Building a United Front and a Better Future for All Americans

Matt Stoller recently wrote here about the State of Black America conference which takes place annually during Black History Month. Beginning in August 2006, I was invited to write a weekly summary of race and politics in the blogs with a focus on left-leaning bloggers on MyDD and cross-post on my own blog at Jack and Jill Politics. The goals of "Racial Politics This Week -- A Roundup" at the time were:


  1. To increase discussion about how race impacts American politics in the progressive blogosphere
  2. To introduce MyDD readers and bloggers to new perspectives on smaller blogs and build bridges across the racial divide
  3. To strengthen unity in diversity in what is perceived as a homogenous group of politically-active internet-connected folks
  4. To build awareness and generate creative thinking among some really smart people (that's you) around race and politics for Election 2006 with an eye to 2008

Why is this important? After all, talking about race and U.S. politics is to explore a territory dotted with painful landmines in the national psyche. Race is not easy to talk about. It's not easy for me. I expect for all of us, no matter your ethnicity, talking or even thinking about how race and ethnicity has screwed us up and held us back as a country is difficult.  

For progressives, it is essential that we do a better job understanding this dynamic than our competitors for the nation's hearts and minds. The demographics of our country are changing rapidly. This has the potential to create a solid base of power for progressives if we tap and expand traditional alliances among minorities, liberals, labor and spiritual communities. Costly missteps such as those seen in the 2004 election cycle that will undermine this fragile connection can be avoided with greater awareness and discussion.

The stakes are high.

Crablaw described in a Racial Roundup comment the changing demographics in MD that can be seen across the country:

In Maryland, Steele was (almost) able to take advantage of conditions that will not exist again.

First, African-American, Latino and Asian-American (specifically Korean-American) communities are growing larger, and that will affect redistricting significantly.  Maryland has the second largest Korean-American community in the country by proportion of population...Meanwhile, the old beat-up rural white part of the state is losing population or at least proportion.  The parts that are growing are, with one exception, turning bluer."


Or could turn bluer. Building a strong long term progressive base with minority support is promising, but success is not guaranteed.

I've been looking at Racial Roundups that got over 10 comments to see what struck a nerve. Looking back the comments really vary. There are 2 one comment posts and several that got lots (27, 50, 60) of comments.

People tended to comment on items that they'd seen in the media or the blogs already and were eager to discuss:

-- Candidates you like or hate: esp. Burns, Steele, Cardin, Webb, Donna Edwards (but not Al Wynn), Obama, Ford vs Corker, Dollar Bill Jefferson v. Karen Carter (Again more Carter, less Jefferson)
-- Campaign ads: racist or not
-- Republican racism in general: the concept and history and specific examples like immigration
-- Affirmative action -- the general concept and history but not specific examples like the so-called Michigan Civil Rights Initiative
-- Pop culture and politics: Obama, Oprah, Borat
-- Leading Democrats signifying on race: Dean's comments after the election, the Clinton blogger lunch

The mid-term election roundup got only 10 comments, but they were all really substantive ones. I would love to see more high-level, thoughtful discussion in a similar vein. What do you think? I've seen more diversity of opinion on MyDD around the Racial Roundup posts and I think there has been much greater exposure of minority-written blogs to other bloggers and blog readers -- some of which are run by regular MyDD and DKos diarists. This is a good thing.

"Does racism still exist, to what extent and how do we know" seems to be the theme of many white comments. Not so much: "what do we do about it" as much as "that makes me mad" or some other emotional response. I know that talking about race is emotional. I don't claim any greater right to short out my brain cells and become ahem...inarticulate over injustice and cynicism just because I am black. But we need to get beyond yelling "I am not inferior!" and "I am not a racist!" past each other when discussing race and politics -- and beyond scared silence -- if we are to build a united front that creates a better future for all Americans.

Yet, I find the lack of recognition of how race and racism impacts our political present (and future) troubling. I think that the blogs have an important role to play in calling attention to dynamics in action whether it's the failure to re-build New Orleans and help Katrina victims or the real cost to our nation of a failed immigration system. To be progressive means that you are interested in social reform. It means, unlike conservatives who tend to believe that yesterday was better than today, we believe that tomorrow can be better for everyone than today.

