Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

I scored this from a source who has access to an NRCC blast fax about their new "Million Dollar Roundtable." It is, in short, a list of what the NRCC currently believes to be their top 32 races in 2006. As you can see, they only have eleven targets, but twenty-one defenses:

Defenses (District: Republican Representative)
AZ-O8: OPEN (KoIbe); CA-50: OPEN (Cunningham); CO-07: OPEN (Beauprez); CT-02: Rob Simmons; CT-04: Chris Shays; FL-22: Clay Shaw; IA-01: OPEN (Nussle); IN-02: Chris Chocola; IN-08: John Hostettler; IN-09: Mike Sodrel; IL-06: OPEN (Hyde); KY-04: Geoff Davis; MN-06: OPEN (Kennedy); NM-O1: Heather L. Wilson; NC-11: Charles Taylor; OH-18: Bob Ney; PA-O6: Jim Ger1ach; PA-08: Mike Fitzpatrick; WA-08: Dave Reichert; WI-O8: OPEN (Green); TX-22: Tom Delay

Here is the rub: they don't even list great opportunities for Democrats like PA-07, NY-24, FL-13 (Katherine Harris's vacant seat) and OH-15, probably because those seats have only clearly become vulnerable in the last two weeks (the fax did not show TX-22 to be open, for example). This list could easily expand, even though their own targeting already suggests that enough seats are vulnerable to lose the House. Overall, Republicans are defending at least ten major open seats: AZ-08, CA-50, CO-07, FL-13, IA-01, IL-06, MN-06, NY-24, TX-22 and WI-08. By way of comparison, as you can see from their targeting, they are only attacking two open seats, including ultra-Democratic VT-AL:

Targets (District: Democratic Representative)
CO-03: John Salazar; IA-03: Leonard Boswell; GA-O8: Jim Marshall; GA-12: John Barrow; IL-08: Melissa Bean; LA-03: Charlie Melancon; OH-O6: OPEN (Strickland); SC-05: John Spratt; TX-17: Chet Edwards; WA-02: Rick Larsen; VT-AL: OPEN (Sanders)

Two things jump out at me. First, I can't really see how this list can grow much, although Scott might be vulnerable in Georgia. Second, if VT-AL is on their list, they are really, really struggling to find new targets. Sure, it is an open seat, but with a Democratic partisan voting edge of around 11%.

A quick look at the NRCC target list reveals just how thin it actually is. First, note that even now, with a stranglehold on the south, five of the eleven Republican targets come from that region. Of course, even in the south, four of the five Democrats being targeted are vulnerable to mid-term redistricting (GA-08, GA-12, TX-17), or Katrina redistricting (LA-03). Outside of the south, two others are open seats, and two more are freshman Dems. Among all non-southern long-term Democratic incumbents, only Leonard Boswell in the IA-03 and Rick Larsen in WA-02 are being targeted by Republicans. Now tell me who is a regional party. Now tell me who is going to be playing defense in 2006.

The Republican target list is only one seat (11) longer than their major open seat defense list (10). While we are still not there yet, the makings of a real tidal wave are rising seemingly every day.

Tags: House 2006 (all tags)

Comments

25 Comments

Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

Minor mistake, Chris. They're attacking two open seats, Sanders in Vermont and Strickland in OH.

by PantherDem 2006-04-06 12:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

And unlike VT-AL, I think OH-6 could very well flip, especially given Charlie Wilson's filing failure.

by PantherDem 2006-04-06 12:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets
Fixed. Thanks!
by Chris Bowers 2006-04-06 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

CO-3 is not a likely GOP pickup.  They might be targeting it, but it's not likely to flip.  If most of the rest of their targets are as "juicy" as that, they're in for a lean season.

by Phoenix Rising 2006-04-06 01:05PM | 0 recs
Great Work Chris!

by molly bloom 2006-04-06 01:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Great Work Chris!
Yes indeed. Thankfully, I had that source, whoever it is.
by Chris Bowers 2006-04-06 01:17PM | 0 recs
VT-AL

This seat is going to be harder to win than it looks.  While Vermont generally votes for democrats, the republican in the race is a very strong candidate.  She(Martha Rainville) was the head of the Vermont National Guard until the beginning of April, holds generally moderate views, including being pro-choice, and has the full throated support of the Vermont GOP.  

The Democratic candidate(Peter Welch) is, IMHO, a great candidate, and is being considered for top tier status by the DCCC.  

Chris, I usually agree with your analysis, but in this case I believe that you got it wrong.  Vermont is not as liberal as everyone thinks, and a moderate woman has a decent chance of winning a state-wide seat.

by Reid 2006-04-06 01:13PM | 0 recs
Re: VT-AL
I live in Vermont and I agree with Reid. Vermont voters are lot more independent then is commonly assumed. Right now, early in the race, this is far from a slam dunk for the Democratic nominee. There are many "centrist" Vermont voters, perhaps we could call them "Douglas Democrats", who have twice elected the Republican governor, Republican lieutenant governor, but also voted for John Kerry and Pat Leahy. The state has been hit hard by the deaths of soldiers in Iraq and Rainville has been a comforting presence to many and has been in the media alot. I wouldn't be surprised if she has higher name recognition than the Democrat, Peter Welch, who is the State Senate President. With all that said, the good news for Democrats is that it is early in the campaign. So far Ms. Rainville has not been running a very good campaign. Also, most Vermonters have little idea what she thinks on the issues besides the war. I saw her interviewed on WCAX and when talking about issues besides the war she seemed to be reciting tired old Republican platitudes that sounded quaint.
by conman9 2006-04-06 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

Is there any way to tell just how vulnerable their targets are? Like Melissa Bean or Chet Edwards?

