Pennsylvania AFL-CIO Fails to Help Its Members

As someone who played a big role in helping to start a union in PA, this pisses me off. Although this might hurt my career, I am going to openly admit to not finding the AFL-CIO open enough, aggressive enough, and progressive enough. And I don't like the way they endorse candidates:The 58 member Pennsylvania AFL-CIO Executive Council, representing 900,000 union members in Pennsylvania made endorsements for the November 2, 2004 General Election. The endorsements are based upon the voting records and commitment of the candidates on working family issues, including good jobs and quality affordable health care. The Pennsylvania AFL-CIO endorsed the following candidates:

U.S. Senate: Arlen Specter (R); Attorney General: Jim Eisenhower (D); Auditor General: Jack Wagner (D); State Treasurer: Bob Casey (D); U.S. Congress: 1st Robert A. Brady (D); 2nd Chaka Fattah (D); 3rd Steven Porter (D); 4th Stevan Drobac Jr. (D); 6th Lois Murphy; 11th Paul E. Kanjorski (D); 12th John P. Murtha (D); 13th Allyson Schwartz (D); 14th Mike Doyle (D); 15th Joe Driscoll (D); 16th Lois Herr (D); 17th Tim Holden (D)

I agree with them, except in one obvious instance:

Labor Rights, Progressive Score
Joe Hoeffel, 83.33
Arlen Specter, 32.61

Their comparative voting records on labor are divergent, and Hoeffel is clearly more progressive on labor issues. This is what can happen if only 58 people are making the political decisions for 600,000+ people. Endorsement voting should be open to all union officers, including officers of locals. If a union isn't responding to the desires of its locals, then what is it doing?

At the very least, does the PA AFL-CIO executive committee have some delusion that keeping Republicans in control of the Senate will be good for labor? With the Senate as close as it is, this election in PA is just as much about which party controls the Senate as which candidate represents PA. One might as well compare the labor records of Jack Reed to Saxby Chambliss when making an endorsement in this race. After all, elect Specter, and you empower whackos like Chambliss. Elect Hoeffel, and you empower champions of labor like Reed.

Tags: Labor (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

This is pathetic
After Specter screwed the workers with the new OT rules the AFL-CIO endorses him?  This is going to make it very hard for Hoeffel to build any momentum.
by MF 2004-09-01 08:39AM | 0 recs
not for Ginny?
"Ginny Schrader's PA-08
is the heart of the
battleground for Congress" --
that's what her ad says in
the next column.

but the Pa. AFL-CIO takes a pass
on this one? what the F?

by Woody 2004-09-01 09:31AM | 0 recs
Re: not for Ginny?
Too much of an unknown for them probably. That annoys me.
by Chris Bowers 2004-09-01 10:29AM | 0 recs
Is this a Pennsylvania thing?
Because the Georgia AFL-CIO endorsed an unknown, unlikely to win Democrat in GA-08 before the Republican primary was even over.
by Drew 2004-09-01 06:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Good thing
Unions members vote 60%+ Democratic. Let them all participate.
by Chris Bowers 2004-09-01 01:36PM | 0 recs
AFL-CIO endorsing Specter:
When they endorsed Specter they said they didn't want to be taken for granted.  Now it would be one thing if the endorsed Specter over someone like an Ed Rendell with a poor labor record, but Joe Hoeffoel had an outstanding record on labor issues.
by Painter2004 2005-06-30 06:50PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------