MyDD 2006 Predictions

Yesterday, I devoted a post to denigrating some of the 2006 predictions made by the folks at the National Review Online, but I realize that it's not entirely fair of me to simply say why I believe they're wrong without putting myself on the line, too. So here goes: some predictions for 2006.

  • Democrats will gain control of the U.S. House, albeit by a somewhat narrow margin. The Democrats will have a tougher go in the Senate, where the Republicans' share of seats will be trimmed to 51 or 52. In gubernatorial contests, the Democrats will pick up seats in some of the most Democratic states in the country -- California, New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts, for example -- as well as in more competitive states like Ohio.
  • At least one more Republican member of Congress will be indicted.
  • Despite attempts to squelch the media by the Bush administration (or perhaps as a result of them), major media outlets will continue to unearth stories that are politically painful to the White House -- with help from inside the bureaucracy. Nevertheless, the media will also continue to peddle the incorrect meme that the Democratic Party is devoid of ideas (in the interest of "balance," of course).
  • The situation in Iraq will not noticeably improve.
  • The economy will strengthen, but President Bush's approval will not significantly rise.
  • The Republican agenda in Washington will continue to be stalled as Republican members of the House from marginal districts defect on major pieces of legislation and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, distracted by the ongoing SEC investigation into his stock sales, is still unable to effectively control the chamber.
Any thoughts?

Tags: Pulse (all tags)

Comments

66 Comments

Predictions
How about a pretext for a strike against Iran?
You make the neocons sound as if they're slinking home in defeat.  These guys are not necessarily rational, and the theme of Bush's presidency, and the whole right-wing take-over of government, is hang on to power, by any means.
by catalan 2005-12-31 11:11AM | 0 recs
Karl Rove will be indicted on one charge
of providing false info to FBI.

There are many skeptics that seem to think he's in the clear and have forgotten that Fitzgerald has another THIRTEEN MONTHS left on his fresh new Grand Jury.  

Karl Rove is going to be indicted, and I will take the day off from work to celebrate.

Happy New Year!

by Sam Loomis 2005-12-31 11:23AM | 0 recs
That sounds about right but...
more than one additional Republican congressman will be indicted before the November elections.

more than one Republican congressman will announce that he is not running for re-election or will spend his entire re-election campaign combatting allegations and rumors that he is under investigation in the Abramoff case.

more than one additional White House insider will resign or be indicted.

Democrats will win more than 5 New York State Senate seats to take control of the State Senate from the Republicans, Sen. Joe Bruno will subsequently be challenged and lose his role as leader of Senate Republicans.

Progressives in New York will then go to battle with entrenched Democratic Party elements in order to effect real change in correcting the problems of New York State government. Certain entrenched Democratic Party interests will fight change tooth and nail. The results of this battle will not be known for sometime.

by Andrew C White 2005-12-31 11:33AM | 0 recs
Re: That sounds about right but...
oh... but that gets us into 2007.
by Andrew C White 2005-12-31 11:34AM | 0 recs
Economy?
Curious as to why the economy will improve?  Housing, debt, energy prices, healthcare?  I am not so sure we are not in for a recession soon, but I guess is it 2006, or 2007?  I see a lot of sign even here in rich NH that the housing market is going soft, more people coming to agencies for help with heating costs, medical costs.  We are in pretty good shape here, but there are parts of the country that are much more vulnerable than rich New England.
by nhselectwoman 2005-12-31 12:01PM | 0 recs
I don't think the economy will get better.
The yeild curve has inverted.  Asure sign of recession
by Delver Rootnose 2005-12-31 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't think the economy will get better.
Controversial.  See this article for an example of a contrary opinion.  E.g., curve inverted in 1998 with no recession.

Beware also of assuming, because many recessions are preceded by inverted yield curves, an inverted yield curve means a recession is necessarily coming.  This is a logical fallacy, but is an assumption underlying a lot of reporting on this subject.  What's needed, and I haven't seen, is a positive predictive value [the ratio of true positives (inverted curve correctly predicting a recession) to all positives (inverted curves, with or without subsequent recession)].

by arenwin 2005-12-31 02:44PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't think the economy will get better.
An inverted yield curve does not necessarily mean a recession is coming, but it is a strong indicator. Other problems on the horizon are the housing bubble, which Wall Street views as a mortgage lending bubble and an out of control current account deficit.