Almost every issue facing America today has a racial component. The majority of African-Americans were against the Iraq War before it started. Few aside outside of Army recruiters appear interested in our opinion then or now however. Take health care. An estimated 40 million Americans are uninsured today. Yet you can't own a car without insurance in most, if not all states. But you can be an American citizen and have no health insurance. There are actually people in the U.S. whose cars are better insured than their own children. How did we decide as a nation that some people's lives are worth less than cars? How does race factor into that decision-making? Or who gets sent to Iraq? Or who gets a good education? Or who gets a job? Or who gets to be an American citizen? Or who lives near a toxic power plant? Or who gets hassled or even shot down by the police for no reason?

The digital divide has changed and now splits along economic and educational rather than racial lines. According to a recent Pew study, American bloggers are actually more diverse than the internet itself. Here's one of my previous comments responding to what I see as common mis-perceptions in the progressive community:

...thanks for your comment. Pew Internet released a study bloggers in July that shows that bloggers are more diverse ethnically than the rest of the internet. Which is already itself pretty diverse now racially if not educationally or economically. The internet increasingly reflects the ethnic makeup of  our country. The digital divide breaks along different lines these days, but people's concept about the character of the internet has not, yet.

The demographics of the United States is changing rapidly. To believe that minorities are not online and therefore not a part of the conversation is wrong. How is the progressive blogosphere going to help embrace the opportunity this presents?

There's a blacks-only political conversation raging online -- in bestselling books, on tv, in the Wikipedia and on radio with a similar one happening with Latinos and Asian-Americans in print, on radio (especially AM radio) and online. There are different heros and villains but with shared progressive goals. In order to create a powerful, lasting movement, we'll need to bridge the divide and figure out how to get on the same page.

Tags: 2008 election, African-American, Asian-American, Latino-American, netroots, progressive movement, race (all tags)

Comments

25 Comments

I always read your roundups but rarely comment

As a Jewish woman living in a 96 percent white state, I don't feel like an expert on how race impacts American politics, or an expert on what we should do about it. I do feel that it is stupid for any person, white or black, to say who black people "should" vote for. I gave money to Ned Lamont and was insulted by people who told me Jews should be for Lieberman.

by desmoinesdem 2007-02-18 07:38AM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better

There are so many threads to untangle. Such as race and class. Health care, education, employment ... all issues of class as well as race. I expect that one of the most common responses this sort of post gets is the 'declining significance of race' thing, and a discussion about the sort of racism that automatically conflates 'black' with 'poor'.

This is a more comfortable discussion for white progressives, I imagine, than one that remains focused more heavily on race. (Which isn't to say it's a discussion without a great deal of value.)

There's terminology, too. I guess it's one of the successes of a hightened awareness of racism that we recoil at being called 'racist.' Such an ugly word, and such an ugly label, and people (whites, usually) deeply resist and resent being called 'racist' ... which makes a discussion and a bridge difficult.

I dunno how many whites here at mydd would say that they're racist. I am. I don't think it's really something that the vast majority of whites (or, I expect, a surprisingly large number of blacks) can avoid. But the word gets in the way. If instead, in inter-progressive discussion, we used something closer to 'inclined to prejudge' or similar (preferably less horribly clunky!), we could talk more openly. I don't think admitting that we've internalized--that all of us have internalized--some unfortunate attitudes is an opportunity for beating our breasts, or pleading for forgiveness, or doing some weird white guilt thing. Screw that. I think we need a more muscular discussion that starts with the expectation that we're all in this spot, and that frankly we might be stuck with these attitudes for a long long time ... so okay. Fine. Sometimes we have unfortunate feeling and reflexes: but what are we going to do?

