More on Gordon Smith, Ron Wyden, and "insider-itis"

Bumped. I am promoting this diary because I want to mislead you about my secret agenda against Ron Wyden. Matt

Thanks to Matt Stoller for bringing attention to the 2008 campaign to defeat Gordon Smith in Oregon.  Over at BlueOregon, I've probably written more about Gordon Smith and the reasons he needs to be ejected than anybody else in the lefty blogsphere.

But Matt misses some important details about Senator Ron Wyden.

Before I go further, a little disclosure is in order:  I was an intern for then-Congressman Wyden in '93 and a volunteer on the '96 campaign that defeated Gordon Smith.  Today, I'm managing Senator Wyden's campaign-funded policy website, Stand Tall for America.  That said, my comments here are my own.  I don't speak for the Senator or his staff.

Quoted in Oregon's most conservative newspaper, the Senator's chief-of-staff  - Josh Kardon - said "he won't campaign against Gordon" and Matt Stoller thought he heard something like "he won't help the Democratic candidate in 2008."

I am absolutely, positively 100% certain that Senator Ron Wyden will do everything he can to help Oregon's Democratic candidate defeat Gordon Smith.

Here's the deal...

Out of every six years, Gordon Smith will be in-cycle two years and Ron Wyden will be in-cycle two years.  If they start bashing each other during election years, they'd be at war for four years out of every six.  (And good luck making peace during the other two.)  If they - and more importantly, their staffs - are going to get basic nonpartisan things accomplished (especially for a small state like Oregon) they've got to get along.

But that doesn't mean that Ron Wyden won't help the Democratic candidate with everything he's got.

I'm a partisan guy, and I'd like to think that I throw political punches as hard as the next guy.  And here's why I'm proud of Ron Wyden - and his partisan political operation:

  • For the 2006 cycle, Senator Wyden donated over a million dollars to the DSCC.  (About $250k in Dec '04 and $770k thru Dec '06.)  As Markos pointed out, that's "most impressive since [he's] not in the leadership."

  • When Governor Ted Kulongoski's campaign looked to be in trouble, he loaned his chief-of-staff (the aforementioned Josh Kardon) - who joined the turnaround team that turned a loss into a landslide.

  • And he didn't just focus on the big races.  The other big fight in Oregon in 2006 was the takeover of the Oregon House (where we picked up an historically unprecedented four seats to take a one-seat majority.)  And Senator Ron Wyden was a huge asset in that fight.

The Oregon House Dems campaign director Jon Isaacs had this to say back in January (my emphasis):

...Just the other day I was talking with a political acquaintance who was making another one of these arguments I'm sure you've heard before - Ron Wyden will never help us beat Smith, in fact he'll probably parade around the state helping Smith win re-election.

To that I say phooey, hogwash, bullocks and so on and so on.

The truth is, no one has done more to help get Oregon's Democrats get where we are today than US Senator Ron Wyden. And you know, he's never asked for any credit for all of his hard work. So I think its time to give US Senator Ron Wyden the credit he deserves. ...

The most important thing Senator Wyden does for Oregon Democrats is he gives every voter a reason to elect more Democrats like him. ...

Ron Wyden did over 20 local events with Democratic candidates in the most important house races in Oregon. Again, he didn't go around lobbing bombs or doing press conferences. He quietly went about his business doing local events with the most important Democratic candidates talking about issues that matter to Oregonians. ...

Most political strategists will tell you that very few public endorsements actually have an impact on the outcome of an election. That isn't the case with Senator Wyden. His support for House candidates truly mattered to voters. Truly persuaded voters. Again, the reason he's different is his genuine leadership. If Wyden spent his time as a US Senator playing high profile partisan political games (like, for example, former US Senator Rick Santorum) he wouldn't have that type of credibility with the public.

I'd suggest heading over to BlueOregon and reading the rest of that Jon Isaacs post.

I'll say it again:  I am absolutely, positively 100% certain that Senator Ron Wyden will do everything he can to help Oregon's Democratic candidate defeat Gordon Smith.

But he'll do it in his own quiet way, putting his political operation in play, introducing the candidate to the right people, and making a critical contribution to the effort.

Just don't expect him to go around bombing Gordon Smith at every turn.  Heck, that's our 2008 candidate's job.  After all, in 2008, we want our candidate to take the lead and look like a strong alternative -- not Ron Wyden.

One last thing: A few moments ago, I helped launch StopGordonSmith.com for the Democratic Party of Oregon.

If you're serious about helping defeat Gordon Smith in 2008, c'mon over and sign up!  We're counting on you.

Tags: Gordon Smith, Oregon, Ron Wyden (all tags)

Comments

7 Comments

Too much Wyden bashing this week?

Kari - Thanks for pointing this out. On the first Insider-itis post, a comment was made to the effect that an incumbent like Wyden can offer more help to a challenger under the radar - introducing him or her to the right people, loaning staff, etc. than above the radar with big public appearances, etc. It sounds like Wyden has a very effective below-the-radar operation for assisting in the campaigns of other Democrats.