The WSJ was complaining earlier this month that Bush's tax cuts had not produced the type of growth that they had been expecting. We will have a recession, sooner rather than later, if for no other reason than it is time for a recession. Unless someone has managed to eliminate the business cycle, we are going to have a recession.

The only question is how bad will the coming recession be?

by Gary Boatwright 2005-12-31 07:47PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't think the economy will get better.
an inverted yield curve may not necessarily mean a recession but it is almost infallible in predicting a slowdown in growth.  And 1998 is no exception.  Growth DID slow down and by 2000-2001 had turned into a recession.

and housing is already slowing down.

by sck5 2006-01-01 02:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Inverted yieldcurve
The Big Picture has some excellent material on this. Mostly that the closer the curve is to inverted, the greater the chance of a slowdown 6-12 months out. Also uses a moving average yield curve to avoid short-term volatality.
by astuar 2006-01-01 08:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Inverted yieldcurve
Interesting - do you have a link on that?
by arenwin 2006-01-01 08:45PM | 0 recs
Historical Perspective
Barely retaking the House while falling short of a majority in the Senate would under-perform the historical norm for the six-year, off-year elections of most Presidents since FDR, so a well-run campaign could do better. However, given how poorly Dems fared in the 2002 off-year election, I think most would gladly settle for the House and gaining a few Senate seats.
by SLinVA 2005-12-31 12:47PM | 0 recs
Terrorist attack
The Bu$h criminal conspiracy will get the ultimate gift from their ally and co-conspirator Osama Bin Laden himself this year. I predict another major attack on several US cities. Following these attacks Bu$h will suspend the Constitution and declare martial law. If the attacks happen as I think they will right before the fall congressional elections, he will also suspend these elections indefinitely. 2006 will be the year the Republic dies and the Empire is born.
by Blutodog 2005-12-31 12:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Terrorist attack
That's not nice.  Not nice at all!
by teknofyl 2005-12-31 02:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Terrorist attack
No it's not but it's going to happen at some pt. over the next 3 yrs even if it doesn't happen this yr. Bu$hCo never intends to let go of the power.
by Blutodog 2005-12-31 05:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Terrorist attack
Uh...If I was BushCo I'd be praying that OBL does NOT attack as any attack is sure to be murderously successful given the lack of improvement in our security, BushCo has done nothing since 9/11 except move the deck chairs, this will result not in a "rally round the Pres." moment but will be Katrina to the  tenth power. You are smoking crack if you think Americans will rally to Bush's incompetence.
by Pericles 2006-01-01 08:05AM | 0 recs
Re: Terrorist attack
While you're right to fear the imperialist and anti-democratic designs of the GOP, any coup would be  subtle enough to keep Americans distracted by more important matters, like Skating with the Stars.    
by Transmission 2006-01-01 08:53AM | 0 recs
Umm...
Your first prediction and you last prediction don't jibe....

If the Dems have control of the House...that will naturally stall the Republican agenda...and there probably won't be any maginal Repubs left!

by Nazgul35 2005-12-31 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Umm...
Umm... but that wouldn't happen until November... he's talking about until then... in the heat of the campaign... THEN we'd retake the House... and in '07... IMPEACHMENT PARTY
by teknofyl 2005-12-31 02:30PM | 0 recs
Perennial Optimist
Heck if the NRO boys can dream, then so can I:

(1) Dems retake House by 15-seat margin.
(2) Dems retake Senate by 2-seat margin.
(3) # of House Reps indicted >= 10.
(4) # of NEW WH Insiders indicted in Plamegate >= 2.
(5) Photos of John McCain in bed with Gary Glitter will surface, effectively ending his WH hopes.
(6) Tim Minear and Joss Whedon will both get hot new series NOT on Fox.

