Bush Administration Only Considers Certain Types of Terrorism Threats

I have argued repeatedly that Democrats and progressives need to drop the war on terror frame because rather than defending Americans, the idea it actually expresses is a battle of civilizations based on reductive identity politics that are antithetical to progressive beliefs. If you still doubt me, check out the latest from the Department of Homeland Security, an entire government agency that derives its name from identity politics: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not list right-wing domestic terrorists and terrorist groups on a document that appears to be an internal list of threats to the nation's security.

According to the list -- part of a draft planning document obtained by CQ Homeland Security -- between now and 2011 DHS expects to contend primarily with adversaries such as al Qaeda and other foreign entities affiliated with the Islamic Jihad movement, as well as domestic radical Islamist groups.

It also lists left-wing domestic groups, such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), as terrorist threats, but it does not mention anti-government groups, white supremacists and other radical right-wing movements, which have staged numerous terrorist attacks that have killed scores of Americans. Recent attacks on cars, businesses and property in Virginia, Oregon and California have been attributed to ELF.

DHS did not respond to repeated requests for comment or confirmation of the document's authenticity.

The conspirators behind the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people and wounded more than 500, were inspired by radical right-wing movements. Eric Rudolph, the man charged with carrying out the 1996 Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta, which killed one woman and injured more than 100, was a member of the radical anti-abortion group Army of God. Initially, Rudolph was the object of a massive North Carolina manhunt in connection with a Birmingham, Ala., abortion-clinic bombing that killed a police officer and seriously maimed a nurse.

Another Army of God member, James Kopp, was convicted in the 1998 shooting of a doctor who performed abortions.

Individuals affiliated with such groups have also been involved in many smaller terrorist acts, including mailing hundreds of bogus anthrax letters to abortion clinics, and in plots to obtain and use conventional, chemical and nuclear weapons against civilians. In 2003, for instance, a Texas man prosecutors say was a white supremacist and anti-government radical pleaded guilty to charges of possessing a weapon of mass destruction. Authorities had discovered enough sodium cyanide bombs to kill hundreds of people; machine guns and several hundred thousand rounds of ammunition; 60 pipe bombs; and remote-control explosive devices disguised as briefcases in a storage space he rented. The man, William J. Krar, was sentenced to 11 years in federal prison.

The DHS is singling out left-wing terrorists and leaving right-wing terrorists alone, which I am sure has nothing to do with the fact that domestic right-wing terrorist groups subscribe to the identity politics that are at the core of "the war on terror." It is also particularly disgusting that the DHS seems to view attacks on property as more serious threats than attacks on people.

Tags: Ideology (all tags)

Comments

12 Comments

I couldn't agree more Chris
The WAR ON TERROR! is a complete and total fabrication. To the extent that Joe Biden, Diane Feinstein and Joe Lieberman buy into it, they weaken the Democratic party and help the Theocons justify their warmongering immoral interventions.

I've tried to throw my two cents in with the suggestion that we use Mike Schuer's phrase Bin Ladenism and attacking Bush for obvious failures.

There is no more reality to a monolithic, world wide terrorism menace than there was a monolithic world wide Communist menace in the 50's and 60's. Democrats need to get with the reality based community and start describing the real problems Americans need to confront, instead of helping Bush and the Theocons focus on the disutopian fantasy world of Samuel Huntington.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-05-19 02:05PM | 0 recs
That the regime isn't concerned with terrorism
was made abundantly clear by an exchange between Bill Maher and Senator Norm Coleman (R-Creepytown) on Maher's last show.

Maher asked why it was that the strip of chemical plants in New Jersey recently dubbed the most dangerous two miles in the US wasn't being guarded against attack. Coleman's initial response was something to the effect of, "you might as well ask why we're not defending our ports and borders." There was some more, but it came across as total gibberish, as Coleman obviously didn't have a good answer.

If the Reeps were really worried about terrorism, they'd be going after groups like the Christian Identity, which has actually pulled off a major terrorist attack inside this country and has alleged ties to al-Qaeda elements. These right-wing groups have always been at the forefront of challenging and resisting the authority of the US government, and considering how the current regime is horning in on privacy and civil liberties I'd expect them to be keeping a close eye on the ultra-libertarian right. Those guys pose a much greater potential threat to this country than some idiots who decide to torch a car dealers' lot in the middle of the night.

by catastrophile 2005-05-19 02:21PM | 0 recs
Re: That the regime isn't concerned with terrorism
They don't give a damn about terrorism, al Qaeda or otherwise.

They just want to make sure the American people are afraid of Arabs and liberals.

