CA-50 Results Thread

Here it is--another election night. I'll be up as long as it takes until the result is clear, or I pass out.

Here is the page I will be looking at to monitor results. If you have other sites to check, let me know in the comments. I will also be closely watching the always awesome Swing State Project and San Diego Politics blog.

I am guessing 45% for Busby, with Roach as the Republican nominee. Since the polls don't close for a few minutes, feel free to take up the interim posting your guesses in the comments.

The most recent results will be at the top. Also, this is my 2,001st post here at MyDD, so let's hope that this is the post where we make contact with victory.
  • The new results thread can be found directly above this one.

  • Finally, more returns. With 99 of 445 precincts, Busby has risen to 42.88%, and Bilbray (15.10%) has put some distance on Roach (13.93%).

  • OK, this is getting kind of ridiculous. I have to do things tomorrow. Nothing new has come in. Busby still has 42.19%. Bilbray, ins econd place, has 14.59%. Let me say that given a result like that, I have a very difficult time believing any spin that Busby isn't in the driver's seat here. At that rate, she needs a little less than 20% of the "other" vote to win in June, while either Bilbray or Roach would need over 80%. Dems and Inds make up around 30% of the "other" vote. It is a crude sketch, but I like the situation.

  • Kos has a great post up where he worries about turnout and Democratic enthusiasm. Worth a read. Turnout might very well be low here (around 120K, compared to 160K in 2002). Then again, special elections like this are well known for very low tunrout, so it might not be a big deal at all. Or it might be.

  • From Trial Mix, Christine Pelosi writes up Busby's speech on the evening:"Today the voters had a choice. And as we go on to June we will know that this district voted for change in Washington!

    "We exceeded our Democratic registration by over 50 percent - our message resonated not just with Democrats but with Republicans and Independents who are telling us to keep giving our message -- and to take this message to Washington in June.

    "No one said it would be easy - last time they said it was impossible - but we beat the registration and we have twice as many votes as the next person tonight.

    "80 percent of the voters today voted for a candidate for change. Going into June, I will be the candidate for change.

    "This is a victory for all of us who said "I won't take it anymore!" We are not alone. We can stand up high for what we believe in. We can walk and talk and put our energy into what we believe in. We will not stop until we win!"

    "The voters have voted for change. They want to hear that we are going to hold Members of Congress to the same standards that they hold themselves.

    "They understand that the Medicare bill was a gift to the prescription drug companies; that the travesty of an energy bill was given to the oil companies, and that the bankruptcy bill was gift wrapped with a bow to the credit card companies -- and we are going to repeat that message until they understand there is only one candidate in this race going to Washington to change things!"
  • OK, somehting else has finally come in. With 33 of 445 precincts in, Busby has 42.19%, and Bilbray still leads Roach 14.59% to 14.02%.

  • Geez, nothing is happening. Come on. I am getting a little tired.

  • I should also add that you guys have done a kick-ass job for Francine, and even though only 1% of the vote is in, I feel very confident about this race right now. It is looking like delayed satisfaction, but really, the results so far are quite good. The absolute upper end of absentee ballot potential was 43%, and Francince got 42.23%. That is really, really good. Well done! I am still expecting her vote % to rise on the totals from today come in.

  • I see that several thousand people are reading MyDD right now. I would like to remind them that there will be a June 6th run-off in this race, and Francine Busby will continue to need your support. She looks very good--she is equal to the top four Republicans combined, but this is still a red district, and a win will not come easy. You can contribute to her campaign here, and you can volunteer for her campaign here.

  • Adding onto the comments from below, I should note that from absentee voting, the district has already swung 6% for Busby from 2004. We would probably win the House with that swing nationwide.

  • I should note that the early results seem to have included the absentee results. Busby already has 27,332 votes, Bilbray has 9,159 votes, and Roach has 9,011 votes. Thus, even though only 1% of precincts have reported, perhaps half (or more) of all votes have already come in. This is a good result for Busby from absentee voting--it confirms the poll results and the projections I made over the weekend. I expect Busby's % to rise as the night goes on, but 50% looks unlikely. I feel confident in the 44% target I was looking for. The Republican race is clearly down to Bilbray and Roach.

  • Super early results. With 4 of 445 precincts reporting, Busby has 42.23%, and Bilbray (14.15%) is narrowly ahead of Roach (13.92%).

