates Respond UPDATED

Hillary = USELESS

by rbrianj 2007-07-03 12:08AM | 0 recs
McCain refuses to kiss conservative butt

by valiantly choosing not to comment on the pardon.

by kingsbridge77 2007-07-03 09:35AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------