Weak Republicans pick expediency over principle - Term Limits
by Daniel Biss, Wed Mar 29, 2006 at 05:55:09 AM EST
[I initially intended this to be a comment in Demeric's diary but unfortunately I let that ship sail.]
Last week, Taegan Goddard linked to an article in CQ Politics about eight House members who are breaking personal pledges not to seek an additional term.
All are Republicans, and all entered office vowing to make good on their firm belief in term limits. Now that the chips are down, they're all too weak to come through. When you're as weak as these people are, it doesn't matter what you believe: you only ever do what's convenient.
More below, with an action item...
Now, I'm not much interested term limits, personally, and from what I can tell, most voters aren't either. It's like residency requirements: a convenient excuse to vote against someone you already don't much like, but not the primary reason.
That's why it's only useful as a campaign issue if it's a piece of evidence that helps paint a bigger picture. It's not about breaking a single naive promise. It's about Republicans all over the country failing to come through, failing to stand up for what they claim to believe in. It's about Republicans being weak.
So, it's a shame that it's only 8 Republicans, right? That won't be enough to tell a national story, right? Well, fortunately, it looks like we're talking about more than just 8 here.
The 10th plank of the Contract with America, which was signed by every single non-incumbent Republican Congressional candidate, is the Citizen Legislature Act. This was a proposed amendment to the Constitution that would have limited every member of the U.S. Congress (both houses) to twelve consecutive years of service.
30 current House members are Republicans first elected in 1994. Only 5 of them are on CQ Politics's list of 8. That leaves 25 more who signed the Contract, which would have stopped them from seeking re-election. At last count, every single one of them was running!
Now, there's a difference between on the one hand trying and failing to pass term limit legislation and then breaking the "law" you couldn't pass, and on the other hand breaking a personal pledge to not serve more than a certain number of terms. The 8 listed in the CQ Politics report (which cites an organization called U.S. Term Limits) had actually made personal pledges that they're now breaking.
That's a true sign of weakness: to believe in something so strongly that you publically vow to live up to it, until it actually starts seeming kind of inconvenient, at which point, um, to hell with principles.
Knowing these Republicans, I wouldn't be surprised if we were able to find pledges made by other members of the class of '94. To get the ball rolling, I found the following on Gil Gutknecht (MN-1) in a May 29, 2004 AP story:
Gutknecht came to office in 1994 as part of a Republican movement engineered by then-Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and featured the Republican Contract with America, which limited lawmakers to 12 years. The proposal eventually died in the House.It was in the immediate wake of that defeat that Gutknecht, who had resisted making a personal term limit pledge during his first campaign, said he would leave office by 2006.
"I will not serve more than 12 years," Gutknecht was quoted in March 1995.
(Link intentionally omitted, since I'm a little dubious about the legality of linking through Lexis-Nexis.)
So, that's the challenge. Can you find evidence that weak Republican House members from the class of '94 pledged not to serve more than 6 terms?
Here are complete lists of all members of Congress relevant to this diary.
The 24 to target (House members in the class of '94 not mentioned in the CQ Politics piece):
Charles Bass, NH-02
Steve Chabot, OH-01
Tom Davis, VA-11
Mark Foley, FL-16
Rodney Frelinghuysen, NJ-11
Doc Hastings, WA-04
J.D. Hayworth, AZ-08
John Hostettler, IN-09
Walter Jones, NC-03
Sue Kelly, NY-19
Ray LaHood, IL-18
Tom Latham, IA-04
Steven LaTourette, OH-14
Sue Myrick, NC-09
Robert Ney, OH-18
Charlie Norwood, GA-09
George Radanovich, CA-19
John Shadegg, AZ-03
Mac Thornberry, TX-13
Todd Tiahrt, KS-04
Dave Weldon, FL-15
Jerry Weller, IL-11
Ed Whitfield, KY-01
Roger Wicker, MS-01
The guilty 5 (class of '94 members) cited in the CQ Politics piece:
Barbara Cubin, WY-AL
Phil English, PA-03
Frank LoBiondo, NJ-02
Mark Souder, IN-03
Zach Wamp, TN-3
The other guilty 3 (members not in the class of '94) cited in the CQ Politics piece:
Jeff Flake, AZ-06
Timothy V. Johnson, IL-15
Ric Keller of FL-08
The new guilty 1 I've already handled:
Gil Gutknecht, MN-01
Just for good measure, the 5 senators from the class of '94 who are seeking re-election:
Mike DeWine, OH
Jon Kyl, AZ
Rick Santorum, PA
Olympia Snowe, ME
Craig Thomas, WY
There you have it. Dig deep and look hard. It's not easy: no politician likes being put on the record making potentially uncomfortable promises. But remember that these Republicans are weak and waiting to be called on it.
Tags: 2006, House, term limits, weak, weak Republicans (all tags)









16 Comments