Senate 2006 Forecast

Bookmark the MyDD Senate forecast

It's back--the permanent Senate forecast. Although it took me all day to put this together, the hard work is done now. With this in place, now I can update the forecast nearly every day. This forecast will be updated regularly between now and November 7th. Until October 17th, I will use registered voter polls instead of likely voter polls where possible. I will also continue to add features, such as local blogs covering each race, and ways you can volunteer to help each campaign. If you can think of more features to add, just list them in the comments. I'm moving directly into working on the permanent Governor's forecast for tomorrow, so expect light posting from me until I have that ready. This stuff takes a while.

Overall: Republicans currently control the Senate 55-43-2. Democrats need at least a net total of six seats in order to take control. One incoming Independent, Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has indicated he will caucus with the Democrats. One Independent in a dogfight, Joe Lieberman (CfL-CT), currently indicates that he will caucus with Democrats.

Thirty-second forecast, August 21: I currently project Republicans to hold the Senate, 51-48-1, with Democratic pickups in Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana and Connecticut. Dick Cheney will be the tie-breaking vote. I do not project any Republican pickups at this time.

Complete details on all competitive races can be found in the extended entry. Campaigns are ranked by tiers, and then ranked within tiers. If I do not list a race, I do not consider that race to have any realistic chance of switching parties this year.
Democratic Targets

Lean Democratic
1. Rhode Island. (Democrat: Sheldon Whitehouse). All trends point blue. Chafee could very well lose his primary to Laffey, which would end the race right then and there. Even if Chafee wins the primary, Whitehouse has significantly out-raised Chafee (and Laffey is nearly equal to Chafee). Whitehouse has also pulled ahead in all polls. Given current trend lines and being squeezed form both sides, in one of the bluest states in the country it is hard to see how Chafee can make up any ground. If Chafee is going to dig into his family fortune, he better start now. This seat looks good.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign.
Latest polls: Rasmussen, August 3rd: Whitehouse 44%, Chafee 38%; Brown University, June 26: Whitehouse 38%, Chafee 37%

2. Pennsylvania. (Democrat: Bob Casey) Bob Casey needs to take this campaign off his front porch. While both sides had been expecting this race to become closer for some time, the recent wave of polls that all showed the race closer than it had been, the more disturbing trend for Casey is that his name ID has actually dropped 9% since February 2005 in the Q-poll. Still, with Rendell cruising to victory and with the Green Party almost certainly off the ballot, Casey should be fine once he finally goes on air, but it would be nice if he seemed to have a plan besides going on air.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign.
Latest polls: Quinnipiac, August 13, Casey 48%, Santorum 42%; Strategic Vision (R), August 13, Casey 48%, Santorum 41%; Rasmussen (R), August 3, Casey 50%, Santorum 39%; Muhlenberg, August 3rd, Casey 45%, Santorum 39%.

Toss-ups
3. Ohio. (Democrat: Sherrod Bown). I agonized over whether to put this race in the "lean Democratic" category, but I just couldn't quite do it yet. While Sherrod Brown now leads in all polls, while DeWine's approval rating is under 50%, and while Ohio is ripe for Democrats this year, Brown just does not lead by enough in the reliable polls, is still over $2M behind in cash on hand, and DeWine's negative approval is too new a phenomenon. I just cannot be an honest election forecaster and say Brown has a clear edge here--yet. But this race is close to moving up a category.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Rasmussen (R), July 27, Brown 44%, (Columbus Dispatch, July 20 DeWine 42%; Brown 45%, DeWine 37%; Survey USA, June 13, Brown 48%, DeWine 39%.

