Downing Street Memo Coverage

Just how bad is it? The first time it was mentioned on NBC, it was mentioned as something supposedly famous: The memo was leaked this year to the Times of London, which printed it on May 1. The story, coming on the eve of Blair's reelection, generated extensive press coverage in Britain. In setting up his question to Mehlman on Sunday, Russert said, "Let me turn to the now famous Downing Street memo" (emphasis added).

Famous? It would be famous in America if the D.C. press corps functioned the way it's supposed to. Russert's June 5 reference, five weeks after the story broke, represented the first time NBC News had even mentioned the document or the controversy surrounding it. In fact, Russert's query was the first time any of the network news divisions addressed the issue seriously. In an age of instant communications, the American mainstream media has taken an exceedingly long time -- as if news of the memo had traveled by vessel across the Atlantic Ocean -- to report on the leaked document.

According to Google news, over the last month there have been 506 mentions of "Downing Street Memo" in media outlets in the Unites States. In just the last two days, the story about the Drunk Pilots has reached 523 hits. The Medical Marijuana ruling has 950 hits over the last three days. Michael Jackson has over 21,000 hits in the last month.

It gets worse. Looking at the first one hundreds stories on the Downing Street Memo, all of the following sources register a hit: Raw Story, Democracy Now! (twice), Questions and Observations, Salon, Spoofnews, Rolling Stone, Redstate (twice), two letters to the Philadelphia Daily News, Wizbang (twice), Pacifica, Buzzflash, Useless Knowledge, Wonkette, Alternet, Capitol Hill Blue, Democratic Underground, News Hounds (twice), Dissident Voice, Blogger News Network, Anti-war.com, Blogcritics, Washington Times, and Christian News Network. In other words, there are a lot of "alternative" news sources among the 506 hits, and zero, count `em, zero networks listed. To make matters worse, most of the stories from the sources I did not mention have only now come within the last two days. In fact, from May 10th until May 31st, there were only 199 stories on the Downing Street Memo from US sources, and fewer than twenty from "mainstream" news sources. Most unbelievable of all, the only network to cover the Downing Street memo at the time was none other than Fox News! Their story was appropriately titled, Downing Street Memo Mostly Ignored in U.S.

And yet, despite all of this, Russert has the gall to go on air and talk about the "now famous Downing Street Memo." Even worse, the main stroty in the media coming out of the Sunday Talk Shows this past weekend was Democrats Criticize Dean. which has, over the same time period, still received more press than the Downing Street Memo.

This is unbelievable, and unacceptable. Visit Downingstreetmemo.com and take action against this crap (that is, of course, if you have any time left over from your cable theft actions).

Tags: Media (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Even with serious pols like Kennedy involved...
It's like there's a blanket conspiracy to keep this one under wraps.  The Rather thing has them cowed.

Frankly, I'd have expected more alternative media references as well!

by Drummond 2005-06-09 12:34PM | 0 recs
The DSM was discussed during last nights TDS...
...during a rather hard hitting interview by Jon Stewart with Colin Powell, where Powell came off as quite a Bush-Bot.  I was watching it with my mother, and she was pissed off at Powell.  I pointed out that Powell's PR was much better than he really was, and that he's always been kinda slimy.
by Geotpf 2005-06-09 01:54PM | 0 recs
I googled my own name
and got a couple hundred hits. Cool! I'm famous!
by daunte 2005-06-09 04:09PM | 0 recs
There's Always The Reliable Weekly World News.
I guess George W. Bush could rape a baby at a state of the Union address, and it would somehow be overlooked by the media matrix. What it boils dowm to, really, is that they assume that we will not revolt when we find out what they have covered up. The very fact that they do get it out to us via sporadic confession shows that they are conditioning us to to be inured to deception by malign neglect.

Here are a few examples that should make it fairly clear what they really think of our "right to know":

San Francisco Chronical

Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
Friday, May 27, 2005
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/05/27/GOVERNOR.TMP

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger traveled to a quiet San Jose neighborhood Thursday, and -- dogged by protesters -- filled a pothole dug by city crews just a few hours before, as part of an attempt to dramatize his efforts to increase money for transportation projects.

