Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in California

It happened in Maryland.  And Maine. Now Assemblyman Mark Leno is going to introduce a net neutrality bill in California.

Assemblyman Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) announced today he will introduce "Net Neutrality" legislation that will preserve the free and open Internet by allowing all users to access the content of their choice.

"The Internet has provided a forum for free speech and open communication, giving a voice for everyone from the largest business with the most expensive website to the individual with a one-person operation," said Assemblyman Mark Leno (D-San Francisco).  "We can't allow those who want to serve as our Internet gatekeepers to discriminate against content and decide for us what we can and cannot view."

The legislation will preserve the Internet as we know it- a driving force of economic innovation, a valuable research tool and a forum of free speech and civic involvement.  Specifically, it will prevent companies that control the internet's infrastructure from discriminating against content based on its source or ownership.

Similar legislation has been introduced in Maryland and Maine, but the sizable force of California's economy is expected to help secure Internet freedom nationwide if the legislation becomes law.  The language of the bill closely resembles a concession made by AT&T in finalizing its merger with BellSouth late last year.  Last month US Senators Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced legislation to preserve network neutrality.  Co-sponsors of this congressional bill include Senators Kerry, Boxer, Harkin, Leahy, Clinton and Obama.

A lot of people assumed that with a Democratic takeover of Congress, net neutrality would be passed quickly and we'd be done with it.  I knew that wasn't true, because a willingness to fight the telcos is not uniform within the Democratic caucus.  Like the telcos, I wrote that our fight had to move to the states so that pressure would continue to build against the telecommunications companies that are in the process of locking down our ability to organize and communicate.

Progressives like Leno now have the capacity to work in a national network with other progressive legislators, and that's a big step forward.  We still have a lot of work to do.

Tags: California, Democrats, Maine, Mark Leno, Maryland, net neutrality (all tags)

Comments

4 Comments

Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa

has said that Los Angeles would fund wi-fi internet for the whole city. http://tinyurl.com/28b487

by realtime 2007-02-19 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in California

The language is clean -


The legislation will preserve the Internet as .. a forum of free speech and civic involvement.

I think it is nice that California has seen through the various competing language framework(s) to one that actually calls it like it is.

We're a country that pioneered free speech, and the internet. And it would be a shame if someone took away that accomplishment just because it could make them a few extra spam bucks.

This always was a first amendment issue.

by heyAnita 2007-02-20 01:32AM | 0 recs
Democrats advocating for state laws?

What's wrong with that picture? As the Kung Fu Quips,

Net Neutrality is an interstate issue.  Introducing net neutrality legislation at the state level is a terrible idea...If every state had a different law for regulating Net Neutrality, the federal government would be forced into the equation and would have to regulate the Internet.

We at Hands Off the Internet believe this type of regulation will only perpetuate the broadband crunch problem at a time when we need to identify solutions to strengthen the internet. Regulation is certainly not one of those solutions.      

by knowthenet 2007-02-20 07:22AM | 0 recs
Net Neutrality bills a terrible idea

I posted a comment a couple of hours ago but upon return, it mysteriously disappeared. What the H?

I just wanted to highlight the opposing perspective, for which my organization, Hands Off the Internet, feels strongly about.

Matt highlights net neutrality bills that are popping up on the state level but as Kung Fu Quips, you can't regulate interstate issues on the state level.

Introducing net neutrality legislation at the state level is a terrible idea...If every state had a different law for regulating Net Neutrality, the federal government would be forced into the equation and would have to regulate the Internet.

More regulation means a slower, non-responsive internet. Don't we have more important things to worry about than regulating a problem that doesn't even exist?  

by VoIPLover 2007-02-20 10:07AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------