Alito Links

Progressive Groups Left Wing Blogs
  • Jeralyn at Talk Left: Alito: The Career Prosecutor:A disaster appointment for those who care about the constitutional rights of the accused. I don't want a career prosecutor like Alito on the Supreme Court. I fear he will be a major proponent of the war on drugs, the death penalty and the war against immigrants, while he will rule to restrict habeas rights and Miranda.
  • Kos: The showdown finally arrives:But this is the best possible scenario for Democrats as well. We now have a vehicle upon which to showcase the differences between us and Republicans, between liberalism and conservatism. This is a golden opportunity, and one wisely denied by Bush and Rove with the Robers and Miers nominations.
  • Ed Kilgore discusses Jeffrey Rosen's theory on the court:As some of you may recall, George Washington University professor Jeffrey Rosen penned an article right after the presidential election analyzing possible Bush SCOTUS picks, and separating them into two camps: "Conservative Activists" (bad), and "Principled Conservatives" (not so bad), with the key dividing line being the jurist's willingness to defer to legislative decisions and to respect precedents. John Roberts was listed as a "Principled Conservative." Samuel Alito headed the list of "Conservative Activists."
  • Liberal Oasis writes What's Samuel Alito's trademark? Hostility to equality.

  • Rude Pundit writesBy the way, what is it about the Bush adminstration's Supreme Court nominees' savage anger towards pre-teen girls? We had John Roberts saying that it was jim-fuckin-dandy to treat a 12-year old girl eatin' french fries on the subway in DC like she was Aileen Wuornos giggling over the gutted corpse of a dead john. And now we have Alito allowing cops to, without cause, molest a child
  • Eirc Mueller has the White Hosue talking points on Atilo.

  • Angry Bear writes:The opinion of Bush's newest nomination to the Supreme Court, Samuel Alito, regarding the abortion issue will undoubtedly receive a flood of attention in coming weeks. But Alito's opinion regarding the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), signed into law in 1993 by Bill Clinton, also seems deserving of close scrutiny - particularly since it highlights one of my greatest frustrations regarding political stereotypes: the notion that conservatives are better defenders of family values than liberals are.
  • Feministing writes:Alito ruled that female public-schoool students who were physically and sexually abused by fellow students in class could not sue the state, because the state has no special duty in caring for them. (D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Tech. School) Alito also participated in a panel holding that the Violence Against Women Act allows a court to order HIV/AIDS testing of a sexual assault defendant. (United States v. Ward)
  • Majikthise writes:Of course Alito should be opposed vigorously, but let's not forget the oldest trick in the political book: When you're unpopular at home, start a war! Since Treasongate isn't going away, the Republicans have effectively opened a two-front war--a move that stinks of desperation.
  • Digby:By contrast, Alito is for Bush as Oxycontin is for Limbaugh. Alito is intended to ease the pain of Fitzgerald's indictments and continuing investigation by changing the subject. Bush, Cheney and Rove expect us to play along on their timetable, which requires that the country get distracted quickly from the brief glimpse Fitzgerald provided everyone, even Kristof, of the enormously fetid swamp of crimes and traitorous behavior behind the sealed gates of the Bush White House. No one, except Bush's base, can be anything but disgusted at what was revealed on Friday.

    And Bush's base will rally around Alito no matter what. They have their carefully honed defenses of Alito ready to roll out. But they are not planning on having the country stay focused on Traitorgate. And that is why I'm saying we must.

    I'm NOT saying ignore Alito. What I'm saying is DON'T LET BUSH CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

  • Rox Populi:Is there any law that requires a man to notify his wife before undergoing a vasectomy? Would such a law violate the Constitution? Post more links in the comments.
  • Tags: Judges (all tags)

    Comments

    22 Comments

    Another link
    Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog seems somewhat confident that Alito won't be confirmed, i.e. he won't survive the filibuster. (Of course, he has no greater knowledge of the states of mind of the Gang of 14 than anyone else, and that's exactly what the outcome is going to depend on.)
    by Crazy Vaclav 2005-10-31 11:29AM | 0 recs
    Re: Another link
    Can we get a gang of 14 rundown?  Any presidential hopefuls need to have it made perfectly clear that if they sabotage a filibuster, there chances to win the primary will be nil.
    by yitbos96bb 2005-10-31 12:32PM | 0 recs
    Re: Another link
    There aren't any presidential hopefuls among our half of the Gang of 14 (Lieberman, Byrd, Ben Nelson, Landrieu, Inouye, Pryor, and Salazar). I might worry about non-member Bayh being faint-hearted, but he voted against Roberts, right?