Coming in 2007:

(1) President Pelosi!

by Paul Rosenberg 2005-12-31 12:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Perennial Optimist
I like it... impeach Bush and Cheney... She's da new speaker... ohhh... yeah... hadn't thought about THAT possibility... me likey likey... me likey likey very much...

Thanks for a Happy New Year's Eve!

by teknofyl 2005-12-31 02:33PM | 0 recs
economy-my first post
The economy will improve. However, even I could prop up the economy with 800 billion a year in foreign loans. When you are allowed to spend more money then you have there are a lot of things that will improve. The problems will start when the creditors come to collect. Our next president (hopefully Mark Warner) is going to have to run damage control to deal with bushes splurges. That is when the effects of bushes propped economy will be felt.
by mallsus2 2005-12-31 12:56PM | 0 recs
These were my DKos predictions:
Bush will not have as hellacious a year as he did in 2005. His approval will rise and fall slightly, but settle around 48% by the time of the elections. Sorry.

  • Alito will be confirmed by somewhere around a 60-40 vote: less easily than Roberts, but with several Democrats crossing over. This will cause more outrage from the left towards moderate and conservative Democrats.

  • Hurricane season will be hideous. A late hurricane (maybe around September) will thoroughly disrupt and throw off the dynamic of the elections in Florida.

  • The presidential buzz will be louder in the MSM than midterm talk. Expect to hear names like Hillary, McCain, Rudy, and Warner more than names like Casey, Spitzer, or Angelides. By the summer we will know where the 2008 convention will be. Denver? New Orleans? Anaheim? Your guess is as good as mine.

  • The economy will look artificially better than it is, prompting a brief surge in Bush's approval rating that calms down by November.

  • Finally, in the elections Democrats will gain around 5 seats in the House, 2 in the Senate, and 4 or 5 governorships.
by raginillinoian 2005-12-31 02:31PM | 0 recs
Re: These were my DKos predictions:
Very realistic. The GOP has to pull out every option it can to boost the economy and make Bu$h look better so it won't lose the Congress. It won't and it will steal what it can't win honestly. The D's will do their usual over confident number and basically let the rethugs kick their ass in the fall. I don't sse much change for the better. In fact I predict by 2008 we'll essentially have a 1 party state with no hope of a D President , Congress or anything else. By 2008 Abortion will be banned Nat'lly by the GOP SCOTUS and Congress and many other precedents will fall as the GOP pushes , drags and bullies the country into a corner. The D's will DO NOTHING. Empire and Fascism are here and I'm afraid there is no going back.
by Blutodog 2005-12-31 06:00PM | 0 recs
I'm laughing at your post
Not because I don't find it serious. Rather, it's funny the way there's truth to what you are saying. Dems generally would capitulate when they are bullied by the Repubs, as they usually do when the MSM colludes with the Repubs in attacking the Dems as a party of no ideas.

I remember the same scenario last year when the Dems had all these predictions that we'd take control of the House. Have the Democrats learnt valuable campaign strategy lessons from last year's utter defeat? The jury is still out.

One thing I can say proudly though is that I'm more confident with Dean as party chair that the Dems are not going to roll over as much as they did before, even maybe pummeling the Repubs to death next year.

Oh, one can hope, and I'm hoping for change in 2006.

by sircharles 2005-12-31 07:03PM | 0 recs
Re: I'm laughing at your post
Hope is all we have @ this juncture but if you've read the DAU report @ Salon.com? It's not likely any single scandal or group of scandals will have much effect on events.
by Blutodog 2006-01-01 11:21AM | 0 recs
Speaking of predictions
Meanwhile... back at the ranch... a little snarkiness in response to Boy George's dreams of a 2006 agenda.
by Andrew C White 2005-12-31 03:51PM | 0 recs
Christine Cegelis
will be Tammy Duckworth in Illinois-06.
by ilyayavitz 2005-12-31 04:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Christine Cegelis
I don't think the voters will fall for identity theft.

:D

justkidding.

