DNC Chatter

Looks like BlogPac (Simon went first with the call/guest entry yesterday) better get busy with the conference calls. There are two new entrants for the Chair, from Hotline:Two of the newest DNC candidates will be making their debut's this weekend at the Southern Regional DNC meeting in Atlanta. Ex-OH Dem chair David Leland and ex-TX Dem chair Molly Beth Malcolm both are on the official list of candidates set to attend the 1/8 meeting. Nearly four hours has been set aside for the DNC candidate forum. C-SPAN will air the forum on 1/9 at 6:30pm and again at 9:30pm. From the Hill e-news:Simon's supporters: Reps. Ben Chandler (D-Ky.), Artur Davis (D-Ala.), Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) have all endorsed New Democrat Network president Simon Rosenberg to be chairman of the Democratic National Committee. They believe that Rosenberg knows how to win in "red" America, and embrace his 50-state strategy. Former Gov. Tony Knowles (D-Alaska) also backs Rosenberg.Richardson, in todays Albuquerque Journal, singled out Rosenber to say, ""He's become a serious candidate and he's got good New Mexico ties". Also, again from Hotline. In DC, Roemer is out and Frost is in, as the favored status quo candidate gaining traction on the Hill, but Pelosi/Reid opened up a can of works in pushing Roemer's candidacy, and now it's getting backlash:Just when you thought the list of candidates couldn't get any longer, in comes word that women's groups (including NARAL and NOW) are urging Kate Michelman to enter the DNC chair race. This renewed effort to draft Michelman stems from the "outrage" (according to one source) some of these women's groups have at the idea of the pro-life Roemer being considered a top-tier candidate. Michelman is purportedly thinking about it and may have more to say next week.Maybe Howard Dean (who gets backing from an old foe) can be the compromise candidate for the two groups (btw, next week is the announcement from Dean, after the Southern regional caucus trial run). On Leland, I checked with some Ohio sources who gave it a thumbs down, without even in-state traction, it's more of just a "statement candidacy". But anyway, here's more on Leland's statement from the Hotline in the extended entry:
In an interview with Hotline, Leland said he is an active candidate, making the necessary calls and sending letters to the DNC members. Leland believes he has a "unique blend of expeiernce," noting he's been a state chair (a tenure that include '96, the last time a Dem carried OH). Most recently, Leland headed up a 527 called Project Vote, which provided him with more experience raising money on a national level. He also notes he's worked for two unions, UAW and AFSCME. Asked what was "right" with the DNC, Leland: "A lot of things right: fundraising is right; message delivery is better; the goals are right; the focus is right; we have, in Terry McAuliffe, one of the best party chairs this party's ever seen." Asked what was "wrong," Leland hesitated at using the term "wrong," but added: "What we need to do is that we need to use the people at the local levels; restructure the organization to use folks in the local communities." He specifically cited how MT Dems are on to something with their local successes in '04. More Leland: "The bottom line is that the party is sort of in a tight spot; and we need to move and grow in a different, more positive direction." Leland also indicated that he viewed the role of DNC chair as less messenger and more mechanic. He said the chair didn't need to be the messenger, that the chair's job was find the right messengers among the talent in the party (Hotline interivew, 1/7).

Leland, in the first letter he sent to all DNC members, which is hitting mailboxes this week:

The contest for DNC chair should not be about an individual, or even a political party. It has to be about our future: a future based on the promise that America can succeed when every individual has a fair and equal opportunity for success. ... I bring a unique experience to this position: experience in fundraising and media relations; experience in running for and holding public office; knowledge and experience in party structure, grassroots politics and other issues confronting state parties; knowledge you get from being a full-time party chair for seven years; experience working for two labor unions; experience as a national mediator; and experience with the internal operations of the DNC. And all this comes with a Midwestern heritage and a keen sense of purpose. The following outlines the direction I want to help you take the Democratic Party:

-- "Brand" the Democratic Party: "We must pull together the great talent in our Party to distill a clear, positive and powerful message about who we are and what we stand for. ... Americans must be able to understand and to say with conviction and without hesitation what being a "Democrat" means. During my race for Ohio House, I was able to beat a 6-term incumbent in a 61% Republican district by framing the debate."