  • In other election news tonight, Barbara Ann Radnofsky easily won the run-off in Texas to challenge Hutchinson. Her chances in the general are not good at all, but I salute her and her campaign. Well done! It also reminds me how much more exciting tonight could have been, if Ciro had kept Cuellar under 50% last month.

Tags: election results (all tags)

Comments

71 Comments

Re: CA-50 Results Thread

46% and facing Bilbray, that's my prediction and I'm sticking to it.

by Bothwell 2006-04-11 06:54PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Chris, thanks for the shout-out, as always. Unfortunately, I don't plan on "live blogging" this puppy. I think I'll just watch the results scroll in. So that means I'll be coming here for up-to-the-minute commentary. :)

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 06:56PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Isn't part of CA-50 in Orange County?  Does the SD County Registrar count those votes on their site?

by AaronLS2 2006-04-11 06:59PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Nope, the entire district is San Diego County. The 49th stands in between the 50th and the OC

by Bothwell 2006-04-11 07:07PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Excellent, thanks.  In the recent Illinois election there was county stradling and it required far too much mental acrobatics for me to monitor.

by AaronLS2 2006-04-11 07:09PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

No, CA-50 is entirely within the county of San Diego.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 07:08PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread
As I mentioned in the previous thread, the results web site doesn't show up in Opera (I use Opera 8.54 under Windows XP). It's fine in Firefox, which is what I'm using to watch it; I'm guessing other browsers are ok too.
by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 07:00PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Nope.  It's blank in Safari 2 (OS X 10.4.6), and Firefox 1.5 gives me an XML parsing error.

by cos 2006-04-11 07:10PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Looks fine to me in Safari.  I am running Version 2.0.3

by juls 2006-04-11 07:37PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Yeah, their XML was broken for a while shortly after polls closed.  They fixed it about 15 minutes later.

by cos 2006-04-14 09:34AM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

as much as i hate to give the local fish wrap the hits, you can check at their link below.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/polit ics/50thdistrict/index.html

by darwinsjoke 2006-04-11 07:04PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread
Isn't part of CA-50 in Orange County? Does the SD County Registrar count those votes on their site? No, CA-50 is entirely within San Diego County (though I do wonder how they'd handle a district that crosses a county line). calvoter.org has s number of PDF maps.
by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 07:04PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

My guess is that the counties would update off each other's websites but I would expect the Sec of State's site to have complete results. How did OH-02 report. I remember Hamilton County updating results live but don't remember if they did only their own or district wide results.

by Bothwell 2006-04-11 07:10PM | 0 recs
Hm anybody know when Absentees come in?

by Liberal 2006-04-11 07:07PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Busby 48%, Bilbray gets second

by dbeard115 2006-04-11 07:08PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

My sweety and I gave five bucks on act blue. We are settling in with popcorn and hopefully Brut for the count. A good electoral field op should have the polls staked out with observors and be able to call it in 60-90 minutes. Any bets and how long to hard data?

by Rotegard 2006-04-11 07:11PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

It looks like they're trying to update the web page at http://www.sdvote.org/election/special.x ml. I just reloaded it in Firefox and got:

Error loading stylesheet: A network error occured loading an XSLT stylesheet:

http://www.sdvote.org/election/SPECIAL.x sl

But looking at the raw XML, it looks like they have absentee results:

Busby: 27332 42.23%
Bilbray: 9159 14.15%
Roach: 9011 13.92%

etc.
by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 07:13PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Chris,

How do those numbers compare to what you were predicting for absentee based on partisan absentee voter numbers?

by Fran for Dean 2006-04-11 07:18PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Answered my own question.

Your analysis of the numbers on Saturday estimated 44% Busby performance for early voting.  These numbers are a bit lower than that... not a particularly good sign, but on the other hand it's not a very big difference, and this is based on two polls, so there's a decent margin of error.

by Fran for Dean 2006-04-11 07:37PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

I'm not sure if the rules hold true for a special election like this one, but generally in California absentee ballots skew Republican, although less so than in the past.

The optimistic way of looking at this is that absentee voters are those who would vote regardless, if Dems have the passion they are showing up at the polls themselves. If Repubs are disheartened, those who normally vote at the polls would be the ones to skip out not the ones who have the easy convenience of absentee voting. Just the optimistic spin.

by Bothwell 2006-04-11 07:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Web site working now (in firefox)

by msn1 2006-04-11 07:18PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

The site is accessible with Mozilla.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 07:18PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

P.S. Fighting Dem Ted Ankrum won his run-off in TX-10.