4. Montana: (Democrat: Jon Tester). This is a tight race. Tester is rising on people-power, and Burns is faltering in front of the media's eyes. However, Burns maintains a significant fundraising advantage, and the polls are tight. Trends are clearly toward Tester, but money and the conservative nature of Montana keep this race in the toss-up category.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest Polls: Rasmussen (R), August 8: Tester 47%, Burns 47%; Lake Research Partners (D), June 26: Tester 43%, Burns 42%

5. Missouri: (Democrat: Claire McCaskill). This race has been deadlocked for some time, and there are no signs of that breaking. McCaskill is slightly ahead in the polls and somewhat noticeably ahead in favorable ratings, but Talent has gobs and gobs of cash. I expect this race to go down to the wire.
Money race: Open Secrets on the campaign
Latest Polls:Survey USA, August 14: McCaskill 47%, Talent 46%; Rasmussen (R), August 15: Talent 46%, McCaskill 44%, Talent 42%; Research 2000, June 22: McCaskill 49%, Talent 43%

Lean Republican
6. Virginia (Democrat: Jim Webb). This race is moving up fast, and has the potential to reach the "toss-up" category before long. Without even going on air, the latest Rasmussen poll shows Webb within only five points, as the Virginia public sours on Allen's increasingly negative public image. People-power is propelling another candidate forward, and right now only a colossal fundraising gap probably stands in the way of Webb and a toss-up.
Money race: Open Secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Survey USA, August 20, Allen 48%, Webb 45%; Rasmussen (R), August 16: Allen 47%, Webb 42%; Mason-Dixon, July 27, Allen 48%, Webb 32%; Zogby, July 15, Allen 47%, Webb 37%; Benson Strategy Group (D), June 27, Allen 46%, Webb 39%

7. Tennessee: (Democrat: Harold Ford). With a new scandal hanging over Bob Corker's head, Harold Ford has found new life in this open seat race. Still, the latest poll shows Corker ahead 48% to 42%, and Corker's self-financed campaign will give him almost unlimited funds. Corker remains favored, but this race is not over by a long shot.
Money Race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Rasmussen (R), August 10, Corker 48%, Ford 42%; Mason-Dixon, July 19, Corker 49%, Ford 36%; Tenn Poll, July 16, Corker 42%, Ford 35%

Likely Republican
8. Nevada. (Democrat: Jack Carter). Defying odds, this campaign continues to stay on the board. Rasumssen has movement-candidate Jack Carter within only 7 points of Ensign, and even Mason-Dixon, which still shows Ensign up comfortably, has the race much closer than it was before. I am keeping my eye on this one, as I still believe it has the potential to move up.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Mason-Dixon, August 8, Ensign 54%, Carter 33%; Rasmussen (R), July 31, Ensign 46%, Carter 39%

9. Arizona. (Democrat: Jim Pederson). Here at MyDD, we had a lot of hope for this race early on, but despite already being on the air, Jim Pederson is having a very difficult time getting over the hump. Pederson is rich, but Kyl has a large enough warchest to more than deal with any self-financing. This race also seems to be suffering formt he opposite problem that we see in Nevada: lot of establishment support, but little movement support. A look at the top few races shows that the campaigns where we are doing the best are campaigns where we have both.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: BRC, July 21, Kyl 45%, Pederson 27%; Rasumssen (R), July 18, Kyl 53%, Pederson 34%; Survey USA, July 17, Kyl 52%, Pederson 40%

********

Republican Targets

Lean Democratic
1. New Jersey, (Democrat: Robert Menendez). If this is the closest thing Republicans have to a pick-up--and right now it is--then Republicans are in a lot of trouble this cycle. While Menendez's position is not perfectly solid, he does look pretty good. Kean actually has an equal higher name ID than Menendez, and polls in New Jersey have notoriously undercounted Democrats for years (remember how the 2004 presidential race and 2001 and 2005 Governor's races were supposed to be close in New Jersey?). Combine this with the pathetic state of the New Jersey Republican Party and the extraordinarily high level of anti-Bush sentiment in the northeast, and I feel quite confident in Menendez's chances. Oh yeah, Menendez has $5M more than Kean too.

Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Strategic Vision (R), August 13, Menendez 42%, Kean 40%; Rasmussen (R), July 25, Menendez 44%, Kean 38%; FDU, July 16, Menendez 43%, Kean 40%; Monmouth, July 13 Menendez 38%, Kean 37%; Q-poll, July 12, Kean 40%, Menendez 38%.

