The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

I spend most of my time covering Democrats and the progressive movement.  There are plenty of others who are very very good at dealing with the right-wing media spin, the overall venality of Republicans, and the complacency of the media.  That's not usually what I write about, even though I respect very much those who do and support vigorous criticism of the Republican Party.  It's been obvious to a lot of us for years that the Republican Party on at least a national level is no better than a criminal syndicate with control of nuclear weapons, a resource rich country, and an incredibly capable military.  

This doesn't leave much room for bipartisanship on most matters, since I no longer consider conservatives or Republicans credible actors in the political system.  It's also a very scary prospect, and one that most political observers and reporters want to hide from because they don't want to believe that things are really this bad.  But they are.  I've also been in favor of impeachment since 2003 when there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq, and quite surprised that there hasn't been a stronger institutional response to Bush.  I've never advocated impeachment as a strategy, though, since going through that process requires a lot of preparation that we frankly have not done yet.

It's days like today that suggest the whole game is unraveling.

The Libby verdict is very exciting --- Howard Dean and other Dems are all calling on the president to promise not to pardon Scooter. The right is spinning like tops. Fox news commentators are lamely saying that the verdicts don't make sense because they acquitted Libby on one count. Bob Novak said the Bush administration had no "guts" because they agreed to allow an "unsupervised" special prosecutor to investigate them when they could have just shut down the investigation from the beginning. (G. Gordon Liddy couldn't have said it better.) It's a bad day for the Republicans.

And it's getting worse. I would suggest that everyone keep at least one eye on the next brewing legal scandal. It's looking more and more obvious like the Bush administration fired all those US Attorneys because they were investigating Republicans or allegedly dragging their feet in investigating Democrats. In Washington state the federal prosecutor was pressured to investigate "voter fraud" where there was none.

With the vice president's office being completely discredited today and using the justice department for political purposes, we are now officially in Nixon territory.

Firing prosecutors for not sufficiently going after Democrats or for going after corrupt Republicans is a whole different level of corruption.  This is new territory.  You see, from what I understand, prosecutors tend to be Eisenhower-style Republicans who are tough on crime, and Defense Attorneys tend to be Hubert Humphrey Democrats who believe strongly in civil rights and protecting the weak.  But lawyers also tend to be professionals.  And this whole purge is throwing the culture of professionalism in legal circles upside down - liberal blogs like TPM are attracting readers who are culturally traditional Republicans, and it's conservative Republicans in Congress who are going after prosecutors for prosecuting criminals.  It's the Scooter Libby's who are begging for mercy and justice, and the Bushniks that are 'soft on crime' and spitting on our troops through their mistreatment of veterans care.

Democrats in Congress are holding aggressive hearings and even the most conservative Democrats smell opportunity.  What Senator Domenici and Representative Heather Wilson did is just not acceptable.  In the short-term, this opens up the same opportunity people of character had during Nixon's second term - the ability to set our system back into balance.  Longer-term, a whole generation of politically neutral and ambitious prosecutors and professionals have been exposed to the conservative movement, the media, the wise men of Washington, and the progressive movement for what they really are.  These are future Mayors, Governors, Congressmen, Senators, and Presidents, and they are being defended by liberal bloggers and Democrats in Congress against an onslaught of corrupt Republicans and a lazy media spearheaded by people like Time Magazine's Jay Carney, who called the prosecutor purge a conspiracy theory.

It's impossible to deny what you have personally experienced.  Being on the receiving end of a whole lot of unprofessional, corrupt, and dishonest behavior by Republicans brings a lot of clarity to your politics.  That's what Bush and his cronies have done for a whole lot of ambitious and intelligent people who will never forget what they are experiencing now.  If a conservative is a liberal who was mugged the night before, then a liberal is a conservative who got in the way of a Republican used car salesman.  Bush has built a liberal factory.

Tags: George Bush, Iraq, Josh Marshall (all tags)

Comments

20 Comments

The problem with this logic...

...is that one would think the Watergate scandal would have prevented the rise of Iraq-Contra or the endless cornucopia of crap that is the Bush Administration, would you not think?