The fact is, we love to identify others as racist, that's why you get a lot of responses to 'look at the racist rightwingers' comments. It's fun, and makes us feel superior. At least we're not that racist! And oftentimes is helpful, too, because the first step is to try to shame racists and challenge the most overt racism (which is the stuff we usually notice first, especially whites).

I guess what I'm saying is this: other than an acknowledgement that we live with a fairly constant hum of racism (as well as all sort of other nasty shit) radiating in the background, I'm not sure there's much to be done about it. Let's pick the low-hanging fruit, first. Just saying, 'there's a racist element in this or that,' yes, certainly, it's almost always the case. But does making that explicit help move us toward a solution? Maybe fractionally, though I'm not sure even that's true, all the time.

Instead: what specific items of policy could the progressive blogosphere unite around that would benefit blacks? This isn't just pandering. This is taking care of one of our core constituencies, which is vital to our continued strength. So again, I'm not talking about initiatives which emerge from white guilt, but from justice (how to fix a problem) and politics (how to serve and strenthen a vital part of the coalition).

I suppose I'm looking for the African-American equivalent of the Employee Free Choice Act. Not an initiative that 'also' serves blacks, but one that is intended specifically to address some issue of the black community. Not an increase in the minimum wage, but ... what?

And how far would this go to bridge the divide, and to nudge the progressive blogosphere into that blacks-only political conversation?

by BingoL 2007-02-18 08:07AM | 0 recs
One thing MyDD Could do . . .

Is provide a link of the link list for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.

JOINT CENTER MISSION:     
    The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies informs and illuminates the nation's major public policy debates through research, analysis, and information dissemination in order to: improve the socioeconomic status of black Americans and other minorities; expand their effective participation in the political and public policy arenas; and promote communications and relationships across racial and ethnic lines to strengthen the nation's pluralistic society. http://www.jointcenter.org/index.php

History

The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies is a national, nonprofit research and public policy institution. Founded in 1970 by black intellectuals and professionals to provide training and technical assistance to newly elected black officials, the Joint Center is recognized today as one of the nation's premier think tanks on a broad range of public policy issues of concern to African Americans and other communities of color.

The history of the Joint Center has not only mirrored the progress African Americans have made since the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but has also mirrored the nation's political and socio-economic progress over the last three decades. When the Joint Center first opened its doors, there were 1,469 black elected officials (BEOs). There are now over 9,000 BEOs in the United States.

Increasing black political participation formed the foundation of much of the Joint Center's work during the 70's and the 80's. However, as the civil rights era gave way to the era of "economic rights," the Joint Center signaled its expanding focus on job creation and workforce development and changed its name to the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. The principle areas of work now include political participation, economic advancement, and health policy. The Joint Center stands primed to continue to drive the nation's public policy discussions with independent and reliable research, analysis, and assessment.

Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the Joint Center is governed by a board of governors. To learn more about the nation's only black think tank and its influence in shaping public policy debates, please spend time visiting our website or call 202-789-3500 for more information.

When I'm looking for statistics about Black people and Black issues in America, my search often ends when I find precisely what I'm looking for at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.

I don't know anyone from the Joint Center personally, but for as long as I have been involved in politics (30 years?), I have seen their information cited in newspapers and scholarly articles to help America understand issues with an important Black component.

Joint Center Names Ralph Everett as President and CEO

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOVEMBER 29, 2006

Contact:
Christine Naylor
(202) 789-3540
cnaylor@jointcenter.org

Trudy Wong-You
(202) 789-6366
twong-you@jointcenter.org

JOINT CENTER NAMES RALPH EVERETT AS PRESIDENT AND CEO

WASHINGTON - The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, the nation's premier African American think tank, announced today that trailblazing Washington lawyer Ralph B. Everett will serve as its new President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1.

Mr. Everett will lead the Joint Center at an important time for people of color in America, with the number of black elected officials in the U.S. having grown to more than 9,500 and as African Americans prepare to assume the leadership of key committees in the new Congress.