As for 2006. As I probably said in a Youth Group circle when the Rapture came up, I don't make predictions.

by RBH 2005-12-31 08:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Christine Cegelis
There's an irresistible irony to your statement.  Ah, the fluidity of identity!

(Now we see if anyone else gets this joke, or if it's too much champagne that makes it funny.  Happy New Year!  ;)

by arenwin 2005-12-31 09:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Christine Cegelis
Sorry.

Christine Cegelis will BEAT Tammy Duckworth in the March Illinois 06 primary.

by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 12:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Christine Cegelis
Christine Cegelis will BEAT Tammy Duckworth in the March primary.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 12:06AM | 0 recs
My Prediction is
House: We win but just barely by 1 of 2 seats.

Senate: We win Rhode Island, Pennsylvannia, Ohio, Tenessee, Missouri, Montana, and Mississippi(only if Tren Lott retires).  While we barely lose Arizona and Nevada, so depending on Lott we might have a Dem  Senate.

Governor: We win Mass, New York, Ohio, Maryland, Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, California, and possibly Min, Alaska, and Nevada.  Also we retain Iowa.

More than one Republican member of Congress will be indicted.

The situation in Iraq will improve for a few months boosting Bush's #'s to around 53%.  Then something will go "terriably" wrong and he'll fall back donw to the low 40's.

The economy will strengthen in the beginning of the year, then slow back down.

Alito will be blocked (if any more documents come out about his views on abortion).

Hillary, Rudy, and McCain will all anounce that their running and as soon as that happens something will happen to McCain to make him lose the nomination.

by Democratsin06 08 2005-12-31 04:50PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
I can see the Democrats picking up between 17 and 22 seats in the House.The latter would give us 225-210,the former 220-215,I just cannot see how the Rethugs can survive the 6 year effect plus Iraq and I can see the housing bubble starting to burst. The entire economy is being propped up by refinancing,if the bubble bursts,I can then see a 25-28 seat pickup.

On the Senate side,I see pickups in Pennsylvania,Ohio,Missouri and Montana which would give us 49 seats counting Bernie Sanders in VT,who is a sure winner.I think Chafee will survive in RI and Kyl in AZ and I don't think Ford can win in TN.

by Litvak36 2005-12-31 07:24PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
One of those seats will be held by Christine Cegelis, after she beats Tammy Duckworth in the March Illinois 06 Democratic primary.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 12:09AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
A historical note: ilyayavitz, formerly named metonym, was banned in September and all comments and diaries were deleted after rampant ratings abuse, a penchant for spamming every active diary to promote his own writings, and toward the end a string of abusive statements about the MyDD community ("disgusting wasteland" was my favorite.)  This comment or slight variants - which promote his own Sun-Times editorial - has now been posted nine times in six different active diaries or FP stories by my current count.  It's actually a perfectly good editorial.  But, FYI, that is why most instances now hidden.  One would have been enough.
by arenwin 2006-01-01 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
Oops, make that eleven instances in seven diaries.  I missed links to the editorial buried in two longer, more substantive comments.
by arenwin 2006-01-01 10:01AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
you are wrong.  ilyayavitz is not metonym.  you must be hallucinating.  
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 07:34PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
Ilyayavitz is a liar and a troll.

The sudden change to the user profile gives the troll away.  For anyone who has doubts, compare ilyayavitz's current user profile with this screen shot, which reflects the user's profile as of just a few hours ago (although the screen shot was taken earlier than that, since I expected this).

Also compare the author name on the editorial the troll relentlessly promotes, as well as the e-mail in the screen shot, to this publicly available page at the University of Chicago.

Yes, remember metonym, who spoke at great length about his erudition as a University of Chicago art history graduate student before disrupting MyDD for several weeks before he was banned?  He's back to this "wasteland" he so despised.

by arenwin 2006-01-01 08:25PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
This is clearly a violation of my privacy.  I recommend you delete this comment immediately.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-02 08:33AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
Violation, how?  
by Jay 2006-01-02 08:35AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
The vidinctive writer has disclosed the institution at which I study; he has publicized my private electronic mail address; and he has provided other forms of what I consider to be confidential information.  I find these actions obsessive and intrusive, and I believe the writer who has made it his task to violate my right to privacy should be denounced.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-02 08:44AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
Baloney.  YOU disclosed YOUR OWN NAME with this comment, where you wrote:

Here is a Letter to the Editor I submitted to the Chicago Sun-Times, where I exhort fellow Chicagoans to denounce Duckworth and Emanuel's intervention in the sixth district.