-- Fight back! "Today, talk radio and some cable news outlets have reverted to the methods of the partisan press of the 1800s. They provide propaganda and talking points for like-minded individuals. We must fight back, using all means of communication at our disposal, from cutting-edge technology and specialty communication outlets to the old-fashioned weekly newspapers. We need to systematically and aggressively drive our message in every city and village in America. ... As Chair, I gave over 7,100 interviews for media outlets worldwide - none was too small to get our message out."

-- "All politics is local": "Build up state and local party infrastructures with money and staff and the latest technology. We cannot speak to and reach the people of this nation without strong, structured local party networks. This involves listening to and empowering local office holders and community leaders who have the knowledge and credibility to communicate our message to their friends and neighbors. ... For seven (7) years as the full-time chair of the Ohio Democratic Party, I implemented these suggestions in my state, and worked through the DNC and the ASDC to assist other state parties."

-- "Involve everyone": "Everybody who wants to help should be welcome. We do not have a Democrat to waste! Our party is about inclusion, not exclusion of people or ideas."

-- "Fundraising": "We must build upon the fundraising success of Terry McAuliffe using all the tools: direct mail, telephone solicitations, one-on-one meetings and the Internet. I enjoy fundraising and I have made it a top priority. For the past fifteen years, I have directed record-breaking fundraising efforts on the local, state and national levels. I have also conducted fundraising seminars across the country."

-- "Stop re-inventing the wheel": "Work with groups like Democratic Gain and other groups, to maintain an ongoing relationship with our campaign staff. These people should be involved in various opportunities within the party and with its allies. There are numerous campaigns, associations, foundations, unions and corporations that need the expertise these folks can provide. The DNC should act as a clearinghouse to help place these individuals to help them grow and prosper."

-- "Remember what we stand for!""This last point is probably the most important. As Americans, there is more that brings us together than separates us. We all want to live in communities that are safe and clean. All Americans want to know that if they work hard, they can make a good living for themselves and their families. All Americans want better lives for their children, and most Americans wish to treat their fellow citizens with the same respect and dignity they expect in return. Republicans win when they magnify the minor differences among us. Democrats win when we speak of our common aspirations" (Hotline sources, 1/7).

Tags: Democrats (all tags)

Comments

18 Comments

Leland???
Maybe he could get the Ohio Dems in shape before he tries to take it national. You can't get much more pathetic than the Ohio Democratic Party
by OldDemocrat 2005-01-07 09:29AM | 0 recs
Re: Leland???
Whoo-hooo!!! OH Democratic head and TX Democratic head!!!! Let's take two of the least successful state parties, grab their chairs and run 'em nationally!

Yep. That's a good idea.

by BriVT 2005-01-07 10:01AM | 0 recs
It's the "not knowing" why we lose . . .
At least this way we'll know.
by jcjcjc 2005-01-07 06:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Leland???
Yeah, really. I have always wondered why some people hold "red state" Dems in such high regard. Isn't the entire reasont eh state is red because the Democrats there were unable to defeat the Republicans there?
by Chris Bowers 2005-01-07 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: Leland???
Well, some "red state Dems" actually can win elections in heavily GOP states:  e.g., Bayh, Dorgan, Mark Warner.  These people deserve to be held in high regard.

On the other hand, some "red state Dems" manage a  party that has become totally irrelevant in their state.  Such is the sad case in Texas, as I witness personally, and apparently also in Ohio.