"Having worked with the Joint Center from my days as a young Capitol Hill staffer nearly 30 years ago, I can tell you this appointment is a dream come true for me," said Mr. Everett.  "In this information-seeking environment, I see a wealth of opportunities for the Joint Center to use its knowledge and influence to drive public policy and improve the quality of life for African Americans and for all who pursue the American dream.  It is an honor to be chosen to lead this distinguished organization."

Mr. Everett has worked since 1989 as a partner at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, a leading international law firm with more than 1,000 attorneys in 18 offices throughout Europe, Asia and the United States.  The first African American to receive a partnership at the firm, he has served as Managing Partner of the Washington office and is a member of the Policy Committee and Co-Chair of the Firm's Federal Legislative Practice Group.  While at Paul Hastings, Mr. Everett has specialized in matters pertaining to the legislative and executive branches, as well as independent regulatory agencies.  He has particular experience in telecommunications and transportation policy issues.

In 1982, Mr. Everett became the first African American to head a U.S. Senate committee staff when he was appointed by Senator Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) to be the Democratic staff director and minority chief counsel of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.  When Democrats won majority control of the Senate in 1986, Mr. Everett was named Staff Director and Chief Counsel of the full committee.  There, he played a significant role in major legislation considered by the committee, including cable, broadcast and common carrier legislation, and regulatory reform of the airline, truck, rail and bus industries.

"Ralph Everett is a man of enormous energy who has the experience and the vision to lead the Joint Center into an exciting future," said Elliott Hall, chairman of the Joint Center's board of governors.  "We are delighted that he will be putting his extraordinary networking and coalition-building skills to work for the nation's foremost policy research institution on African American issues."

The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies was established in 1970 to provide training, assistance and research to newly-elected black officials.  Today, its signature research focuses on disparities in health care, improving the socioeconomic status of black Americans and expanding their effective participation in the political and public policy arenas.  Opinion leaders, academics, government officials, business leaders, community activists and the media utilize the Joint Center's research and analysis to improve the lives of African Americans and other minorities.

In addition to his law practice, Mr. Everett has been active in national and community affairs, including six years of service on the board of the National Urban League and more than ten years on the board of the Center for National Policy, where he served as Secretary of the organization.  He has served as a member of the President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, as Vice Chairman of the Commonwealth of Virginia Waste Management Board, and he is currently a member of the Economic Club of Washington, the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Science Museum and Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity.

Mr. Everett currently serves on the boards of directors of Cumulus Media Inc. and the Shenandoah Life Insurance Company.  He is also a member of the Board of Visitors of Duke University Law School and has served as Chair of the Board of Trustees of the historic Alfred Street Baptist Church, the oldest African American congregation in Alexandria, Virginia and one of the oldest Baptist Churches in the United States.

In 1998, President Clinton appointed Mr. Everett as U.S. Ambassador to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Plenipotentiary Conference in Minneapolis, and that year he led the U.S. delegation to the ITU's second World Telecommunication Development Conference in Malta, where he was elected Vice Chairman of the conference attended by representatives from more than 190 nations.

Mr. Everett is admitted to practice law before the United States Supreme Court and is admitted to the bar in the District of Columbia and in North Carolina.

A native of Orangeburg, South Carolina, Mr. Everett is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Morehouse College and has a juris doctor from Duke University Law School, where he was an Earl Warren Legal Scholar.  He began his professional career as a lawyer in the North Carolina Department of Labor in Raleigh.  In 1977, he moved to Washington to work as a legislative assistant in Senator Hollings' office.

Mr. Everett resides in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife, Dr. Gwendolyn Harris Everett.  They have one adult son, Jason Gordon Everett and a daughter-in-law, Heidi Jackson Everett.  

Mr. Everett will succeed Dr. Margaret C. Simms, who has been serving as interim President and Chief Executive Officer.http://www.morehousedc.org/dcchaptermore housemeninthenews.html?sid=11656

Linking providing a link to the Joint Center would help and encourage all of us to make evidence-based and empirical decisions when matters of skin-color, Blacks and Latinos are involved.  With 20% of Democratic National Convention delegates being Black, it is impossible to develop intelligent Democratic strategies without accurate information about Black people.

by francislholland 2007-02-18 12:09PM | 0 recs
Re: One thing MyDD Could do . . .