    The only presidential hopeful in the other half (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, De Wine, Chafee) is McCain. He'll be the most interesting one to watch... i.e does he shaft the rest of the crew in order to increase his chances in the 2008 primary, or has he already given up on getting any religious right votes and need to burnish his moderate credentials for the general? De Wine and Chafee will also be interesting to watch, in terms of whether they tack left or right in preparation for their 2006 re-elections.

    by Crazy Vaclav 2005-10-31 12:51PM | 0 recs
    Lindsey Graham out if filibuster happens
    Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has said a filbuster "will not be successful". I would take that to mean Graham is out if the Democrats filibuster.

    That gives Frist 49 votes. He only needs one more to go nuclear.

    I would get a source, but I'm too lazy.

    by wayward 2005-10-31 02:40PM | 0 recs
    Same for DeWine
    DeWine also indicated that a filibuster of Alito would not appear to meet his test for extraordinary circumstances, thereby freeing him to support the nuclear option. That's probably true for most on the GOP side. Thus, IMHO, a filibuster isn't really an effective option, especially if Democratic members of the Gang of 14 continue to oppose it, which would be likely if Alito does well in the hearings.
    by SLinVA 2005-10-31 03:27PM | 0 recs
    even if it fails
    it is still necessary.  A stink needs to be raised about this guy.  What the hell are we saving the filibuster for if not goddamn Alito?
    by Valatan 2005-10-31 03:46PM | 0 recs
    Re: even if it fails
    It's a fight the Democrats must fight, even if they won't win it.

    It would be a shame if the toughest questioning Scalito faces in committee is from Arlen Specter.

    by wayward 2005-10-31 04:00PM | 0 recs
    Here are a couple
    From Pam's House Blend, Daddy Dobson, Bauer, Scalito's mom weigh in.

    Shakespeare's Sister, Gimme A Break:

    They've gotta be kidding - the wingnuts are saying lib'ruhls hate Alito because of his ethnicity!

    Earlier today on Fox News, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, followed Matt Drudge's lead and implied that opponents of Samuel Alito's nomination may be motivated by Alito's ethnicity. He warned senators "to be very careful here," because a vote against Alito would be "held against them" by Italian-Americans...

    Hey, dimwits--don't project your idiotic measuring sticks onto us. That ain't the way we roll. I don't give a rat's tit if Alito is a straight white guy or a wheelchair-bound, multi-ethnic, queer deaf-mute with a glass eye. Anyone who wants to curb our rights is a turd onto which no amount of polish can be applied to make him look pretty.
    by Gary Boatwright 2005-10-31 11:30AM | 0 recs
    Re: Here are a couple
    Did I vote for Allen on the list of 2006 senators I most wanted gone?  Hmm, Hatch may have just replaced him with that comment.  The man screams ignorance.
    by yitbos96bb 2005-10-31 12:34PM | 0 recs
    A biography at Wikipedia
    Samuel Alito

    (click through for links)

    See Samuel Alito Supreme Court nomination for details on the nomination process.

    Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. (born April 1, 1950) is a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Alito and his wife, Martha, live in West Caldwell, New Jersey; they have two children: a son in college and a daughter in high school. On October 31, 2005, President George W. Bush nominated him to the position of Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, replacing Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring.

    Contents

    1 Early life
    2 Career
    3 Nomination to US Supreme Court
    4 Case history
    5 Trivia
    6 References
    7 External links

    by Gary Boatwright 2005-10-31 11:37AM | 0 recs
    Links
    Alito, Hibbs and Federalis at Lawyers, Guns and Money

    Alito's nomination to the Court is unacceptable, and he should not receive a single Democratic vote.

    and

    Little Nino Link Dump

    Casey as the Bat by Billmon

    I certainly hope that over the next several weeks pro-choice voters in Maine (Snowe, Collins) Rhode Island (Chafee) Ohio (Voinovich, DeWine) and the other haunts of "moderate" Republicans are made aware of the fact that Bush's nominee believes husbands have a vested property right in their wives' uteruses.

    How to Judge by Jeffrey Rosen

    Rosen argued back in November that Dems should vote to confirm Roberts, but oppose Alito.

    by tgeraghty 2005-10-31 11:42AM | 0 recs
    Re: Links
    I certainly hope that over the next several weeks pro-choice voters in Maine (Snowe, Collins) Rhode Island (Chafee) Ohio (Voinovich, DeWine) and the other haunts of "moderate" Republicans are made aware of the fact that Bush's nominee believes husbands have a vested property right in their wives' uteruses.

