Strange Bedfellows

I never thought I'd see this coalition exist, between the Christian Coalition and the Liberal Blog Network, but here you go:

WASHINGTON, May 17 Christian Wire Service -- Today, Christian Coalition of America announced its support for the effort to amend pending telecom legislation in Congress in order to prevent the large phone and cable companies from discriminating against web sites.

Roberta Combs, the President of Christian Coalition of America said, "Christian Coalition is joining a broad array of organizations, representing consumers, businesses, and all ends of the political spectrum. The Coalition is committed to working on behalf of our supporters to ensure that the Internet remains the free marketplace of ideas, products and services that it is today."

Major telecom companies are laying plans to create tiered access to the Internet - and to charge extra fees to consumers and content providers in order to offer select web sites for "fast access" by consumers. Without "Net Neutrality", American consumers who want to pay for fast broadband access to the Internet will find out they don't actually have what they thought they were paying for. They won't have high-speed broadband access to the entire Internet; just the part that the phone and cable companies allow them to see.

The Internet is what it is today because every site, no matter how obscure, is just as accessible to every individual as any name brand site with a multi-million dollar budget. Every American has the opportunity to create their own site and say what they want to the entire world and have the same access to the world as anyone else. And consumers have the ability to connect with them.

Since the inception of the Internet, it has existed on phone lines, which were covered under what are known as "common carrier" regulations, which prevented discrimination, based on content. This principle helped make the Internet what it is today -- a dynamic engine for free expression and economic growth.

Mrs. Combs said, "Under the new rules, there is nothing to stop the cable and phone companies from not allowing consumers to have access to speech that they don't support. What if a cable company with a pro-choice Board of Directors decides that it doesn't like a pro-life organization using its high-speed network to encourage pro-life activities? Under the new rules, they could slow down the pro-life web site, harming their ability to communicate with other pro-lifers - and it would be legal. We urge Congress to move aggressively to save the Internet -- and allow ideas rather than money to control what Americans can access on the World Wide Web. We urge all Americans to contact their Congressmen and Senators and tell them to save the Internet and to support 'Net Neutrality'."
---------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Christian Coalition Announces Support for 'Net Neutrality' to Prevent Giant Phone and Cable Companies From Discriminating Against Web Sites

To: National Desk
 http://www.earnedmedia.org/cc0517.htm

Contact: Michele Combs, Director of Communication for the Christian Coalition, 202-549-6257, 202-479-6900

 Special thanks to Mike McCurry & the Telco's for bringing us together.

Tags: net neutrality (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Re: Strange Bedfellows

Yeah...now this is democracy.

by Pericles 2006-05-17 08:51PM | 0 recs
common carrier

Kudos to the Christian Coalition for making the connection to the "common carrier" model in their press release!

(mild) jeers to the Save the Internet coalition for never mentioning it in their ads/publicity/releases.  Looks like the Christian Coalition knows their marketing & framing better than we do.

by cos 2006-05-17 09:54PM | 0 recs
Update on Judiciary's NN Bill

From Multichannel News:
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA63 35841.html?display=Breaking+News&ref erral=SUPP&nid=2226

A House source said Wednesday that House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) has refused to give the Judiciary Committee a period of time to amend a major communications bill (H.R. 5252) that passed by Energy and Commerce April 26 without a broad array of prescriptive "network-neutrality" regulations.

In the wake of the speaker's ruling, Judiciary Committee chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) is planning to process his own bill that will address network neutrality from an antitrust-law perspective, which would likely mean Justice Department oversight of the industry rather than the Federal Communications Commission.

"Judiciary will initiate its own legislation," said Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), a net-neutrality proponent with seat on both Energy and Commerce and Judiciary. "The draft is being put together as we speak."

Boucher added, "I am not at liberty to discuss the contents of it except that when it surfaces, I intend to be a co-sponsor. I am very involved in the drafting process."

"Network neutrality is the core," Boucher said of the Judiciary bill, "and it will be the balance I have been looking for."

by mitchipd 2006-05-17 10:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Strange Bedfellows

Strange Bedfellows . . .  between the Christian Coalition and the Liberal Blog Network


It seems to me that the CC has a much bigger stake in net neutrality for high bandwidth and a common carrier market model those services than the liberal bloggers.  How much bandwidth did it take to down load this thread?   No one is talking about asking someone to pay extra to be able to access a site like this.

But what is possible is that outfits who wanted to be able to make available video feeds to people all around the country would have to put up money to buy into the ability to deliver that sort of bandwidth to cable subscribers in large parts of the country.

I just am reading your "Crashing the Gate" where it talks about how the vast rightwing media machine provides the same talking points and how the Pat Robinson gang is part of that.  But of course it might be an issue for them how much they had to pay if they wanted to stream their stuff to everywhere.  And they already have studios and technicians and performers who know how to produce professional quality audio and video programming. 

I hope that we are a lot faster in catching up with the right in the area of broadband media presentation than we were in catching up with talk radio.

There is nothing strange at all about Christian Coalition fighting for net neutrality.  What is strange it that liberal bloggers think it is strange rather than seeing what a long way we have to go to be able to take advantage of  high bandwidth communications the way I am sure the religious right is poised to do.

by Fred in Vermont 2006-05-18 03:40AM | 0 recs
Direct your attention to cable a la carte

If you want to lobby for a telco change that will negatively affect the religious right, bug your local officials to establish cable a la carte. Right now, when you pay your cable bill, you're sending money to Pat Robertson.  That's just not right, being forced to pay for a political message you disagree with in order to be able to watch John Stewart.

by jayackroyd 2006-05-18 05:08AM | 0 recs
And 700 Club people are suporting Steven Colbert

 . . . being forced to pay for a political message you disagree with in order to be able to watch John Stewart.


And think of all those 700 Club people.  Someone should tell them that they are helping to support Steven Colbert.

 

by Fred in Vermont 2006-05-18 09:03AM | 0 recs
The Common Enemy

Greedy Business practices.

Interesting, vote for this bill, get some money from the telcos and loose your base, the ground troops, without which you can't win, no matter what side of the fence you're on.  (Remember, you don't need that much money to communicate with your base.)

To be clear, I think that telcos are getting shafted in the competition with cable (original intent of the bill).  However, this crass attempt to control access is looking like electoral death to anyone who votes for it.  

by NvDem 2006-05-18 03:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Strange Bedfellows

Time to challenge local Republican bloggers to support net neutrality.

by Alice Marshall 2006-05-18 03:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Strange Bedfellows

Got to make sure those nasty telecoms give good treatment to conservative hate sites like Rev Phelp's godshatesfags.com

by bernardpliers 2006-05-18 05:36AM | 0 recs
SMILES

I told you so. Told you so. Told you so.

And guess what? The senate is going to kill off the gay marriage ban too. Know why? Not because its unchristian to get two guys together and get them married.

But because christians are smart enough to know whats important in their own faith. The net right now is more important than Republican election year posturing.

Sure its nice to save money when the GLBT wants to sue everyone in sight and drag the gay marriage issue through the court system.

But so what. Their issue is dead. And the issue is dead with the christians as well.

The GOP is getting ready to make lots of sound and noise about it. I DARE them.

This is the same set of folks I've told you about for years. Like the doobie brothers said..
Jesus is just alright with me..

by turnerbroadcasting 2006-05-18 11:16AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------