Or do we have to be like an alcoholic that really, truly reaches bottom before we as a nation get the point?

by palamedes 2007-03-06 11:48AM | 0 recs
Re: The problem with this logic...
Much of said cornucopia can be traced back to survivors of Watergate. Just because not enough of the bastards got caught doesn't mean that occasions like this don't provide the hope of a fresh start.
by Englishlefty 2007-03-06 02:51PM | 0 recs
Re: The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

I think one overlooked aspect of all of this is how political power filters out in so many ways. Would the prosecutors like Iglesias come forward if they knew there wasn't anyone in Congress with the power to follow their lead and run cover for them after they went public? Would the WaPo push a story like the Walter Reed scandal as hard if there wasn't the likelihood of Congressional hearings to extend the story? Would any of these stories have the second or third gear without a Democratic Congress?

There is a serious downside to going forward with these stories or public challenges. Without the upside possible with a Democratic Congress, the cost might outweigh the benefits for someone like Iglesias.

For all the frustration we have about Iraq, FoxNevada, Lieberman giving radio addresses for Democrats, etc, etc ... it's good to notice how different so many parts of the political/media landscape is with Democrats in charge.

by BriVT 2007-03-06 12:08PM | 0 recs
Re: The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

  Now the ball is in the Democrats's court. If they play a good game, and are serious about fighting corruption everywhere, and cleaning up government and making it competent, then a whole crop of people who are principled independents and conservatives will not vote Republican. I was just talking to an independent the other night, and they said that while they are neutral on the Democrats, they hate the Republicans. If enough independents and conservatives just decide to oppose the Republican Party, then things will improve for sure

by liberal2012 2007-03-06 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

seems like a perfect example of the "party before country" stratagy they have taken.  Why are republicans silent?  Maybe because they haven't recieved their talking points from rove?  why is redstate.com not working today? I dont understand why republicans dont support our country.    clear examples; not calling out poor performance and conditions at walter reade, Not calling out the perjure and liar that scooter libby is.

by asdf 2007-03-06 12:26PM | 0 recs
No one hates Bush and cronies more than me...

They are criminal pigs.  I've used my legal education for years to better our world and forward "liberal" causes.  My partners and my husband think I do way too much liberal pro bono work, but alas... call me idealistic.

But, I have bad news!  Libby's conviction is nonsense and I am quite certain it will never stand.  The trial was a mess, the judge was a goof, and Libby was very poorly served by his attorneys.

Now I understand many of you on here will use the same basis of hatred for all things Bush that I have to blindly ignore the truth:  But Libby was wrongfully convicted, and it will never stand.  SORRY>

by EileenDoherty 2007-03-06 12:33PM | 0 recs
Re: No one hates Bush and cronies more than me...

Riiiggghht. Sure. Forgive me if I read your opinions with some, uh, skepticism ...

by BriVT 2007-03-06 12:43PM | 0 recs
Sorry not to toe your concept of the party line...

You spend all day long calling the republicans "fascist" then act like one when someone has the audacity to tell a truth that disappoints you.

Truth is sometimes inconvenient.  Roe v. Wade is horrible law and will someday be overturned.  I wish that wasn't true, but it is.  Abortion obviously should be legal, but it needs to rest on good law.

I'm sure Scooter Libby and I agree on nothing political:  but his charges and the trial were outrageous.  It ultimately hurts our side when his conviction is overturned.

Sorry to go all "real world" on you but some of us live and work in the real world well outside the "drug" of living all day online and only on political sites that agree with us.  Watch what happens, Libby's conviction was complete nonsense legally and will last only as long as it takes to get to the appellate court (unless the trial court judge is unusually courageous... some are suggesting he will be...).

by EileenDoherty 2007-03-06 01:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Sorry not to toe your concept of the party lin

I for one appreciate the dose of reality. I heard a conservative commentator on NPR this evening saying he also thinks the conviction is junk, but for a different reason - he used to work for Libby and implicitly trusts that he wouldn't have done what he was convicted of doing.

Now I certainly look on that person's opinion with a small dose of skepticism, but not yours. I wish more people here were willing to give someone the time of day when, as you put it, "someone has the audacity to tell a truth that disappoints you."

by the wanderer 2007-03-06 01:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Sorry not to toe your concept of the party lin

OK. Find one instance of me calling Republicans "fascist," let alone all day long. Then explain to me how "skepticism" about your opinions equal fascism. Otherwise, stop this nonsense.

As for my skepticism ... you are a lawyer?

by BriVT 2007-03-06 01:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Sorry not to toe your concept of the party
One easy way to stop the scepticism: tell us what was specifically was wrong with the verdict.
by Englishlefty 2007-03-06 02:49PM | 0 recs
I Agree

I'm quite unimpressed by contentless claims.  Especially given the quality of analysis available at FDL telling exactly the opposite story.  Ad to that Fitzgerald's reputation, the obvious desperation of Libby's defense, the unusually high level of professional expertise among the jury--all these signs point to a very solid decision.

