The People Are Here

The Roots project from FDL is another sign that the people are taking back the the country.  Yesterday, they delivered copies of Crashing the Gates to every Democrat in Congress.  You can watch the delivery on video at PoliticsTV.

Political progress is slow, until it's not.  The organizing work of the 1930s-1950s led to the Civil Rights movement of the next decade; the same can be said about the New Deal, which was based on 40 years of populist and progressive organizing.  Political change looks rapid, because opportunities open up quickly, but the actual work to make that rapid change happen is slow and filled with losses, self-doubt, and heartache.  Every successful movement has been tagged as a group of losers who are childish and angry.  Every successful movement has lost political battles; a lot of them in fact.  And every successful movement has persevered through those times, learned from them, and ultimately validated itself.

9/11 and the few years after that was a dark time.  Fake heroes like Giuliani and his minions, Bush and his minions, and Fox News and its stable of entertainers ruled discourse.  Clinton's impeachment had laid the Democrats low.  Iraq happened with no public debate, right-wing extremists took Congress in 2002 and strengthened their grip in 2004, and progressive politics were bereft of leadership, resources, and ideas.  Or so it seemed.  

Below the surface, progressive energy was simmering, and we're only starting to see a boil-over.  At the same time, the right-wing movement, which looks so healthy as it governs the country and controls the levers of power in corporate board rooms, is dying.  These two trend lines are crossing with increasing frequency; the people are on our side and not theirs anymore.

Since 1998, the progressive movement has been building its leadership structure, its tactics, and its coalition.  In that year, Moveon.org and Campaign for America's Future emerged.  Both groups worked together to save Social Security.  In 2002, we saw the birth of the progressive blogosphere out of the ruins of the Iraq War debate.  In 2003, the media reform movement came together for the first time to attempt to stop the FCC from loosening ownership restrictions. In 2004, Dean and Democracy for America emerged.  Drinking Liberally was born the same year in a bar in Hell's Kitchen.  In 2005, a generation of bloggers matured and engaged on public policy issues (including Bolton and Social Security), and in 2006, we saw the internet dominate the culture of Democratic campaigns with local blogs popping up everywhere.  These blogs are largely progressive and run by normal citizens, not traditional Democrats.  

The signs of a real movement are accelerating.  The Roots Project and PoliticsTV is now seeing video and people-powered collaborative action.  How Would a Patriot Act and Crashing the Gates are showcasing a new market for progressive ideas and an ability to publish books around the mainstream editorial filter.  IPac is leading the political charge around intellectual property issues, Freepress around media reform issues, and Moveon around every other issue.  The Progressive Legislative Action Network is creating legislation for state legislators who desperatey are looking for solutions.  The net neutrality fight scared Bourbon Democratic lobbyists like Mike McCurry and pushed them out of the structure of the party.  SEIU is making labor relevant again, with Donna Shalala finding out what it's like to be organized against by the people.  

We've also created a new generation of heros, intermixing ordinary citizens with legislators.  The highest calling is that of citizen, yada yada.  We have stars, such as Stephen Colbert, and heros, like Harry Reid and Barbara Boxer.  We have emerging political leaders, like Ned Lamont and Deval Patrick, and emerging internet leaders, like Jane Hamsher, Christy Hardin Smith, John Aravosis, Ezra Klein, Juan Melli and others that we haven't seen yet.  

I want to clear up one misconception.  This is not a bottom-up movement.  Things like this don't just happen, spontaneously.  People make them happen.  This is a movement about leadership and citizenship.  This movement is living proof that anyone, any American, can make a difference.  We have the tools, now all we need is the will.  In the next fifteen years, we're going to see a tremendously different political system.  Progressive politics will be one pole, and it will be powerful.  We'll see progressive solutions to global warming, the energy crisis, and a new counter to the global war on terror frame that is suffocating this country.  Will we win?  I think so.  But we're going to keep trying, regardless.

It all starts with you, or with each one of us.  The Roots project is about that ability of any person to be a leader.  The people are back.

