People-Powered Government

I'll be talking up transparency increasingly over the next few months because of a project I'm working on called The Open House Project. It's sponsored by the excellent Sunlight Foundation, and endorsed by Speaker Pelosi.  This is an area which, for a variety of reasons, the conservative movement and the new progressive movement share an alignment of interest.  It's Crashing the Gate and people-powered, only it's government instead of politics.

Here's what the Open House Project is doing, and how you can help.

The rules of the House of Representatives haven't really been reconsidered in any fundamental way since 1995.  Let's take a couple of examples - member web sites and mass emails are still governed by franking rules that were largely designed to handle offline correspondence.  As a result, it's difficult to integrate things like comments and youtube into a member or committee web page.  It's even difficult to link from a member websites to outside sites.  Imagine that - a representative of the people has a hard time engaging in the vibrant public conversation going on all over the internet because of traditions inherited from a time before the internet was a mass medium.  Another example is that committee transcripts of hearings are required to be collected according to a rule established in 1946, but not required to be published.  Since there was no internet in 1946, where would the House publish committee transcripts?  This means that public committee hearings, which should be accessible to the millions on the web in a taggable and bloggable format, are hidden.  Public officials should be salivating at the opportunity to distribute their content on the web, but they often don't know that a whole new world is out there.

In other words, since 1995, there's been a tremendous change in our communications environment, mostly notably the mass spread of the internet, the development of web 2.0, and the emergence of tens of millions of citizens into a newly energized public sphere.  With the takeover of Congress by the Democrats, there's an opportunity to reconceptualize how the House and its members relate to the public.  Speaker Pelosi knows this, and is encouraging the public to come up with ideas.

The Open House Project is meant to jumpstart a discussion on this topic.  It's a working group made up of right-wingers, left-wingers, and nonpartisan open government advocates whose goal is to take suggestions, work through them, and come up with recommendations for Speaker Pelosi and other members of Congress on what is possible and, most importantly, easyto get done with the way that the House currently operates.

The operating principle of the Open House Project is known as Paving the Cowpaths. We're trying to find the least intrusive ways to open up the House, the low-hanging fruit where the internet and Congressional procedures come together. The potential of this project lies in the possibility of experts and citizens from all fields to come together and identify areas where Congress can open up and allows all of us to have more information and access.

If you'd like to help, come to the Open House Project and add a suggestion.  If you're a Hill staffer, you can suggest changes confidentially here.   Our Google group is here.

I'm going to be writing updates on the Open House Project.  We're already discovering how government functions and the different hurdles and opportunities in creating a very webby people-powered government.

Disclosure: I consult for the Sunlight Foundation on this project.

Tags: open house project (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Re: People-Powered Government

Good job this week everyone.  As they are saying at Firedoglake, ding

A

by Awfergu 2007-02-09 01:45PM | 0 recs
how about C-SPAN camera control?

I was really disappointed when Speaker Pelosi did this:

The House of Representatives is often called "the People's House." So wouldn't it be nifty if the "people" could see what was going on in their own house?

But those watching on TV really can't. Only tight camera shots of lawmakers speaking on the floor -- or of the presiding officer in the chair -- are allowed. The camera is not permitted to pan the chamber. Incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) had promised that the Democrats would have "the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history."

So Brian Lamb, the head of C-Span, which got the electronic eye into the House and Senate in the first place nearly three decades ago, thought this would be a great opportunity to improve coverage. (The GOP turned him down in 1985.)

He wrote Pelosi asking for more cameras, saying the current system "does a disservice to the institution and to the public." For example, the fixed camera means "you can never get a reaction shot" during a debate, he told us, so it "takes out of the experience any soul" or sense of the give-and-take.

Not so, Pelosi said in a Dec. 22 letter to Lamb. "I believe the dignity and decorum of the United States House of Representatives are best preserved by maintaining the current system of televised proceedings," she wrote.

The wingnuts also had a problem with her decision.

by Bob Brigham 2007-02-09 01:52PM | 0 recs
Re: how about C-SPAN camera control?

C-Span has weird issues with allowing content to be reused on the web.  I don't think this is necessarily a bad decision.

by Matt Stoller 2007-02-09 01:58PM | 0 recs
we know why this is

Many of these speeches are delivered to an empty chamber.  So it is embarrassing, and will be used for political attacks and late-night comedy.

by John DE 2007-02-12 04:43AM | 0 recs
Really good news

Without wanting to go all - y'know, Stoller - about it, this is huge.

The availability (mostly, the lack of it) of committee hearing transcripts is one of the things that bug me the most about Congress online.

All you get is the GPO, which is 6 months behind (at least) and doesn't cover every hearing.

The idea that one of ours will be involved in opening up this area is really encouraging.

(Plus, you get a few spons out of it, and add to your showreel.)

