The Goal of the Alito Hearings

I am in DC today, as I will be for the rest of the week. While I am down here, one of the main things I will be working on is to defeat the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

I want to make that last sentence clear. I believe the Democratic goal for the Alito hearings should be to defeat his nomination through a filibuster of 41 votes or more, and then to defeat the nuclear option with a vote of 51 votes or more. Samuel Alito is an unacceptable choice to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States.

This is my belief and my goal, and I write this without representing any group or elected official in Washington DC.

I don't care if a filibuster of Alito results in Republicans successfully triggering the nuclear option. Blocking an unacceptable nominee to the Supreme Court is the main reason why we need the filibuster for judicial nominees. If we can't use it in order to save it, it is worthless. I also don't fear any significant public backlash in the event of a Democratic-led filibuster, as enough of the country already opposes Alito's confirmation to prevent any significant political repercussions for Democrats. If anything, I believe Republicans will have more severe political repercussions for using the nuclear option at the start of the legislative session just before the State of the Union address. Further, I always thought it would be fun to see the Democratic response to the destruction of the filibuster, which Harry Reid outlined back in April.

Given all of this, I am not going to blog these hearings the same way that I blogged the Roberts hearings back in September. This week, it is going to be more about vote counting, about protests, about linking to as many progressive bloggers on Alito as possible, and about all of the other things that will be taking place as part of the effort to prevent Alito from being confirmed. I will be in connection with a lot of people down here, and I will try and give you a sense of what it is like to be here yourself.

I'll be blogging all day on Alito Tuesday and Wednesday. Check out Dragonball Yee for some photos and a first-person write up of the protests at Justice Sunday yesterday.

Tags: Judges (all tags)

Comments

11 Comments

Don't blather, organize
I like that. Wishing you success, Chris.
by janinsanfran 2006-01-09 10:04AM | 0 recs
New "Anti_Alito" tool:
Here's a new "No to Alito" tool:
   Write a letter to the editor of your local paper and contact your congress critters -- all with one click.

Also: Moveon.org gathered 300,000 signatures in their Anti-Alito petition -- in a day!
They're shooting for 500,000, please sign if you haven't already:

Move On.org's stop Alito petition

People for the American Way have sent over 60,000 letters to the Senate:

Save the Court Petition

American Rights at Work also
Oppose Alito Petition

Defending the Constitution's Stop Alito Petition

http://ga3.org/...

Democratic anti-Alito petition:

Democratic Party's Reject Alito Petition

Stop the NRA is also getting in on the party:

Stop the NRA's Oppose Alito Petiton

And while you're at it: sign Planned Parenthood's anti-Alito petition, too:

Planned Parenthood Petition

NARAL is shooting for 500,000 signatures, please add yours:

Naral Anti-Alito Petition

And don't forget: urge Congress to support Plan B:

Plan B Petition



by judybrowni 2006-01-09 01:35PM | 0 recs
I've got your back
I know I irritate many of you with my moderate DLC-style ways, but I'm with you on this one, Chris. Take no prisoners! Alito is not fit for the SCOTUS, and Democrats should not be afraid to do whatever it takes to stop him. Filibuster if we have to, this is the fight that will define the year. Nuclear option? Fuck it, if they want to try that unconstitutional shit, bring it on.
by bluenc 2006-01-09 10:10AM | 0 recs
Re: I've got your back
I agree with this 100%.  There is no reason for the Democrats to fear the nuclear option.  There actually will be a Democratic President again, with a Democratic Senate.  If there is no judicial filibuster, then we can appoint some true progressives on the bench.
by Andy Katz 2006-01-09 10:32AM | 0 recs
What good is the filibuster if we can't use it
Hi All

Seriously! A filibuster we never use because Frist might take it away from us is exactly the same as not having a filibuster. Obviously we only need the filibuster when the Republicans are really motivated to take an extreme action and that's exactly when they'd be most motivated to go muclear anyway. If they can get away with taking the filibuster from us we ought to make them do it in public instead of just giving it away.

Keith

by keith johnson 2006-01-09 01:57PM | 0 recs
thanks
for the shout out Chris.  can't wait to hear what's going on down there in DC first hand.
by Albert 2006-01-09 10:27AM | 0 recs
Did anybody notice...
about 35 minutes into today's hearing, right after Alito said "nobody is above the law," that he had to pause for a while and looked like he was going to choke to death? It struck me as a pretty profound Freudian slip and well worthy of a video-capture. Unfortunately, I'm on the road and don't have the equipment with me.
by hoose 2006-01-09 11:07AM | 0 recs
In Seinfeldian terms...

Triggering the nuclear option as a use it or lose it... is kind of like SEX to SAVE the friendship

Go for it!

by jgkojak 2006-01-09 11:28AM | 0 recs
Hearings
It's OK for this place to have a point of view, but when the Roberts hearings were blogged, it was presented as if Committee Democrats were winning a decision, when just about every other source had Roberts by a knockout. There's a need for some realism in the presentation.
by SLinVA 2006-01-09 05:27PM | 0 recs
Good luck, Chris because
the fight against Alito is the single most important fight in our time.  SCOTUS is more responsible for the civil liberties in this country than the other two branches.  In many ways, who sits on the bench in the Supreme Court is more important than who sits in the Oval Office.

Presidents come and go, but Supreme Court decisions are many times permanent.

by jgarcia 2006-01-09 07:07PM | 0 recs
You nailed it!
The country is watching..let them use their nuclear option. Either way the Dems win. The only reason I supported the gang of 14 deal was because nobody was watching. Nuclear option would now get national play. It can be spun as Republican's changing rules when they can't win and Democrats finally STANDING UP for their beliefs - a refreshing change.
by STUBALL 2006-01-09 10:49PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------