May Senate Forecast

April Forecast

Overall: The Senate is now in play. However, like last month, I predict a three to five seat gain for Democrats.

Thirty-second analysis. The addition of Arizona to the "already competitive" tier gives Democrats a sixth potential pickup. Arizona moves up two tiers in one month with a wave of new poll results showing Kyl under 50%. In an otherwise stagnant environment, this sharp movement should offer hope to Democrats in states like Nevada, Tennessee, and Virginia. While Rhode Island threatens to slip back a tier, it still is not feasible to project Democrats capturing the Senate (yet). Democrats seem to be gradually improving their Senate chances every month.

You can see money totals here. Polling can be found at Rasmussen, Zogby, Survey USA, and Polling Report. Details on individual campaigns can be found in the extended entry.
Likely Pickups
Democrats: Pennsylvania:
Santorum has still not passed 41% in any poll since Casey announced lat March. I have had conversations with people who try to convince me that Casey remains the underdog because of Santorum's enormous warchest, but I don't buy it. There are reasons to be worried about Casey's declining favorables, but Santorum's are declining at an equal rate. Santorum remains the least popular Senator in the country, and the least popular person in the state. An incumbent with 90% name ID who can't break 41% is clearly going to have to come, ahem, from behind.

Republicans:None

Already Competitive
Democrats: Arizona, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Rhode Island
  • In Arizona, in just one week, several polls suddenly showed this race to be very competitive. Behavior Research Center saw the race drop from a 56-26 lead for Kyl, to a very competitive 40-33 lead for Kyl. In their most recent poll, Pederson led among independents 31-19. Also, in another poll, Pederson closed from a 60-26 deficit in January to a 45-25 deficit in May. The Pederson ad blitz could be seen slowly eating into Kyl's lead even before May, as Rasmussen showed Kyl's lead drop to 51-35, and Arizona St. saw it drop to 42-31. Pederson is up on the air, and the numbers in the race are moving fast. Further, Pederson is a very wealthy man, so he will have plenty of cash to compete with Kyl's $7.2M warchest as the campaign continues. We have a race out in Arizona.

  • In Rhode Island, Chafee's position is becoming more solidified. He has racked up endorsements form a series of "progressive" advocacy groups, such as NARAL, LCV and the Sierra Club. Matt Brown's scandal has forced him out of the Democratic primary, and if polls are any indication, it hasn't helped the lone remaining Democrat, Sheldon Whitehouse. Rhode Island College recently showed Chafee over 50% for the first time in this campaign. However, ARG still shows Chafee under 50% in his primary against Laffey, so this race stays in the "already competitive" category. Polls show Laffey being beaten by Whitehouse 2-1. Go Laffey!

  • In Montana, following the Democratic primary two weeks from today, this race has a chance to move up into the "likely pickup" category. Incumbent Conrad Burns has seen his approval numbers drop to Santorum levels, and both Democratic challengers, Jon Tester and John Morrison, now comfortably lead him in the polls. However, Burns has a lot more money than either Democrat, so I need to see how the primary winner survives Burns attacks before moving his race up a tier. The latest poll on the primary had Morrison up 35-28. Jon Tester is netroots endorsed.

  • In Missouri and Ohio, nothing has really changed. These two races remain toss-ups.
Republicans: Minnesota, New Jersey

  • In Minnesota, Republican Mark Kennedy has a lot of money and Rasmussen shows him competitive with Democrat Amy Klobuchar. I have never seen Kennedy reach even 45% in any poll, but for fear of being too optimistic I am leaving Minnesota in this tier. Kennedy does have a lot of money, and his running in a state with advanced, Thune bloggers 2.0 conservative netroots.

