Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct 9/11 Commission Recommendations?

One of the central lines of attack Democrats have lobbed at Republicans in recent years has regarded their inability and indeed opposition to passing all of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission -- the creation of which a number of Republicans did not even support two years ago. With that in mind, one of they key planks of the House Democrats' 100 Hours agenda includes passage of the Commission's policies in full, a move that could lead to obstruction from Congressional Republicans, as Dan Eggen and Spencer S. Hsu report today for The Washington Post.

Homeland security experts cautioned that Democratic control of Congress will not guarantee implementation of some of the commission's most controversial suggestions, which have languished because of entrenched political and bureaucratic obstacles.

A prime example is the commission's call to base the federal government's homeland security funding on the actual risk of terrorist attacks or other calamities -- an approach that would generally benefit large metropolitan areas at the expense of smaller cities and rural regions. Although such an approach would favor regions represented by Democrats, lawmakers have preferred to spread dollars to as many jurisdictions as possible.

While Eggen and Hsu don't spell it out explicitly, the implication is that Republican legislators' lust for pork trumps their desire to protect American national security as efficiently and effectively as possible. Make no mistake; Republicans' determination to garner homeland security earmarks for their states and districts, many of which we can safely assume are far from the top of most terrorists' target lists, hurts efforts to keep Americans safe from attacks.

Now no doubt there are individual Democrats who fall prey to this same vice. But just as is the case with the issue of corruption, the improrpieties of individual Democratic members of Congress pale in comparison with the culture of the Republican Party that puts preservation of power above all else -- homeland security included.

So if legislation containing all of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations, including the prioritization of homeland security grants on the basis of threat rather than seniority of individual members, does not reach the President's desk, Republicans alone will be to blame. And in that case, the Democrats should stop at nothing to educate the American people about the skewed priorities of today's Congressional Republicans and their propensity to obstruct legislation that does not fit in with their radical ideology.

Tags: 9/11 Commission, Republicans (all tags)

Comments

14 Comments

Dems who don't benefit from the redistribution

better take one for the team.  

It would send a huge message to the whole nation for the Democratic caucus to be united in keeping the nation safe from terror.  Meanwhile, Republicans would be split.  Some would be too scared to oppose proposals blessed by the holy saints of the 9/11 commission (all praise their ability to make a government report a best-seller).  The hardcore members would continue to oppose, the theme of "Republicans divided" increases Democratic strength yet again.

Even one democratic opponent allows the Republican party the fig-leaf of bi-partisan opposition.

by One Hand Clapping 2006-11-11 04:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Wil Rbto bsrct 9/11 Cmeions?

OMG, you crazed liberal, don't you realise that you are siding with the terrorists and putting Sunman, Indiana at risk?

by NorCalJim 2006-11-11 05:03PM | 0 recs
Anti-Terrorism Earmarking

Speaking as a Hoosier I must say that I am confident that most residents of Indiana are willing to sacrifice their own personal safety for the good of the nation.

If you must take off the list of terrorist targets our popcorn factories, our petting zoos, and our flea markets so that money may be directed elsewhere then I say, do so! For the good of the nation!

P.S. Please leave some money to protect the VX nerve gas storage facility in Newport, Indiana.

by Curt Matlock 2006-11-12 05:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Anti-Terrorism Earmarking

Have relatives all over Indiana.  I've actually spent some time in Sunman.  Pretty little town at the time. Sadly, there aren't too many small towns out here anymore.

by NorCalJim 2006-11-12 09:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct 9/11 Com

Isn't Holy Joe going to be in charge of the Homeland security Committee? Knowing Joe he will begin payback for repuglican support, you can bet our security on it. Things are going to get interesting. Also Connecticut is going to be very very well protect from now on!

by eddieb 2006-11-11 05:12PM | 0 recs
National ID card?

Isn't one of the 9/11 commission recommendations a national ID card?  Pardon me if I'm not too excited about that.

Secure identification should begin in the United States. The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as drivers licenses. Fraud in identification documents is no longer just a problem of theft. At many entry points to vulnerable facilities, including gates for boarding aircraft, sources of identification are the last opportunity to ensure that people are who they say they are and to check whether they are terrorists. 41

To hell with that.

Also this one dosn't seem like a 100hr type of thing:

The U.S.government must define what the message is, what it stands for. We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.

by delmoi 2006-11-11 05:59PM | 0 recs
Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct 9/11 Com

Why do you think that hypothetical terrorists, many of whom unfortunately seem to be able to be effective by traveling a short distance to Iraq and Afghanistan rather than a long distance to here, will prefer to attack in urban rather than suburban or rural areas?  One can readily identify rural targets that are entirely vulnerable and that are sufficiently unprotected that the same terrorist can escape afterwards to strike again.

by phillies 2006-11-11 06:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct 9/11 Com

Are you trying to tell me Bemidji, MN doesn't deserve Homeland Security funds to protect this?

by SPIIDERWEB 2006-11-11 07:15PM | 0 recs
pardon me..

So if legislation containing all of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations, including the prioritization of homeland security grants on the basis of threat rather than seniority of individual members, does not reach the President's desk, Republicans alone will be to blame.

The Republicans kept saying the same thing about us obstructing their work, and we kept calling them idiots.

I know that they might actually hold up the process, but starting now, we need to take responsibility for getting things passed, not blame the out-party for what we can't do.

by msnook 2006-11-11 07:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct 9/11 Com
If the repubs don't want to do 9-11 recommendations then, I say, let's send in Webb to talk to them about homeland security and thier little addictions to pork.
The guy wants this stuff stopped and the pork out and I don't think he'll listen to thier excuses for long.
Good to have the good guys back in.
by vwcat 2006-11-11 08:19PM | 0 recs
Republicans try to obstruct for political gain...

Tell me it is not so????!!!

I cannot believe it!

by dvogel001 2006-11-11 08:21PM | 0 recs
Look for more Homeland Security... for Pork!

The 'Homeland Security' budget was and will remain just another hog trough for Congress to go to for, like, new pickup trucks for Wyoming? Gasmasks for South Bend, Indiana?  Hazmat gear for cops in Elko, Nevada?  Congress on both sides of the aisle have been about as honest with this budget as state legislatures with the tobacco settlement.  The switch to the Dems will mean more snuffling for better slops in the cities. So -- don't worry.  All the little chanchitos will remain securely fed by 'Homeland Security.'  

by diego277 2006-11-11 11:53PM | 0 recs
9/11 Commission Recommendations?

Do you trust this phony non-partisan group?  I don't.  The 9/11 survivors wanted them boiled in oil.  Quite frankly, I think their report is as worthless as their investigation.

by dkmich 2006-11-12 03:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Will Republicans Continue to Obstruct?

Say,

I have an idea...

Why not put all the nation's business on this footing. The idea that your Congresscritter's main job is to 'bring home the bacon...' rather than do what is best for the nation as a whole while alien to most of the sheeple is something that should be 'on the table'.

Especially here in Left Blogistan.

by Pericles 2006-11-12 05:19AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------