Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

Outside of the battle for Congress, and to far less fanfare, Democrats are virtually assured of a major breakthrough in the states. Looking at Jonathan's Governors forecast, I have produced the following projected map of the country's Governorships:



Any state that is "lean Democratic" or better is in blue. Any state that is "lean Republican" or worse is in red. The six toss-up states are in purple (Rhode Isalnd is purple, in case you can't see that). Breaking down this map by congressional district, we get the following:

Democrat: 210 (24 states)
Republican: 185 (20 states)
Toss-up: 40 (6 states)

Whatever worries we may have about Congress, when it comes to governorships, Democrats are on the brink of taking a national majority, in terms of states, population, and congressional districts. In fact, we are practically assured of pulling off all three of those majorities in 2006.

The fun doesn't stop there. The only national majority we currently have comes in state legislatures:Currently, state legislative chambers are controlled almost evenly between the two political parties. Twenty legislatures are controlled by Republicans, 19 by Democrats and 10 legislatures are split (for those who are counting, Nebraska is a nonpartisan legislature). In terms of individual legislators, Democrats maintain the slightest 21-seat majority over Republicans. While more Democratic-controlled legislatures feature narrow majorities, more than any other type of major elected office, local state legislature seats are the ultimate unknowns for voters. This means that what I have previously termed "the generic advantage" will play heavily in Democratic favor this year. For example, in a recent special election for State Senate in Pennsylvania, the Democratic candidate won a heavily Republican district by 13%. Across the nation, there have been many other examples like that over the past year as well. I expect Democats to hold most, if not all of their state legislative majorities, and pick up a few more majorities. Where control does not shift, Democrats will either massively increase their leads, or significantly narrow their deficits. We are going to win a lot of state legislature seats this year.

In many ways, whatever gains we make in Congress will simply be an added bonus to our gains in the states. It is in the states where we build our benches for higher office, and our benches had been severely depleted since 1994. It is in the states where progressive legislation will first appear before it is adopted nationally, and even a Democratic Congress in D.C. won't be able to adopt much progressive legislation as long as bush is President. It is also in the states where voters maintain their core partisan identification, and where GOTV operations preside. It is also in the states where the control over much election machinery and congressional maps is held. Controlling the states is the backbone to any national governing coalition. In 2006, Democrats look set to take clear control of the states for the first time since 1994. As much as anything else, that will stop the conservative movement in its tracks, and help change the direction of this country.

The fifty-state strategy is a beautiful thing. This is why we support Democrats everywhere, and why only targeting a handful of states with money form the party committees was such a poor idea.

Tags: fifty state strategy, Governors 2005-6, state legislatures (all tags)

Comments

26 Comments

Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

Wrong, the Univ of tenn has Ford behind in TN. I wouldn't count my chickens. They just came out with a poll today.

by olawakandi 2006-10-03 11:25AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States
Um.. that's in the Senate.
by Chris Bowers 2006-10-03 11:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

More like a dead heat.

http://www.gallatinnewsexaminer.com/apps /pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061003/NEWS0206 /61003001

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-10-03 11:34AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

Plus, it seems that the latest polls showed an increase in the support for the TN Gay marriage ban amendment.

http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story .asp?S=5490776

This either means that issue is driving people awauy from Ford, or that the polling sample is more conservative than usual.

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-10-03 11:36AM | 0 recs
by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-10-03 11:33AM | 0 recs
Re: I'd color Oregon purple, if I were you.
I actualyl had it purple, until I noticed Jonathan had it lean Dem. Jonathan is also from Oregon... connection?

I didn't want to step on Jonathan's toes. This forecast is his turf.
by Chris Bowers 2006-10-03 11:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

"(for those who are counting, Nebraska is a nonpartisan legislature)"

Correction: Nebraska is a unicameral legislature (1 house).

by srsjones 2006-10-03 11:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

It's both; Nebraska's legislature is unicameral and nonpartisan.

by Bromius 2006-10-03 11:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

That's fair. But you rate the MI Governor's race as pruple, even though Granholm actually has had a consisetnt lead over the past few polling cycles.

It's not a huge lead, but it's still a lead.

by Hesiod Theogeny 2006-10-03 11:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States
Like I said, I'm following Jonathan's lead.
by Chris Bowers 2006-10-03 11:44AM | 0 recs
It gets better

One of the side effects of the upcoming success in governor's races is to all but eliminate any viable candidates for the 2012 Presidential election. If Hatch defeates Pawlenty in Minnesota, there will be no popular two-term, pro-life governors.

That will make it very difficult for the Republican party in 2012, if they do not win in 2008. The party will be limited to Mountain West governors of deep red states, HW Bush and W Bush cabinet officials, and assorted figures like Newt Gingrich.

by niq 2006-10-03 11:43AM | 0 recs
Re: It gets better

If Hatch defeates Pawlenty in Minnesota, there will be no popular two-term, pro-life governors.

Is Hatch ahead? I live in Minnie and haven't heard a thing - ominous silence on this campaign. As quiet as the Senate race - like it wasn't even happening. Is it really Fall '06?