Nice work.

by skeptic06 2007-02-12 04:33AM | 0 recs
Re: People-Powered Government

Seems fascinating and important.  Good to see you involved, Matt, and thanks for the post.  Keep em coming.  This is important infrastructure building, and I have a feeling the MyDD community will be able to contribute to the effort.

by mitchipd 2007-02-12 05:32AM | 0 recs
Off topic: wireless networks

Sorry to go off topic here, but I wanted to post a comment triggered by a Breaking Blue post you did Matt:

First of all, I'm glad to see you picking up on that wireless net neutrality paper by Tim Wu and to see him taking the time to address that issue.  I hope to read it myself soon.  

On another wireless front, there's a pending FCC proceeding (comments filed end of January, replies due March 2) about opening up big chunks of high-quality broadcast spectrum for unlicensed use after broadcasters return their analog spectrum in early 09.  

Like Wu's paper, this FCC proceeding is part of the broad and expanding debate on "open vs. closed networks" as it relates to wireless.  Broadcasters want rules that severely limit spectrum use, especially for personal/portable devices, while Google, Intel, MSFT, HP and Dell are arguing for a regime that could open up the possibility of creating next-generation muni/open access wireless networks that could potentially change the whole competitive dynamic in broadband.  

New America Foundation in DC is also leading the charge on this, and the NAF web site has an assortment of very good papers on this issue, some of which are not that technical.
http://www.newamerica.net/programs/wirel ess_future

The proceeding is FCC Docket 04-186. If you go to this URL:  http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsr ch_v2.cgi you can get access to the comments file by typing 04-186 in the "Proceeding" box at the upper left.  Most of the comments are pretty technical, related to interference, etc.

It's also possible to submit comments, and I noticed there are some short email filings that have been submitted by individual citizens.  It might be nice for the FCC to hear from MyDDers and other citizens who want more spectrum opened up for unlicensed use.  If their rules lean too far toward protecting broadcasters (and cable operators), it could kill, or at least seriously restrict, the potential of this spectrum to provide a high-capacity alternative open network.  Broadcasters, of course, are very good at this regulatory game, with a lot more experience than the hi-tech coalition that's arguing the other side of the issue.

Reply comments are due March 2.

Some info on how to file comments is at these links.  I believe there's a way to file comments by email (see second link):
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/uploa d_v2.cgi
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/email.html

by mitchipd 2007-02-12 06:47AM | 0 recs
American Legends

I love the blog that you have. I was wondering if you would link my blog to yours and in return I would do the same for your blog. If you want to, my site name is American Legends and the URL is:

http://www.americanlegends.blogspot.com

If you want to do this just go to my blog and in one of the comments just write your blog name and the URL and I will add it to my site.

Thanks,
Mark

by JMEnglish 2007-02-12 06:28AM | 0 recs
Re: People-Powered Government

The concept of the Sunlight Foundation is a good one.  Based on what I've what I've read at metroactive.com, I'm not sure if this is the best group to promote the intended goals.

http://metroactive.com/metro/01.31.07/mi chael-r-klein-0705.html

If the Sunlight Foundation receives a bulk of it's funding via Astar Air Cargo, which handles a lot of defense contracts, then I think this alliance should be clearly defined.

War profiting by any companies, including political spouses, must be investigated.  If Richard Blum, husband of Dianne Feinstein, is making a huge profit with the Iraq war, then I think the American people deserve to know the details.

by epretzel 2007-02-12 11:01AM | 0 recs
Re: People-Powered Government

Hello epretzel! I see this is your first comment here. Tell me, do you believe everything you find on the internets?

Spend a few minutes reading the so-called reporting by Peter Byrne that The Bohemian has published on Mike Klein, Sunlight Foundation's founder, and on his relationship with Senator Feinstein and her husband, Richard Blum and you will see it all dissolves into thin air.

For example, Byrne alleges that Sunlight set up Congresspedia.org, our wiki with a page on every Member of Congress that anyone can contribute to, in order to whitewash Feinstein's record after some critical material was posted on her Wikipedia page. (I kid you not, Byrne really thinks this.)

Yet a check of Congresspedia's page on Feinstein shows several critical references, including a link to an article by David Baker raising some of the same issues from 2003. The user logs show that article was posted on Feinstein's page two months in advance of Bryne's.

War profiteering (not "profiting," epretzel) is a serious charge. But only five percent of Astar's business is military; the vast majority of its income comes from flying civilian freight for DHL. And Astar is hardly Mike Klein's main source of income; as he made clear in a letter to the editor published by the Bohemian, less than 5 percent of his income has come from military- or civil-government-related revenue. His principal asset is CoStar Group Inc., a business he founded that sells commercial real estate data embedded in software. Hardly a defense contractor or war "profiter."

Here's a link to Klein's letter to the editor, responding to the major claims made in those stories. http://bohemian.com/bohemian/02.07.07/le tters-0706.html

If epretzel cares about the truth, he or she will admit that Byrne's articles are full of holes.

Micah Sifry

Full disclosure: I am a consultant to the Sunlight Foundation and have been since December 2005. And I am working with Matt Stoller on the Open House Project.

by Micah Sifry 2007-02-13 01:35PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------