2. Washington, (Democrat: Maria Cantwell). Cantwell still has a clear edge in this race. Polls show a fairly close race, and McGavick will be able to self-finance despite being way down in fundraising. Still, Cantwell has a lot of money, and a lead in a significantly blue state in a bad year for Republicans. Republican polling firm Strategic Vision aside, Cantwell still looks pretty good.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Strategic Vision, (R) July 23, Cantwell 48%, McGavick 44%; Rasmussen (R), July 17, Cantwell 48%, McGavick 37%; Elway Poll, July 13, Cantwell 47%, McGavick 33%

3. Maryland (Democrats: Ben Cardin, Kweisi Mfume). Mfume's lower poll standing and far lower cash flow could make this race closer, or even a toss-up, if he wins the primary. In truth, however, I don't think it really matters who wins the Democratic primary. In a year this bad for Republicans, how many undecideds can Michael Steele really expect to get in the deep blue state of Maryland? This is not even to mention that Steele is behind in the polls despite having far higher name ID than either Mfume or Cardin (especially Cardin). Whoever wins the primary will almost certainly take a double-digit lead from the media boost, and then may never have to look back. Still, this campaign isn't quite "likely Democratic" just yet. We have to wait and see what things look like a week or so after the primary.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Rasmussen (R), August 9th, Cardin 47%, Steele 42%, Mfume 46%, Steele 44%; Washington Post, June 25, Mfume 46%, Steele 43%; Cardin 49% Steele 39%

Likely Democratic
4. Minnesota (Democrat: Amy Klobuchar). This race is barely on the board at all anymore. Polls shows excellent news for Klobuchar. Also, did we ever really expect Mike Kennedy, who has consistently under performed Bush in the past, to somehow win in Minnesota when Bush is at 34% approval here? I think mainly I am leaving it on the board so people don't ask where I am ranking it these days.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Rasmussen (R), August 1, Klobuchar 50%, Kennedy 38%; Survey USA, July 24, Klobuchar 47%, Kennedy 42%; Bennett, Petts, and Blumenthal (D), July 20, Klobuchar 50%, Kennedy 34%; Star Tribune, July 11, Klobuchar 50%, Kennedy 31%

5. Michigan (Democrat: Debbie Stabenow). I had taken this race off the board, but a post-primary bump for Republican Bouchard has made me put it back on. In fact, I now rank it as more of a threat than Minnesota. Stabenow is still up more than 8-1 in cash, and she also maintains decent leads in polls in a fairly blue state in a bad year for Republicans. While the post-primary bump has made me put this back up on the board, I don't expect it will stay here for long.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: EPIC / MRA, August 14 Stabenow 54%, Bouchard 42%; Rasmussen (R), August 10, Stabenow 49%, Bouchard 44%; Survey USA, August 7, Stabenow 48%, Bouchard 41%; Detroit Free Press, July 12, Stabenow 49%, Bouchard 29%

*********

Other
Connecticut: (Democrat: Ned Lamont). This is one race where I don't give a rat's butt what the polls say. In less than four months, Lamont has gained 73 points on Lieberman among Democrats, moving from 65-19 down to 63-35 ahead. I fully expect that Lamont will continue to rise, and that Lieberman will also fall behind among Independents. Further, despite the full support of the Republican establishment, I do not expect Lieberman will be able to maintain a 75-13-10 lead among Republicans (that lead actually puts Lamont in second among Republicans, btw). I believe Ned Lamont will win this race, but even if he doesn't, Lieberman has still promised to caucus with Democrats.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Polls: Quinnipiac, August 14: Lieberman 49%, Lamont 38%, Schlesinger 4%; Rasumssen (R), August 9, Lieberman 46%, Lamont 41%, Schlesinger 6%

