Hot Breakfast and Trade Spats

I just got this from a source.  Apparently Sirota's right that there's immense strife in the caucus around this trade deal.  The other side tends to tell me that they got the Republicans to cave on big demands, and that labor shouldn't be complaining that much.  The problem is that labor got pushed out of the room when the deal was negotiated, as did Fair Trade Democrats, and the New Dem Democrats don't have such a great record on trade.

It's becoming pretty clear that the politics here are too screwed up to move forward.  There's also the lobbying reform issue to tackle, and the budget.  Lots and lots of sticky stuff.

And a hot breakfast. They really want people at this meeting.

Update [2007-5-16 18:20:42 by Matt Stoller]: Rep Brad Miller calls me out in the comments.

There's a joint caucus and whip organization meeting every Thursday morning at 9:00 in HC-5, and a hot breakfast is always served. There may be ultimately be strife in the caucus about the trade deal, but that's kinda thin evidence of intra-caucus warfare.

I'll take Miller's word on this. Note to self: don't blog while hungry and thinking about breakfast. It's my favorite meal of the day by far.

Tags: Betty Sutton, Fast Track, Frank Vargo, free trade, mike michaud, NAFTA, NAM, Nancy Pelosi, Tom Donahue, us chamber of commerce (all tags)

Comments

16 Comments

Uh,

there's a joint caucus and whip organization meeting every Thursday morning at 9:00 in HC-5, and a hot breakfast is always served. There may be ultimately be strife in the caucus about the trade deal, but that's kinda thin evidence of intra-caucus warfare.

by Rep Brad Miller 2007-05-16 01:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

Haha.  I love it.  Straight from a man who should know about these things.

by juls 2007-05-16 02:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

I agree that the meeting itself is not a sign, but the flim-flamming around of the meeting I think is. The fact that Dems requested a caucus meeting, were "rebuffed" as the Hill reported, then it was scheduled, then it was taken off the schedule, and now its scheduled again is pretty shady.

by David Sirota 2007-05-16 02:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

The people demand a pie fight.

by Steve M 2007-05-16 02:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

This is why I love law-makers posting.

by Bob Brigham 2007-05-16 02:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

What they get desert too?

Tim Ryan is going to be drooling.  I wonder if he will bring his own cottage cheese.

by juls 2007-05-16 02:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

Nice snide remark from a resident D.C clown who makes far more than $9.00/hr.

If there is not a some intra-caucus warfare I would submit it's because you all sold out to K-Street a long, long, long time ago.

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee!

This race to the bottom is fun...ain't it!

by Pericles 2007-05-16 08:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

Where you see a snide remark, I see information. Where you see a clown, I see an elected representative who's willing to explain something.

Where you see warfare, I see the politics of inclusion.

Have a nice day.

by KB 2007-05-17 04:52AM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

I thought he was joking, hence his final line.

by Robert P 2007-05-17 10:16AM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

Knock it off.  Miller's got a good record on trade.

by Matt Stoller 2007-05-17 06:45AM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

What I said above, I think he was joking, making fun of YOU actually.

by Robert P 2007-05-17 10:16AM | 0 recs
Re: Uh,

I find that surprising....

Will have to do some research on this. Frankly, I'm finding a lot of the discussion on 'who's with the progressive movement and who isn't looking, to me, like hair splitting. One day I'm and 'idiot liberal....' the next I need to 'cut it out...' I am of the growing suspicion that it's all about who you know....

You know?

by Pericles 2007-05-17 04:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Hot Breakfast and Trade Spats

When Max Baucus signed on I knew it sucked, every economic policy that Bush has enacted wouldn't have happened without Max Baucus screwing the people.

by Bob Brigham 2007-05-16 01:56PM | 0 recs
So the secret

to a Representatives heart is scrambled eggs and ham?

Jokes aside, I think that it's going to be many of the same people who peppered Robert Rubin with questions on trade during his meeting with the House Caucus last December.

One of my favorite qoutes from that meeting:

Indiana freshman Rep. Joe Donnelly (D) told Rubin he has former Delphi employees in his district who feel that our government sold them out to foreign governments, that they were making $21/hour and are now making $9/hour, meanwhile they're outsourcing, dumped their pension obligations on the government. He demanded of Rubin: "What do you say to that?"

Maybe if the House leadership can't understand that 2006 was about economic insecurity, the labor  Dems need to go on strike and deny the speaker a quorum.

by ManfromMiddletown 2007-05-16 02:18PM | 0 recs
Re: So the secret

I guess the 'New Dems' figure that 'folks' should be happy with $9.00/hr.

Say...can you buy a house or even a new refrigerator on those wages?

Just askin'.....

by Pericles 2007-05-16 08:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Hot Breakfast and Trade Spats

I think all differences can probably be reconciled over a warm bacon sandwich.  MMMM.

by Illustrious 2007-05-17 02:28AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------