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 07:22PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

more importantly the democrat who put sexy cheerleading on the floor of the texas house seems to have been beaten.

YAY!!!!!  A real dem is going to hold this seat now and not worry about sexy cheerleading.

but who knows, it 52.1-47.8 with  3 of 43 precincts still out, still looks like he's gone now.  :)

by Trowaman 2006-04-11 07:38PM | 0 recs
If sexy cheerleading was on the floor of the house

...then I'd watch C-SPAN more often.

by HellofaSandwich 2006-04-11 07:42PM | 0 recs
sexy cheerleading

Many Republicans considered Jean Schmidt's performance in tight, patriotic uniform sexy cheerleanding.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 07:44PM | 0 recs
Republicans...

...are perverts.

by HellofaSandwich 2006-04-11 07:48PM | 0 recs
sexy cheerleading

oh sorry, he wanted to BAN sexy cheerleading at football games.

and all results are in, he lost

by Trowaman 2006-04-11 07:49PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Did you ever see the film entitled AMERICAN BEAUTY?  Perhaps that motivated the legislation he proposed.  I am not a fan of cheerleading, and I too believe it should be banned.  But I do not know if that would be the centerpiece of my political platform.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 07:51PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Just to double-check: The guy who wanted to BAN sexy cheerleading lost, yes?

Finally, a good day for democracy!

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 07:51PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

A feminist, I am opposed to cheerleading.  Indeed, it is utterly sexist.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 07:55PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

A feminist, I am opposed to cheerleading.  Indeed, it is utterly sexist.

Someone rated this comment zero, and I do not believe it is wise to rate a feminist a zero comment simply because you believe women should be relegated to the role of sexualized support for bad, masculine behaviour.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 08:00PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

You do know there are male cheerleaders, right?

by asf6 2006-04-11 08:04PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Yes, I do.  But it is still a regressive spectacle.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 08:08PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

ok, fine beyond sexy cheerleading, the guy has been on Gov. Perry and Speaker Craddick's side a bit too often on school and tax reform, which are the only two issues in Texas until immigration bills start appearing.

The sexy cheerleading was just, why are you doing this when (as of now) you have 1 month to fix the education system before it is shut down for the next school year?

Not as bad as Cuellar, but not too hot.

by Trowaman 2006-04-11 08:15PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

I am not supporting him.  In fact, I would never allow a ban on sexy cheerleading to define me politically.  But I am voicing my discontent with cheerleading in general.  Whether or not it is sexy or scabrous, I believe it is regressive.  But I do know of a group of butch lesbians who mock cheerleaders, and I find them very amusing when they perform in Chicago.  

I am sure his ban was not done with my intentions in mind.  And I am not endorsing that candidate.  I am simply stating that a ban on cheerleading can make political sense from a radical feminist persepective.  

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 08:18PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

fair enough.

Except the district (and both candidates) are african american and are not exactly conserned with the feminist vote in that area.  I'm just saying, the guy did it to get name recognition and nothing else, and it got him name rec, however it was for being Craddick endorsed.

Also, of the 6 runoffs speaker Craddick had a stake in, he won 1.   And he won it by 48 votes.  Texas is finally (if not voting for Dems) kicking out far right school voucher supporting republicans.

by Trowaman 2006-04-11 08:23PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Darn it, you're right.  We need to mobilize immediately to put an end to the white slaver males with their evil penises of death who kidnap innocent girls and make them high kick and wave pom-poms.

"Sense of humor" is on aisle three, on the right, middle shelf.  Lucky for you there's a three for one special, so don't tarry.

by beerwulf 2006-04-11 08:33PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

simply because you believe women should be relegated to the role of sexualized support for bad, masculine behaviour.

Ahh... I know you. You're the mind-reader! You know what's in people's brains! Impressive stuff.

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 08:35PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Of course, you also use low ratings on comments you merely disagree with, which of course is a no-no, but why should you care?

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 08:37PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Mocking a political position that has been invalidated both by the Left and the Right for the past six years is something I take very seriously.  And I believe my comments account for my disgust with your mockery of feminism.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 08:39PM | 0 recs
Re: sexy cheerleading

Once again, the mind-reader!