Hawaii. Democrats: Daniel Akaka, incumbent, and Ed Case, challenger. Yeah, I am clearly taking sides in this primary in favor of Akaka by linking to Case's website. This is a very late primary (September 23rd) where the winner will go on to an easy victory in the general election. It goes off the board as soon as the primary is over. Akaka has the edge in polls (but not by much in some) and money, but expect this race to be close.
Money race: Open secrets on the campaign
Latest polls: Rasmussen (R), August 7, Akaka 47%, Case 45%; Honolulu Advertiser Hawaii Poll, June 27: Akaka 51%, Case 40%

*******

Off the board
Democratic held seats: Bingham (NM), Byrd (WV), Carper (DE); Clinton (NY); Conrad (ND), Feinstein (CA), Kennedy (MA), Kohl (WI), Nelson (FL), Nelson (NE)
Independent held seats: Open (VT) is project to go easily to Sanders (I-VT)
Republican held seats: Hatch (UT), Hutchison (TX), Lott (MS), Lugar (IN), Snow (ME), Craig (WY). Note: I will have links to all of our challengers in these seats up soon, even if I consider them extreme longshots.

Tags: election forecasts, Senate 2006 (all tags)

Comments

35 Comments

Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Couple of notes, Chris:

First, a Survey USA poll shows the VA-Sen race to be a 3-point margin.

Additionally, the HI-Sen Democratic primary is on September 23, not September 26.

by PsiFighter37 2006-08-21 02:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast
That poll came out when I was writing this post. I'll make the appropriate update later on.

And really? The primary is on a Saturday? That is a little odd.
by Chris Bowers 2006-08-21 02:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Well, according to Rasmussen, it is. I also stated the same date in my diary on the primary.

by PsiFighter37 2006-08-21 02:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast
I updated the poll. I think I am going to keep the race "lean R" for now though, just because the finanical gap is so huge. But Virginia is very, veyr close to being a toss-up.
by Chris Bowers 2006-08-21 02:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Well I live in the DC media market. Here in DC the Macaca comment is still dominating the news. My instinct is that the comment has hurt Allen in Fairfax County significantly, where there are a ton of racial minorities and immigrants. I think that Allen may very well have suffered tremendous loss in Northern Virginia.

For Webb to win he will need to dominate Fairfax County, carry Richmond, and then far well in Hampton Roads/Tidewater. If he can win those votes then, whatever rural VA does, it won't be enough for Allen to win.

by jiacinto 2006-08-21 02:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Is there any buzz about the book that Allen's sister wrote? She says he was a violent bully.  Here's a link to a short article from Huffington Post.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/08/16 /gop-senator-george-allen_n_27382.html

by prince myshkin 2006-08-22 12:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

What about the leaners- VA, TN and NV?

by bruh21 2006-08-21 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Thirty-second forecast, August 21: I currently project Republicans to hold the Senate, 50-49-1, with Democratic pickups in Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana and Connecticut. Dick Cheney will be the tie-breaking vote.

If we picked up RI, MT, PA, OH, and CT, as you forecast, that would take us to 51-48-1.  You said 50-49-1.

Did you forget to list Missouri among the states you expect we'll win, or is the 50-49-1 number not what you meant?

Thanks for all this hard work.

by texas dem 2006-08-21 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast
No, it was just bad math. At this moment I do not think McCaskill would pull it out. Talent just has too much money. But I wait for new evidence to change my mind.
by Chris Bowers 2006-08-21 02:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Now take out the part that says Cheney would be the tie-breaker. Not needed 51-49.

by Mullibok 2006-08-21 03:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2006/8/ 21/124626/258/59#59

See the link above. I posted about the PA Senate race.

Here was the key excerpt from that link:

"A Quinnipiac University poll released last week showed his challenger, Democratic state Treasurer Bob Casey,leading 49 percent to 39 percent in those four [suburban Philadelphia] counties."

If Casey can dominate Philadelphia and mirror Rendell's 2002 and Kerry's 2004 performance in the Phialdelphia suburbs, then before any other precincts report in the state, he will have won.  While Chester still leans Republican, if Casey wins Bucks, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia counties, then Santorum losees.