    Only problem was that Casey himself was a Democrat.

    That and the Democratic Party is currently promoting his son's Senate campaign.

    There are plenty of reasons to oppose Scalito, but those who oppose him should not fall into the abortion trap. The right WANTS to make the debate about abortion. The right WANTS to make the Democratic Party the party of abortion in the eyes of the American people.

    The right also wants people to overlook Scalito's record on everything else.

    by wayward 2005-10-31 03:56PM | 0 recs
    Raw Story
    A sample of Dem reaction:

    'Of course he's against abortion'

    Alito's record on key issues -
    Kerry: 'No excuse'
    Reid: Too conservative -
    Pelosi: Radical right 'in charge'
    Boxer: 'Appeasing' far right -
    Chickenhawk accusationst

    by Gary Boatwright 2005-10-31 11:49AM | 0 recs
    Why I won't take a side
    Because its demeaning to me, personally to be involved in a war of ideology when criminal behaviour is afoot.

    That is also why you're only getting four posts.

    They were openly discussing whether to try out the terror alert approach.. or to ram through a senate conf. on a guy like this in only one month.

    Has anyone besides me noticed that the schedule is deeply flawed? A review of Scalito will take weeks and months. No way to get it voted on b4 january.

    Sorry. I don't play this game.  ... I heard today that one of the reporters clearly identified the very first source he heard Val Wilson - CIA operative who was knowingly and willfully cover-blown for politics - from Karl Rove.

    Give me simple justice first. Then I'll give you your supreme court justice..

    by turnerbroadcasting 2005-10-31 11:49AM | 0 recs
    Schedule
    Ginsburg's hearing came about 30 days after her nomination, this one won't be much different.
    by SLinVA 2005-10-31 04:10PM | 0 recs
    More stuff
    The Roberts/Alito Court

    SPOUSAL CONSENT AN UNDUE BURDEN

    LIBERALS HATE ITALIANS

    THE ANGRY WHITE MALE FAVORITE

    GOTTERDAMMERUNG IT IS

    Don't forget about economic issues:

    Follow the Puppet Strings by Brad Plumer

    the White House was reported to have consulted business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, headed by former Michigan governor and Bush friend John Engler, over potential nominations
    by tgeraghty 2005-10-31 11:57AM | 0 recs
    Re: More stuff
    Brad buried the lede. Or it's at least what I would highlight, since it's a potentially big conflict-of-interest chink in Alito's armor. If Ginsburg (Doug, not Ruth Bader) can get torpedoed for smoking pot, I think this provides an even better launching pad for opening an attack on non-ideological grounds against a hyper-ideological candidate.

    Three years ago, Alito upheld a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit against Vanguard Group. Yet Alito had hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in Vanguard funds at the time. While he later recused himself from further involvement in the case, the issue could be used to block the nomination.
    by Crazy Vaclav 2005-10-31 12:07PM | 0 recs
    Re: More stuff
    You think this is nasty, wait until one of the liberal justices (Ginsburg or Stevens) leaves the court.
    by wayward 2005-10-31 02:47PM | 0 recs
    Kentucky Democrat
    The Kentucky Democrat
    by kydem 2005-10-31 12:50PM | 0 recs
    Alito and Business
    Alito, Worker Protections and the Environment

    Most troubling, however, is Alito's identification with the theories espoused by the so-called "Constitution in Exile" group . . . which argues that the most important rights are economic rights, particularly the right to property, and anything that take away those rights -- such as environmental or workplace safety laws -- are, or should be, unconstitutional.
    by tgeraghty 2005-10-31 10:00PM | 0 recs
    Scrutiny Hooligans
    Had this to say:

    "Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito ought to be the new President of the Hate America club. Looks like he hates immigrants, detainees, families, the disabled, minorities, and women. So if you're a healthy, white Christian male who's never run afoul of the law - Alito is your candidate. The rest of you? George W. Bush wants you ruled by a jackbooted conservative whose activist rulings demonstrate that he wants people who look like him to have more rights than people who don't."
    by Screwy Hoolie 2005-11-01 03:54AM | 0 recs
    Why I Opposite Alito
    I opposite Alito, not because of his apparent anti-abortion stance, but for other reasons that I feel are actually more important.  His views on the commerce clause are especially dangerous as it would put Federal employee discrimination, civil rights, and environmental protection legislation on very shaky grounds.  It could render the EPA virtually useless.  See my extended opinion here:

    The  Agenda Gap

    by michaelrherman 2005-11-01 08:10AM | 0 recs

    Diaries

    Advertise Blogads


    ----------- myDD - skin -----------