Vote Rankings for Democratic Members of Congress Running for President

This week National Journal released their annual vote rankings, which measure where within the Senate or House a particular member of Congress lies. As the editors explain in the methodology section, "The liberal percentile score means that the member voted more liberal than that percentage of his or her colleagues in that issue area in 2006."

Below I have recreated the table containing both scores and rankings for each of the five Democratic presidential candidates currently serving in Congress. I have ordered the candidates in the Senate from most liberal to least on the composite score and separated the lone House member in the race, Dennis Kucinich, to make clear that this is more of an apples-to-oranges comparison between chambers than an apples-to-apples one.

Composite
Score (Rank)
Economic
Score (Rank)
Social
Score (Rank)
Foreign
Score (Rank)
Obama86 (10th - Tie)87 (1st - Tie)77 (22nd - Tie)85 (13th - Tie)
Dodd84 (17th)83 (14th - Tie)93 (6th - Tie)72 (27th - Tie)
Biden77.5 (24th)87 (1st - Tie)73 (27th)65 (35th)
Clinton70.2 (32nd)63 (36th - Tie)80 (15th - Tie)62 (37th - Tie)
Kucinich87 (49th - Tie)74 (101st - Tie)96 (12th - Tie)88 (42nd - Tie)

As you can see from the chart, Barack Obama is across the board the most liberal candidate in the race who is currently serving in the Senate, though Chris Dodd is not far behind him. Dennis Kucinich is slightly more liberal in relation to his chamber than is Obama, but nearly a quarter of his party's caucus in the chamber was more liberal than him in 2006, according to National Journal (while exactly one-fifth of Senate Democrats were more liberal than Obama in 2006). Joe Biden is in the middle of the pack of Senate Democrats, or slightly to the right of the median, and Hillary Clinton hails from the most conservative third of the party caucus in the chamber.

On economic issues, Obama and Biden are tied with others for being the most liberal within the chamber, while Dodd is not too far behind. Clinton is in the most conservative fifth of the caucus on economic issues while Kucinich is about exactly in the middle of the House Democratic caucus.

On social issues, Kucinich is near the top of the House Democrats in terms of liberal score, while in the Senate Dodd is near the top, as well. Clinton just comes in among the most liberal third of her caucus on social issues, while Obama and Biden are near the middle of the caucus, with Obama slightly to the left of the median and Biden slightly to the right.

None of the candidates in the race is terribly liberal on foreign policy, though both Kucinich and Obama are among the most liberal quarter of their respective party caucuses. Dodd is near the middle of Senate Democrats on foreign policy while both Biden and Clinton are in the most conservative quarter of their party's caucus on the issue.

Now the National Journal vote rankings are not the be all and end all of vote rankings and, what's more, judging a member of Congress' voting record in a single year is not necessarily the best way of judging how liberal or conservative he or she is -- or, for that matter, how liberal of a President he or she may be. That said, they do paint an interesting picture and will undoubtedly be used by campaigns and outside interest groups to portray candidates as too liberal or too moderate or just liberal enough or just moderate enough, and as such are worth taking a gander at.

Also, later on this weekend I will update my chart of the vote rankings of the Senators up for reelection in 2008.

Tags: 2008 Primaries, Democrats (all tags)

Comments

15 Comments

Obama's opponents

...see that he is the most liberal, and are - IMO - using the Rovian strategy of attacking his biggest stregth (namely, his immediate and consistent opposition to the iraq war) at the expense of the best progressive candidate in the race.

by faithfull 2007-03-02 12:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings

I'd be interested in knowing what they consider economic and what social, and what exactly they mean by "liberal".

by jallen 2007-03-02 01:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings for Democratic Members of Congre

How does Edwards compare to the others.

by robliberal 2007-03-02 01:35PM | 0 recs
Not the best year for data

A year that the Democratic party has the ability to enter their bills would be better than 2006. Too bad the primaries will have started before these rankings will come out for 2007.

by Zimbel 2007-03-02 01:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings for Democratic Members of Congre

Senator MBNA is tied for first on economic issues?  How is that even possible?

by Eli 2007-03-02 02:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings for Democratic Members of Congre

I don't get that one either.

by robliberal 2007-03-02 02:39PM | 0 recs
ADA Rankings

The ADA rankings on Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are interesting. Clinton and Obama have just about the same liberal ranking with their range being from 95% to 100%. Edwards is far below that in the 60's.


Since ADA's founding in 1947, the Annual Voting Records have served as the standard measure of political liberalism.

2006
Clinton 95%
Obama 95%

2005
Obama 100%
Clinton 100%

2004
Clinton 95%
Edwards 60%

2003
Clinton 95%
Edwards 65%

by robliberal 2007-03-02 02:52PM | 0 recs
Re: ADA Rankings

Those rankings are a bit misleading. The reason Edwards got lower ADA scores in 2003-2004 was because he missed votes. Of the votes he did make, he got 100%.

by clarkent 2007-03-02 03:24PM | 0 recs
Re: ADA Rankings

The ADA rating for Edwards for previous years is a little better but it does appear he is more conservative than Clinton and Obama.

2002
Edwards 70%

2001
Edwards 95%

2000
Edwards 85%

1999
Edwards 90%

by robliberal 2007-03-02 03:43PM | 0 recs
Re: ADA Rankings

You should also consider that his votes changed significantly in 2003-2004, when he got much better, and as clarkent said, when he voted then, he was 100%.

by jallen 2007-03-02 05:04PM | 0 recs
Re: ADA Rankings

He never got to 100% according to the rankings.

by robliberal 2007-03-02 05:50PM | 0 recs
Re: ADA Rankings

I guess you didn't understand what I was saying.  Oh well.

by jallen 2007-03-02 10:45PM | 0 recs
Kucinich vs Obama: splitting hairs

Dennis Kucinich is slightly more liberal in relation to his chamber than is Obama, but nearly a quarter of his party's caucus in the chamber was more liberal than him in 2006, according to National Journal (while exactly one-fifth of Senate Democrats were more liberal than Obama in 2006).

I get:
A. counting Jeffords and Sanders in the caucus:
Obama: 10/45 = 22.22% bracket among Sen. Dems
Kucinich: 49/203 = 24.13% bracket among House Dems

B. not counting Jeffords and Sanders in the caucus:
Obama: 10/44 = 22.73% bracket
Kucinich: 49/202 = 24.25% bracket

Not exactly a significant difference.

In fact, the house Dems tend to be quite a bit more liberal than the senate Dems (as for example with Iraq votes, in general), and Kucinich wins this match by a bit, in my opinion.

by NuevoLiberal 2007-03-02 03:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings for Democratic

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS!!!

It confirmed what I knew all along.

You put a smile on my face.

And, I'll definitely be using this post for future reference.

by rikyrah 2007-03-02 04:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Vote Rankings for Democratic Members of Congre

Looking at the rankings of the most conservative Senators -- Mr Unity Chuck Hagel ranks as the most conservative of any possible 08 hopeful. He is to the right of McCain and Sam Brownback. What sort of renegade votes to the right of Sam *&^%ing Brownback -- ???

by thesleepthief 2007-03-02 06:02PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------