YOU also disclosed YOUR OWN E-MAIL ADDRESS on your MyDD user profile, before you suddenly changed it for the sake of claiming you are not the "metonym" who was recently banned.  I don't have administrative access to this site; I'm only capable of getting that screen shot because it was publicly available.

And not only does that e-mail address identify the institution at which you study, you REPEATEDLY and very publicly stated that institution in your former MyDD handle as "metonym."  All your comments are now deleted, but see this comment for a few excerpts.

There's not a thing here I had to research.  EVERY last piece of information was public.  I clicked on the links you provided.  The only thing I linked to that you had not directly provided was the very first page that comes up in a google search of the e-mail address you published.

And you know what?  I noticed all this after your very first comment under this new handle.  I didn't bring up your dual identity until you started google bombing the site, and I didn't compile the public information into a comment until you lied about it and accused me of "hallucinating."

So, if a site administrator thinks I've stepped over the line, they're welcome to delete my comments.  But don't give me this wounded, invaded privacy crap.  You got caught lying, period, end of story.

by arenwin 2006-01-02 09:14AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
But you know what - if you want me to, I'll hide this comment which started this whole thread, thereby hiding everything underneath it from view, including the screen shot.  I can't see how that makes a difference, since you've provided links to the editorial signed under your real name twelve times - including once where you very expicitly claimed credit for writing it - and I don't have the capacity to hide each one of those.

But, hey, it's your call, metonym.

by arenwin 2006-01-02 09:38AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
The vidinctive writer has disclosed the institution at which I study; he has publicized my private electronic mail address; and he has provided other forms of what I consider to be confidential information.

Ken, you do a disservice to the University of Chicago humanities programs by writing such abject nonsense.  Nothing that you put up on the net can possibly be constued to be confidential information.  

I believe the writer who has made it his task to violate my right to privacy should be denounced.

Denounced?  You mean, like, at a party meaning for misunderstanding Mao's writings?

by Jay 2006-01-02 09:59AM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
all postings were relevant.  i reserve the right to predict Cegelis's victory over Tammy Duckworth.  And no, I am not promoting the Letter to the Editor.  I am instead providing embedded links to it in order to increase its rate of appearance on a google search.  

That you deleted other germane comments from other diaries reveals you have a predilection for engaging in ratings abuse.  

by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 07:37PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
That's called a google bomb, and is even an more offensive form of spam.
by arenwin 2006-01-01 08:07PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
you have no evidence i am the metonym to which you refer.  and that you rated germane comments unfairly reveals you abuse that system.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 08:42PM | 0 recs
Re: My Prediction is
 There will be a bitch load of congressional investigations in to the bush admin after we take the house or senate. He won't be able to fart without someone looking up his ass to see if he did it legally.
by mallsus2 2006-01-01 08:51AM | 0 recs
The People
The public will decry the "opposite sides of a counterfiet coin" that is party politics, and the disaffected will gather in the center and support locally-selected candidates in larger numbers.  Meaning Duckworth & Casey are history, spawning profound changes in the democratic party apparatus.

ActBlue will supplant the national democratic fundraising machine, providing directed contributions to local candidates of choice.  Once the "bigs" realize they can cut out the middle fat layer, they will likewise contribute online.

Somewhere around March or April, the "prime time" bloggers in the political arena will reach critical mass with their cross-publication topical journal on all things progressive.  Similar to the "AP", the online-only publication will begin to penetrate the likes of Yahoo & Google News with daily releases, and downstream e-mail delivery.