So an unsupported claim to the contrary doesn't impress me in the slightest.

by Paul Rosenberg 2007-03-06 05:27PM | 0 recs
You're A Troll!

You've been here two days, have made 5 comments and you're hurling accusations like this!

God, we've really got to get a better quality of troll.

Just pretending to be a progressive attorney doing scads of pro-bono work hardly makes one a first class troll.  It's not the superficial luster of a legend that counts.  In fact, a troll doesn't need a legend at all.

But, of course, it takes a better quality troll to know all that.

by Paul Rosenberg 2007-03-06 05:32PM | 0 recs
Re: You're A Troll!

Yeah ... that's why I called "her" out in the first place.

Not a particularly effective one, either.

I was sorta hoping that "she" was bad enough to explicitly claim some legal profession after claiming to be an ad rep the other day, but alas ...

by BriVT 2007-03-06 09:53PM | 0 recs
The Comment About Rowe Being Bad Law

was particularly revealing.  It makes one sound sophisticated.

But then to imply it will be overturned because it is bad law gives the whole game away.

If it's ever overturned it will be because of politics--and the soundest legal reasoning in history will not stand against wilfull political ideologues.  

by Paul Rosenberg 2007-03-07 06:19AM | 0 recs
Re: No one hates Bush and cronies more than me...

Well, IANAL, but none of the legal analysts on the networks I've seen have espoused such a view.

Even the right wing talking points I've seen haven't really claimed the trial itself was somehow improper.

And yet, you take umbridge when you, alone of all lawyers see some key flaws in the case which would make it fall on appeal.

Yet list none of them.

To wit:  Sorry!

by scientician 2007-03-06 03:20PM | 0 recs
Re: The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

One of the tactical errors made by our side (and repeated incessantly by the media) is to continue referring to the Bushniks as "conservatives."   I have been hammering away at this theme for a long awhile, to no avail.  If the radical Bush cultists had been properly identified and labelled as the fascists that they truly are, we would have been spared a lot of the misery that has occurred over the past 6 years.  The term 'conservative' affords those bastards a mainstream legitimacy that they do not deserve.

by global yokel 2007-03-06 03:06PM | 0 recs
Re: The Republican Criminal Conspiracy

I hear you, but this point is under debate.  I think the flaws of this administration are inherent to conservatism in its essence though.  Whatever dry paper-only ideology may exist that seems vastly different, this, on the ground is what conservatism IS.  

I look forward to a day when conservatism joins the ash heap of failed ideologies alongside communism, feudalism and fascism.

by scientician 2007-03-06 03:24PM | 0 recs
Bush has built a liberal factory

Matt, the line about car salesmen made me laugh.

If things keep up like this, 2008 could look like 1932.  We exceeded our wildest dreams in the senate in 2006.  Maybe 60 seats is within reach?  Maybe the Democratic primary will be the real General?

Too optimistic I expect, but the liberal factory bit has me hopeful.  We have a lot of work to do but maybe the walls will crumble faster than we thought.

by scientician 2007-03-06 03:27PM | 0 recs
Building Momentum For Political Realignment

I think it's unfortunate that there doesn't look to be much follow-up on the Libby conviction.  I thought there was enough evidence of more wrong-doing exposed in the trial to warrant further investigation and indictments.  Given Democratic behaviour so far, I doubt there will be any sort of Congressional investigation--it's just too likely to ignite.

But the USA hearings are a source of hope.  This is definitely something that wouldn't have happened without the blogosphere.  In fact, it wouldn't have happened without TPM.  This is a real sign of growing power and influence.  And this is the sort of thing we need to really focus on, because it only takes a few percentage points to build a landslide.  51-49% is a closely divided nation. 54-46% gives you a clear majority. 57-43% and your in the beginnings of landslide territory.

Sure, I'd rather be up in 60%+ land.  But with the incredibly entrenched RW/M$M combine arrayed against us, we should be looking at grinding out a series of victories like the USA investigations, Walter Reed, and the push-back against Anne Coulter.  There are smaller victories than the broad Plame-Gate investigation we ought to be having, but significant victories, nonetheless.  And what becomes important is how we tie them all together.  It's about building a foundation for the next 30+ years, not just for the next election.  But the next election should be key.  Put two wave elections back-to-back, and you'll get your political realignment--one that should last for a good three decades, plus.

by Paul Rosenberg 2007-03-06 05:23PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------