Late Night Hardball Blogging

Yesterday on Hardball, Chris Matthews was interviewing former Cheney aide (and kool-aid connisseur) Ron Christie and former Asst. Attorney General Robert Raben on the topic of the Libby pardon when suddenly a lightbulb went off:

MATTHEWS: I got an idea, I got a solution. Pardon him but send him to Iraq in uniform and put him in the front. Send him to the front, he supported the war, send him to fight it. Hey, look, a lot of guys had to go fight that war didn't do anything wrong.

[snip]

In the old days, the judges would take a working class kid who got in a scrape with the law and say "Jr., you want to go to jail or you wanna join the army?" They should say the same thing to Scooter Libby.

After years of promoting Bush as the guy you want to have a beer with, Matthews finally seems to get that Bush and his entire neocon and conservative agendas are at war with the regular guy, the war in Iraq being the most egregious example. And Matthews is finally getting pissed. It's about time he starting acting like the working class warrior he clearly fancies himself.

He's interviewing Coulter on Tuesday. Here's hoping he goes off on her too.

Tags: Chris Matthews, Scooter Libby (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

I saw that last night and I was amazed, but Matthews is almost schizophrenic in his statements from night to night.  One night he saying something like this, but the next night he's assailing the Dems for wanting to cut off funding and reinforcing right-wing talking points.  

I've come to the conclusion that he is heavily medicated, as made evident by his multiple 'fucks' and 'shits' he's let fly in the past few months.  

He'll go easy on Coulter, he always does.

by IsThisOverYet 2007-06-22 07:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

Bush and his entire neocon and conservative agendas are at war with the regular guy,

Only in the sense that wolves are 'at war' with the caribou.

It's predation; in a war you get to fight back.

by Davis X Machina 2007-06-22 08:38AM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging


I don't know why the hell I like Chris Matthews.  Maybe because he irritates me on so many levels.

First off, stylistically.  How did this guy ever get a job as a talker?  His diction is positively slapdash.  If listening to Olberman is like watching a gymnast dance the tango on a tightrope, listening to Matthews is like watching a drunk attempt the can-can on ice.  

Second, attitude.  Or posturing, or whatever.  Matthews presents himself as an everyman, with a gut appreciation of how the average voter thinks.  He's not as transparently phony as The Man Who Is Looking Out For You, at least.

Still, he seems to take unabashed pleasure in the combat of politics, and I do appreciate an hour-long, Paris-Hilton-free show.  And he has begun to call bullshit on Republican talking points, albeit in a tentative, uneven way.  It will be interesting to see his next go-round with Coulter.  On past form, I think he's a little scared of her.

-- TP  

by Rethymniotis 2007-06-22 10:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

yeah, it's that combativenesss I think I'm addicted to. sometimes it's good to get mad and therapeutic to actually see someone expressing your own frustrations directly back to the rightwing hacks. Olbermann is more of a friendly dose of sanity. what does it say about me that I'm more drawn to the unstable one?

by Todd Beeton 2007-06-22 10:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

I've got an idea.  Let's send both Libby and Matthews to fight in Iraq.  Wasn't he a war supporter, too?

by Terp 2007-06-22 10:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

Tweedy claims that he opposed the war (openly) from the first mention of it as a possibility. But, I've never made any effort to confirm this claim.  

by DPW 2007-06-22 01:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

Here's the 2002 column where he opposes the war:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f= /c/a/2002/09/01/IN133269.DTL

"So I'll say it: I hate this war that's coming in Iraq. I don't think we'll be proud of it. Oppose this war because it will create a millennium of hatred and the suicidal terrorism that comes with it. You talk about Bush trying to avenge his father. What about the tens of millions of Arab sons who will want to finish a fight we start next spring in Baghdad?"

I personally like Matthews because at least he's unpredictable and doesn't sound like he's reading off talking points.  I disagree with him a lot, but when he's on my side on an issue it's hard not to cheer because he's great at badgering someone to answer a question.  "Did John Kerry shoot himself on purpose?  I want a yes or no, Michelle."  Great moment.  Unlike most of the hacks on TV, he has his moments, I'll give him that.

by Philosopher 2007-06-22 03:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

I agree with you about Matthews. People on both the left and the right tend to be very annoyed with him, but he's one of the only political hosts that I can watch regularly--despite the fact that I disagree with him sometimes. I didn't think he was a very good debate moderator, however.

Thanks for the link.

by DPW 2007-06-22 05:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Late Night Hardball Blogging

Matthews can come up with hilarious stuff every once in awhile, and this was one of those times.

by rikyrah 2007-06-22 06:23PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------