Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than Previously Estimated

In a long article over at Policy by Blog entitled "Are Blogs the New Iowa?", David Perlmutter posts what to me is an astonishing bit of research (emphasis mine):The Nielsen//NetRatings service reported that in the single month of July 2005, Kos attracted 4.8 million separate visitors. The Kos audience is thus greater than the combined populations of Iowa, where the first presidential caucus takes place, and New Hampshire, site of the first primary, according to the current Democratic party schedule. Through Site Meter, I had long known what the average daily audience of Dailykos is. On slow days, it comes in at around 400,000. On heavy days it comes in at well over one million. However, I had very little idea what the total audience of Dailykos was, because I had o reliable information on the breakdown between the casual audience and the regular audience. Now, I know that like any measurement of website traffic, Nielson is hardly perfect, but it does provide some real insight. 4.8 million is a stunning number, considering that in July of 2005 Site Meter recorded about 15.7 million unique visits for Dailykos (see report here, PDF, page 7).

Using Site Meter and Blogads, I have for some time measured the daily audience of the progressive political blogosphere at around three to four million. However, to be on the safe side, I had assumed that everyone who reads political blogs read them every day. Further, I was measuring only those blogs that could be considered "independent," and that are not tied to an established media publication such as MSNBC, a progressive organization such as the Center for American Progress, or large financial backing, such as the Huffington Post. I further was not counting traffic for large message boards such as Democratic underground that have blogs, but are not mainly blogs. Clearly, considering all of my underestimations, I have been holding down public estimates hwo the size of the audience of the progressive political blogosphere. Now it seems to me that the Neilson figures on Dailykos support numbers from Hotline back in April, even though I doubted those numbers at the time:20. How often do you read "blogs" that deal with political issues?
Every Day: 8%
A few times a week: 9%
A few times a month: 6%
Less often than that: 10%
Never: 65%
Don't Know / Refused: 3% This poll was entirely of registered voters who self-identify as Democrats. With around sixty to seventy million Americans fitting that profile, the Hotline figures implied a daily audience for the progressive political blogosphere of about five to six million, a weekly audience of around ten to twelve million, and a monthly audience of fifteen million.

That fifteen million number may sound absurdly high, but with 4.8 million separate visitors coming to Dailykos in one month, it may not be. One thing for sure is that my estimates of three to four million were in fact low. The daily audience of the progressive political blogosphere is at least four million, and the monthly audience probably does surpass ten million.

For the progressive political blogosphere to have reached this size in just five or six years of existence is remarkable. When one considers the demographics of the progressive political blogosphere and the sheer size of its audience, it is not an exaggeration to write that the progressive political blogosphere now reaches the significant majority of the well-heeled activist class within the Democratic Party and the progressive movement. The political and media ramifications of this development are astounding. I won't pontificate on those ramifications at this time, but I will direct people back to the BlogPac netroots survey (part one and part two). Remarkable indeed.

Update: In the comments, someone has produced the actual research, which it appears Perlmutter misquoted by moving the decimal place over one. That again appears to leave the numbers from the Hotline poll as the anomoly. The mystery over how many people read progressive political blogs raamins as difficult to calculate as ever.

Tags: Blogosphere, Media (all tags)

Comments

17 Comments

Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

But can we get all of those readers to contribute $5 a month to campaigns? That is the challenge - moving  from discussing change to making it happen. I hope so.

by tjlord 2006-06-20 10:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than
Taht's the trick isn't it. The blogospehre has always been good as drawing politically intereste porgressives and agitating them into action. that's something we need to step up a bit for 2006.
by Chris Bowers 2006-06-20 10:34AM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

I was always quite skeptical of the sitemeter readings, since they count a new visit if you haven't been back to the site for 30 minutes.

But that's pretty amazing.

Interesting to compare that to the Combined netroots fundraising page, which has only raised 200 grand to date. That's barley enough to run a decent congressional race in a very cheap media market. But turn that into 20 million... that's serious cash.

by dantheman 2006-06-20 10:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

i would think that discussion is a part of change. If the outcry is big enough during the watercooler talk, the boss is going to change things to get his employees to stay. Same thing here. Obviously they need money, but all of this discussion is a HUGE part of winning seats back.

by mcjak 2006-06-20 10:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

I think the blogs are the new Iowa.  Why would so many WH08 wannabes show up to DailyKos if it wasn't?

The was blogs can become that new primary/caucus is to give people a chance who otherwise would be in the wilderness, like Dean and Clark in 2004.

In 2008, I hope that we can be more of kingmaker than rising people up from obscurity.

by DaveB 2006-06-20 11:15AM | 0 recs
Responsibility


One thing I get a little frustrated with Markos at... is his hemming and hawing and awshucks, its just a website attitude.  

I understand completely his saying "its not about me"- he needs to repeat that to the traditional media who don't understand the blogosphere.

But his editorial opinion (and he DOES use it) carries weight- playing footsie with Warner means something- and if its taken further, in old terms, its probably like the Manchester paper endorsing a candidate.  

I am amazed at how well the purveyors of progressive sites deal with this trust so well... but its about to go to a whole new level.

by jgkojak 2006-06-20 11:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

You might want to check that figure -- I believe Netratings reported 476,000 unique visitors.

Here is the original report.

by dblhelix 2006-06-20 11:49AM | 0 recs
How exactly was the mistake made?

Firstly, it wasn't the blog piece itself, but the Chronicle of Higher Education piece it was quoting that made the mistake. (The blogger didn't check, though. Perhaps it was too good to check?)

Second, the way that the Neilsen table is set out makes it hard to see how the mistake could be made.

The numbers are in units of 1,000 unique visitors per month. The number beside Daily Kos is 476.

