Looking Ahead

With what seems to be a decent number of absentee and provisional ballots remaining, Busby has 43.92% of the vote, the non-Republican total is at 47.27%, Bilbray is at 15.15%, and turnout looks to be around 135K. I don't know what the ratio of absentee / provisional ballots are among the remaining votes, so I don't have a good idea of whether or not Busby's totals will rise or fall. Either way, she is right at the 43.8% total I was looking at yesterday morning. That means this is a great result, if not as clearly so as I would have liked. I think Busby is the favorite here, though not much.

June 6th now looms large in the primary calendar. Just two days before the start of YearlyKos, two netroots candidates, Francine Busby and Jon Tester, will be facing the voters. Alabama, Iowa, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota have also scheduled primaries for that day. In between now and then, May 2nd features Indiana, North Carolina and Ohio. Nebraska and West Virginia are on May 9th. My primary, in Pennsylvania, is on May 16th, as are primaries in Kentucky and Oregon. Arkansas and Idaho are on May 23rd.

Republicans are clearly weak in 2006. They spent over $5M on this race, much more than they will be able to spend on any district in November, and still are going to come well under the 55%+ Republican performance in the district. With fourteen Republicans in the race, virtually every type of Republican was available for the voters in this heavily Republican district to choose from, and yet they still under-performed. Republicans are fractured too--not a single candidate could pull in more than 15% of the vote yesterday.

Then again, even with all of that in mind, we still haven't put together the pieces for a landslide election in the House. For narrow control, maybe, but not for a landslide. Our basic problem seems to be that turnout is low. It isn't massively lower than 2002, but it is lower. After Texas and Illinois, this is starting to look like a pattern. It is entirely possible that running on Republican corruption could be a double-edged sword that depresses Republican turnout, but also depresses all turnout as people grow disgusted with politicians in general. There probably needs to be more work from good field people to really determine if we are facing a turnout problem, but there also need to be more work done to motivate Democratic voters.

We are making progress, but clearly have a lot of work left to do. Taking back the country was always going to be a marathon, not a sprint. Onwards and upwards.

Tags: CA-50, election results, House 2006, MT-Sen, Primary Elections (all tags)

Comments

15 Comments

Re: Looking Ahead

I don't think it's that running on GOP corruption is a double edged sword, it's just that it isn't enough.  Dems need to put together a strong platform so we can offer clear alternatives to the failed and corrupt conservative agenda.  It will never be enough to convince people to vote against the other guys we have to give them reasons to vote for us.

by Theo929 2006-04-12 09:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

The DLC strategy of lying low and waiting for the Republicans to implode is going to depress Democratic turnout. It's as simple as that. You have to take some risks to thrive in politics. The Democrats have to do two things: push the Republicans off the cliff, and tell America how they would be different (and better).

Not every Democrat has to do everything, but every Democrat has to do something. And right now only a handful are doing anything more than testing the water with thier pinky toes.

by shargash 2006-04-12 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Oh, and the really sad thing about this is that, lying low WILL probably win the Democrats the house this year, but barely, and it will not win the senate. The DLC-consultant types will call that a victory and use it to re-enforce the bad old way of compaigning. After which, the Republicans will retake the house in '08, while keeping the senate and presidency.

by shargash 2006-04-12 10:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Why don't the Dem strategists go after the Latino vote?  In CA 50, 20% are Latino. That might be enough to make a difference.  Clearly, they are a networked and powerful group.  Its annoying they are not participating in  a bigger way.  

by Kai 2006-04-12 11:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Don't make the mistake that the population demographics for the 50th District match the demographics of registered voters.  They do not match up!  Plus, what makes you think that the Busby campaign hasn't done serious outreach to latino Dems and latino voters in general?

by Phonatic 2006-04-12 09:37PM | 0 recs
Turnout vs. A Corruption Message

Chris, in my view your analysis is very wise.

It is always double-edged to have criticism be the dominant tone in any campaign in this time of widespread cynicism.   We need an equivalently strong forward-looking positive message.

Before the R collapse of this year, I didn't expect D's to really contend for Congress for a couple more cycles.  I believe we inevitably will come back....but circumstances are forcing us to come up to the plate before we're really ready.   Maybe we can punch the ball into a hole.  The home run will probably come in later years - an exceptional 2008 messenger, possibly.

by Andmoreagain 2006-04-12 10:25AM | 0 recs
Turnout

I understand that turnout (135K) was lower than in the 2004 election (150K), but isn't that an improper comparison?  Shouldn't the proper comparison be to the last April special election?  Maybe the turnout was actually higher than the last special election.

by taylormattd 2006-04-12 10:59AM | 0 recs
Re: Turnout

There are no really useful comparisons when you are dealing with special elections.  Each tends to be its own creature, animated by a very specific, very local set of issues and candidate personalities.

The run-off gives us the opportunity to explore answers to an important question:  how can Democratic candidates win, or even contend, in very Republican CDs?