What the hell, it's all just projection after all.

by rba 2005-12-31 06:01PM | 0 recs
Tarot, ESP, and a Dart Board
Okay, I got out my tea leaves, gave Syl Stalone's momma a call, and came up with:

*    Jordan, Egypt or possible Saudi Arabia will become dangerously unstable. (Yeah, I know, how could you tell.)

*    A center-right election victory in Latin America (the only one actually), will be hailed by the Bushies as a sign of returning American influence in the region...they will take the opportunity to ignore Latin America for the rest of Bush's term.

*    On election night, it will look like Dems will pick up 6 seats in the Senate, but in a repeat of a story we all know, days later a Republican will take one of the seats, leaving a net pick up of 5 seats.

*    Cement and aggregate stocks with large developing market exposure will do very well.

*    One of the Big 3 newspaper chains (Gannett, Knight-Ridder or Tribune) will go private. Surprisingly, most likely Gannett.

*    The Bushies will try to get Kurds to agree to long-term leases for military bases in the north of Iraq. They'll do it because the Shiite's won't agree to it, the Turks will increase limits on US operations from their bases, and the Gulf will look increasingly shaky. Of course, this is a tacit acknowledgment that Iraq is failed state...but hey, it's part of the NeoCon wet-dream for Iraq that's still doable.

*    At the end of 2006, things will look pretty much the same as now. The term "Malaise" will appear first in financial papers, but will work it's way into MSM framing.

by Seadunkirk 2005-12-31 07:47PM | 0 recs
2006
--> After credit card minimum payments rise, several analysts notice that housing markets across the US go "soft."

--> Samuel Alito's move to the floor is blocked by Lincoln Chafee.

--> While everyone wonders what Patrick Fitzgerald will do about Karl Rove, testimony from his trial against Ken Lay reveals that Ahmed Chalabi was at the 2001 energy task force meetings with Dick Cheney and in an "active role".

--> Condi Rice's political future is dashed when photographers inadvertantly catch her with her lesbian lover.

--> Security threats puncture the World Cup, but not because of Al Qaeda. Instead the Polish squad finds itself under constant protest by European fans for its participation in the CIA secret jails program.

--> Singapore Airlines finds its debut of the Airbus A380 delayed until late June. Because it was used on the London to Singapore route, this has the added benefit to Airbus of being announced in the run up to the Farnborough Air Show.

--> The New Orleans Saints return to the Superdome for the 2006 NFL season. On hand are the President, NFL maven Condi Rice, Mayor Ray Nagin, Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, and Representative Bobby Jindal, who's district is not in New Orleans. Jindal manages to get plenty of face time in a ploy to re-challene Blanco for governor in 2007.

--> The midterm elections go from boring to riveting after Tom Tancredo appears with Tennesee GOP Senate candidate Bob Corker at a rally in Chattanooga. With illegal immigration a growing problem in Tennessee, Corker hopes that Tancredo's embrace will cement him as doing something about the topic. Instead, in a speech evoking Blaine's "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" speech, Tancredo mentions that "a vote for the GOP is a vote for white Christian America".

--> Abramoff-related scandals put several previously safe districts in play, in addition to the Superme Court rejection of all DeLay style gerrymanders. The Democrats retake the House, but the Republicans retain the Senate after Lincoln Chafee pulls out a win on his record with Alito. New Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott talks about the need for "humility".

--> Fed President Ben Bernanke, having watched deflation eat at the American economy all year announces a turn to interest rate cuts to stem the tide.
-->

by risenmessiah 2005-12-31 07:50PM | 0 recs
Re: 2006
Dream on. Howabout this instead, the tooth fairy makes Bu$hCo suddenly see the light. That's more likely then most of your post no offense.
by Blutodog 2006-01-01 11:23AM | 0 recs
Re: 2006
--> Samuel Alito's move to the floor is blocked by Lincoln Chafee.

If that is meant to suggest there would be a vote against Alito in the Judiciary Committee, can't happen since Chafee isn't on the Committee. More generally, don't expect Chafee to vote against Alito unless he bombs out in the hearings, which isn't likely. Rhode Island has the greatest percentage of Italian-Americans of any state, and Chafee faces primary opposition from the right. Politically, the smart vote for Chafee is to confirm.

by SLinVA 2006-01-01 08:28PM | 0 recs
Re: 2006
Don't know how I got that confused.