Tags: Roots Project (all tags)

Comments

20 Comments

Re: The People Are Here

Edrie, Jeff, Clarke, David Grossman (PoliticsTV), and Dave,you're amazing. PhiloTBG has a recap of the days events, and FDL on further action.

We just finished the tour last night, so it was a timely occasion (I crawled over the finish line... thanks Matt, for telling me you were sick after I kissed you). Whatever.

New Haven, Providence, Cambridge... awesome events!

Let me just say to to everyone that showed up, to all people that helped organize the many events, the CTG progressive partners and the bloggers that supported making it happening... that was one hell of an experience.

by Jerome Armstrong 2006-05-24 07:14AM | 0 recs
Re: The People Are Here

Thanks for the link Jerome. I can't say enough about how positive this entire experience was. We really crashed the gates of Congress yesterday and I'm confident that our message of greater involvement and respect for the netroots was heard.

by PhiloTBG 2006-05-24 08:02AM | 0 recs
Same here

Thanks for the link Matt.  We had a good time yesterday, although there were some footsore folks at the end of the day.

And, Jerome, thanks for the book.  Sorry I missed you and Kos at the event on the Bowery.  

by jayackroyd 2006-05-24 08:08AM | 0 recs
Re: The People Are Here

Jerome,

I'd like to pick your brain sometime on movement building, if possible.  I'm currently facilitating these Roots Project networks.  I'm at pachacutec01 at gmail dot com.

Thanks!

by Pachacutec 2006-05-24 08:12AM | 0 recs
Omigod!

The People Are Here?

You mean, all of them?

Why would you want to be part of a movement to which such ra-ra stuff would be appealing?

Aren't we supposed to the reality-based guys, as opposed to the fantasists, snake-oil merchants and bullshit rhetoricians of the GOP?

[Does Matt write romance novels on the side, I wonder?]

And what to make of

We've also created a new generation of heros, intermixing ordinary citizens with legislators.

Bilbo raged against mongrelization, but this seems much worse!

We don't want heroes (where's Dan Quayle when you need him...). Heroes are for empires and totalitarians. We want - OK, I want - to be as wised-up as I can about the world of politics, a world that most of us (including me) struggle with limited success to get a handle on.

(And - if Uncle Harry is a hero of yours - well, you must set a low bar for heroism!)

Rabble-rousing is for rabbles. And folks round here are unlikely to be flattered by the implied 'compliment'.

If the conservative forces (including Beelzebub himself, Mike McCurry) are desperate to characterize bloggers as teenagers, a piece like this is ready-digested grist to their mill.

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 07:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!
There is the need for recognizing progress.  I'm with Matt and I really appreciate his post.  I think we do have a great deal to be proud of, with a long way to go.  We may not agree on heros, but we have a chance now we did not have 2 years ago.  We have an organized effort now we did not have without Matt and the others.  Without some positive words on occasion, life (& campaigning) way down south is impossible.  
Thanks Matt,  
by Blue in the south 2006-05-24 08:19AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

I think there's a need for recognizing progress, but -- maybe it's just that I follow multiple blogs -- I feel like there's been a rash of this sort of 'pat yourselves on the back, goonies' posts lately in the liberal blogosphere.

These posts serve a useful purpose, to give us some perspective and to keep hope alive, but they seem to be -- in size and in quantity -- out of proportion to the progress we have actually made.

It's a long time between now and 2008, and in the meantime these people have Congress for at least the next six months. Every day we learn of a new law that Bush has broken, lately he's doing it in an attempt to cover up the crimes of his cronies (see today's stories on Negroponte and the SEC...).

Please, let's not see any more of these until we have Busby in the house, Lamont in the Senate, and/or Chimpy and Cheney hauled up before the ICC.

by lightyearsfromhome 2006-05-24 08:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

My tone may have been slightly more acidic than intended on account of this being only the latest in a series of highly wrought pieces in the Stoller oeuvre.

(Hence my reference to McCurry, the depths of whose evil had escaped me until Matt served up the gory details. Again. And. Again.)

Of course, we all need cheering up from time to time. I'm the last one to poop a party. (No, really...)