Not a bad idea. Media Matters is also great for data. The Joint Center has some great info. Their Databank could use an overhaul. There's a lot of comprehensive data in there but much of it hasn't been updated since 1998. Hope the new prez can makes that a priority.

by Jill Tubman 2007-02-18 01:28PM | 0 recs
My absolutely favorite frame

for understanding and talking about race and its role in society is the one found here:

http://www.unlearningracism.org/writings .htm

by Sadie Baker 2007-02-18 08:33AM | 0 recs
Re: My absolutely favorite frame

Sadie -- there is some amazing stuff here! The Guidelines for Improving Communication Within a Diverse Working Group really spoke to me as did Working Assumptions and Guidelines for Alliance-Building.

I'd be very interested to know, if you're white, what you think about Working Assumptions For White Activists On Eliminating Racism: Guidelines For Recruiting Other Whites As Allies?

by Jill Tubman 2007-02-18 01:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

I had a number of friends who were black, Asian, Indian (that means from India people), Filipino, poor, rich, middle class, etc.  I come from an area of WA that was pretty much white when I grew up.  The reason I had these friends was because I went to a state college where people of many different backgrounds and ethnicities mingle together and share their life experiences.  It is a real education when you talk to a person from India who says how proud they are that their country now has nuclear weapons because it shows they are an advanced country.  It is a real education when two of your friends are getting married and one of them is disowned from her family because her new spouse is black.  Everyone needs the kind of exposure that comes from a college town where people come from all over the country and the world and from every different background.  I am sure there are other types of experiences, such as military service, where this kind of exposure happens but it sure needs to happen more.  The more we get people out of their enclaves and into a diverse population the better off our country will be.

by msstaley 2007-02-18 08:51AM | 0 recs
Sensitivity and acknowledged ignorance rule

When the internet was young and gay, I was inclined promiscuously to offer my opinions on all sorts of things - in a way I'd never had done IRL, as they say. Because it was all throwaway.

Now, we've got places of permanent value to build upon and succour (like this one), it matters to me that I speak only on matters in which I believe I have some particular expertise. (Whether I actually have is for others to judge!)

That lets out most of what you wrote about, I'm afraid.

Then there's the sensitivity point. I note that even some (what I perceive as) white commenters here find it hard not to see racism in any criticism of black pols or institutions.

Thus, criticisms I made of the CBC over their actions on Jefferson and Hastings resulted in several playing the race card.

That was fine: this was in my bailiwick, and the stuff needed to be said. Barracking, I can deal with.

But it just reinforced the wisdom of not straying from that bailiwick, particularly where race issues were concerned.

(Around the same time, as I recall, Matt wrote a piece on the CBC, saying that Dems are reluctant to criticize it for fear of drawing abuse for being racist.

Obviously, that sanction has bite when the Dem in question is out and in a political career.)

But - don't let that dissuade you from cross-posting here. As others on the thread have said (rather more succinctly than I!), lack of comments doesn't mean lack of interest.

The idea that I would limit myself to read stuff on which I'm competent to comment - it would be virtual mental imprisonment!

by skeptic06 2007-02-18 08:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Jill, Your post is on point as usual. Your weekly summary  "Racial Politics This Week -- A Roundup" is great. I look forward to reading it each weekend. I'm glad you have been able to increase discussion about how race impacts American politics in the progressive blogosphere. Your post have truly introduced MyDD readers and bloggers to new perspectives. Keep on doing what your doing with MyDD. Your doing a great service to the blogger community through your post. MyDD and Jack and Jill Politics, keep up the good work!

by AAPPundit 2007-02-18 11:02AM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Aw shucks AAPP -- thanks!

by Jill Tubman 2007-02-18 01:45PM | 0 recs
Thanks for doing this, Jill!