Wyden has recieved a lot of negative comments from me this week, both in the original Insider-itis thread and in the Blue Oregon thread about Wyden's health care plan. I had been mulling over Wyden's health care plan over the weekend, was upset about it (my complaints are in the Blue Oregon comments), and saw a few opportunities to voice those complaints.

That being said, Ron Wyden has been a pretty good Senator, and my disagreements with Ron over trade and health care shouldn't overshadow his outstanding leadership on Net Neutrality and other technology issues, as well as his consistent opposition to the Iraq war and GWB's abuses of power. I'm proud to be represented by Ron Wyden, and I hope my representative in the house (Pete DeFazio) can join him in the Senate soon.

by robin oz 2007-04-17 12:16PM | 0 recs
Re: More on Gordon Smith, Ron Wyden

Nothing here addresses the question of whether Wyden would actively go after Smith. Nobody doubts Wyden's commitment to Democrats in races that don't affect his personal position, but it stands to reason that he might express reluctance to go after the other senator in his state.

As the sorry episode of Joe Lieberman proved last fall, we cannot expect Democrats to be consistent during election campaigns in who they support.

by eugene 2007-04-17 03:33PM | 0 recs
Re: More on Gordon Smith, Ron Wyden

Eugene raises a solid point. I don't think I ever believed he wouldn't work for a Democratic candidate (although to say he's not 'leadership' isn't true, since he's Vice-Chair of the organization he was giving to); the issue much more revolves around the framing regarding Smith. Wyden comes off sounding as if the idea that Smith will win re-election doesn't even bother him that much, and the strong implication from saying he won't campaign against him is that he doesn't find much to campaign against.

One needn't take a colleague to the woodshed with personal attacks on their character, to express firm policy disagreement and the far larger truth that--however nice a guy he is--Smith is part of the group that put us where we are today nationally, and there has to be an accounting for that...for which he supports the choice of Oregon Democrats.

by torridjoe 2007-04-17 04:34PM | 0 recs
Standing Tall.

Let me try this even more succinctly.

If Wyden were the guy throwing the punches, it'll make our '08 nominee look weak.  

Wyden needs to provide advice and support, build infrastructure, point the way for money and policy, and be an advocate for the powers in DC.

The 2008 candidate has to stand on his or her own two feet.  They have to convince the voters to fire Smith, and hire them.

by karichisholm 2007-04-17 05:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Standing Tall.

What the candidate does has nothing to do with it; we're talking about what Wyden does. The candidate will not look weak, since they damn well better be taking it to Smith as well. (Note that DeFazio is correctly discussing Smith's fitness for re-election, and he won't even hint he's in). We're not talking about an attack, we're talking about campaigning against him--spelling out why there needs to be accountability. If Ron Wyden can't even bring himself to say he needs replacing, THAT is what makes our effort to replace him look weak IMO.

by torridjoe 2007-04-17 11:04PM | 0 recs
An endorsement

Wyden needs to provide advice and support, build infrastructure, point the way for money and policy, and be an advocate for the powers in DC.

I agree with just about everything you've said, and I agree that Wyden's work behind the scenes is credible and admirable, however there are two more things I would ask of him that don't involve confronting Smith directly. One is non-negotiable (IMHO), and the second would be his way of proving he's a "good Democrat."

1) Endorsement. That's it. Just endorse the Democrat. I simple press release. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe Wyden ever officially endorsed Bradbury (in 2002). Failing to do so, in my opinion, is unacceptable.

2) Appearances. Wyden should appear with the Democratic nominee at a few events. His speeches can be purely positive about the candidate and need not disparage Smith in any way, but his support should be clear. Again, to the best of my recollection, Wyden didn't ever appear in support of Bradbury.

There's no reason for Wyden to go negative against Smith (and plenty not to, as you've so well illustrated). If that's to be done, the candidate and supporting organizations can handle that. However, the Democratic nominee should be able to count on Wyden for his vocal (purely positive, issue-based) support. Anything less is unacceptable.

by nate pdx 2007-04-17 11:54PM | 0 recs
Re: An endorsement

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe Wyden ever officially endorsed Bradbury (in 2002).

You are wrong.  From the 2002 Voter's Pamphlet:

"I support Bill Bradbury because he is right on the issues. He will be a champion for consumers and working families." -Senator Ron Wyden

Wyden should appear with the Democratic nominee at a few events.

You can bet he will.  And he did in 2002.  I remember several occasions.  Here's a reference to one, from an ILWU newsletter:

The political firepower massed at  Portland's noontime rally included Daschle, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), U.S. Representative David Wu (D-Portland), State Rep. Dan Gardner, Multnomah County Commissioner Diane Linn and Oregon Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, who hopes to join Wyden in the U.S. Senate next year and is running with union backing.

I know that there are a lot of folks desperate to understand why Bradbury lost so badly in 2002 - and they've glommed on to some myth that Wyden didn't help enough.  Well, that's BS.  Bradbury lost because Gordon Smith hammered him on the war - and we were still in 9/11 after-effect then.  Bill Bradbury was right on the war, Gordon Smith war wrong.  Oregon voters just didn't know it yet.

(Disclosure: Bradbury was a client of mine in 2004, but not in 2002.  Wyden is a client of mine now, but wasn't in 2002.)

by karichisholm 2007-04-18 01:23AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------