  • In New Jersey, Scott Shields fueled Bob Menendez is regularly tied with empty suit Tom Kean Jr. This is going to be an expensive race, and while New Jersey is a blue state, Democratic officials in the state have low approval ratings across the board. Of course, that was the case in 2002, 2004, and 2005 as well. If Menendez pulls out of this race with a 5-10% victory, remind me to never trust New Jersey pollsters again. The high number of undecideds they all find always, always seem to break for the Democrats on the ballot.
Potentially Competitive
Democrats: Tennessee, Virginia
  • In Tennessee, Ford is slipping. While no Republican is over 50% yet, the days when Ford was tied with his potential Republican challengers are over. Ford has some money and this race could be competitive as time goes on, but is it overly cynical of me to seriously doubt that an African-American can be elected statewide in the south even now? I don't like typing that, but I sometimes have to wonder what else is holding Ford back.

  • In Virginia, I'm moving this race up a notch. I know that Republican Allen has a ridiculous money advantage, that he remains a Republican favorite for 2008, and that Webb and Harris are engaged in a surprisingly vicious Democratic primary despite low fundraising totals. However, Allen's approval rating, favorables, and re-elect numbers hover just above or below the 50% mark in all polls. If the democratic primary winner can get some money, this race could surprise some people. For now, however, it remains only "potentially competitive."
Republicans: Michigan, Washington
My analysis in these two states is unchanged form last month.

Keep an Eye Out
Democrats: Nevada
With the movement we have seen in Arizona, with the huge influx of new voters in Nevada, with the wonderful work of Sarah Carter, and with Ensign's approval still below 50%, I refuse to give up on this race. Jack Carter can still take this, even if it remains a longshot.

Republicans: Connecticut, Hawaii, Michigan
  • In Connecticut, Lieberman refuses to rule out an independent run. He would probably win if he ran as an independent, but then who would he caucus with? In the Democratic primary, Lamont is gaining steam, but I have yet to see a head-to-head match-up between Lamont and any potential Republican nominee. While democrats remain favored, we will have two eyes open on this race at all times.

  • In Hawaii, Akaka might be facing a steep primary challenge from Rep. Ed Case. IF case wins the primary, it may have repercussions on the general elections. I'm keeping an eye on this one for a bit.

  • In Michigan, Stabenow is blowing away her challengers in all non-Strategic Vision polls. However, her approval rating remains under 50%. Although it is tempting, I am not ready to take it off the board yet. At the very least, we have to wait for the primary.
Removed from the board: Wisconsin (Thompson isn't running, thus ending the race), and Nebraska. Nelson has loads of money to keep pace with Ricketts, the highest approval rating in the nation, and a 20%+ lead in the polls. I do not care how conservative Nebraska is. Bush is under 50% there, and someone please tell me the last time a Senator with a 73-19 approval rating, millions of dollars, and a massive lead in the polls actually lost.

Already off the board
Republicans: Indiana, Maine, Mississippi, Texas, Utah, Wyoming

Democrats: California, Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, New York, New Mexico, North Dakota, West Virginia

Tags: forecasts, Senate 2006 (all tags)

Comments

23 Comments

Arizona

I was just in Arizona on a short vacation and I saw a bunch Pederson signs in Phoenix and no Kyl signs.  While unscientific, yard signs are an indication of support and enthusiasm.  I took it as a good sign for Pederson and a bad one for Kyl.

Pederson also had a great commercial on the air.  I'd love to get some input from people who are from the state and know the dynamics of the race.

by John Mills 2006-05-23 08:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Arizona

The Pederson/Kyl race is, from my perspective, much closer than even the polls suggest. Granted, I hail from the progressive center of the state (Tucson), but Kyl and his Republicists have been forced, already, to dip into that giant war chest to produce and air at least 3 ads (one pretty negative) responding to Pedersen....before the primaries (a mere formality at best). Pederson's ads highlighting the quote from McCain saying Kyl's immigration plan "bordered on fantasy" really struck a nerve- both with the public and with Kyl. Also, be on the lookout for a new poll (I was actually phoned on this one- first time ever) that should be released soon. My hunch is that the margin will further narrow.