The choreographed press opportunity -- at least the governor's fourth recent event involving transportation issues -- seemed aimed as much at thwarting the demonstrators who have followed Schwarzenegger for weeks as grabbing new attention for his proposal.

Schwarzenegger strode toward television cameras on Laguna Seca Way to the sounds of the Doobie Brothers' "Taking it to the Streets,'' while flanked by 10 San Jose city road workers wearing Day-Glo vests and work gear. After speeches by the governor and city officials, a dump truck backed up and unloaded a mound of black asphalt and, as television cameras recorded the moment, Schwarzenegger joined the work crew, taking up a broom and filling the 10-by-15-foot hole, later smoothed over by a massive roller truck.

"I'm here today to let everyone know that we're going to improve transportation all across our state,'' said Schwarzenegger, highlighting his proposal to fully fund Proposition 42 and restore $1.3 billion in transportation money to the current state budget.

______________________________________ The Big Pharaoh
http://bigpharaoh.blogspot.com/2005/06/i-didnt-want-to-write-what-you-are.html

Hi, I am from Egypt. This is my first blog ever. I would like to use it in making my voice heard. I hope you enjoy the stuff I write here.

Sunday, June 05, 2005 I didn't want to write what you are going to read right now

I admit I thought countless times before writing today's post. I signed in to Blogger twice only to sign off again. My hesitation was a result of me not wanting to "hang our very dirty clothes" in front of this blog readers. After much thought, I decided to post just to inform you of the humiliation many of us feel and what this "humiliation factor" can lead to.

Upon Laura Bush's recent trip to Egypt, it was planned that she, along with her host Mrs. Mubarak, would visit a USAID funded school in Alexandria. One week before the scheduled visit, the tattered school was painted anew, tidied up, and the sewage system was fixed. The dirty roads around the school were cleaned up and trees were miraculously planted all around the area. A sign in English was written to welcome the 2 first ladies.

Nevertheless, the Alexandria education officials didn't like how the Om el Qura school kids looked like! The girls were poor and wore dirty school uniforms. Instead of cleaning them out and distributing clean clothes that would have definitely drew a huge smile on their faces, the officials decided to replaced the kids with new kids brought from a language school! Not only that, they gave the entire school staff a one week leave! Can you imagine how humiliated the school kids and the teachers are feeling right now!
by blues 2005-06-09 04:49PM | 0 recs
There is a way to win this
Moveon.org has 300,000 signatures on a petition
that will ask George W Bush to respond to congress,
about the allegations in this letter.

Rep. Conyers, has stated that if the signature
count reaches 500,000, he will personally
deliver a letter to Bush that requests his
formal reply.

This is an all-important step on the road
to impeachment.

We all need to believe in bipartisanship
again, a president who commits impeachable
offenses, should not be allowed to get away
with them, even if he forced the FCC media
consolidation item into the omnibus
spending package for the American
broadcast lobby...

This isn't about the media, its about
us.

go and sign the moveon signature petition,
I think its at:

http://www.moveon.org

somewhere. maybe moveonpac.org.
the sooner, the better. Preferably,
in fact, while Blair is still here..

you will need to get the correct link.
send it to your friends. this petiition
can be signed by tomorrow morning and on
its way. Representative Conyers has promised
the minute its signed he'll take it.

And maybe the cameras will be clicking
then...
?

by turnerbroadcasting 2005-06-09 07:01PM | 0 recs
Re: There is a way to win this
Correct link is "Tell the Truth"

http://www.moveonpac.org/tellthetruth/

by turnerbroadcasting 2005-06-09 07:02PM | 0 recs
'Famous' Means That Even Russert Has Heard of It!
We keep acting like we need further proof that these idiots are idiots.  Of course they're idiots! It's in their job description. It's in their blood. It's in their water supply. It's everywhere they are, or even could imagine. The amazing thing is that they ever say anything remotely close to being either true or important.  
by Paul Rosenberg 2005-06-09 07:35PM | 0 recs
yeah, whatever.
Awesome, guys. Great job. After the MSM covers the DSM, maybe they'll cover this, too:

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

Then there's this from CNN's Larry King Live in July 2003:

Clinton also told King: "People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."

by Joe Joe 2005-06-10 10:07AM | 0 recs
Or maybe the Media should cover this...
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)

--H.R.4655--

H.R.4655

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

An Act

To establish a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq.

      Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

      This Act may be cited as the `Iraq Liberation Act of 1998'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

      The Congress makes the following findings:

            (1) On September 22, 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, starting an 8 year war in which Iraq employed chemical weapons against Iranian troops and ballistic missiles against Iranian cities.

            (2) In February 1988, Iraq forcibly relocated Kurdish civilians from their home villages in the Anfal campaign, killing an estimated 50,000 to 180,000 Kurds.

            (3) On March 16, 1988, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iraqi Kurdish civilian opponents in the town of Halabja, killing an estimated 5,000 Kurds and causing numerous birth defects that affect the town today.

            (4) On August 2, 1990, Iraq invaded and began a 7 month occupation of Kuwait, killing and committing numerous abuses against Kuwaiti civilians, and setting Kuwait's oil wells ablaze upon retreat.

            (5) Hostilities in Operation Desert Storm ended on February 28, 1991, and Iraq subsequently accepted the ceasefire conditions specified in United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (April 3, 1991) requiring Iraq, among other things, to disclose fully and permit the dismantlement of its weapons of mass destruction programs and submit to long-term monitoring and verification of such dismantlement.

            (6) In April 1993, Iraq orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate former President George Bush during his April 14-16, 1993, visit to Kuwait.

            (7) In October 1994, Iraq moved 80,000 troops to areas near the border with Kuwait, posing an imminent threat of a renewed invasion of or attack against Kuwait.

            (8) On August 31, 1996, Iraq suppressed many of its opponents by helping one Kurdish faction capture Irbil, the seat of the Kurdish regional government.

            (9) Since March 1996, Iraq has systematically sought to deny weapons inspectors from the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) access to key facilities and documents, has on several occasions endangered the safe operation of UNSCOM helicopters transporting UNSCOM personnel in Iraq, and has persisted in a pattern of deception and concealment regarding the history of its weapons of mass destruction programs.

            (10) On August 5, 1998, Iraq ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM, and subsequently threatened to end long-term monitoring activities by the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNSCOM.

            (11) On August 14, 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-235, which declared that `the Government of Iraq is in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President `to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations.'.

            (12) On May 1, 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-174, which made $5,000,000 available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition for such activities as organization, training, communication and dissemination of information, developing and implementing agreements among opposition groups, compiling information to support the indictment of Iraqi officials for war crimes, and for related purposes.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING UNITED STATES POLICY TOWARD IRAQ.

      It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.

SEC. 4. ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT A TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ.

      (a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE- The President may provide to the Iraqi democratic opposition organizations designated in accordance with section 5 the following assistance:

            (1) BROADCASTING ASSISTANCE- (A) Grant assistance to such organizations for radio and television broadcasting by such organizations to Iraq.

            (B) There is authorized to be appropriated to the United States Information Agency $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 to carry out this paragraph.

            (2) MILITARY ASSISTANCE- (A) The President is authorized to direct the drawdown of defense articles from the stocks of the Department of Defense, defense services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training for such organizations.

            (B) The aggregate value (as defined in section 644(m) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961) of assistance provided under this paragraph may not exceed $97,000,000.

      (b) HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE- The Congress urges the President to use existing authorities under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to provide humanitarian assistance to individuals living in areas of Iraq controlled by organizations designated in accordance with section 5, with emphasis on addressing the needs of individuals who have fled to such areas from areas under the control of the Saddam Hussein regime.

      (c) RESTRICTION ON ASSISTANCE- No assistance under this section shall be provided to any group within an organization designated in accordance with section 5 which group is, at the time the assistance is to be provided, engaged in military cooperation with the Saddam Hussein regime.

      (d) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- The President shall notify the congressional committees specified in section 634A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 at least 15 days in advance of each obligation of assistance under this section in accordance with the procedures applicable to reprogramming notifications under section 634A.

      (e) REIMBURSEMENT RELATING TO MILITARY ASSISTANCE-

            (1) IN GENERAL- Defense articles, defense services, and military education and training provided under subsection (a)(2) shall be made available without reimbursement to the Department of Defense except to the extent that funds are appropriated pursuant to paragraph (2).