That Santorum is at 39% in suburban Philadelphia is not good for him. For him to have any chance of wining he needs to fare very well in those counties surrounding Philadelphia. Should Casey come out with strong leads in Erie, Scranton, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, coupled with strong suburban Philadelphia support, then this race is over. Santorum can't find enough votes in the center of the state.

PA Democratic strength comes from the four corners: Scranton, Erie, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh. If Santorum totally craters in the four corners then he cannot win.

This explains why his campaign was indirectly helping to put Romanelii on the ballot. Their aggressive efforts indicate that they (privately) may believe that they can't win a two-man race. They might perceive having Romanelli on the ballot, which leaves the potential for Casey to be Naderized, as one of the only ways that they can win.

The polling has shown Casey losing support, but Santorum not necessarily gaining either. He continues to be mired in the 39%-42% range. He can still come back, mind you; but, given these trends, it is going to be hard for him to win.
---------------------------------------- ----------

VA an TN should move up now. In VA a polling report just released on Channel 9/WUSA TV news here in DC shows Webb within three points. Apparenlty the Macaca comment has hurt Allen in the suburbs of DC, especially within Fairfax County.

TN should move because of the land deal. That miscue on Corker's part gives Ford an opening to go on the offensive.

by jiacinto 2006-08-21 02:20PM | 0 recs
Great stuff jiacinto

That's what is always missing on these political blogs, real world analysis of where a candidate figures to gain or lose, based on the opponent and dynamics of the race. You are sorely missed on DU with this type breakdown.

I think Pennsylvania belongs atop the list of our most likely pickups, for the regional reasons you detail. Santorum virtually needs to draw to an inside straight. No way I see that happening in the suburbs, especially with white women coming back in our direction.

I can see the logic of placing Rhode Island on top since Chafee has two major hurdles, but if he gets past the first one then suddenly it's a pick'em race. I can't see how Santorum ever gets to pick'em.

I'm concerned too many posters assume the top 5 races are all but won. Not on MyDD, but elsewhere I see that all the time. "We have five, but where is the 6th?" It drives me bonkers, assuming wins against incumbents in red states. Then when it doesn't happen you get the Diebold nonsense.

I agree with Chris that McCaskill is the most unlikely of the top five. Losing statewide for gov in 2004 doesn't thrill me. You come back and run again in a state that tilts somewhat the other way and my instincts are you'll probably lose again. I thought that about Strickland in Colorado in 2002, and Bowles in North Carolina in 2004. It's different when you're trying again in a state where your party has the edge, like Thune in South Dakota. Forrester is another example of running and losing twice in a state where the partisanship is against you. We'll need a major nationwide tide to yank McCaskill along with it.

by jagakid 2006-08-21 04:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Great stuff jiacinto

Well I was a member of DU until Skinner banned me three years ago. While part of me misses DU, I like MyDD and DKos better because there are more rational people there. Green influence is kept to a mininimum, as opposed to DU, where it is rampant.

Well I think Chaffee is likely headed toward defeat, as is the Govenror, Don Carcieri. They both are in trouble because they are Republicans in very heavily Democratic states in a year when the sitting Republican president is horribly unpopular. They are simply the victims of being in the wrong state at the wrong time. Bush is extremely unpopular in the Ocean State. These factors will most likely bring them both to defeat, although Cariceri is probably less vulnerable than Chaffee.

Chaffee is the Connie Morella of this cycle. Morella was a popular Republican representing Montgomery County, MD in Congress. She was first elected in 1986 and had no problem winning re-election until 1998, routinely drawing 70% in a 60%+ Democratic district. She then fell to 60% in 1998 and then 52% in 2000. Basically the partisan tilt of her district, coupled with her partisan affliation, led to her defeat.

Chaffee is facing similiar dynamics. The GOP base there is disaffected with him. Whitehouse is a former AG and he has the money and the support. So he is in deep trouble. I don't think he wins this year.