Anyhow, you still don't have special privileges to abuse the ratings system. Though clearly you think you do. I guess it's just illinois062006's world and we just live in it!

by DavidNYC 2006-04-12 11:03AM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

I just finished a quick-and-dirty Perl script to process the broken XML on the results page and display it in order.

So of course they just fixed the page.  It displays correctly in MS Internet Explorer and Firefox, but it's still blank in Opera.  Grr.

by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 07:24PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread
4 of 445 precincts - 00.9 percent
FRANCINE BUSBY 27332 42.23%
BRIAN P. BILBRAY 9159 14.15%
ERIC ROACH 9011 13.92%
HOWARD KALOOGIAN 4824 7.45%
BILL MORROW 4700 7.26%
ALAN UKE 2709 4.19%
RICHARD EARNEST 1729 2.67%
BILL HAUF 1116 1.72%
CHRIS YOUNG 1061 1.64%
WILLIAM GRIFFITH 665 1.03%
SCOTT TURNER 555 0.86%
VICTOR E. RAMIREZ 519 0.80%
PAUL KING 470 0.73%
JEFF NEWSOME 391 0.60%
SCOTT ORREN 182 0.28%
DELECIA HOLT 166 0.26%
BILL BOYER 95 0.15%
MILTON GALE 31 0.05%
by soshi 2006-04-11 07:37PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

I'm still guessing 44.9%.

Managing my own expectations here, people.

by HellofaSandwich 2006-04-11 07:50PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

That is a good number, it would guess, 45%. It might be higher. It won't be over 50%. I suspect that Bilbray will be the GOP opponent. Roach I think with his Mormon base did better with absentees than he will with the remaining half or 40% of the ballots, but who knows?  All of the votes counted, and there will be no more votes for at least another hour. Mr. Bowers suggested 4 precincts were counted. If there were, they are stub precincts for absentees. No today votes have been counted, and as I said won't be for some time. They need to be trucked down to downtown San Diego. The general will have boatloads of money spent on it.

by Torie 2006-04-11 07:55PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Can you report Young's results along with the frontrunners?

It would be interesting to see if a signifigant number of Dem voters vote for the first Dem on the ballot.

by dantheman 2006-04-11 07:56PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

yo chris -- not to be a pain in the ass, but i think 2010 is the year (post) we make contact.

by hexagon son 2006-04-11 08:03PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

People have been assuming that absentee results will tend to skew Republican (implying that Busby's numbers will improve as non-absentee votes are counted).  But Busby's campaign encouraged people to vote absentee, and distributed absentee voter applications with campaign literature.  On the other hand, they also encouraged people to turn in their absentee ballots at the polling places on election day, which means those votes probably haven't been counted yet (and might come in later than other votes).

Should be interesting.

by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 08:07PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Chrissy-B says that the best Busby could've done on her absentee ballot showing was 43%.  I'm not sure how he derived that number, but 42.3% out of 43 is pretty darn good.

by HellofaSandwich 2006-04-11 08:11PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

That was from that post where he multiplied early absentee ballot partisan breakdown by partisan preference expressed in polls. He actually got 44%, so I don't know why he's revised that down, but it's close enough for political work.

by DavidNYC 2006-04-11 08:38PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread
The projection you got from the campaign was 46-37-14. Taht seemed odd to me, because it only added up to 97%. I revided downwards baed on that remianing 3%.
by Chris Bowers 2006-04-11 08:49PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread
Have you been celebrating early?
Or do you just need a better spell checker program???       :o)
by dabuddy 2006-04-11 09:02PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

So I'm wondering, if she can get 44% here, how would that translate to the runoff? Would 5% of GOP voters here cross over and vote Busby? Is 44% a good sign that she would win the runoff?

by padcrasher 2006-04-11 08:16PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

If we donate enough money and run enough ads, we can force enough Republicans and independent voters to cross over or stay at home.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 08:19PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

The hope is that such a fractured Republican primary will lead to wounded feelings and general nastiness among the GOP to the point that just enough of them stay home.

If Bilbray wins a plurality among Republicans, the DCCC can dump a load of anti-lobbyist ads in his lap, too.

by HellofaSandwich 2006-04-11 08:22PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Geez, nothing is happening. Come on. I am getting a little tired.

