Saving The Artic Refuge Is Another Democratic Victory

This is almost becoming routine:A nearly two-decade effort to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling suffered a severe setback at the hands of moderate House Republicans just as Congress was about to deliver it to President Bush as his top energy priority.

GOP leaders scrapped the drilling plan in a search for just enough votes to pass another of Mr. Bush's priorities, a $51 billion deficit-reduction program cutting spending on food stamps, Medicaid, child support enforcement and other domestic programs through the rest of the decade. Also axed was another conservative priority, a plan allowing states to lift a moratorium on oil drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts.

What I find irritating about the narrative on this piece is that "moderate" Republicans are being given credit for this. So what if 22 Republicans opposed it--at least 190 Democrats opposed it. The vast majority of the opposition to wildlife refuge destruction came from Democrats, not Republicans. Any portrayal of this as a victory of Republican moderates is thus wildly misleading, to say the least. These are the same "moderates" who put the refuge in danger in the frist place by voting and working for Bush, Cheney, DeLay and Frist. If it were up tot he leaders that the Republican "moderates" successfully helped put in power, the refuge would be destroyed.

Democrats stopped drilling in the Artic Refuge, not Republicans. As Republicans abandon Bush by the droves, we are going to see more and more of these victories. And these victories are for the people who voted against Bush, who voted against Cheney, who voted against DeLay, and voted against Frist. These are not the victories of people who put these people in charge in Washington. These victories are ours.

Tags: Democrats (all tags)

Comments

8 Comments

Couldn't it still happen?
Couldn't it still get added back in when the Senate and House meet to combine the bill?  Reason I ask is I heard the Senate passed it.

What stinks is they will continue to fight to get access and they may eventually win.  Once that happens and once they start drilling its over.  Untouched true wilderness land once touched can never be untouched again.  We have to keep fighting and winning, they only have to win once.  True on many issues.

by jrflorida 2005-11-10 11:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Couldn't it still happen?
Couldn't it still get added back in when the Senate and House meet to combine the bill?  Reason I ask is I heard the Senate passed it.

Affirmative on both counts.

by Seldom Seen Smith 2005-11-10 11:54AM | 0 recs
The key is The People
When the people vote, they can move mountains, for good or ill. The People sent a world quake through the edifice of the GOP on Teusday. The Republicans aren't stupid (just unethical), they know that "plaing to the base" is a recipie for political oblivion. It is a lesson Democrats should heed as well.
by Paul Goodman 2005-11-10 11:48AM | 0 recs
I'm sorry I can't spell
n/t
by Paul Goodman 2005-11-10 11:48AM | 0 recs
GOP Credit
I dont think that moderate Republicans neccessarily get "credit" for pulling the bill, but they are the reason why it was pulled. Yes, 190 Democrats voted against that, but 190 Democrats probably opposed a lot of things that Republicans have passed. If the GOP continues to see schisms within the party, they will be unable to pass legislation. And yes, Democrats do have a lot to do with that.
by AC4508 2005-11-10 11:50AM | 0 recs
Re: GOP Credit
Hmm...disagree.  22 republicans wouldn't have stood up to their leadership if they didn't know that there were 190 democrats ready to vote this thing down.

If democrats were split on the issue, the moderate republicans would likely have shut their mouths and waited for some other fight to show their distance from Bush.

I suspect that's what's happening here - some are thinking they need a few votes against Bush initiatives on their records for the 2006 campaign.

by scientician 2005-11-10 12:01PM | 0 recs
Re: GOP Credit
I respectfully disagree. The GOP legislation engine under GWB has been based on pushing through votes with their narrow majorities and to hell with everyone else. I believe 188 Democrats voted against  CAFTA (I know, if 190 had it wouldnt have passed) and there were plenty of Republicans who- based on their constituiencies- SHOULD have stood up to their leadership and did not, e.g. Robin Hayes. I think the story here is a growing schism in the Republican party that will make it harder for a conservative agenda to be pushed through Congress.
by AC4508 2005-11-10 12:25PM | 0 recs
These victories are for everyone
Barring the very few very wealthy people who would have realized significant financial gain from drilling ANWR, this is a victory for everyone.  It is the right thing to do, and even though some idiots vote based on their narrow short term interest or partisanship, that they didn't get their way still benefits them too.

If anything, perhaps closing this door will push more people towards real energy solutions as opposed to, at best, stop gap band-aids that just delay the inevitable.  

In general*, we shouldn't care who is in power, so long as the right decisions are made.  If republicans suddenly become progressive, that is our victory too.  

* - of course demonstratably corrupt and amoral people don't deserve the rewards and perks of power, and many of the current crop of republicans fall under this moniker, but the idea is sound.

by scientician 2005-11-10 11:59AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------