North County San Diego is a very Republican district.  It would be an amazing thing if Busby can win in June and November.  It will take more than extremely effective GOTV.  It will take a candidate and set of ideas that resonate with what is on those voters' minds.

by James Earl 2006-04-12 02:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Turnout

Comparing special election turnouts with regularly scheduled elections is "improper".  Special elections usually have lower turnouts than either off-year elections or presidential elections.  But I did see an estimate of 35% turnout for yesterday's special election, and I think that's relatively high for a special election.

by Phonatic 2006-04-12 09:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Votes for demcrats are motivated by Hope, votes for Republicans are motivted by Fear.  The Corruption scandles only reduce votes for Repulicans (out of shame) but without Hope for improvement, does nothing to increase votes for Democrats.  

Politics corrupts all who touch it, the feeling goes, so really, it doesn't make much different who wins...

It's much easier to make people be afraid then it is to make them feel hopeful, but that's what Democrats need to do to win a landslide...really that's what clinton did, by talking about how politics works well, how it is an expression of our will in a positive way...how both democrats and republicans are parts of a system that is meant for Good.  

It isn't ideas that matter, it's just the idea that there is something to look forward too.  

A feel good ad campaing might do the trick.

by David in Burbank 2006-04-12 02:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Call me a cynic, but I don't think these results are good at all.  Obviously this is a dead red district, so objectively, Busby's performance was great.  But great isn't our goal, winning is.  And unless Republican discipline completely collapses in two months, this race is at best a toss up.  Our only hope is that Independents decide to vote with us.  Otherwise, we will be bludgeoned by blind Republican loyalty and lose 52-48.

by Fitzy2 2006-04-12 05:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

The June runoff will not be a two-way race.  There will four names on the ballot: Busby, Bilbray or Roach, a Libertarian, and an independent candidate.  So it will be possible for the winner (hopefully Busby, knock on wood) to win with less than 50%.  The goal now is to come in first, regardless of whether she gets to 50%, the optimal situation.  Those two additional names will attract votes.

I want to see a breakdown of the votes by precincts, but yesterday's returns were consistently between 42% and 44% throughout the night, including the absentee returns.  That suggests to me that her support is consistent throughout the district.  With that kind of a base and the upcoming general primary occurring at the same time as the runoff, I think she can improve on her vote enough so that she can win.  But I also suspect that her win will be a squeaker.

by Phonatic 2006-04-12 09:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

The Precinct Level and GOTV

"Organize the whole state so that every Whig can be brought to the polls... Divide the county into small districts and appoint in each a sub-committee. Make a perfect list of all the voters and ascertain with certainty for whom they will vote,keep a constant watch on the doubtful voters and...have them talked to by those in whom they have the most confidence, and on Election Day see that every Whig is brought to the polls." -Abraham Lincoln 1/21/1840.

This is as important now as it was then. Poor Democratic turn out  is showing that the Democrats have not mastered their work at the precinct level. This does not bode well for the coming elections.  A get out the vote GOTV and precinct operation should be a year round permanent operation of the party to protect its incumbents and to prepare challenges to opposition incumbents. Bloggers in every precinct would be invaluable in coordinating and setting up these permanent year round campaigns.

There is a vast majority of voters not interested in national, state, or even local politics in a regular basis. They may be registered or not, many vote, completely uninformed, and probably mark the ballots with the first candidate named in each list. Many potential supporters do not bother to vote at all. These voters believe every politician is a crook and are not interested in framing, issues, political shenanigans, and the corruption and incompetence of our leaders.

If these voters somehow were persuaded to vote, they could be that 4-6+% difference in total votes that could win many elections. How can this be accomplished?

At the local level sort of between friends and family, "have them talked to by those in whom they have the most confidence."

Democrats need an operation that on a permanent basis, at the precinct level, identifies favorable voters, keeps them up to date about our platform, informs and persuades the undecided, and makes sure that our supporters go to the polls on Election Day.

Accomplishing this work a few months before the election does not help much since many voters have decided weeks or months before the election and worse-many vote early.

This is expensive, but it is the foundation of a successful campaign. It is the footwork and  human toil in the streets that will deliver that extra 4-6% total votes in an election. Proselytizing for a few months before the election and pouring millions in TV ads, consultants, etc., and still lose elections is not an alternative.

Forget framing, issues, or expecting the opposition to implode under the weight of its corruption and abuse of power. The base is already won. The informed are either with or against us. The battle is decided at the Precinct Level, possibly years before the election, by getting to know our voters.

It is difficult and necessary. Republicans are doing it and look how well it has worked for them. We may not like their policies but we should need to implement their strategies if we want wins for our side on election day.

by thutmosis 2006-04-12 09:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Right on!  The Republican/Rove success at GOTV that we've witnessed is something that Rove copied from the Democrats.  We need to get back to our roots as Democrats.  And when we do, the GOTV will reflect it.

by Phonatic 2006-04-12 10:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Looking Ahead

Btw, Chris, congratulations on your prediction of 44% for Busby!

by Phonatic 2006-04-12 10:06PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------