At any rate, I think Chafee will prevail in Rhode Island because his father's popularity and there's no sense that he's not lived up to his father's legacy.

Even so, I stand by my post otherwise.

by risenmessiah 2006-01-01 10:31PM | 0 recs
I predict
  •  The defeat of liberals at the hands of moderates.  In other words, the center will move right.  

  • More and more Democrats will become complacent, and more and more civil liberties will be jettisoned in the name of "freedom."

  • We will have a House full of representatives who vote in fear of their constituents instead of voting to their constituents' benefit in 2007.  

  • Yes, we will gain a majority in one of the legislative chambers, but that majority will be a spurious majority comprised of moderates, DLC activists, representatives beholden to Rahm Emanuel, and various other drones who will vote with Republicans more often than not.  

  • I do predict a Scalito filibuster, and I will be in the gallery to witness it.  

  • The Senate will become a free for all.

  • Bill Frist will be more doddering than he ever was before.

  • Lisa Murkowski will become more moderate.

  • Blanche Lincoln will move more to the Left.

  • Mary Landrieu will become more outspoken.

  • Hillary Clinton will introduce at least three bills many Leftists will find problematic.

  • Maria Cantwell finds her voice and emerges as the new star of the Democratic party.

  • Hackett will win the Ohio Senate Primary by 6 percentage points.

  • Cegelis will edge Tammy Duckworth, but mud will be slung.

  • Senate Democrats will be forced to filibuster a marriage amendment.

  • Anne Northup loses KY-03.

  • Claire McCaskill edges Talent by 20,000 votes or less.  

  • The South Carolina race for Governor becomes a competitive race.

  • Blagojevich is relected by less than 1 percent.

  • And, finally, Jim Bunning resigns early from the Senate.
by ilyayavitz 2006-01-01 12:19AM | 0 recs
Prediction for 2006
a) Immigration will be THE TOPIC of the year whipping the anti illegal alien frenzy into high gear sometime in the fall. All of sudden we all will be talking about it as though no other issue matters, and the MSM seeing ratings will do the same.

b) Someone else in the WH will be indicted- who I don't know, it's just gut instinct.

c) Bush's numbers will go up slightly- maybe to mid 40s. They are artificially low right now because of a perfect storm that happened to early for us to use it.

d) I think the House also will flip, but ONLY if the Democrats are willing to take risks. This is my concern that they will not. That if the Republican polling numbers improve (which given their historic lows they will) then the Democratic response will be weaker.

e) Centrists (I don't use the term moderate) or centrist wannabes will continue to try to convince right that they are okay through various measures- pissing off the Democratic base, and not convincing the right of a single thing. Commentary: you would think by now in their own self interest the centrists would pick up on the one sided nature of their relationship to the right.

f) The MSM will continue to grow a pair. It will not be earth shatering.

g) The American will continue to become an disengaged electoral- not having a clue what people here and on the right wing blogs are up to. Not caring what's going on politically except when they are told to care on cue around the election. In fairness, they are too busy trying to survive and pretend like they are thriving rather than surviving to have time to care about anything on a higher political scale.

h) The Senate will see some pick up, but there are too many things that seem to have to allign in order to take the Senate out right. However, 2008 we will see a major shift in our favor on that front.

i) Gay marriage will increasingly become less and less of an issue- the Christian rights impact will lessen. The reason being is that some Republicans who want to win in 2008 don't see it as the best strategy. Whether that faction of Republcan will win out is anyone's guess.

j) Latinos if the Republicans use immigration will almost certainly become more and more Democratic as they have been trending for a while.