The fact that Malcolm and Leland are being seriously considered should be a serious embarrassment to all of us.

by pmbryant 2005-01-07 10:53AM | 0 recs
malcolm
totally.  why in the world is molly beth even in the running???
by annatopia 2005-01-07 12:16PM | 0 recs
Re: malcolm
Well, what this suggests to me is that certain third-rate would-be DNC chairs don't realize how seriously this race is being taken. It's the first time in a while the party has been able to select a chair without input from a sitting president, and it's also probably the first time ever that a sizable chunk of activists (via the blogosphere) is following and getting active in the race.

Some of these people must believe they could wind up as a compromise candidate, or a stop-someone (probably Dean) candidate, or just otherwise sneak in. They probably don't realize that this race is the big-time - the biggest thing we've got until 2006, and perhaps as important as anything save the presidency.

by DavidNYC 2005-01-07 02:03PM | 0 recs
Primaries revisited... :-S
I'm starting to wonder if the ongoing crowding of the field is a strategy encouraged by D(L)C party elites. Maybe now that they have failed to build up a strong anti-Dean candidate, they are changing their approach and hope that an overcrowded field of candidates will make the DNC electors lose overview. This could once again - as much as I hate it - work against Dean - in these two ways:

For a wider public, Dean is the only one who stands out of the field. And we all now the result the last time when all the attention was on "Dean, the frontrunner"...

The crowded field could also serve as further "evidence" that "only Terry can hold the party together".

Yes, this is just speculation, but I think Dean must be prepared for everything.

Regards,

Urs

by GermanDeaniac 2005-01-07 09:44AM | 0 recs
If this is the case, the next step will be
for some "dark horse" to come out of nowhere, with lots of cash and a good organization behind him, to play savior and lead the bickering Dems to the promised land.

I wouldn't be surprised. But we'll see.

by catastrophile 2005-01-08 09:27PM | 0 recs
Simon's supporters:
Are all recipients of NDN's funding during their campaigns

  • Reps. Ben Chandler (D-Ky.)

  • Artur Davis (D-Ala.)

  • Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.)

  • Adam Smith (D-Wash.)

  • Former Gov. Tony Knowles (D-Alaska)
by Parker 2005-01-07 09:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Simon's supporters:
And if you think about the amount of money that NDN put into blogads this past year, you begin to get a glimpse into Simon's strategy and why he has so much support.
by bi66er 2005-01-07 10:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Simon's supporters:
Yeah, Jerome is clearing being bribed to say things about Simon.  Riiight.
by CentrismIsForLosers 2005-01-07 11:24AM | 0 recs
Fowler crackpots
You came here less than a week ago to praise Fowler and now you're suggesting our host has been bought?

Even more amusing is that you think our host has been bought one candidate while he used to work for another candidate.

This Fowler-flop has unbelievable entertainment value.

by Bob Brigham 2005-01-07 12:43PM | 0 recs
Rosenberg or Dean
At this stage, Rosenberg's going to end up being the ABD guy by default.

Obviously, Pelosi and Reid are competant at killing off aspirants efore they even really have a chance.

And, the Clintons are showing just how thin their bench really is.  The Clinton wing clearly is a superstar team.  W/o their stars, Bill and Hillary, the Clintonistas are a joke.

So, when all is said an done, the DNC race is between Rosenberg and Dean.  

And, let's be honest: that bodes very well either way.

by jcjcjc 2005-01-07 06:54PM | 0 recs
Does Anyone Know
where the eastern regional conference of the Democrats would be.  This site stated that it will be in NYC the last weekend in January.  Has the actual site and time been set yet.  
by Andy Katz 2005-01-07 01:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Does Anyone Know
> > > January 29, 10:00 AM
> > > Eastern Regional Caucus
> > > Roosevelt Hotel at Madison Avenue & 45th St.
> > > New York City, New York
by Jerome Armstrong 2005-01-07 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Does Anyone Know
Thanks.
by Andy Katz 2005-01-10 03:05AM | 0 recs
Seems
like everyone agrees Leland is a hack.

What about his platform? I think he said a lot of the right things. Maybe he can't execute it, but at least he's talking the talk. No?

by Norcal Lib 2005-01-08 06:56AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------