The Internet Slaps Back At Nasty Actors

There's lots of very cool electoral, political, and organizational news on the net neutrality front, including more public humiliation of net neutrality opponents.  The video above is just one local story from Save the Internet's nationwide set of rallies over the past few days.  Here's where we are in the fight.  

In September and October, we're going to see a massive push by telecom companies on net neutrality.  They've been doing quiet lobbying through astroturf groups, but it's going to heat up dramatically.  Included in this PR campaign will be a push by the Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras to talk about the issue in a way that's favorable to telecom companies.  Majoras is a Bush crony and comes from big business, a sort of Michael Brown of the internet, so it'll be interesting to see what kind of backlash this potential move from the Bush administration provokes.  One thing to note is that the Bush administration is apparently going to unmask itself as a net neutrality opponent.  I imagine the telecom companies don't realize what they're doing here, and that Deborah Platt Majoras doesn't understand that she's putting herself in a very very public spotlight.  But then, political insight hasn't been a strong suit of the telecom lobby.

On our side, there have been grassroots lobbying efforts throughout August.  There were rallies around the country today and yesterday in front of Senate offices, and four Senators came out in favor of net neutrality (Schumer, Jeffords, Harkin, and Dayton) this week.  Tim Karr runs down the rallies.  There was great local coverage of the incredible events in Detroit, New York, Buffalo, Fayetteville, Denver, Boston, Newark, Providence, Baltimore, Portland (ME), Seattle, Eau Claire and Milwaukee, Montpelier, Wilmington, Orlando, Honolulu, Louisville, Columbus, Madison, Spokane, Charleston, Albuquerque, and Santa Fe.  Our Senate tally is updated here, so you can see where your Senator stands. Note all the waffling by the R's.  That's not an accident.

And now we get to the most fun part of the fight, which is how the internet is taking its revenge on bad characters.  This time, it's Ted Stevens and George Allen.  When we set out on this fight, it wasn't a progressive issue, but based on the people who have unmasked themselves as opponents of net neutrality, it is becoming a fight over the progressive nature of the internet.  And what's interesting when we're fighting over progressive values is how multiple fights always seem to converge at key points among key personalities.  Take George Allen, for instance.

It shouldn't be a surprise that Allen, in his perch on the Commerce Committee, voted against net neutrality.  The internet has practically destroyed his Presidential prospects in 2008, and may cause him to lose his Senate seat.  Ironically, Allen is now running running TV ads touting his high technology work in Virginia, evasively avoiding discussion of his vote against net neutrality.  At the time, Allen had $10 million on hand, and was considered a leading Presidential contender for the Republicans in 2008.

Since that vote, the internet has hit back, hard.  It's well-known by now that George Allen's campaign is being ruined by the Macaca comment, a racist jab that flew all over the internet because of youtube and blogs, and then all over Virginia through local and national media.  Allen still can't escape it, and his polling numbers have crumbled.  But what's less well-known is how an internet draft campaign recruited his opponent, Former Reagan administration official Jim Webb.  Moreover, internet sleuths have linked Allen with the KKK descended group the Conservative Citizens Council, circulating pictures of Allen with the group's leadership online.  

So I'll just point out that net neutrality, internet politics, and electoral work are all converging on Allen.  A candidate drafted by activists on the internet, Jim Webb, is now challenging Allen, an internet foe.  There is just a very bright and stark line, and a real race, where before the Senate reelection was seen as a cakewalk and prep time for 2008.  Earlier this year, Allen was hanging out in Iowa and talking about how bored he was in the Senate.  Now he's hanging on for his political life.

Another character getting smacked is Ted Stevens, who recently placed a secret hold on a bill to prevent a searchable database of earmarks, supposedly as revenge against the Senator trying to prevent Stevens' pet pork 'bridge to nowhere' from being funded.  Citizen journalists on the internet forced Stevens and his secret hold to come to light by querying every Senator about whether they had used the tricky legislative maneurver.  Stevens of course is the force behind eviscerating net neutrality in the Senate.  Stevens hasn't yet lived down his series of tubes moment, when he solidified his image as a cranky old man who either hangs out in haunted amusement parks or yells at pigeons.

Lead actors involved in the net neutrality fight on the other side have seen a massive loss of prestige and substantial public embarrassment.  Al Wynn is facing a real primary challenge in Donna Edwards.  George Allen got torched by internet activists, and saw his political career and influence reduced dramatically.  And George Allen, Ted Stevens, and Mike McCurry are all to varying degrees objects of public ridicule.

There were rallies all around the country yesterday and today to save the internet, to save net neutrality.  This train is leaving the station.  I wouldn't want to be in its way.

Tags: Al Wynn, Chuck Schumer, Deborah Platt Majoras, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, George Allen, Jim Jeffords, Mark Dayton, net neutrality, Ted Stevens, Tom Harkin (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

Re: The Internet Slaps Back At Nasty Actors

So one of the anti-Democrats who support Lieberman may be the deciding vote on net neutrality? He needs to informed in no uncertain terms that what happened to his friend WILL happen to him if he votes wrong.

by Sitkah 2006-08-31 04:40PM | 0 recs
Re: The Internet Slaps Back At Nasty Actors

Thanks for posting this, great insight on the influence of the internet in Virginia particularly.

by Matt in VA 2006-08-31 05:50PM | 0 recs
Allen Is #1 Incumbent Senator in Tech PAC $$

Focusing on Allen (R-Va.) is important. There's an on-line article today from "National Journal's Telecom Update" that is entitled "Telecom, Cable Interests Channel Donations To Republican Incumbents." The story has this paragraph:

    Allen has received $260,132 in PAC money from the tech sector this cycle -- more than any senator up for re-election. NAB, NCTA, Siebel Systems and VeriSign each contributed $10,000 to Allen.