Santorum is most likely also headed toward defeat. While Casey has lost some of his lead admittedly, Santorum hasn't gained any support. Frankly their aggressive indirect push for Romanelli indicates to me that they most likely (private) have come to conclusion that without a Green, they have a slim chance of winning. The 39% in suburban Philadelphia is not good for them. For without suburban Philadelphia, in the rest of the state's populous areas, such as Philadelphia county, Alleghany County (Pittsburgh), Lackawana County (Scranton, which is Casey's base), and Erie County , Casey will dominate. That leaves them places like Lancaster, York, Harrisburg, Altoona, Williamsport, and other towns in the center of the state. There just aren't enough votes in the "Alabama part of PA" to overcome what Casey will poll in the cities. The only hope for Santorum was to win the suburbs of Philadelphia, like he did in 1994 and 2000. Without Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery County solidly behind him, I don't see Santorum winning.

Santorum's other hope was probably pro-life Catholic blue collar Democrats in places like Erie, Johnstown, Wilkes-Barre, and Scranton. Desptie the protests of the pro-choice community, by nomnating Casey, the Democrats have also been able to neurtalize whatever appeal Santorum might have to these voters. Also, because Casey is pro-gun, Santorum can use gun control against the Democrats either. Without those issues those voters have no incentive to vote for Santorum again, for they do not share his economic positions.

Santorum's two hopes were thus: suburban voters in Philadelphia and white, blue-collar, Catholic Reagan Democrats. Even if Santorum mirrors Mike Fisher and George W. Bush's numbers in ancestrally Democratic parts of Western PA, where Kerry and Rendell did not fare as well as previous Democratic candidates have, suburban Philadelphia won't support him either. Casey has sucessfully taken away whatever appeal that Santorum might have had for those voters. If Casey alone mirrors Rendell and Kerry's performance in metropolitan Philadelphia, then Santorum will not have enought votes to win.

To sum up, when I look at hard voting blocks within PA, I don't see how Santorum wins. The numbers are just too impossible. He will close the gap and may even end up with 47-49% of the vote, but it won't be enough to win. The math just isn't there.

As for Missouri that is the least favorite of the five that are most vulnerable. However, from what I have read, McCaskill is campaigning in rural parts of the state. What might be the issue is the stringent voter ID law, though. She does have a good chance, though; and in a year where GOP fortunes seem to be lagging, I think McCaskill will win if there is a national mood against the GOP. She has won statewide before. And Talent lost once before winning. So losers can win second on their second attempts.

If the election were to be held today I would say that Santorum, Chaffee, Burns, Talent, and DeWine lose. The five of them are extremely vulnerable, but circumstances could still change. Right now, though, Democrats are faring very well in Senate contests.

by jiacinto 2006-08-21 06:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Great stuff jiacinto

Nice analysis on Casey-Santorum. The numbers aren't there for him although the latest Q-poll does have him seeming to shore up the usual R advantage in south central PA and among white men.

I also agree Santorum's internal numbers must show
him unable to win a two-way race and that's why he
and the GOP are working so hard to get and keep Romanelli on the ballot.

But more interestingly, if you parse the 2 and 3-way numbers of both RVs and LVs from Quinny, you find that Romanelli takes away just about as much support from Santorum as he does from Casey. Look especially at the number of voters for "someone else" in the 2-way and Romanelli in the 3-way in central PA that are very closely correlated. There is where PACleanSweep has its strongest support and these voters are in a very anti-incumbent mood as Brightbill and Jubelier recently found out. PACleanSweep members are also volunteering for the GP in the court-ordered bipartisan review of the
nominating petitions. My sense is that even though
Romanelli couldn't be farther from their political
views, he'd get their vote simply because he's
not "the incumbent" which both Santorum and Casey are. It's an interesting dynamic which I'd bet
Santorum's people never considered. I think when
Dems and Indys go to the polls those who might
be considering Romanelli, if he stays on the ballot, would think twice about it, but the Rs
and Libertarians are so angry, they'd vote 3rd
party with no qualms.

by phillydem 2006-08-21 11:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Great stuff jiacinto

Actually, I think there is nothing at all wrong with having a candidate who lost statewide run again, particularly if they ran a close race the first time as McCaskill did. A statewide race, even if unsuccessful, builds name ID and a pool of campaign contributors and volunteers.In WV where I am from, both Jay Rockefeller and Joe Manchin lost their first statewide race.