But just so long as we don't start believing our own propaganda, and give up those American (or should I say, Yankee?) virtues of caution and doubt and distrust of fancy-talkers for those American (same question!) vices of impetuosity and gullibility and admiration for the gift of the gab.

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

Your username fits you well.

by Matt Stoller 2006-05-24 10:15AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

Look, I agree with you concerning Stoller, but who wants to join a movement that's all doom and gloom? If Stoller believes all his rhetoric then we have a serious problem, but as a motivational tool it's a valuable serivce and I'm sure Stoller knows there's still a lot of work to do.

by MNPundit 2006-05-24 11:15AM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

I confess to believing what I write.  The great thing about a movement is that I'm not the leader, and you can think I'm full of it and still be a part of the movement.  

We all are leaders.

by Matt Stoller 2006-05-24 12:05PM | 0 recs
That's where you lose me

It's a good thing that leaders (what else are MyDD FP-ers if not leaders - perhaps not the only ones round here, but leaders nevertheless) should say what's on their mind, and that others should criticize.

The sort of virtual hero-worship one gets at some sites I'd say we could well do without.

As is the absurdly wasteful and soul-destroying internecine warfare that often passes for discussion over at Kos.

Disagreeing with another guy does not imply thinking that he is full of shit.

Litmus tests, cliques, vendettas we can all well do without. Happily, mostly we do here, and long may it continue.

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 01:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

I suppose you have great powers of persuasion that cause others to flock to your causes?

No?

I'm shocked.

If you don't know anything about movement building, try not to advertise your ignorance, my friend.  Skepticism is good.  A myopic, hidebound adherence to skepticism. . . is not courageous, and suggestive of other potential problems.

by Pachacutec 2006-05-24 11:59AM | 0 recs
S/he's got nothing else to advertise.

I can't honestly remember one positive suggestion-just pissing down everybody else's boots then  trying to sell umbrellas.

by boadicea 2006-05-24 12:16PM | 0 recs
Re: S/he's got nothing else to advertise.

You don't seem terribly familiar with my stuff for such a colorful review.

(Comments to this diary from earlier today, for instance.)

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 12:45PM | 0 recs
Excellent.

There's one at least.

by boadicea 2006-05-24 12:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

I suppose you have great powers of persuasion that cause others to flock to your causes?

I have no causes for which flock-making powers of persuasion would be useful, I'm pleased to say.

If you don't know anything about movement building, try not to advertise your ignorance, my friend.

That doesn't sound very friendly...

A myopic, hidebound adherence to skepticism. . . is not courageous, and suggestive of other potential problems.

Wow! I come here to talk politics and - twofer! - I get my head shrunk.  

I'd suggest - if I might be allowed - that, if the movement is so jerry-built as to be unable to take the modest criticisms I may from time to time offer, it's hardly going to withstand the buffeting of two years of the GOP Congressional minority that we all want to see installed come January!

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 12:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

Straw man much?  No one is saying that your criticism matter.  What Parachutec is implying is that you are pretending like you are part of the movement by saying that there's a lot of work to be done without actually being part of the movement to get it done.  

Skepticism is good, but cynicism is not.

by Matt Stoller 2006-05-24 01:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Omigod!

Straw man much?  No one is saying that your criticism matter.

It was levity, actually. Keeping things light.

And as for

pretending like you are part of the movement

all I've been doing is offering suggestions and comments and arguments. Not pretending to be part of anything, let alone a movement.

And

Skepticism is good, but cynicism is not.

Insofar as cynicism comports a lack of interest in solutions or improvements or in the detail of how the world works, I'd agree with you.

But I'd say it was thoroughly beneficial to have a reflex assumption that anything anyone tells you is liable (without their being deliberately untruthful - necessarily) to be partial (in both senses) and to require parsing.

by skeptic06 2006-05-24 03:09PM | 0 recs
Re: The People Are Here

I wouldn't be so quick to lump Jane Hamsher and Christy Hardon Smith in with a group of bloggers that you call "emerging Internet leaders." There's a difference between being a political activist working toward the common good and a power-mad bitch who runs an overrated cult that was borne out of being banned on Daily Kos.

by jurassicpork 2006-05-24 07:18PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------