There's lots more good background information in the article. It's at: http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/tel co/live/tb-OKES1155672762163.html

by BB10 2006-09-01 07:27AM | 0 recs
FWIW


   Most people don't really understand the concept of net neutrality, but when it's explained to them, they almost uniformly favor it. I was able to convince my right-wing father that net neutrality was the desirable outcome here. I used the cable-TV analogy -- can you set up your own cable channel if you want to? Can you switch to another cable provider if you're dissatisfied with your current one? Would you like your ISP to decide for YOU what websites you can and cannot access?

 I explained to him that the Hands Off ads were just telco propaganda -- it's the first time he'd heard the term "astroturf organization". (He found it extremely amusing.) He gets it now.

 That's what we need to do. Make sure your friends and family understand that net neutrality is WHAT WE HAVE NOW, and it WORKS JUST FINE.

by Master Jack 2006-08-31 06:08PM | 0 recs
Re: FWIW

It's actually funny that you mention switching to another cable provider - the bill that everyone seems so intent on blocking actually doesn't gut net neutrality (it just doesn't create strong net neutrality laws either), but it does seek to create new competition in the cable TV market so that people could switch to another provider.

by WADem 2006-09-01 08:55AM | 0 recs
Re: The Internet Slaps Back At Nasty Actors
That was a very good piece by the local team.  They took what can sometimes be an overly complex issue and distilled it into something easily managable for the general public.  Nice work.
America's Least Wanted
by budpaul 2006-08-31 07:28PM | 0 recs
I saw an anti-net nutrality ad on cable.

If you ask me, cable companies should be banned from using their own pipes for Propaganda.  They ran some goofy propaganda against Iowa's government educational fiber optic network. And now they're running ads against net neutrality "Net neutrality means you pay more." They say.  

Really lame. And it's lame that they can use their own monopoly TV networks to pump in propaganda

by delmoi 2006-08-31 09:19PM | 0 recs
Quest President Charles Ward

Two things.  

First, take a close look at his responses.

"At the end of the day, it has to be supported with revenues."  

"It is how investments get supported."  The reporter goes on to paraphrase Mr. Ward that if there is more regulation on the internet, it would seriously stifle new developments on the internet.

Most popular sites found their way to the internet, to market, and found their revenues, all without the "help" of telecoms.  They already pay telecoms for access.  Ward makes no case at all why the internet should be rigged to create another additional new revenue stream for telecoms, he just repeats that telecoms should be able to be supported by revenues.    There is no illumination, explanation, or justification for this.  Can you explain that part, Mr. Ward?  

Second, look at his seating position, posture, facial expressions, and speech pattern.  The slouch to the right, the unnatural right arm on both the arm of the chair and on his knee (try it, you'll see what I mean) create a defensive seating posture without crossing arms or legs.  The breaks in direct eye contact to the reporter, the nervous laughter, and the high rate of eye blinks says to me that this guy is very uncomfortable and defensive being asked these questions.  

Running a line of total bull would sub-consciously elicit these non-verbal communication cues.

He doesn't have the honesty to say telecoms want a bigger piece of the pie, even if it's not their pie.  Google went from zero to many tens of billions of dollars of worth, and telecoms are upset they didn't get a chunk of that-a BIG chunk-and they are determined it will never happen again.  While Google was happeneing, telecoms stock value was being pummelled by investors.  Qwest is worth half of what it was in 2001.  

Being able to take a piece of internet companies like Google and others would have been a real earnings shot in the arm, and made those telecom execs stock option plans worth millions more.  The control is just a side benefit of getting the money.

by markt 2006-09-01 06:53AM | 0 recs
Re: The Internet Slaps Back At Nasty Actors

The internet does work just fine now and there is no need for Congress to intervene by slapping on more regulations.

This opinion in The Sun News focuses on the big picture, "Passage of the legislation would bring real competition to our nation's telecommunications and cable TV marketplace. Among its many positive effects, the bill would streamline the process by which providers get video service franchises from government. This would ensure faster deployment of new TV services delivered over the broadband telecom network, which would mean more TV service choices for consumers sooner, lower prices, greater technology and product innovation and more investment in the nation's economy and broadband network."

The piece also notes that "The real shame is that the red herring Net neutrality issue threatens all of the good that the Senate Communications Bill would do for consumers, schools, first responders and rural Americans. The Senate must oppose the self-serving restrictive Net neutrality amendments sought by the bill's opponents. At the least they are unnecessary since the bill contains an Internet Consumer Bill of Rights that more than addresses the issues trumped up by Google and Microsoft."

VoIPLover - Hands Off The Internet

by VoIPLover 2006-09-01 07:21AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------