As I said in a comment to BingoL, above, one thing that MyDD could do this very day is to add a link here to the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, America's largest and oldest Black think tank.  Link to comment above:  http://francislholland.mydd.com/comments /2007/2/18/121417/095/8#8

Another thing that MyDD could do this very week without inordinate effort is to put up page on the MyDD site that is a list of Blackosphere blogs and put a link to this page on the primary external links list at MyDD.  

The link would be to "Blackosphere Blogs".  When a reader opens that link, a whole list of Blackosphere blog links will appear, in alphabetical order, from which the reader can choose.  For the sake of speed and simplicity, this list could start as simply a list of the blogs that you, Jill Tubman, regularly read now or know of and believe to be valuable.  

The list could evolve later with more elaborate approaches, but the important thing now is to immediately have a way for people at MyDD to begin to access the great variety of Black thought and action that is currently going on.  This link will also be an act of good will toward the Blackosphere while showing newcomers and oldtimers alike that Blacks are indeed valued  - as voters and as site participants - by decision-makers here at MyDD.

By providing one link here that leads to a page of links to Black blogs, it avoids a long and arduous (an inevitably somehow unfair) process of deciding which two or three Blackosphere blogs deserves to be listed.  Better to post a link to a long list that serves as a resource for people who want to learn about the Blackosphere.

by francislholland 2007-02-18 12:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Thanks for doing this, Jill!

Interesting idea to be done somewhere, if not on MyDD. I would hasten to ask if we shouldn't add the emerging latino, asian-american and native american blogs? And how would we decide: maybe an index of the top 10 or top 20 (or top 5 depending on the segment)?

Thanks Francis.

by Jill Tubman 2007-02-18 01:43PM | 0 recs
Black, Latino, Asian

You're right of course.  There could and should be links to blogs from all demographics supporting and participating in the Democratic Party.

I don't think putting up the most popular by site visits will necessarily accomplish a lot, since that's probably going to lead to a blog by the latest Hollywood star, regardless of which Demographic you look at.

Again, this is the sort of complication that is to be avoided at all costs if one wants to get something done simply and quickly.  Just link to the to 20 Blackosphere ones YOU visit, Jill.  That would be a change for the better, and best of all it doesn't require a $200,000 six-month market study.

As for Asian and Latino blogs, the same process could be followed:  See who's Asian and Latino and  post a list of the blogs they visit.  The links at those blogs will lead to other blogs, for anyone interested in doing so.

So, now we're up to three new buttons on the MyDD list related to an aggregate 30% of the Democratic Party base.  That doesn't seem like a lot of new buttons, when you look at it that way.  You don't even have to take down any of the overwhelming number of whitosphere links to put up those three new buttons leading to three new pages, each of which has 20 sites listed - Blackosphere Sites, Latinosphere Sites, Asiansphere Sites.

I would hasten to ask if we shouldn't add the emerging latino, asian-american and native american blogs?

Great idea!  I'm glad you thought of it!  

by francislholland 2007-02-18 03:06PM | 0 recs
I grew up

on Hague Avenue in St. Paul Minnesota.

The block I grew up on was multi-racial.  The older families being, for the most part, white and working class.  The younger families mostly black and, uh, working class.

I'm white. I'm a white, middle class American with a good college degree. But my earliest experiences as a white American were of living in a multi-income, multi-racial community of blacks and whites, of being a "white kid" amidst many African American friends and elders.

When I tell folks about my background it elicits all sorts of unusual, unexpected sets of expectations and insights as if there would or could be one generic experience of growing up white on a multi-racial block.

In my experience, however, especially after having conversed with friends who grew up as "minorities" in one way or another all over the country, it's pretty clear to me that there IS NO set lesson or experience one can draw. Each of our histories is just that, specific.

That being said.  For myself, I think I've been shaped by a couple things.

First, I've come to understand race and racism as "Always On" facets of American life. I'm always shocked to hear people talk as if race can somehow be banished from the table...as if there can be a situation where our ongoing racial history will just evaporate.  In particular, it always strikes me when my fellow white Americans imply that "racism" only comes into play when "other people" or "other races" are around.  