            (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated to the President for each of the fiscal years 1998 and 1999 such sums as may be necessary to reimburse the applicable appropriation, fund, or account for the value (as defined in section 644(m) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961) of defense articles, defense services, or military education and training provided under subsection (a)(2).

      (f) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS- (1) Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this section are authorized to remain available until expended.

      (2) Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this section are in addition to amounts otherwise available for the purposes described in this section.

      (g) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE- Activities under this section (including activities of the nature described in subsection (b)) may be undertaken notwithstanding any other provision of law.

SEC. 5. DESIGNATION OF IRAQI DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION ORGANIZATION.

      (a) INITIAL DESIGNATION- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall designate one or more Iraqi democratic opposition organizations that the President determines satisfy the criteria set forth in subsection (c) as eligible to receive assistance under section 4.

      (b) DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL ORGANIZATIONS- At any time subsequent to the initial designation pursuant to subsection (a), the President may designate one or more additional Iraqi democratic opposition organizations that the President determines satisfy the criteria set forth in subsection (c) as eligible to receive assistance under section 4.

      (c) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION- In designating an organization pursuant to this section, the President shall consider only organizations that--

            (1) include a broad spectrum of Iraqi individuals, groups, or both, opposed to the Saddam Hussein regime; and

            (2) are committed to democratic values, to respect for human rights, to peaceful relations with Iraq's neighbors, to maintaining Iraq's territorial integrity, and to fostering cooperation among democratic opponents of the Saddam Hussein regime.

      (d) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- At least 15 days in advance of designating an Iraqi democratic opposition organization pursuant to this section, the President shall notify the congressional committees specified in section 634A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 of his proposed designation in accordance with the procedures applicable to reprogramming notifications under section 634A.

SEC. 6. WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL FOR IRAQ.

      Consistent with section 301 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102-138), House Concurrent Resolution 137, 105th Congress (approved by the House of Representatives on November 13, 1997), and Senate Concurrent Resolution 78, 105th Congress (approved by the Senate on March 13, 1998), the Congress urges the President to call upon the United Nations to establish an international criminal tribunal for the purpose of indicting, prosecuting, and imprisoning Saddam Hussein and other Iraqi officials who are responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide, and other criminal violations of international law.

SEC. 7. ASSISTANCE FOR IRAQ UPON REPLACEMENT OF SADDAM HUSSEIN REGIME.

      It is the sense of the Congress that once the Saddam Hussein regime is removed from power in Iraq, the United States should support Iraq's transition to democracy by providing immediate and substantial humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, by providing democracy transition assistance to Iraqi parties and movements with democratic goals, and by convening Iraq's foreign creditors to develop a multilateral response to Iraq's foreign debt incurred by Saddam Hussein's regime.

SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

      Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

by Joe Joe 2005-06-10 10:25AM | 0 recs
The latest false trail...
...comes from the CSIS:
Robin Niblett of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, says it would be easy for Americans to misunderstand the reference to intelligence being "fixed around" Iraq policy. " `Fixed around' in British English means `bolted on' rather than altered to fit the policy," he says.

As a native speaker of British English, I can say: No, it doesn't.

There is no figurative phrasal verb fix around (where the combination of verb plus adverb or preposition makes a new meaning).

(Quick comparison: Go down in its main sense means go lower - the adverb merely indicates direction of travel.

Whereas go down in the Monica sense is a unity that means - something quite different.)

The natural meaning in British English of fix around in the sentence in the DSM is tailor to accommodate. Any intel that didn't fit was trimmed off.

The pejorative sense of fix - implying chicanery, if not illegality - is the predominant sense of the word used in the context of politics - whether or not in combination with around, and, in that sense, is certainly by no means too colloquial for an official memo. Not in Tony Blair's sofa-based Downing Street, at least!

And, of course, in context, it is perfectly clear that Dearlove is (being reported as) taking a dim view of the US handling of intelligence.

So far as I can recall, none of the British media at time - sadly operating under the handicap of being denied  Niblett's linguistic expertise - interpreted fixed around in any other way.

by johnsmith0903 2005-06-10 10:48AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------