In addition, Kyl's money advantage doesn't scare me in the least. Considerable research shows that the larger the incumbent's war chest in competitive races, the greater their likelihood of losing- they have to raise more and spend more to battle a strong opponent. Ask Tom Daschle about that one. That Kyl is already on the defensive, and that his ads have run with considerable frequency spell trouble for him. His inseparability from Bush in his voting record is resonating among the population as well- and not in a good way. I suspect that many undecideds and weak Republicans who voted for him in 2000 will not have the motivation to do so this time around, as this election is at least in part a referendum on Bush- and while these folks may not turn and vote Dem, they are less likely to even show up in Nov.

This race hinges on 3 dynamics, 2 of which break in Pederson's favor: The Kyl/Bush referendum factor, and Kyl's high profile stance on immigration. Should the issue get even more play between now and Nov, with Kyl standing out in front aligned with the provisions proposed in the House version (will he be named to the conference?) it helps Pederson. If he changes his tune or backs off, it helps Pederson. I don't see how Kyl can swing this in his favor with more than the 20% of hardcore anti-immigration nuts in the state.

The third issue is tied to immigration and turnout and that is the Hispanic vote. With the recent successful ballot initiative to "reduce voter fraud" (read: systematically disenfranchise likely Democratic voters) and some of the snags that plagued the recent county voting procedures regarding what is considered acceptible ID, coupled with fairly successful Republican anti-voter registration tactics waged in 2004, this race, should it come down to a too-close to call situation, I believe favors Kyl. We have seen too many times what happens when we have recounts: large blocks of ballots from Democratic strongholds either disappear or are otherwise "discounted," removed from the rolls, or merely invalidated. Throw on top of that GOP animatron Jan Brewer, Secretary of State. Will she be Katherine Harris v.06? I sure hope it doesn't go there. While I think this race is definitely in play, unless Pederson is able to open up a sizeable lead (beyond margin of error- and the only way this will happen is with a large Hispanic turnout, which is NEVER reflected in polling), Kyl will probably retain the seat, narrowly. On the upside, momentum from this race will probably bleed over into the 8th district race, where any of Giffords, Weiss or Latas (I can still hope) is likely to pick up the seat vacated by Kolbe.

 

by hyena 2006-06-02 08:21AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

     The rubber stamp running against Amy Klobuchar in Minnesota is Mark Kennedy, not Mike.

by Lokileague 2006-05-23 08:23AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

Not a bad forecast, you may be a little optimistic in Arizona, as for Connecticut I believe Lieberman will win the Primary but I read somewhere he will caucus with the Democrats in the next Senate, I read this in an article when he turned down the request from the Gop nomination.  As for Hawaii if Case wins his primary, my opinion is he has a better chance for an upset they Lamont does, but if he does he will win easily in November and if Akaka wins the priamy more of the same.  The RI Senate primay may be very close but if Chafee wins the primary I think he makes it, I have said though and will mark my words that is Chafee is still in the Senate ten years from now he will not be a Republican.

by THE MODERATE 2006-05-23 08:26AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

Missouri is probably still a toss-up but I believe the statewide stem-call vote will help her.  Talant has flip-flopped and appeased no one but his hellfire and dammnation base with his opposition to stem-cell research.  The St. Louis & KC business community is estranged from the rest of the increasingly conservative Republican party.  McCaskill has a slight edge.

by howardpark 2006-05-23 08:52AM | 0 recs
New Jersey

What's hurting Dems across the board here is Gov. Corzine. He stepped up last month and said the state is essentially bankrupt and in a fiscal crisis, and announced lots of tax increases and spending cuts for this year. So, his approval rating's in the crapper, and it's pulled Dems down across the board, including Menendez.

by dwbh 2006-05-23 08:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Santorum

Santorum has just gone up on the air in western Pennsylvania with an ad attacking Casey. Rick blames Bob for sending "Democratic operatives" to "peep" in the windows of Santorum's Penn Hills house, where neither Rick, his wife, his kids or even his niece and nephew, who did live there for awhile, live anymore. I think every person in western PA knows Rick and family actually live year 'round in Leesburg, VA, too.