Now you qualify your comments by saying you're talking about states that "tilt somewhat the other way," but, obviously, our party is going to lose the majority of races in those states regardless of whether the candidate already has a statewide loss or not.

I agree she has a tough race, but McCaskill is by far the strongest candidate we had to run in MO this year.  And if she loses it wont be because she lost once before, it will be because she was so heavily outspent by an incumbent who is "moderately" popular.

That being said I think there is a reasonably good chance that she will win.  It has become "out of fashion" here to talk about the "incumbent rule," but I think in this highly anti-incumbent atmostphere we should win races like this.

by Andy Katz 2006-08-21 06:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Thannks for this analysis.  I look forward to the updates as election day gets closer.

by John Mills 2006-08-21 02:28PM | 0 recs
I think there's a 'not' missing

in what currently reads "Yeah, I am clearly taking sides in this primary in favor of Akaka by linking to Case's website. "  There is no link.  

by John DE 2006-08-21 02:34PM | 0 recs
I think we get MO, NV and maaaaybe VA

I've given up hope on AZ, and I had almost given up hope in TN until the latest news on Corker.

Realistically, i'd like to say we get MO, NV, VA and TN, but I have a hunch that Ford may not be able to pull it off...

but then i've been radically wrong before.

the thing that worries me in Ohio is Blackwell and his antics.

-C.

by neutron 2006-08-21 02:36PM | 0 recs
oh and BTW.

niiiice work.

-C.

by neutron 2006-08-21 02:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Pickups

Connecticut would be a liberal or progressive pickup, but not a Democratic pickup...

by ltsply2 2006-08-21 02:38PM | 0 recs
Kennedy

It's MARK KENNEDY not MIKE.

Just pointing it out.

by MNPundit 2006-08-21 02:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Kennedy
Man, I kep forgetting which one it is.

Fortunately, soon, I'll never have to remember again.
by Chris Bowers 2006-08-21 03:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Great listing Chris.  I agree with all of your categories (so I must be brilliant(?).)

I have great hopes for VA, TN, and perhaps NV to move to "toss up" but do not think they are there yet.

Of note, you have an error on Missouri Rasmussen as you give (no)Talent two numbers.    

by hilltopper 2006-08-21 03:36PM | 0 recs
Why Cheney as casting vote?

I currently project Republicans to hold the Senate, 51-48-1...Dick Cheney will be the tie-breaking vote.

Cheney will only be the casting vote if the caucuses are 50-50. But you're projecting 51 GOP.

No comprendo.

by skeptic06 2006-08-21 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Cheney as casting vote?

I believe Cheney votes by proxy (Joe Lieberman).

by freedc 2006-08-21 04:20PM | 0 recs
I believe

That the proper abbreviation for the "Connecticut for Lieberman" party is (Con-Lie).

by DavidNYC 2006-08-21 03:54PM | 0 recs
CT not really a pickup

If the incumbent is now a Democrat and is running on another party, then the only possible outcomes are that we lose the seat to CFL, caucusing with Democrats or we win the seat with our nominee. So calling CT a "pickup" is not right.

By the way, awesome work.  I love to see analysis that is not clouded by wishful thinking.  

by freedc 2006-08-21 04:19PM | 0 recs
Here are the Tradesports odds

Just for reference purposes. I'll round them off, using Bid/Offer and Last, with theoretical Democratic win likelihood first:

Arizona: 9-91
Maryland: 80-20
Michigan: 84-16
Minnesota: 85-15
Missouri: 45-55
Montana: 62-38
Nevada: 14-86
New Jersey: 55-45
Ohio: 68-32
Pennsylvania: 80-20
Rhode Island: 75-25
Tennessee : 30-70
Virginia: 25-75 (big move toward Webb)
Washington: 80-20