I fear Dems are in the blog bubble again... don't see or hear what's happening in the non-online world.

Anyone else nervous too?

by dryfly 2006-10-03 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: It gets better

You're 300% right about the bubble.

by BrklynDad 2006-10-03 06:22PM | 0 recs
Necessity is the Mother of Invention

Perhaps the GOP will use the thin bench to create an ever better strategy though.

by risenmessiah 2006-10-03 08:29PM | 0 recs
Make the 'governorship' part bigger.

I looked at the map and was very very confused and I had to search for the word governor.

Just telling you first glance people are gonna be confused like the first poster

by MrMacMan 2006-10-03 12:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

Chris,

Great news. One minor comment/criticism.

There's appears to have been a concerted effort by Repubs to refer the the Democratic party as the "Democrat" party, which many (myself included) view as disparaging (not to mention yet another indication of how pathetic and desperate these Repubs are if this is what they're reduced to).

In this post, you (inadvertantly I'm sure) employ this term here, even though you use the correct term "Republican":

Democrat: 210 (24 states)
Republican: 185 (20 states)
Toss-up: 40 (6 states)

You might want to add the missing "ic". Just a head's up. It's a pet peeve of mine. ;-)

by kovie 2006-10-03 01:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

Okay, I'm Canadian so I might be wrong about this, but...

Don't states control how the federal elections are run? Couldn't the states controlled by Democrats amend the state constitutions to include massive protections for democracy:

1.) No gerrymandering districts. All districts will be draw up by computer using only population data from the latest census.

2.) Equal access. All districts will receive the same funding / number of voting machines / etc. since they should all have the same number of people.

3.) Paper trail. All voting machines must have a paper trail or they will not be certified.

I'm sure we could think of others, but the point is, the more protections for democracy we have, the better it is for everyone, (but more so for the Democrats than the Republicans). It would remove a major advantage the Republicans had in 2004 and no one could stand up and argue that it was bad for the country.

by C S Strowbridge 2006-10-03 01:25PM | 0 recs
This is all correct

#2 and #3 can be done easily.

However, I am against #1.  The Democrats should gerrymander states they control in a partisan way.  If they don't, they literally hand dozens of seats in the House to the Republicans if the Republicans gerrymander nationwide and we don't.

I am in favor of playing dirty in every way, shape, and form, everything except outright cheating.  If the other side plays dirty and we don't, we lose.  And the stakes are too high to worry about being a "gracious loser".

This is why I admire Clinton's electoral skills.  He didn't have a problem playing dirty when it was needed.

by Geotpf 2006-10-03 02:45PM | 0 recs
Re: This is all correct

I am in favor of playing dirty in every way, shape, and form, everything except outright cheating.  If the other side plays dirty and we don't, we lose.

The GOP's favorite argument is "They're both the same."  When they convince voters that there is no difference between the parties (and it's too often true), Democrats lose.

If the Democratic Party becomes the party of scrupulous honesty and fairness and represents the people rather than moneyed interests, it won't need dirty politics to wax the GOP in every election.

Gerrymandering is a cancer on our democracy and I for one will never countenance it.

by Sitkah 2006-10-03 03:03PM | 0 recs
Re: This is all correct

I think if you had 28 or states adopt the exact same standards, and have Democrats in the legislation of the other 22 states propose the same standards, you could guilt most of the Republican states into adopting them as well.

How are they going to run in two years if you can ads saying, "When the Democrats wanted to make sure every vote is heard and every votes is counted, the Republicans instead opted for a system where the party in power could steal votes for the poor."

by C S Strowbridge 2006-10-03 09:22PM | 0 recs
Republicans don't know the meaning of...

...guilt.  Are you serious?

Gerrymandering is too obscure a topic for the general public to care about.  It's too "insider baseball".

by Geotpf 2006-10-04 08:44AM | 0 recs
Michigan and Iowa

Are crucial governorship tossups. But if debates matter, last night was of help to both Democrats Granholm (MI) and Culver (IA).

We have a write up of the Iowa debate already and the Michigan commentary is coming tonight to DebateScoop.

by demondeac 2006-10-03 02:40PM | 0 recs
Here's a Republican predictor's position:

Current:  28 GOP, 22 DEM
Projected:  22 GOP, 28 DEM
DEM +6, GOP -6

http://www.electionprojection.com/electi ons2006.html#governors

He's obviously a partisan Republican, but I trust his predictions.

by Geotpf 2006-10-03 02:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Democrats Poised To Take Over The States

This is great news. Governorships and state legislatures are the farm teams of Congress and the Presidency. We build a strong farm system, and we assure ourselves of future generations of Democratic leadership. Hopefully, once we seize the mantle of leadership, we'll police our own and won't screw the pooch like the Republicans have.

by gas28man 2006-10-03 04:27PM | 0 recs
by estebban 2006-12-22 04:29AM | 0 recs
by wcwcwc 2007-06-30 02:19PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------