(Note how the adminstration did NOT hype the capture and guilty plea of one of the more prominent terrorists in recent memory, Eric Rudolph.)

by wayward 2005-05-19 06:13PM | 0 recs
Re: That the regime isn't concerned with terrorism
The military base closings and realignments continue to pull the military away from possible targets in places like NY, Nj, IL or California and protect such "targets" as Missisippi. Texas, or South Carolina.  I keep thinking that except for these politically motivated closings over the years, the second plane would have been stopped.
by David Kowalski 2005-05-19 11:06PM | 0 recs
Actuall the War on Terror is very real
Lets remember that what we're doing
here is trying to prevent the infiltration
of our country by sleeper cells,
the use of our resources against us,
and widespread death as a result of a
massive strike.

Al Qaeda takes about 5 years to get one of
these things going. They are extremely well
funded, extremely atomized and diverse.

DHS is neither left or right, they don't
play politics. That bogus alert thing
happening in 2004 was pretty sad but it
was the pressure coming from the executive
as usual. If you want to fix the problem,
impeach Bush and be done with it.

Seriously.  But this latest report about
how DHS is helping guard us against all
these domestic groups -

Listen man, there are none. America is
not partisan or bitter or political.
They're mostly apolitical and
tuned into their daily thing rather
than the latest and greatest heaven's
gate missive.

So remember that the next time you
visit your librarian, and give
her a big hug. She's your front
line in the war to preserve your
own civil liberties. Then bone up
on Osama Bin Laden with your favorite
nite lite and a good cup of coffee
because it takes about 20 pages of
his bio, 70 pages of the 911
commission report and then another
20 pages more from the journal of irreproducible
results before you get a good view of
the enemy.

They ain't sitting out there with a nametag
on.

They's right down the street shipping
CBRN inside cans of olive oil to the
corner salad bar and jacking them away
in a nice honda civic.

Credit where credit is due: Clinton
Administration stopped the one in 1999.

So if its left/ right, ok, can we
measure this by how many bad guys we
actually catch.

PS. Don't rent 'the september tapes'.
The smell of fear makes it awful.

by turnerbroadcasting 2005-05-19 02:42PM | 0 recs
The ghost of Jeanne Kilpatrick
They are also using the infamous Kilpatrick distinction between "bad totalitarian dictators" and "good authoritarian dictators." Or was it the other way around?

The Khazikstan dictator is "good" because he is a right wingnut dictator who boils his people alive and is on our side. But for some reason Chavez is a "bad" democratic leader, because he is "too far left."

Democrats lose when they don't tell the truth about the farce that Bush and the Theocons call U.S. foreign policy. So does American and the rest of the world.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-05-19 02:46PM | 0 recs
We know that Chavez
must have fixed the election . . .

. . . because we tried to fix it, but he won anyway!

by catastrophile 2005-05-19 05:08PM | 0 recs
The Bush Administration supports terrorism.
You realize that we would right now be bombing many countries around the world that published a document that showed evidence that a country was trying to protect any terrorist organizations, don't you?

That document places the United States in the Axis of Evil.

by afs 2005-05-19 03:22PM | 0 recs
by Coltrane 2005-05-19 04:27PM | 0 recs
Don't forget the KKK!
Of course, the largest US born terrorist organization came from the South-East...the good old Ku Klux Klan.  Let's not forget them!
by Ryan 2005-05-19 04:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Don't forget the KKK!
Even scarier:

The Klan's gone national (since the 1920's)
There are groups far, far, worse these days.

by wayward 2005-05-19 06:10PM | 0 recs
War on Terwar =Tough on Crime
I have to agree with Chris here. The same reductionist thinking that allowed Republicans to bait Democrats for years as being "soft on crime" is now at work in foreign policy. By somehow trying to make sense of what is, at best, an incomprehensible policy, we are heading towards moments as awkward as Mondale's infamous photo inside the tank. I think Hillary is making a huge mistake in this regard pursuing the "tough on immigration" schtick. Just as the death penalty and the assault weapons ban were used to intimate that the party "base" was soft on crime, so too will the war on terror merely make the rank and file members of the Democrat party look bad. If they become staunchly pro-war it's a contrivance, if they are staunchly anti-war we are myopic.

We have to focus on making foreign policy have a positive face. The stark realism of people like Kissinger is not how the US will develop a benevolent relationship with the Middle East or China or ____. That requires us to recognize that explotation both economic and political must end, lest we want a world where half owns everything and the other half tries to get it or die trying. Where are the legislators, for example, trying to sponsor Al Jazeera onto American cable? Where is Howard Dean annoucing a "discussion on CAFTA"? And where is Carol Mosley-Braun and Al Sharpton annoucing new initiatives to Africa?  

by risenmessiah 2005-05-19 08:23PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------