And here's a very good article in the Las Vegas Sun, briefly breaking down all the Nevada statewide races including senate and gov. The author, Jon Ralston, is the best local political guy and he picked every primary result correct last week. He doesn't say much about the senate race. He's correct in the assessment but the liberal blogs don't seem to realize the southern Nevada/northern Nevada aspect and how Ensign benefits dramatically due to his base in Clark County. Notice in the gov race he estimates Gibbons may lead Titus by 80,000 outside Clark County. I think that's high but it demonstrates what a Democrat is up against. You have to get a margin out of Clark County and right now Ensign is invulnerable in that regard:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/storie s/commentary/2006/aug/20/566664614.html

by jagakid 2006-08-21 04:57PM | 0 recs
Re: The Las Vegas link

Thanks for the link to the NV races rundown.
It was wonderfully informative, if sobering.

I'm still optimistic that we'll pick up a few
seats in NV this go, but maybe not so many
of the big ones as I'd been hoping to see.

Taking down Ensign will not be easy, but
it's still well worth trying. Go Jack!

by Woody 2006-08-24 09:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Man, if I was a betting man, I'd put mad cash on Webb right now!

by JJCPA 2006-08-21 05:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

Any update on the ballot challenge to the Green Party candidate in PA?  I believe I read Romanelli was getting 6% in polling, which makes me nervous.  Hopefully he will get knocked off the ballot and charges will be filed against Santorum and his campaign.

by ArizonaDem 2006-08-21 06:24PM | 0 recs
Re: Romanelli

The court ordered a re-review of all the petitions
by a team of 1 Dem and 1 GP, or their rep. There are over 3k petitions and looking up voters in a database is very tedious work so the review is still going on. I suspect the judge is going an extra step to be scrupulously fair.

I worked on the initial review of petitions for about half a day at Casey's campaign office in Phila. From 5 or 6 sheets I worked on, the error rate was at least 75%. At that rate, only 25-30k
signatures would be valid, not enough to qualify
him. I suppose that's why the GP is also pursuing
another court case arguing that the 2% rule should
be applied to the 2005 general election where several PASC judges were up for a statewide
judicial retention vote. Using that election would make Justice Newman, with 800k votes, the top vote-getter, meaning only 16k signatures would be
needed rather than the 67k based on Casey's 2004
3.4M votes for state treasurer. No ruling on that
yet.

by phillydem 2006-08-21 11:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

If this is your thirty-second forecast, do you have the first thirty-one archived somewhere?

/thick

by xebecs 2006-08-22 08:07AM | 0 recs
Re: CT is NOT a pickup

A couple of years ago, the 44 Democratic
Senators and 1 Independent caucused and
voted Harry Reid as the Minority Leader.

On the other side of the aisle, 55 (R)
Senators elected Frist as Majority Leader.

Based on those results, committee chairs
were appointed, committee seats apportioned
among the members, and control of the daily
agenda was put in the hands of the (R) leader.

Nothing that has happened, or will happen
before the first Tuesday in November, 2006,
can change that controlling line-up, 55/45.

Because we are talking about a possible
change in control of the Senate, from 55/45
to 52/48 or 51/49 or 50/50 or whatever, any
recent developments in CT are irrelevant.

To refer to the CT seat as something other
in this context is more than confusing,
it's downright misleading.

In a different context, say, how the 'center'
will shift, how the tone of the antional conversation will change, etc. I agree
that the results in CT are hugely important.

But here we are counting who will control
vs who had control, and CT will not change
the count -- especially since Lamont will
win, so quit obsessing on the old guy!  
;-)

by Woody 2006-08-24 08:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Senate 2006 Forecast

    The polls are tighting and the races are closing together as Novemeber gets closer.  The new 8-30 GNP figures up, GNI figures are up, unemployment is down, US - Iraq generals are getting more air time, terrorists at airports, the news has added this poygamy stuff, the trial of Sadam and his nerve gas stuff, and now Iran is bringing big time security issues to light.  How does the press help Dems with this stuff in the headlines. I think this kind of press and news will help pro military, right wing Christians, and other R's more then the D's as the elections get closer.

by menacerken 2006-08-30 08:11AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------