by bruh21 2006-01-01 06:34AM | 0 recs
fun with predictions
  1. House: DEMS will gain some seats, but GOPs will have a majority about 220:215;
  2. Senate: DEMS will gain some seats, but GOPs will have a majority about 52:48;
  3. New GOPs will be indicted, including some members of administration;
  4. Civil war in Iraq will grow to reality;
  5. Economy will be in strange semi-stalled mode, when riches are becoming better, but rest will suffer more;
  6. More jobs will be outsourced and overall American skillset will continue to decrease;
  7. China will continue to grow at our expense...
by WeNeed3rdParty 2006-01-01 06:39AM | 0 recs
Economy will strengthen
I dont know. Apparently the housing boom is close to ending or already has. A housing slowdown would hurt the economy since it seems that is really what has fueled job growth.
by jj32 2006-01-01 08:23AM | 0 recs
My predictions:
  • We will pick up the house by gaining 32 seats, giving us a good majority to stop anything bad coming from the Bush admin. We gain 5 seats in the Senate, and while it appears that we do not have a majority, a new Bush scandal emerges that causes Olympia Snowe to switch parties, giving us control of the Senate.
  • Many Republican Congressman are indicted, causing us to pick up a lot of these seats.
  • The MSM will finally stop the distortion when it comes to the Democrats (i.e. the Murtha Resolution) and finally report candidly.
  • The Housing bubble will burst in late summer of 2006.
  • Frist gets indicted.
  • All of these factors become "the perfect storm" of 2006.
by KainIIIC 2006-01-01 09:53AM | 0 recs
Re: My predictions:
I like your dream. Olympia is not as good as you think.
Also gaining of 32 seats is just a perfect DREAM. Keep dreaming...
by WeNeed3rdParty 2006-01-01 01:22PM | 0 recs
Predictions
Any "improvement" in the economy will not trickle down to enough people to create any significant boost in approval ratings for Bush.

Iraq wil deteriorate.

New Orleans will fester racially and in the press as things go more and more sour and more corruption news hits the wires. Mardi Gras will put things in stark relief.

More Congressional indictments before SOTU, and quite likely Rove's.

Scalito and the NSA will overshadow SOTU.

Bush will not hit 50% before SOTU.

There will be leaks about specific deaths in the Plame affair.

There will be an assissination of a key political figure in Israel.

by Retired Catholic 2006-01-01 03:54PM | 0 recs
predictions
OK.  We get the House.  We net 3 state houses.  Senate-49 GOP, 50 Dem, one indie who is yet to emerge from the GOP.
by Retired Catholic 2006-01-01 03:57PM | 0 recs
Re: predictions
I'm guessing you're lumping Bernie Sanders in with the Dems?
by Valatan 2006-01-01 09:07PM | 0 recs
Predictions
  1. Democrats will gain 35 seats in the House and 9 Senate seats, including Mississippi, where Ronnie Musgrove will beat Chip Pickering.

  2. Roy Moore will be elected governor of Alabama, defeating a lackluster campaign by Lucy Baxley, and instantly become the evangelical favorite for 2008.

  3. Tom DeLay will resign by summer.

  4. Insurgents in Iraq will pull off a spectacular assault on the Green Zone.

  5. Kurdistan secedes from Iraq after cutting a deal with the Shiite south.

  6. Netanyahu returns to power in Israel and Israeli forces retake Gaza.

  7. Fidel Castro dies, throwing Cuba into turmoil.

  8. Bob Woodward leaves the Washington Post.

  9. Gold approaches $1,000 an ounce.

  10. Reconstruction aid promised to New Orleans does not materialize.
by Quaoar 2006-01-01 07:31PM | 0 recs
Economic Armageddon.
The entire Bush Bubble Bursts, in fact goes supernova soon -- probably before the '06 elections.

Somehow or other the Economic Armageddon is swiftly followed by a largish terrorist attack. Which causes Bush to instinctively close all the banks and freeze all the ATM machines.

Bush then claims that the Economic Armageddon was a direct result of the terrorist attack that "forced him to close the banks and freeze the ATM machines."

People lose faith in the ATM cornucopia -- then in the computer voting system as well.

I make an obscene killing on my giant stockpile of aluminum foil (which is always worth 10 times its weight in gasoline).

Praise the Lord and pass the duct tape.

by blues 2006-01-02 11:41AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------