Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq

Ok, Powell is taking the gloves off. In what looks to be Colin Powell's rejection of Bush, Powell joins the redeployment crowd.

The United States and allies can not resolve the current sectarian violence in Iraq, former Secretary of State Colin Powell said today during a lecture in Minneapolis.

"Only the Iraqi people can resolve this," Powell said.

U.S. troops have to stay in Iraq for "some time," he said. "But there is a limit to the patience of the American people."

Powell was the featured speaker at this year's distinguished Carlson Lecture at the University of Minnesota.

In Iraq, "staying the course isn't good enough because a course has to have an end," Powell said.

This is why what's going on in Connecticut is critical, because the 'stay the coursers' need to be beaten for this country to change.  Ned Lamont, who ran against the mindset that led to the 'stay the course' idea, pointed out today that Lieberman is now facing opposition from Colin Powell, as well new revelations in Bob Woodward's book that show that this mess is worse than we thought possible.

"Secretary Powell is the latest expert to say that it is time for a change, and Connecticut deserves a straight answer from Senator Lieberman about why he continues to ignore these experts by pushing a failed `stay the course' strategy," said Lamont. "Last week, our intelligence agencies said `stay the course' is endangering our security. Early this week, Bob Woodward reported that the administration has misled the American people about the reality on the ground in Iraq. Now, a distinguished military and diplomatic leader like Colin Powell is saying stay the course is a failed policy. When will Joe Lieberman finally face reality?"

"How much more does America's national security have to be compromised before Senator Lieberman stops being an apologist for the Bush administration?" Lamont said. "We now have one of the Bush administration's own national security icons saying it is time for a change. Connecticut deserves a senator who actually listens to our military and intelligence officials - not one who is so reliant on the Bush White House that he refuses to start pushing for a change in a war that is harming our country's security."

These new revelations, combined with new information about Rice's behavior prior to 9/11 and a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan, demand a response from Senator Lieberman.  Lieberman is running against a phantom 'negative' campaign, hoping to distract from substantive critiques by people like Colin Powell, as well as Lamont's message of change.  At this point, the Connecticut press and people ought to hold Lieberman accountable for his unbelievably poor judgment.  That's democracy in action.  Change is hard, but it's what we need.

Tags: Colin Powell (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Re: Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq

It's about time.  Given that the Iraq war violates nearly every tenet of his own doctrine, he should have been saying these things four years ago.

by jhupp 2006-10-04 11:40AM | 0 recs
Re: Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq

Apart from the obvious villains--Bush and Cheney--no single person bears more responsibility for the Iraq mess than Colin Powell. He provided key cover for the loonies to move forward--if he'd ever had the guts to say what was in his heart or threaten to resign over the thing it never would have happened because it never would have been authorized. So I don't have a lot of respect--let alone sympathy--for Powell now.

by KevStar 2006-10-04 11:59AM | 0 recs
No one respects Powell anymore

Powell is in the same boat as Woodward. The right hates him. The left does not respect him.

He should have taken a stand much earlier or at least, resigned before his term was up.

by Pravin 2006-10-04 12:05PM | 0 recs
Re: No one respects Powell anymore

It is disgusting to watch Colin Powell evade responsibility for this.

by Alice Marshall 2006-10-04 02:42PM | 0 recs
Senate races

In my mind the most critical Dem senate races to win are Lamont, Webb and Tester. They will change the dynamic of the Vichy Dem caucus and bring in much badly needed outside the beltway mindset and an allegience to principle than triangulation.

Hopefully the other Dems will win too and the Dems gain a majority.

by ab initio 2006-10-04 01:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Senate races

Absolutely.

by mjshep 2006-10-04 02:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq

Powell was the featured speaker at this year's distinguished Carlson Lecture at the University of Minnesota.

Cool, is he still doing that gag where he waves little tubes of white powder around and says it's enough anthrax to kill everyone in the room?

That always slays them, pardon the expression.

by Del C 2006-10-04 01:29PM | 0 recs
The future in Iraq

Everyone's attention has been so focused on the upcoming November midterms, but I am getting more and more worried about the news from Iraq.

a. More and more mines defused.
b. An increase in attacks.

While the last year has been an internal cleansing - Iraqi against Iraqi - with the U.S. troops being somewhat ignored - at some point, the police/death squads will stop this - and focus on US troops

And truly, the troops are in very vulnerable positions.

I foresee an architected massive attack - on supply lines, on troops in the field, on reinforced bunkers - all at once.  

Planned in advance, coordinated by word of mouth.

There will come a point - six months, a year, three years, where the troops will be in a race against time, to get the heck out of Dodge.  And I don't see anyone preparing for that future eventuality/certainty

by jc 2006-10-04 04:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq

Colon's Bowell is full and so he takes another dump on us.  Sorry Colon, you had your chance to stand up to War Criminals. You failed. Enjoy your legacy.

by cosmosis 2006-10-04 04:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Colin Powell Pins Bush, Lieberman on Iraq
As his biography is due out and I am sure it's not flattering to this administration, he feels he can now speak.  
I think at first he felt he could not and then, with a book on him and Woodward's book, he needed to keep quiet until the release.
He knew he'd be getting alot of publicity with these books and timed his "coming out" with those.
Say what you will but, Powell is the only first hand knowledge person from this administration with some intregrity.  The one who saw it all and the one people want to know the real deal from.  I wouldn't trust the stuff from Cheney or Rice or anyone else but, with Powell, I expect there is much truth he has to tell.
by vwcat 2006-10-04 06:51PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------