This is significant because western PA is Santorum's base. He's the "home boy". If he has to go negative against Casey right off the bat in his home park, he's in deep, deep, deep trouble.

Personally, I suspect the ad will backfire and only serve to remind people of the cyberschool and residency flap last year.

by phillydem 2006-05-23 09:08AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

Maryland???

by aiko 2006-05-23 09:38AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

under potentially competitive - rethugs you have michigan and i think you mean md

by aiko 2006-05-23 09:40AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

MD may be fluid but only in the September Dem primary. Mfume may beat Cardin, its looking better every day, but Steele isn't going to win anything.  

I no longer believe the Republicans have a chance to pick up the Senate or hold the State House.  Bush approval ratings and congressional corruption is going to keep independants from supporting the 'other' party and there just aren't very many Maryland Reps.  not enough anyway.  Look at registered voters. By and large, independants will either vote Dem or they won't vote. This race is a lock for the Dems. Mark my words.

by aiko 2006-05-23 09:50AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

I agree about the Senate seat.

But given what I've seen on the ground in Maryland, I'm not as confident in the state level races. The Maryland Republicans are some under handing monsters. And the Democrats suffer from the standard Blue state problem of apathy. I mean the Democratic party announced the first training session for June, the Republicans have been campaigning solidly for a year now. And the Democrats allowing the Governor and his crooked cronies make such a terrible deal over electricity rates, I don't think the Democrats are as safe as they seem to think they are.

by Jamison 2006-05-23 10:45AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

New Jersey:  I've NEVER considered New Jersey a Blue state--I live 1 mile from NJ and used to be a reporter in North Jersey.  Still, the radical right there is economic, not mainly religious, which may be why it appears to be moving a bit to the left in national elections.  It's a true swing state, the Republicans have just trended right.

I still think that once the voters realize Kean Jr. isn't Kean Sr. that the race will be pretty much over if...

1. Menendez wins whatever debates there are.

2. There are no Democratic scandals.

Corzine?  Well if he shows real, imaginative leadership....  Actually, I don't think he's that good a communicator.  Could be a drag.

New Jersey was always an anti-tax state.  It.s been only in my lifetime that a sales tax and income tax were imposed.  By that time the state built up a tremendous debt and property taxes are sky high.  The will to takle these issues in a comprehensive way has always been small.  And because of debt, there's not a lot of leeway.

by Reptile 2006-05-23 09:49AM | 0 recs
Tennessee

"I don't like typing that, but I sometimes have to wonder what else is holding Ford back."

Ford's strengths: he can easily outraise all of his competitors, a crowded and late (early august) republican primary, and he is an excellent orator, one of the best I've ever seen.

Weaknesses (what's holding him back): an uncle recently brought down for bribery charges (the TN Waltz), a father who was not the cleanest politician in DC.  He and his campaign also suffer from being politically inept.  The ineptitude is mostly manifested in small ways: a campaign ad blasting gas prices with Ford filling up an SUV, telling a room full of Democrats he supports vouchers (although no one asked if he did), not showing up to events, etc.

Also, those of us who have actually examined his voting record in detail aren't excited about him. In fact, the ONLY reason I will vote for him is because if he wins, we're one step closer to taking back the senate.

by schwompa 2006-05-23 09:53AM | 0 recs
Re: Tennessee

I have never commented on a blog before. I am a long time Tennesseean, and have followed Ford. As the commenter said above, he comes from a corrupt family. Recently his Aunt was kicked out of the Tennessee House. His family owns Memphis with the Funeral Parlors. Making racist comments about the South is not good for MYDD.

by mcvols 2006-05-23 12:05PM | 0 recs
Nevada

anyone know what the newest Rasmussen Reports poll on the Nevada Senate race looks like? It's behind the subscription firewall, so I couldn't look at it. Their poll on the NV Gov race was quite encouraging with Dem Dina Titus leading Republican Jim Gibbons 44-40.