In my experience, race is ALWAYS on, racism is a part of our day to day lives...we're Americans, it's a part of our lives.  In particular I feel the need to mention that race is always on especially when one is a whites only setting.

I don't claim not to be racist.  I don't claim to know or have examined all the assumptions that go into my "whiteness".  Hell, living in the East Bay of California creates a myriad of experiences of race and ethnicity that leave no room for easy answers or pat assumptions. One of the beauties of Oakland is that none of us here can get away from dealing with these intertwined realities and histories.  They are a part of our day to day lives. There so many new arrivals..that we don't have time to hash the past much either.

One thing I do wish that people did more was just talk frankly about race and racism.  Personally, I wish that whites, in particular, would just open up about their experience of race, especially those aspects that involved an all white setting.

There's a lot to be learned on all sides.  A good starting point, of course, is to remember that we are all just people.  Living our lives in our little corner of history.

To think we can escape from or are exempt from our history and racism seems to me to be one of the hallmarks of white privilege.  And I say that as a white, middle class American.

by kid oakland 2007-02-18 01:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

None of us are really observers in the racial drama of the United States, are they? It's an infection we all suffer from. At least that seemed to be the attitude of the abolitionists and of white activists during the Civil Rights Era. How do we recapture that spirit of working together towards common goals?

by Jill Tubman 2007-02-18 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better

I would like to thank you for this post. I hope that this is the beginning of an open dialogue between the blogospheres.

Race is the third rail, times 10, in America, but the only way to help is to talk sincerely about it, with respect.

by rikyrah 2007-02-18 02:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Most whites in the U.S. do not conceive of whiteness as an identity with much specific content.  They/we conceive of white/dominant culture (or their niche in it) as "the norm" without much self-consciousness about doing so.  While white Americans certainly did not invent ethnocentrism, we are among the planet's most faithful practitioners of it.

Trivial example.  A Black law school colleague of mine and I grabbed a bite on a Thursday night 13 years ago.  I was getting ready to depart to go watch "Seinfeld", and commented that I was following the overwhelming majority of the country in doing so.  He correctly informed me that while that show was popular among eastern educated whites, its ratings among Black Americans were pretty weak, and that "Living Single" was the dominant show among black viewers of our approximate age.  I never looked at the bizarrely all-white universe of Seinfeld the same again.  Much the same could be said of Woody Allen's movies, in which the persistent and obnoxious absence of any meaningful black characters - in New York, of all places, not Burlington, Vermont or Reykjavik - in movie after movie after movie speaks volumes.

America's secular left is overwhelming white.  According to polls, less than 1% of African-Americans are atheists; probably 17-20% of whites are explicitly non-religious, atheist or humanist in outlook and, according to one poll that I recall on Daily Kos, more like 40% of Kossacks report an avowedly secular or atheist outlook (what in French is would be term "laique.")  As clumsy as secular whites might be in engaging Black culture life as a whole, their/our cultural incompetence probably hits its Chevy Chase-like zenith in engaging Black spirituality, religious practice and lexicon.  One major exception to this sad rule of general incompetence was the nation's "first Black president."  

It would not surprise me if that cultural difference were part of the digital divide at DKos and, frankly, here.  It would not surprise me either if a great deal of the divide in progressive media and culture extended from religion and especially religious metaphors, lexicon, proverbs (small p and big P) and other references.  If you understand African-American religious culture, Tavis Smiley and Tom Joyner are likely to make a whole lot more sense to you in their monologues, interviews and writings, since both major media figures and authors make liberal use of such cultural references which white people largely miss.

Sadly, many white Americans who come closest to understanding such cultural references are going to be campaigning for Sam Brownback or Mike Huckabee.

by Bruce Godfrey 2007-02-18 04:23PM | 0 recs
How did Woody Allen Make NY so white?

Have you ever wondered at the effort it must have taken to film on the streets of Manhattan without showing a single Black person in the background?  They must have cordoned off the entire street and then taken particular care to exclude the Black half of he public that would otherwise have walked by.

