Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Senate Democrats stand strong:Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday scrubbed a planned vote on President George W. Bush's bid to keep John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Committee Chairman Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican, did not explain why the vote on whether to send Bolton's nomination to the full Senate was removed from the day's agenda and did not say if or when it would be taken up again.

Given Democratic opposition to Bolton's nomination, all Republicans on the committee would have to back him in order to send his name to the Senate with a full endorsement. Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, who is locked in a tight re-election bid, has not publicly said how he would vote. I just received word over email that the nomination has been pulled (although maybe that is the same thing as the vote being cancelled--I'm not sure). This follows reports that Senate Democrats had enough votes to filibuster a floor vote:With some colleagues, I have completed a real whip list, and the Republican leadership and the White House are wrong again this year. Based on conversations with individual Senators and their aides, I can say confidently that they don't have the votes.

Republicans need 60 Senators to win a cloture motion and end debate. Without tipping my hand completely, I can say that the Republican leadership has 53 votes it can count on, and another 4 who are leaning in its direction but uncertain. On a sunny day, that makes 57. Even if they capture the 2 truly undecided votes, that still leaves them a vote short of the 60 they need. It's simply not going to happen.

Democrats need to wake up and realize they have the votes to defeat the Bolton nomination. They've been lulled to sleep by the August recess and psyched out by the Republicans' phony show of confidence in Bolton's confirmation chances. After the 2006 elections, Bush will still be President and Democrats probably will not control the Senate. I imagine w can expect more of these nonsense attempts to confirm Bolton, but the Senate will be more Democratic, which makes the odds of said confirmation even lower than before. Whatever happens though, Bolton's authority at the UN will continue to be undermined, which in turn undermines the neo-con agenda. This is a nice victory for Democrats, and before long I hope we can start celebrating much bigger victories than this.

Tags: Bolton, Senate 2006 (all tags)

Comments

8 Comments

Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Operation Save Chafee?  

by Pogues Fan 2006-09-07 08:58AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Almost certainly. Chafee may have been planning to send the nomination to the full Senate, then vote no, but unless Frist wanted an insta-vote with no debate, he could have done that to keep the Laffey-taffy crowd happy, then voted against Bolton after the primary to keep on the side of moderate Dems in RI.

Any Senate procedural experts know whether Lugar had to get the nomination pulled in order to avoid a committee vote, or whether it could be delayed?

by etagloh 2006-09-07 10:05AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

A victory for sanity in America's foreign policy.

No more jerks masquerading as diplomats, dragging America's good name through the dirt and bringing us closer to WWIII.

by justintime 2006-09-07 09:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Whatever happens though, Bolton's authority at the UN will continue to be undermined, which in turn undermines the neo-con agenda.

Can he be reappointed by recess appointment?  Doesn't his one-year emergency term expire pretty soon?  If a president can just keep reappointing someone without the confirmation of Congress, doesn't that kind of make the whole advise and consent function a joke?

by antidoto 2006-09-07 09:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

I don't think that a recess appointment can be renewed by another recess appointment.

by rfahey22 2006-09-07 09:52AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Yes, it can:

The President may make successive recess appointments of the same or a different
individual to a position. Payment from the Treasury to the appointee may be limited,
however, under 5 U.S.C. 5503.

Meaning that Bolton could get re-recess-appointed, but he wouldn't get paid for the privilege.

by etagloh 2006-09-07 10:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Bolton Vote Cancelled; Nomination Pulled

Not getting paid will be fine with Bolton.  The neocons will still find a way to keep his hands wet.

by AnthonyMason2k6 2006-09-07 04:01PM | 0 recs
by manie 2007-04-09 04:55AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------