What The "DOS" Story Is About

I just talked with Eddie, and he told me that yes, turnout was very high in some places and pretty low in other places. However, he told me, there was a consistent pattern where it was very high in Lamont wards and very low in Lieberman wards. This is not surprising. We have poll watchers all over the place, and canvassers to back them up in those same wards. Lieberman, by contrast, has no one at the polls, has cancelled the rest of his public appearances today, and has invited his supporters not to volunteer, but instead to attend a party at 5pm, during peak voting. Things seem to be going well today for Ned Lamont, and Joe Lieberman is on the brink of a defeat--possibly a defeat that would surpass expectations, thereby finishing Lieberman off.

For a long time, the storyline the Lieberman camp was going to use to justify an Independent run was low turnout. The Lieberman camp kept pushing a narrative that they would do better with high turnout, and that they wanted to make a case to as many voters as possible. However, with turnout looking pretty good today, and with it looking like high turnout will help Lamont, not Lieberman (read Mystery Pollster for more on this), that justification for an independent run is collapsing. Now, they need something else, and have latched onto this "dirty tricks" narrative. If the storyline reads that Lieberman was robbed by evil bloggers, then he can justify running as an independent almost no mater what he loses by. The lapdog media has been more than helpful in fueling this narrative for Lieberman.

Never mind that the Lieberman website crashed the last time they had huge traffic back in June. Never mind that the Lamont campaign has offered to come help fix the problem. Never mind that the Lamont website has a Google cache link to the Lieberman website, thus allowing it to receive several times more traffic than it would have otherwise. Never mind that the Lieberman website had no interactive features or tools for supporters to use anyway. Never mind that the idea that this is even a DOS attack doesn't add up. Never mind any of this, because the lapdog press cannot stop falling all over themselves to help throw Lieberman a lifeline for a few last minute sympathy votes and a justification to run even if he loses tonight.

Gotta run--Ned just walked in. Keep contacting reporters.

Tags: CT-Sen, Media (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Re: What The "DOS" Story Is About

Look, Lieberman's stronger areas of support (among blue collar workers and African-Americans) will probably not vote until they get off work so turnout now means nothing.

Bowers alluded to this with his 5pm as prime voting time, but I just wanted to make it clear.

by MNPundit 2006-08-08 11:31AM | 0 recs
Re: What The "DOS" Story Is About

Which is why this smear is killing Lamont.

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-08-08 12:02PM | 0 recs
well

it's a little early to assess that it's "killing" him, unless you got some polling data I don't know about.

It has the potential to hurt, yes.

by Teaser 2006-08-08 12:05PM | 0 recs
Re: well

Hyperbole, I admit. But Lamont needs to get a forceful denial, and snarky putdown of desperate old Joe ON CAMERA before the 5pm News broadcasts start.

They need that countervailing soundbite for the TV stations to run when the INEVITABLY make that one of the lead stories this evening.

Turn it into a He said/WATB said story rather than a one-sided attack on Ned Lamont where his only responses have been to claim the charge is "scurrilous" like some 18th centruy barrister, and poor Tim Tagaris on the Lamont Campaign weblog.

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-08-08 12:09PM | 0 recs
Re: well

get a grip

by bruh21 2006-08-08 12:15PM | 0 recs
Re: well

I have to admit that a snarky response and denial by Ned in time for the local news would be a pretty good idea. But this is a minor flap at best, no matter how much it's spun.

by MNPundit 2006-08-08 12:18PM | 0 recs
Re: What The "DOS" Story Is About

Found a blog peddling this nonsense up here in MA:

http://underthegoldendome.blogspot.com/2 006/08/dirty-political-tricks-sen-lieber mans.html

by Shai Sachs 2006-08-08 11:40AM | 0 recs
Re: What The "DOS" Story Is About

I posted about this at the blog I mostly neglect, but this story is a problem with Lamont's campaign even after today.  It ties too closely into the bloggers-as-manipulators story, and is going to be used in a smear campaign by Lamont's opponent(s).

This story has to be turned around. Anyone who can needs to comment to reporters that this is about the incompetence of Lieberman and his campaign, and not about Lamont's supporters.  They couldn't even keep up a web site.  Only after you've established a counter-story can you go into details about how fishy the "attack" theory is.

by Neogaidaros 2006-08-08 11:42AM | 0 recs
Re: What The "DOS" Story Is About

You don't even need to do that.

Just have Ned Lamont tell some reporter, on camera, that Joe is lying, that the Lamont campaign has nothing to do with it, and that Joe is looking for anyone else to blame for his defeat in the election than himself.

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-08-08 12:04PM | 0 recs
Nope, not Lamont
Have some staffer make an official statement, then ignore it. If a reporter asks Lamont directly, all he needs to say is, "I don't know anything about why the Lieberman website had problems, it had nothing to do with our people -- who incidently offered to help the Lieberman folks with their problem. Do you have any questions for about real issues?"
by Bearpaw 2006-08-08 12:11PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------