I've used the kind of machines that I think they're using.  Basically, the optical scan records have to be collected and trucked into the county clerk's office.  It takes 45 minutes just to do the closeout at the precinct, if everyone is fast, and then you wait for the peace officers to turn up.

Results will just be rolling in now (at best).

by jsw 2006-04-11 08:36PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Guess we should be hoping for Roach to win. It looks like it will be very close.

by dantheman 2006-04-11 08:51PM | 0 recs
44%

So far the results are incredibly disappointing, albeit, limited. Busby needs 45%+ to have a hope in the runoff. Kerry received 44% in this district. If she can't outperform Kerry she can't win. 50%+1 would have been awesome, but what we really needed to see tonight was that she was outperforming a generac Democrat in this relatively strong GOP district. My fingers are still crossed since we don't know where the results are coming from yet and many precincts are left.

by Bothwell 2006-04-11 09:19PM | 0 recs
Re: 44%

Remember--there is another Democrat, Chris Young, who has 1.3% of the vote.  Don't lose hope.  See my main post, just made.

Frank D. Russo
www.californiaprogressreport.com

by Frank Russo 2006-04-11 11:24PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Is there any indication from the (R)s in the running about who will or will not run for the November general election primary in June?  Are they all planning to run again?  If so that'd be pretty interesting (and advantageous) if the Republicans are running attack ads against each other while one of them is running in (special) general election at the same time as a primary for the November election.

by Fran for Dean 2006-04-11 09:34PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

When making predictions for June, make sure you add in the 1.5% from Chris Young that Francine Busby is likely to get the vast majority of.

(so for example, right now, 42.88 + 1.53 = 44.41% of the vote is for a Democrat)

by Fran for Dean 2006-04-11 09:45PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

That's a good point - no one's really talking about that. Some (probably small, but nevertheless) portion of those votes are likely due to to the fact that his name appeared on the ballot above Busby's.

by NorthStarPolitics 2006-04-11 09:49PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

the whole ballot bias needs to looked at (by the interested). Most people other than Busby gained on their pre-election poll findings.

by NeuvoLiberal 2006-04-11 09:59PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

Well folks, it's 1am here in Chicago and I have to get up early tomorrow. Hoist one for me if she goes over 50%.

by dabuddy 2006-04-11 09:52PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

She climbed to 43.28%.

by illinois062006 2006-04-11 10:04PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

big update, too. 2/3 of the precincts are in.

by Fran for Dean 2006-04-11 10:07PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

O just go ahead a throw half of the Libertarian's votes into Busby's bucket as well.
Another .35% thank you....LOL

Libertarians hate wiretapping with or without a warrant.

by padcrasher 2006-04-11 10:05PM | 0 recs
not really

Libertarians will vote Republican because their anti-government, anti-tax view trumps everything else.

by johnny longtorso 2006-04-11 10:08PM | 0 recs
Cunningham on TV

We're watching the local news on channel 8.  They're some place in Del Mar talking to the candidates and waiting for results.

We just saw Duke Cunningham walk into the room.  Big smile on his face, being warmly greeted.  Since all the major candidates have been vigorously campaigning against him, it seemed very odd.

...

According to Wikipedia, Cunningham is currently in the Butner Federal Correctional Complex in Butner, North Carolina.  Assuming that's correct, they must have slipped some stock footage into their coverage.

by Keith Thompson 2006-04-11 10:10PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-50 Results Thread

This race is winnable in June.  No one said it was gong to be easy.

Here's the dynamic I see.  If you take Busby's vote and taht of the other Democrat, Chris Young, you are at over 45%.  This is what I see with 93.9 percent of the votes counted.

I don't know how the provisional ballots cast in this race may affect these results.  We have had a problem with our Secretary of State's implementation of HAVA (another long story--covered on my website www.californiaprogressreport.com in some past articles) and there may be a higher number of these.  Many new registrants may have had problems--I'd depend on someone with the campaigns to say if that is so.

Most of the provisional ballots will be from Democrats--what else is new.

I can't see Busby getting over 50% tonight.

The big question is turnout in June when there is a heated Demo primary and little for Reeps on the state primary ballot since most of those races are not contested.

It all depends on turnout and how upset folks that voted for the losing Republican candidates are about the negative campaigns run and whether they will have incentive to turnout.

There were a lot of absentee votes here--looking to me to be almost half of the total.

by Frank Russo 2006-04-11 11:21PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------