That beside the Smoking Gun is 2,243 (!).

No comma, no millions.

These things happen - and don't I know it! I'm just curious, in this case, how.

by skeptic06 2006-06-20 12:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

Whoa!

That's a bit of a difference.

Can we get a correction Chris?

by dantheman 2006-06-20 01:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than
Chris,
I work for a company that tracks web traffic.  If you want good stats on the blogosphere, contact me and I can help you out.
by alipsman 2006-06-20 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger

I put this together this morning for someone who's developing a project to find synergies between blogs and cable TV news:

As far as I know, no one does a complete, scientific survey of online readership, but the following pages may help you develop the numbers you need to sell the project.

Percentage of American adults who are Internet users (estimated number, 172 million):

Poll Shows 77% of US Adults Are Now Online [6/1/2006]
http://www.webmetro.com/news1detail1.asp ?id=1587

Number of Americans who get news online:

Online News: For many home broadband users, the internet is a primary news source
By the end of 2005, 50 million Americans got news online on a typical day, a sizable increase since 2002. Much of that growth has been fueled by the rise in home broadband connections over the last four years. For a group of "high-powered" online users - early adopters of home broadband who are the heaviest internet users - the internet is their primary news source on the average day.
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_News .and.Broadband.pdf

The most recent stats I could find on total blog readership information, though more than a year old:

The State of Blogging
By the end of 2004 blogs had established themselves as a key part of online culture. Two surveys by the Pew Internet & American Life Project in November established new contours for the blogosphere: 8 million American adults say they have created blogs; blog readership jumped 58% in 2004 and now stands at 27% of internet users; 5% of internet users say they use RSS aggregators or XML readers to get the news and other information delivered from blogs and content-rich Web sites as it is posted online; and 12% of internet users have posted comments or other material on blogs. Still, 62% of internet users do not know what a blog is.
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_blog ging_data.pdf

If the above 27% applies to the more recent number of 172 million Internet users, then there are 46.4 million blog readers, though not all of them are political blog readers, of course.

Blogads' 2006 blog readers survey breakdowns (political and other):

Article about the survey findings:
Survey Shows the Blogosphere is Breaking Out [4/26/2006]
http://www.webmetro.com/news1detail1.asp ?id=1571

The survey breakdowns:
Overview of 2006 surveys
http://www.blogads.com/survey/blog_reade r_surveys_overview.html

Though admittedly not scientific, the Blogads survey is the only one I know of that can be used to try to make a determination of how many of the potential 46.4 million blog readers are political blog readers.  There were 56,000 responses to the survey, and 36,230 + 47 = 36,277, or 64.8% were political blog readers.  64.8% of 46.4 million is 30 million political blog readers.  The almost 50% Democrats and almost 20% independents are the most likely watchers of non-right-wing cable TV news shows, which means that there are about 20 million potential viewers for your project.  As you know, of course, very few cable TV news shows have even a million viewers.
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/rati ngs/the_scoreboard_friday_june_16_38731. asp

Caveats to the Blogads survey
Demographics of Democratic Blog Activists
http://mydd.com/story/2006/4/26/11425/25 63

If you use any of these numbers, you should always say that there is no definitive source for this information, therefore it's necessarily extrapolated, and in any case is just an estimate.

Nielsen has what it calls NetRatings, but it seems to concentrate solely on search engines, sports, and commercial usage.
http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/news.j sp?section=new_pr

Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com

by Caro 2006-06-20 12:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

I still do not believe you and would be more confident in what you were saying if you were explicit about people who visit multiple times during the day. As far as I know sitemeter counts them as separate unique visits if they are more than 1 hour apart. As you know, lots of people click compulsively on dKos about once an hour at work.

Lacking info on this, I would divide the 4.9 million by a factor of about 8, just to be sure.

Best: Peter Waksman

by pwax 2006-06-20 12:54PM | 0 recs
Why 8?

Seems pretty random to me - odd, coming as it did right after a complaint about someone else being less than precise.

by PantherDem 2006-06-20 01:11PM | 0 recs
Even at 476,000, it is comparable to Iowa

Apparently the correct rounded number for "separate individual visitors in the month of July 2005" is 480,000 rather than 4.8 million separate visitors.

Still, 480,000 is approximately the total number of self-identified Democratic voters for the entire state of Iowa, and 480,000 is approximately 3 times the number of self-identified Democratic voters in the state of New Hampshire.

sláinte,
cl

by Caoimhin Laochdha 2006-06-20 01:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Progressive Political Blogosphere Larger Than

It might be a good idea to put the update near the top of your article.  I almost missed the update that it was 480,000, not 4.8 million, and I'm sure others may be skimming your posts, too.

by aip 2006-06-20 01:44PM | 0 recs
Too right!

Basically, this is only a story if the 4.8 million number is right.

We now know it's wrong.

If an MSM outlet pulled something like this - say, writing a gee whiz story about the booming Bush economy because they misread an annualised monthly GDP number for an unannualised one - and only told readers the real number at the bottom, the lefty sphere would being going troppo.

Chris should insert a graf at the top, pointing out the error.

Secondary question: Chris isn't responsible for the CHE journo's error; but, given just how good the number was (ie, too good), shouldn't he have gone back to the source doc and checked it?

by skeptic06 2006-06-20 03:17PM | 0 recs
Blocked sites at work

I used to be able to read lefty blogs at work, but a lot of them have been blocked now.  (MyDD is still open, which means you guys are not getting the traffic that Daily Kos does, I think).  I have been surprised how many of them are blocked.  We have been depending on a satellite network for Internet, and I am sure the traffic was slowing down business.  

by bloomingpol 2006-06-20 04:52PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------