Good for Harold Ford Jr.

I see that Harold Ford Jr has put out a statement disputing what the Washington Times wrote about him last week (which I quoted here).  As I don't regularly check the DLC website, and no one told me about his statement, I didn't see it until now.  Here it is.

"Had I been in the Senate, I would have voted in favor of the supplemental. How the Washington Times reporter -- after my speech, previous statements, and recent campaign platform -- could have interpreted my remarks to the contrary is puzzling.

As recently as three weeks ago, I wrote an op-ed for the Chattanooga Times Free Press outlining a "Plan B" for Iraq. Although the op-ed was written before the supplemental vote, the Plan B approach would not have cut off funds for our soldiers, urges outreach to Iraq's neighbors and encourages formation of a Democracy coalition, which I talked about in the speech Wednesday.

It is unfortunate that the Washington Times misunderstood my position on this critical issue and reported it wrongly. The record should be corrected.

When I blogged about this, I went over Ford's prepared speech in full because I know that the Washington Times tends to falsify information, and finding no discussion of withdrawal in there, I assumed that the Times had done an interview with him or picked up on questions that were not in the prepared remarks.  I'm glad he has told us all that the Times was full of it.

I am no fan of Harold Ford, but I respect it when a public figure corrects the record on his or her own behalf.  It's not hard to do, and it's something that would be really helpful to activists and bloggers.  We don't like it any more than our public figures do when a reporter misquotes or misrepresents one of our public figures, even if it's someone we don't like.  To me at least, journalists have an obligation to represent the world as it is.  When they fall down on that duty I resent it deeply.  

With a website and an email to bloggers public figures can correct the record.  It would be interesting if enterprising politicians begin to tape record their media interviews and put them online themselves, so that the press had some citizen oversight in these exclusive interviews.

Anyway, thanks Harold Ford for setting the record straight, and while I still think your pony plan is dumb, I'm glad you would have voted for the supplemental.

Tags: harold ford, tennessee (all tags)

Comments

11 Comments

Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

One thing I have always liked about Harold Ford Jr's Ideas about Iraq was partitioning.

He was on record stating that a partition, where the different languages (kurdish, etc.) would define the boundaries - e.g. basically three states - would be the best approach.

This is already happening, it will make the country safer. kurdistan almost never has the kind of outer bagdad and southern iraq type of violence.  and the kurds like us.

btw i have decided today is a belated april fools day because official april fools fell on sunday, which to my view is the way the ancient of days plays with our april fools schedule

by heyAnita 2007-04-02 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

You do realize that partitioning will open another can of worms, right?  Turkey will stand sit by and watch Kurdistan become it's own country.  Why don't you think partitioning hasn't been talked about more?

by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle 2007-04-02 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

right - my friends and i have spoken of what instanbul will want to do there, and i honestly believe that if the kurds receive the endorsement of the united states that turkey will have to accept the independent state

lest we forget? saddam hussein gassed these people with chemical weapons because they wanted their own state.  

also we owe them: they found saddam hussein hiding in a hole for us.

by heyAnita 2007-04-02 07:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Don't bet on it. Turkey doesn't want the Kurds on its side of the border agitating again, and they've made noises in the past about invading. If the US withdraws, there's hardly likely to be support for going back in to dislodge a nation which is after all a strategic ally.

Partition might avoid the Lebanonisation of Iraq, but it'd also unleash ungodly amounts of chaos, and a strongman would be trying to unify the nation within a decade.

by Englishlefty 2007-04-03 04:25AM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Ok, I'm confused...?

Harold Ford's Plan B DLC press release is dated March 3 on the dlc site.

Chattanooga Times Free Press | Opinion |
Time for 'Plan B' in Iraq
By Harold Ford, Jr.
March 3, 2007
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=85&a mp;subid=65&contentid=254233

However, when I read the the Washington Times piece it appears to be referring to a more recent opinion/statement?

Ford splits with Democrats on Iraq
By Brian DeBose - THE WASHINGTON TIMES
March 29, 2007

"Former Rep. Harold E. Ford Jr., the new chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), yesterday said he does not agree with efforts by Congress to set a deadline for U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq."

Also there's seems to be quoted material that doesn't appear in the Plan release?

So where was Brian DeBose getting his source material from?  Maybe a longer press release on Plan B, a particular conference speech of Ford's?

Huh?

by SandThroughTheEyeGlass 2007-04-02 01:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

It would have helped it you had linked maybe to the prepared statement which I'm guessing is this one?

DLC | Speech | March 28, 2007
Remarks of Rep. Harold Ford, Jr. to the Democratic Leadership Council
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=137& amp;subid=900145&contentid=254226

I see that the quoted material in the WTimes does not appear in the prepared statement, however, having seen AIPAC statements from certain congress personnel also being edited on websites, I would interested if maybe you could contact the WTimes author of the piece to see if he was physically at the event?

Seems v. strange that a journalist would outright lie on a quote - take it out of context maybe?  Although I don't know Brian DeBose, does HE usually twist and invent words?

by SandThroughTheEyeGlass 2007-04-02 01:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Ford had a great plan in the election of just splitting the country into three parts, that's the quickest and least bloodiest exit.

by Jerome Armstrong 2007-04-02 02:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Have you got a link to this plan...

Apparently when you do a search for how the Arab region feels about splitting up Iraq, you get the impression they don't think it that great an idea.

Juan Cole:

"The US is attempting to avert a potentially disastrous Turkish military intervention in Iraqi Kurdistan.

The Turks accuse Kurdistan of harboring 3600 guerrillas of the radical Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK), who, it says, are committing acts of terrorism in eastern Anatolia and then slipping back over the border into Iraq. Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul is threatening hot pursuit by Turkish troops across that border. Such an incursion could set off the tinderbox that is northern Iraq.

Prince Hassan of Jordan supports Turkey in this regard. He warns against an ethno-religious breakup of Iraq, saying it will lead to the Balkanization of the entire Middle East..."
http://www.juancole.com/

Looking at the situation now, if Iraq is split up into partitions wouldn't it cause more inter-regional fighting, even more problems for US military forces to protect, train and support EACH partition partner + the oil fields?

by SandThroughTheEyeGlass 2007-04-02 05:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

If you think it isn't inevitable anyway.

by jallen 2007-04-02 07:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Ford is also going to be taking questions on TPMCafe, which I think is pretty courageous, and shows an open willingness to engage critics.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archive s/013405.php

by pontificator 2007-04-02 03:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Good for Harold Ford Jr.

Sorry, Matt, I choose to disagree.  Even though the Moonie Times is a less than respectable rag, there's no reason to be giving Harold kudos for covering his own ass, when he saw which way the wind blew on keeping the troops in Iraq.

He did vote to fund it in the first place when he was a Congressman.  Remember that.

by Political Junkie 2007-04-03 05:35AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------