And yet, in all of the Woody Allen films I saw, I can't remember ever seeing a single Black person in the crowd shots of New York.  Am I saying that Woody Allen is "racist"?  No, I'm not, because the word "racist" presumes the existence of a biological phenomenon which has no basis in science - the fallacy of "race".  

What I AM saying is that Woody Allen, as director, must have taken enormous care to exclude all Black people from his movies set in a city where Black people are ominpresent.  That's what I'm saying.

It's up to the psychiatrists to determine what, if any, psychiatric illness would cause such skin-color specific  behavior.

by francislholland 2007-02-19 09:46AM | 0 recs
Re: How did Woody Allen Make NY so white?

Race as a political and, in context, marketing construct is part of how Allen makes his movies and his money.  Some nice liberal hallucination that 2.5 million black New Yorkers vanished, or got kept outside the liberal urban playground.

When Spike Lee commented that Woody Allen aims his movies at an all-white Upper East Side, at first I thought it was Spike Lee finding another topic to get PR about, much ado about nothing.  But Woody Allen's New York is as white as David Duke's family reunion (we assume....)

by Bruce Godfrey 2007-02-19 06:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

What were the costly missteps in the 2004 election cycle?

In this respect, that is. I could keep typing till Thursday on various 2004 missteps and downright blunders, but off the top of my head I can't think of any with specifically racial aspects.

by joyful alternative 2007-02-18 08:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

This is a blunder that has been many, many years in the making, but last Presidential cycle the real weakness of Dem strategy relying on GOTV efforts for elections, but ignoring the community in between cycles became much more apparent.  To the extent that the NYT Magazine had a stunning article highliting the cavalier way Dems have treated the political life of a black SC town.  Part of that weakness was also shown by the fact that Rove and Melman were quite able to peel off a decent number of Black voters in much the same way they were able to peel off working class and middle class whites -- convincing them that their own interests could not be as important as those in charge.

In 2006, Michael Steele's outreach to MD blacks largely consisted of asking the question, What Have They Done for You Lately?  That is a question that I think that Dems would still have a problem answering and I would NOT be surprised if this is a major repub front in attempting to peel off more voters this cycle.

by cassandra m 2007-02-19 09:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Then again, they haven't done anything lately for average white people either, not since Johnson's Great Society.

I'll try to look up that NYT article; it could be where my husband used to live.

by joyful alternative 2007-02-19 06:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Just want to say how grateful I am to you and MyDD for opening this discussion. In the southern states, Democratic victory comes from driving up the black vote and as many white votes as you can peel away from Republicans until you get to 50.01%. The vast majority of votes for Democratic candidates come from black voters and that has been the case since 1965 and will not change for the foreseeable future.

I don't think netroots understands that. We almost lost the senate race here in Virginia because there were too many "progressives" who were willing to throw blacks and older women under the bus. So I am really grateful for this open discussion.

by Alice Marshall 2007-02-19 06:13AM | 0 recs
Thanks for telling us, Alice! n/t

by francislholland 2007-02-19 09:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Building a United Front and a Better Future fo

Folks at myDD who are in the New York City area might be interesed in Facing Race, a conference in late March. The outfit putting in on has a history of trying to help people of color of different races understand the different racisms that condition their lives -- and being welcoming to white folks of good will. (Full disclosure, I worked for these folks in the 90s.)

In California in the 90s as the state passed the demographic tipping point at which whites ceased to be the majority, Republicans capitalized on white anxiety to pass a series of measures designed to create structural barriers to the majority taking hold as full citizens. We outlawed affirmative action, bilingual education, took a swing at immigrants with Prop. 187 (invalidated but now mostly federal law) and passed a 3 strikes incarceration measure that has filled the prisons with permanent, mostly black and brown, inmates.

White Americans can't hold back the demographic tide, but they can get very nasty trying to slow it down -- or all of us together can take over the Democratic party and make it the party that manages onrushing racial diversity successfully so as to preserve democracy. We have a choice.

by janinsanfran 2007-02-19 11:23AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------