Especially Chet Edwards, he seems like one of the only Democrats who can survive in Texas outside Austin and the inner cities. Hate to lose him.

by Epitome22 2006-04-06 01:25PM | 0 recs
What about FL-09?

Its an open seat with an arguably rich GOP candidate with the same name as the incumbent.  But all he has going for him is name recognition and $$$$.  Is that all it takes to get a House seat today?  What about the issues? What about experience?  Tell me it ain't so...

by poliblogist 2006-04-06 01:28PM | 0 recs
Re: What about FL-09?
Forgot about htat one. Clearly, that is another good target.
by Chris Bowers 2006-04-06 01:33PM | 0 recs
Sounds like The Distinguished Gentleman

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104114/plot summary

by Geotpf 2006-04-06 03:10PM | 0 recs
Bullseye

Love this!  You are so right!

by poliblogist 2006-04-07 06:02AM | 0 recs
No Hersyth?

What is interesting is which seats are not on the list.

There are some seats that would be natural targets that are not on the list.

by Nazgul35 2006-04-06 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: No Hersyth?

Herseth drew a weak challenger, thank God. She's also got an approval rating in the 70s.

by PantherDem 2006-04-06 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: No Hersyth?

Link here.

by PantherDem 2006-04-06 01:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

Here are some resources that address the level of vulnerability for the races:

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystal ball
http://www.cookpolitical.com
http://www.cqpolitics.com

Another very winnable race for us they don't mention is Connecticut 5, the two Nevada Republican seats.  Someone asked about Herseth.  I heard the Republicans failed to find a challenger before the filing deadline.  Also, it's important to realize that Democrats like Herseth, Matheson, Edwards, etc. defended their seats last year under much more unfavorable circumstances.

by TheUnknown285 2006-04-06 01:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

Interesting piece, Chris. It's also interesting-- at least to me-- that many of the Democratic incumbents most in jeopardy are the ones who most frequently vote with Republicans and against their own caucus. Obviously we all want to see Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel and Steny Hoyer replace Denny Hastert, John Boehner and Roy Blunt (don't we? What a wonderful world it will be!), but I just can't get all that excited about defending Repug-lites like Melissa Bean and Jim Marshall when we have a shot at electing genuine progressive, true-blue Democrats like Jan Schneider in FL-13, Francine Busby, Charlie Brown and Jerry McNerney in California, Lois Murphy in PA-06 and Coleen Rowley in MN-02.

They don't need us anyway. Rahm and his crew are looking out for them. On the DCCC list of Frontline incumbents who need help, they are 90% about right-of-center Democrats and don't even bother mentioning a progressive incumbent who actually needs and deserves help, Julia Carson.

I hope you won't mind me taking the space to mention that my offer for a free CD for the first 50 donors through my ACT BLUE page for Francine Busby is still open.

by DownWithTyranny 2006-04-06 01:58PM | 0 recs
This makes sense

If the district is competative, it's probably fairly conservative, so if they do elect a Democrat, it's probably a fairly conservative one.

by Geotpf 2006-04-06 03:11PM | 0 recs
Re: IN-7 Julia Carson

I as glad to see that Julia Carson is on the short list of candidates that SNAP PAC is going to try to help this year:

http://www.snappac.org/candidates.html

I haven't read anything yet about who the GOP will put up against her this year, but they've pulled out all the stops on "nasty" in that district, in other cycles. I've been a fan of hers for literally decades, back to when she was in the State Senate and actually tried to enact prison reform legislation... in Indiana.

by Christopher Walker 2006-04-06 05:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Top Republican House Defenses and Targets

Julia Carson's not vulnerable this year. Her opponents are nobodies. One is a convicted felon, one is a lawyer, one is a car dealer, and one is a GOP activist. NONE are strong candidates.

by Ament Stone of California 2006-04-07 06:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Spratt

Carolinians can correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Spratt practically an institution down there? I find it very hard to believe the RNCC thinks he's vulnerable - even in that very red state.

In Pennsy, PA-7 just recently got interesting with Weldon's ill-conceived remarks about Sestak's daughter, so not surprised it's not listed. Interesting to note PA-17 (Holden) isn't on the RNCC target list.

Here's my upset special prediction: Joe Pitts loses in PA-16. This has the same earmark as PA-17 did after the 2002 redistricting, an incumbent who hadn't faced serious competition for years and basically took reelection for granted.

by phillydem 2006-04-06 02:19PM | 0 recs
Re: WA-08: Dave Reichert

It's anything but a done deal but Reichert is in a lot of trouble.  Probably the only reason he was elected was because he was Sheriff when the Green River Killer was caught and he rode those coattails to victory.  The Stranger had a great profile on his opponent Darcy Burner

by Fledermaus 2006-04-06 03:22PM | 0 recs
Fla 13 ... Jan Schneider

Jan Schneider can take that seat for the D's. Her primary opponent is an inexperienced former Republican.

Schneider's got Joe Trippi on board, and has backing from Sen. Harry Reid.

by danwalter 2006-04-06 09:34PM | 0 recs
CT-02

I'm glad to see this race featured.  We are working very hard on the ground to elect Joe Courtney, a good solid Democrat, to this seat.  We could use some help with fundraising! Thanks for all your good reporting.

by MVD 2006-04-07 08:08AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------