by jedinecny 2006-05-23 10:13AM | 0 recs
Nebraska

Obviously no Senator has ever lost re-election where Nelson is at now, but you really are under-estimating the power of Nebraska's redstate dynamics.  Nelson is hig in the sky mostly because an early ad blitz reminded Nebraskans of why they liked him, and the Ricketts primary spots were all positive.  Nelson hasn't been attacked yet, and Rickett's message that he is a political outsider has the potential to catch fire.  I don't think you can call this race over because of some polls taken in May.  After all, in 1996 Nelson was just coming off his '94 landslide reelection to the governor's mansion (one of the most lopsided races in Nebraska history), had huge approval ratings and consistently led in the polls by significant margins against an unknown Republican businessman.  By November, Chuck Hagel came ahead by about 10 points.

Similarly, Nelson led by huge margins all throughout the early months of the 2000 race and ended up winning by about 1%.   Nelson is a great politician, a smart campaigner and someone who Nebraskans really like and trust, but he's still a Democrat, and that's reason enough for many Cornhuskers to fire him.

by Ryan Anderson 2006-05-23 10:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Nebraska

Chuck Hagel is the only Republican Senator to be elected in the last 30 years Nelson seat has been in Democratic Hands, except a brief GOP appointment, since 1976 though Ed Zorinsky, Bob Kerrey and Ben Nelson, although both Zorinsky and Kerrey were ex-Republicans when they ran.

by THE MODERATE 2006-05-23 10:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Nebraska

That's really just interesting trivia and little else.  Zorinsky was a popular former Republican mayor of Omaha who joined the Democrats as a last resort, Exxon, Kerrey and Nelson were all popular governors (and far more attractive and candidates than their opponents), none of whom might ever won an election had the Republican gubernatorial incumbents they defeated not pissed everyone off by raising taxes.   The Nebraska Democratic party has such an impressive winning streak because they managed to find three individuals who were such talented politicians that they could overcome the overwhelming odds against them.  They most certaintly didn't win election because Nebraskans are adverse to Republican senators.  

by Ryan Anderson 2006-05-23 09:51PM | 0 recs
Wisconsin - Thompson not out for sure
Thompson did rule out a run earlier this month, but it wasn't for the senate. He ruled out a run for Wisconsin governor.

He's remained silent about the senate race, much to the dismay of some in the Wisconsin GOP.

by OoklaTheMokk 2006-05-23 10:19AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

Case would be a disaster. He, lieberman ( if he wins) Casey and Webb ( if they win) would form a quisling cell inside the D's caucaus that would subvert and betray any and all progressive moves.

by Rational 2006-05-23 10:27AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

I take issue with you on that foursome! Lieberman is fiercely pro war mildly prochoice, Casey is antichoice but seems to be a solid D on everything else, Webb is HIGHLY CRITICAL of the Bush war handling, not at all about to ally with Lieberman on that issue and Case is pro war but largely a D on most all other issues.

While I support Lamont over Lieberman and I have actually donated money to him, Cegilis and Ciro so you know where my heart is, I will take these four seats in the D column gratefully especially the pickups in VA and PA and worry about having the luxury of majority infighting later.  The thought of Feingold, Boxer, Lautenburg, Kennedy and Leahy Chairing the Key committees is too much good to pass up simply because one is not 100% satisfied with these four on every issue!  By the way you might as well have sited Landreau, Both Nelson's, Bayh, Lincoln and Pryor as well.  We will always have centrists in our majority or we will never have a majority.  It is the leadership that counts the most and taking the chamber out of Republican hands!

by politics64 2006-05-23 11:34AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

Ohio's clearly a toss-up to anyone here, and i think it leans to retaining DeWine unless Brown improves his campaign. It worries me that so many are eagerly putting this in the win category. It makes me a trifle pessimistic. I wouldn't count this one as a given for quite a while yet.

by anastasia 2006-05-23 11:59AM | 0 recs
Re: May Senate Forecast

you've got two michigan entries, chris. perhaps the first one is supposed to be maryland?

by wu ming 2006-05-23 01:18PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------